You left out where Settings::fee is coming from. If the class Settings isn't found, you'd get a fatal error. The fact that you aren't indicates that it's mis-defined somewhere. You'll need to either post more code, or do digging with that lead yourself.

Or more. And good luck getting confirms when it finally does mint stuff at random.

http://i.imgur.com/wkqKvDC.png
(Screenshot taken moments ago. Yes, stuff from Aug 19 still lacks confirms and that's the last time it's bothered staking. In other words, the screenshot is up to date as of this moment.)

Is anyone else having problems with their PoS mined coins not confirming? As far as I can tell, the coins only stake when you close and re-open the wallet which I apparently don't do often enough. It looks like most of my PoS mined coins haven't actually confirmed. That's kinda.... yeah...

At this rate, the next update will be after Bittrex delists the coin. 

Indeed. This coin had a ton of promise, according to its whitepaper. But at this point, I'm believing it was all talk to pump-and-dump. If I wanted to be generous, I'd say that raxe didn't realize how much work would be involved and is hoping to save face by not admitting it.

I wouldn't mind being proven wrong. But it's gonna take a lot to happen all at once for people to notice it again, I fear.

It looks like 10 days or so for 3%. (I'll let someone else correlate that to the announcement's 15%...)

I understand perfectly well how staking works. It's just a bit disconcerting to see people reporting multiple stakes over the course of days when you have a large sum which hasn't seen a single stake.

And here I am at about 10 days without a single stake yet.  Raxe.io hasn't been the most communicative, which isn't helping confidence at all.

I have a decently large stash of DIS, and my fingers are getting itchy to ditch it in small batches before it falls more.

It really sucks because I had really high hopes for this coin. There were many things which attracted me to it, and it's starting to look like the basics can't be delivered upon, let alone the really interesting bits. 

So you did a force push, wiping out the previous repository contents? There's a PR older than your first commit, which indicates that there were extant sources prior to that commit. The entire point of version control is to be able to see what changed, when, and by whom. Blowing away the history doesn't help bolster your claims that you fixed things which were broken, as it's impossible for a third party to validate such a claim.

I'm curious to see exactly what you did, now. Could you please link to a github diff of your changes against the tree prior to your changes? That would help dispel much of the "did the work actually happen to what should be raxe.io's satisfaction?"

Did you not actually pay attention to the screenshot during your ranting? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=614921.msg7289391#msg7289391

This has the signs of vendetta or trying to depress the market or something. I'm not sure what. But my own BS meter starts waggling when someone starts shouting "SCAMMER DOES NOT WANT TO PAY ME AND I DID THE WORK!" and I can see myself that the claimed work has not happened.

EDIT: The blockchain doesn't prove the Windows client is working. It was confirmed a few days ago that the Linux client is staking now. So of course the blockchain would show staking, even if the Windows client doesn't work.

So that makes two of us confirming issues with staking on Windows, versus a screenshot which doesn't actually prove staking is working and a screenshot prior to the staking issues? We really need more of this story than big red "SCAMMER!" text.

Seriously.

Indeed. That first link looks a lot like my screenshot a short time ago in this thread. I've been looking at 1 second for waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long now.

It's sure not working for me. And I have a non-trivial amount of coin, so it's worrisome to me if it's not working for me but it is for everyone else.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=614921.msg7289391#msg7289391

Based on the bits of information from one side, the only thing that strikes me is that Windows staking was a requirement before payment. That isn't working. So, yeah. We need more of the story.

Indeed. I'm especially curious about the bit where the Windows wallet is supposed to be staking now, since mine sure isn't and I haven't seen any announcement that it was fixed yet. It's only been a lucky few people I've seen in this thread who it's working for.

I interpreted the question as "Why isn't it showing on coinking.io as a mineable currency for the multipool?" and answered appropriately.

BTW, unteroid, you can select DIS from the top right of your wallet page on coinking.io to convert almost anything you're mining in a multipool to DIS. The IRC channel can help you figure out the most efficient thing to mine to maximize your payout.

It's in PoS, so it can't be mined right now. It's listed on coinking still though. https://coinking.io/coin.php?coin=distrocoin

"Your weight is 147946, network weight is 1755. Expected time to reward is 0 second(s)." here. Just waiting on a new Windows wallet. 

Dunno. I'm not entirely sure how one would claim it, either.