Unless you do not keep it safely, no one is able to have your private key.

Go or C. Considering using a more modern language, I will prefer to GO between these two.

Bitcoin core developer Peter Todd twitted several hours ago, saying that there were a lot of SegFaults in c programed Lightening Network testing. See below the original words:

Initial impressions of Lightning on testnet: c-lightning segfaults a lot, and when it's not crashing payments fail more often than not. Writing it in C - a notoriously dangerous language - doesn't strike me as a good idea.

What's your opinion on this? Does it mean that the LN is not right way for bitcoin scaling?

Looks like it's hard to be there as now the price goes down again. I think we need to expect this in April.

Forget about micro payment for now using bitcoin. Try IOTA for micro payments . Lightening Network probably is a solution for bitcoin micro payment, but it still needs proved.

No, after 10 years, you will be with grateful that you could join the crypto world as a relatively early bird. The cypto world is the future, but there are still a lot of people not joinning yet around you.

AE。 今年年底前肯定翻不止一倍。德国人的严谨，做出来的这个基础平台可能与 ETH 会有的一拼哦。把合约的执行放在侧链上应该是一个很好的想法。

NEM is not cheap for now. Probably you can say this in half an year ago. NEM does not have that popular in smart contract, so it's still a long way to go.

Is this possible? I think the inputs depend on how many UTXOs you need to gather together, in order to achieve the total transfer amount.

They are totally different, are not they? Blckchain vs hashgraph. They are both a means for distributed ledger, but technically are different. Besides them, there is also a structure, naming DAG. Both DAG and hashgraph are blockless technology.

Ethereum. The echosystem is much stronger and it's much more open. There are already a lot of developers developing Dapps on Ethereum.

The most important reason could be that via altcoins, many innovative thoughts can be experimented, which will finally benefit to the whole crypto world.

The Lightening Network basically is an offline scalibility solution for bitcoin. With it, you and your partner can do frequent, micro payment in a fast way and a lower fee via state channels. Bitcoin main chain only needs to record the beginning state and final state of the channels.

NEO, QTUM, WAVES, EOS... They all have made a big progress in last several months. That means they are full of potentials.

Increasing supply limit technically needs a consensus, most of the people need to support this option and upgrade their wallets, or there will be a hard fork. However, I think increasing the supply limit will reduce the price of 1 bitcoin, and the big whale will not support it.

EOS no doubt. You can easily have the conclusion if you look into both their source code. Plus BM is at least a man with technical gift.

There looks like no very bad news in the market. The only reason I think is it already increased a lot and after some failed trials to breakthrough, now it's time to adjust.

If the CEO himself sold most of the tokens, then we can hardly say that it's not a scam.

In order to run smoothly, there need several big players in the network, acting like a hub to connect the individuals. The big player needs to have enough funds as the payment channels require to lock the currency. That needs a long time to establish.

Support you, dude If you can have a small innovation, the marcketcap will be not that small.