Search content
Sort by
Showing 12 of 12 results by lulucorn
Re: I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY NEWBIES KEEP ASKING THE SAME QUESTIONS !MUST TO READ !
Very well said. Couldn't have said better.
Unfortunately, this won't be read by most newbies because they don't know how to read. If they did then they wouldn't be asking same basic question over and over and over when they could Google in 30 second and get the answer.
It really boggles my mind how newbies are spending thousands and thousands of dollar setting up rigs yet they do not understand even some BASIC concept. Don't get me wrong, everyone has to start from the bottom but they should at least learn how their profitability works (luck, block reward,pool type,global hashrate,etc).
Unfortunately, this won't be read by most newbies because they don't know how to read. If they did then they wouldn't be asking same basic question over and over and over when they could Google in 30 second and get the answer.
It really boggles my mind how newbies are spending thousands and thousands of dollar setting up rigs yet they do not understand even some BASIC concept. Don't get me wrong, everyone has to start from the bottom but they should at least learn how their profitability works (luck, block reward,pool type,global hashrate,etc).
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.7.9 - Nimiq/Kawpow/Ethash/Cryptonight/Chukwa and More
0.7.13 seems buggy to me.
I've had a rig running (5x 570 8gb) with over 30 day uptime with 0.7.9 but switching to 0.7.13 crashes either GPU 0 or GPU 5 (last gpu) in 4-5 hours. I know there was a bug in 0.7.11 with some cpu and mobo incompatibility but that was supposed to be fixed for 0.17.3 as stated in changelog(?)....
Even applying --eth_dag_alloc_patch as stated on README doesn't help either. Hash and power printout was cool but apart from that there were no hashrate or power improvements either.
I've had a rig running (5x 570 8gb) with over 30 day uptime with 0.7.9 but switching to 0.7.13 crashes either GPU 0 or GPU 5 (last gpu) in 4-5 hours. I know there was a bug in 0.7.11 with some cpu and mobo incompatibility but that was supposed to be fixed for 0.17.3 as stated in changelog(?)....
Even applying --eth_dag_alloc_patch as stated on README doesn't help either. Hash and power printout was cool but apart from that there were no hashrate or power improvements either.
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)
⭐ Merited by xandry (2)
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/blockchain-drivers/110847/12
Weve confirmed that the performance drop is due to the size of the DAG exceeding the total on-chip TLB capacity on the Pascal GPU. As a result, there is an increased number of TLB misses, which affects performance. Because the TLB is a fixed capacity hardware resource, and the ETH algorithm accesses the DAG randomly, we dont believe there are any software optimizations that could reduce the TLB miss rate.
Nvidia seemed to acknowledge the issue however they passed it off as a "hardware" problem. Really a bummer since that means 99% they won't release a driver fix; not to mention Nvidia probably hates crypto miners since angry shareholders opened a class action lawsuit regarding GPU sales
Weve confirmed that the performance drop is due to the size of the DAG exceeding the total on-chip TLB capacity on the Pascal GPU. As a result, there is an increased number of TLB misses, which affects performance. Because the TLB is a fixed capacity hardware resource, and the ETH algorithm accesses the DAG randomly, we dont believe there are any software optimizations that could reduce the TLB miss rate.
Nvidia seemed to acknowledge the issue however they passed it off as a "hardware" problem. Really a bummer since that means 99% they won't release a driver fix; not to mention Nvidia probably hates crypto miners since angry shareholders opened a class action lawsuit regarding GPU sales
There are a lot of other coins with similar profit. I'm going to switch to Ravencoin, Monero, XZCoin or something else if Ether will be unprofitable. But I think that its price will rise after successful Constantinople update and profit in fiat money will be the same.
I doubt it will happen...
Yup.
Prices will remain the same or even go lower depending on BTC of course. Classic supply and demand theory only works on necessity or rare goods (food,water,clothing,shelter,jewelery etc). No one is using ETH for anything so why would anyone want ETH other than hodling. If less supply = higher price then may I present you with Bitconnectttttt.
I wonder who/what will be the next scapegoat that ETH bagholders will blame next.
Re: Ravencoin Dev confirms no ASIC Fork unless 80% hash agrees to fork. GG GPU Miner
LMAO. Shitcoin with shitty devs. Who would have thought 
They want Proof?
Does he/she really expect ASIC companies to come out and say "wE hAvE aSiC 4 x16R1!!!11!" while they can secretely mine in their factories?
Or better yet, develop a model that 5-6x faster than the previous one and dump the old models at ridiculous price to public AKA SHA256,Equihash, and ETH ASICS
If you ask a thief if he's a thief, do you think he/she say yes?
What kind of logic is that.
They want Proof?
Does he/she really expect ASIC companies to come out and say "wE hAvE aSiC 4 x16R1!!!11!" while they can secretely mine in their factories?
Or better yet, develop a model that 5-6x faster than the previous one and dump the old models at ridiculous price to public AKA SHA256,Equihash, and ETH ASICS
If you ask a thief if he's a thief, do you think he/she say yes?
What kind of logic is that.
Re: Ethereum Hard Fork Test Goes Awry, “No Constantinople In 2018“
They couldnt find a miner to support the reduction in block reward. What I bet happens is Ethereum ends up having to hard fork away to get these changes implemented. Miners will stick to the chain they on now because they dont want to see a reduction in profits. Problem Is those propping the coin up are the ones wanting the reduction. Stuck between rock and hard place Id say. Quite the conundrum. End result will be loss in mining rewards in terms of usd no matter what they decide. Id say pow mining has some major issues that need addressed. Maybe its not a viable way to secure a blockchain. Greed if left unchecked becomes cancerous in nature. If that is what is to happen to crypto then so be it. just be ready for it is all I ask
BR
BR
Hmm. Maybe if devs gave even a single fuck about... decentralization and ASIC resistance then maybeeeee miners would have helped out on testnet.
But nope
"ASIC resistance - Do we even care about that" Actual quote from dev meeting. Obviously miners are the fault here and not the devs despite what whitepaper says /s
Re: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener
Been using this for over a month, just didn't have time to post my result.
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
What model of 1080 and 1080ti do you have? Thanks!
I have MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X and MSI GTX 1080 Ti Armor.
What are your settings for MSI 1080ti Armor? I have Gigabyte Aorus 1080ti, but maybe I can use the same settings... Thanks.
Core: Shouldn't matter much. I put mine on a fixed custom curve 1600mhz @ 0.8v
Memory. +360 exact / 5865mhz on MSI Afterburner . I found out putting higher value (such as 500) is not helpful but instead, finding a specific value helped tremendously. You should take some time and raise or lower it by increments of 10 as it's really sensitive to the change. Long time ago but I remember +500 only doing 52-52.5 on my card until I lowered it down. Must be due to some kind of timing
Been using this for over a month, just didn't have time to post my result.
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
Does your 1080 Ti get stable hashrate for a month ? and how much the effective hashrate what you got from the pool ?
if you getting 56 Mh/s hashrate consistently, I think you already have done the best OC for your 1080 Ti.
Yup. It's been hashing at stable 56mh/s for over a month with ~56.1 mh/s effect speed at pool.
Power limit is at 100%?
Nope. It's at 80%
Re: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener
Been using this for over a month, just didn't have time to post my result.
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
What model of 1080 and 1080ti do you have? Thanks!
I have MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X and MSI GTX 1080 Ti Armor.
What are your settings for MSI 1080ti Armor? I have Gigabyte Aorus 1080ti, but maybe I can use the same settings... Thanks.
Core: Shouldn't matter much. I put mine on a fixed custom curve 1600mhz @ 0.8v
Memory. +360 exact / 5865mhz on MSI Afterburner . I found out putting higher value (such as 500) is not helpful but instead, finding a specific value helped tremendously. You should take some time and raise or lower it by increments of 10 as it's really sensitive to the change. Long time ago but I remember +500 only doing 52-52.5 on my card until I lowered it down. Must be due to some kind of timing
Been using this for over a month, just didn't have time to post my result.
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
Does your 1080 Ti get stable hashrate for a month ? and how much the effective hashrate what you got from the pool ?
if you getting 56 Mh/s hashrate consistently, I think you already have done the best OC for your 1080 Ti.
Yup. It's been hashing at stable 56mh/s for over a month with ~56.1 mh/s effect speed at pool.
Re: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener
Been using this for over a month, just didn't have time to post my result.
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
What model of 1080 and 1080ti do you have? Thanks!
I have MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X and MSI GTX 1080 Ti Armor.
Re: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener
Been using this for over a month, just didn't have time to post my result.
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares
No crash and working as intended.
Tried it on Claymore and Phoenix and no problem
My 1080 Ti does 56mh/s and 1080 does 42mh/s. Got really lucky with the 1080 as it can OC +1000 stable
https://i.imgur.com/Hapg3Xh.png
Recent 23 hours of hashing log (had to turn off the pc to clean some stuff out), 0 stales/invalid shares