no, it should not and I believe it does not matter in the long run.
you will get the equal amount no matter how many coins you hold on one address.
for the small amount ones like the 100moin address, receiving one stake means much more in the short term.
that's why after one month the 100moin got twice the percentage compared to the bigger address (see my post from February 13, 2018).
but that does not mean, that this will be this way in the long term. as you can see I my following posts after that, the percentual interest from the smallest address went more and more to the same as the others (from twice as much to 42% more and now to 28% more).
it's still a gap, but after some time it will be the same. you don't have to split your amount into small chunks, it does not matter, and time will show this more clearly.

the main reason why we did this test was to check whether 1k or 500moin or 100moin was the minimum required amount for successfully receive stakes
and I think this test has shown that it does not matter and you can receive stakes with as little as 100 moin or most likely also less than that.

the information we get about how much you receive with 24/7 staking is another thing and also, this can change as the network weight can change. but right now it looks like you get about 50% interest per year if you stake 24/7.

Staking Tests with various balances: 100/200/500/1000/2000/5000 - Update after three months

Time elapsed: ~ 84 days / 12 Weeks    (snapshot taken at 9.4.18 18:58 GMT) (started on 15th Jan 2018 at 23:42)
The wallet was running almost 24/7 with only some minor downtime of a few hours. (Every address had the same downtime, as they run in the same wallet.)

start	|	now	|	rewards	|	interest for 84 days
100	|	113.7	|	09 staking rewards	|	13.66 %
200	|	221.3	|	14 staking rewards	|	10.64 %
500	|	553.2	|	35 staking rewards	|	10.64 %
1000	|	1095.7	|	63 staking rewards	|	9.57 %
2000	|	2176.1	|	115 staking rewards	|	8.80 %
5000	|	5458.5	|	300 staking rewards	|	9.17 %

percentage on the end of the lines above stands for the total interest for the 84 days.

the percentaged interest of the smallest address approximates more and more to the others as predicted.

Current result of all addresses:
Average Interest per day: 0.11%
Estimated Interest rate per year for staking 24/7: 49.76%

btw, nearly all addresses reached now the minimal promised annual staking rewards of 10%, which is kinda nice after just 12 weeks

Staking Tests with various balances: 100/200/500/1000/2000/5000 - Update after two months

Time elapsed: ~ 56 days / 8 Weeks    (snapshot taken at 12.3.18 19:36 GMT) (started on 15th Jan 2018 at 23:42)
The wallet was running almost 24/7 with only some minor downtime of a few hours. (Every address had the same downtime, as they run in the same wallet.)

100  -> 107.5   =   05 staking rewards   ->   7.50 %
200  -> 210.5   =   07 staking rewards   ->   5.25 %
500  -> 527.2   =   18 staking rewards   ->   5.44 %
1000 -> 1059.0   =   40 staking rewards  ->   5.90 %
2000 -> 2119.5   =   79 staking rewards   ->   5.97 %
5000 -> 5304.1    =   201 staking rewards   ->   6.08 %

percentage on the end of the lines above stands for the total interest for the 56 days.

the smallest address still does stand out a bit, but it already got a bit balanced to the other addresses.
This will probably continue to align further.

Current result of all addresses:
Average Interest per day: 0.11%
Estimated Interest rate per year for staking 24/7: 47.8% 

Next report in approx. 4 weeks for the quarter results.

I think you were very lucky with one stake every two days. See my Test with different balances here.
The wallet with 500 Moin received 11 stake rewards in 28 days.
(I will update my test in two days with new data because then another month will have passed)

why do you let CAT run for that long when you have it clearly set up with wrong configurations?
do you think you can just press start without thinking anything and making money?
that's not how it works. The only thing to blame here is you.

Staking Tests with various balances: 100/200/500/1000/2000/5000 - Update after one month

Time elapsed: 28 days / 4 Weeks    (snapshot taken at 13.2.18 01:06 GMT) (started on 15th Jan 2018 at 23:42)
The wallet was running almost 24/7 with only some minor downtime of a few hours. (Every address had the same downtime, as they run in the same wallet.)

100 -> 106         =   04 staking rewards   ->   6 %
200 -> 206         =   04 staking rewards   ->   3 %
500 -> 516.5      =   11 staking rewards   ->   3.30 %
1000 -> 1027.2   =   18 staking rewards  ->   2.72 %
2000 -> 2058.8    =   39 staking rewards   ->   2.92 %
5000 -> 5147.7    =   98 staking rewards   ->   2.95 %

as you can see, every address got some stake rewards, even those with only 100 and 200 moin in it.
so it's possible to stake with as little as 100 moin.

most of the addresses got almost the same interest of 3% during that month.

the 100moin-address with 6% doesn't mean that staking with smaller amount leads to better results. It just got lucky.
I will continue the experiment and report back. Hopefully we will see that all will approximate to the same percentage over time.

According to KingCaper:
The staking weight shown in the wallet is only for informational purposes. The amount of coins in the tx.outs of one address only affects the difficulty (and likelihood of staking) for that address.
So if you had 2 addresses in the wallet - one with 10 MOIN, one with 500,000 MOIN - the likelihood of the one with 10 MOIN earning stakes is unaffected by the huge balance at the other address.

so the experiment should still be valid. thanks anyway for your input.

based on the above questions/answer from northa/vella85, I made some tests about the required size of moin balance for good staking results.
On 15th Jan 2018 23:42, I filled addresses with the following balances: 100/200/500/1000/2000/5000.

Now, after roughly 4 days and 12 hours, I have the balances below (The wallet was running nearly 24/7 in this period):
100 -> 100 = 0 staking rewards, 0%
200 -> 200 = 0 staking rewards, 0%
500 -> 503 = 2 staking rewards, +0.6%
1000 -> 1006 = 4 staking rewards, +0.6%
2000 -> 2009 = 6 staking rewards, +0.45%
5000 -> 5018 = 12 staking rewards, +0.36%

So I wouldn't try to stake coins with less than 500 MOIN balance on it.

In the long run, the percentage earnings from staking should align to each other.
I will continue to monitor the balances and report again here in a few weeks.

no, that's not true. you can also gain stakes on just let the wallet run for a few hours per day.
although 24/7 is better, it isn't necessary.

lol.

CAT will work for you, but you still have to think on your own.
why should anyone tell you his good trading pairs? so that he get's less revenue? yeah, for sure.

folks, do you even read the last few posts? its was already asked just above you...

omg. its unbelievable to read what people expect here.
if you want features of a bot with completely other behaviour why don't you just write it on your own or pay a developer to do it for you? it will cost you probably a lot more.

read the description of the OP what CAT actually does ond what it is good for.
If you can't use it that way because you don't understand or don't know how to trade that way, why don't you just look for another piece of software?
this arrogance of some users here is absolutely unbelievable. If I were Sampey I wouldn't have that much patience with such requests.

CAT has good functionality and is working very good.
CAT is very cheap for the amount of exchanges ond currency-pairs its able to trade.
Sampey, don't think your customer base is not happy. There are a lot of traders who like your product as it is very much.
Don't try to fit every request. I would prefer if you would stay with your initial ping-pong trading and not please everyone.

I have some drafts for contest but not yet finished..

over 16k USD / 15.6 BTC volume in last 24h on C-CEX 
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/moin/#markets

looks like not delisting in this period

WOW. just wow.
someone accumulated a lot.

I'm running the new wallet on 3 windows clients without any problems.

What exactly does not work? Without any further explanation its pure FUD.  

could you please stop quoting each other if you don't refer to anything particular from the previous post?
I have this topic subscribed and get mails of every post and it's pretty hard to follow the conversation with all the duplicate texts without opening the site.
thanks

looking forward for the t-shirt. curious how it will look.

See my post above, it's highly unlikely that something like this may happen.
And even if, those traded coins would still stay on your account. an attacker could not transfer them anywhere.

please not.
as far as I understand you, that would require communication with a third party server to maintain your keys.
This is far more of a security concern than this whole cloudbleed thing now!  Sampey, Please don't.

I don't think this incident did any harm to exchange-api users.
As far as I understand, the problem was mainly that some leaked data got cached on some search engines like google and was therefor longer available and publicly readable.
But as an user of exchange api's this would not affect us, because api calls are surely not indexed by spiders. I this incident is more of a problem for "normal sites". But I could be wrong here.

Some other things to put into perspective:

- Only sites which used cloudflare are possibly affected. (Here a list of possibly affected sites).
In our CAT perspective: Possibly affected: btc-e.com, poloniex.com, kraken.com.
All other trading sites, f.e. bitstamp.net, bittrex, bitfinex are surely not affected.

- The greatest period of impact was from February 13 and February 18 with around 1 in every 3,300,000 HTTP requests through Cloudflare potentially resulting in memory leakage (that’s about 0.00003% of requests).
Meaning: If you didn't use CAT on this timespan on the mentioned exchanges there was most surely no leak of your data.
As you can also see, only 0.00003% of requests were affected by this leak. It is highly inlikely that someone of here was even inside those requests.
And even if they were, those requests must have been captured or cached to become a serious problem. The probability for that is even smaller.

- If you have withdrawal disabled on your api key, any possible leak could not directly steal any funds from you. The only thing an attacker could do is buy/sell coins on your behalf, but they would still remains on your account. It is not even sure, that anyone was/is trying to make profit of this leak. I would really doubt that anyone would just messing around with some unknown trading portfolio if he can't use the fund for himself afterwards.

So, as far as I can see, only 3 sites from here are affected and it's highly unlikely to be even a real problem.
I don't think its necessary to change the keys. If your paranoid you can change btc-e, polo and kraken if you used them in the mentioned timespan.

Just my two cents.

My personal opinion:

I think you should pause the twitter campaign after the threshold of the initial announced amount is reached.
It may have been a good thing, which can be used again in the future. But I personally don't think something like this should last longer than a few weeks.

Its always very difficult to measure how much marketing campaigns actually support or aid the advertised product, but it was good to show some more presence on twitter.
In the future, there has to be also tweets about moin without getting rewards from here. I would love to see that evolve in the near future.

And again, stopping here now doesn't mean it can't be started again at some time.

just my two cents..

In the end it doesn't matter which size your stake inputs are. you will receive the same amount.
But I would recommend to hold chunks of something around 10k. If you have less, let that all stake on the same adress.