WOOF COIN

Since the beginning of the pandemic, pet surrendering rates have increased dramatically around the world. Waitlists for surrendering household pets have increased to a remarkable eight months as animal shelters and welfare organisations have seen an increase of 34% for animals needing help.

Typically, animal shelters are under resourced and under financed; relying heavily on donations and the volunteer efforts to assist animals.

This is where Woof Coin steps in. As avid lovers of dogs, we wanted to make a difference. Using the power of Proof of Work mining, we’ve created a coin where miners are contributing to the donation of money to animal welfare shelters. These shelters initially include the ASPCA who already have a cryptocurrency donation mechanism but with intention to expand to the RSPCA and other organizations suggested by the community. 

Our aim is to put animals first and we intend on developing ongoing relationships with pet shelters to help adoption.

Coins Specifications
21 billion supply
Block 2,100,000 halving (4 years estimated)
Algorithm: KawPOW
Proof of Work

Download Links:
Windows wallet - https://github.com/Woof-Core/WoofCoin/releases/download/WoofCoin/WoofCoin.zip

Social
Coming soon!

Please reach out if you have any questions  Smiley

We're touching BETI 0: https://i.imgur.com/Kt23YnW.png

Hey, I think you might be right. I did check this by taking the parameters from the very first post and applied them to the 25.-NOV-2913:
Screenshoot: https://i.imgur.com/nbQADHd.png

This way I get similar results as in the graph in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=470453.msg26855063#msg26855063. It would be great if jl2012 could confirm this.

The question to ask imo is whether we should reallyhold on to the old BETI values (BETI values in the past, calculated with parameters of the past) in the graph, or whether the whole BETI graph should always be based on the newest parameters only. In my opition the BETI graph should only be based on the newest parameters, because the old regression curve was caculated using "less information" (=btc price action after the calculation in that point of time). Thus we need to recalculate the past everytime we get new a/b parameters, thus we need to completely recalculate the BETI graph overtime.

Okay, to figure out what's wrong i'd like to check how
 - this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=470453.msg26854986#msg26854986
 - produced this beti chart: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=470453.msg26855063#msg26855063

Right now things don't add up for me. Please have a look at this: https://i.imgur.com/EOaiYlj.png

I took the beti formula linked in the first post and applied it to two dates:
 - 22-DEC-2017, where both formula and chart produce BETI 0,62 [1]
 - 25-NOV-2013, where the beti formula does NOT match the chart [2]

For me the chart seems not to be produced by the BETI formula. Am I missing something or have we been looking at a flawed chart?

-----
[1] https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ln(13441.46)-(+0.00331615547164061++(+december+22,+2017+to+jul+17,+2010++)%2Fdays-0.118770392977885+)
[2] https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ln(1100)-(+0.00331615547164061++(+november,+25+2013+to+jul+17,+2010++)%2Fdays-0.118770392977885+)

Hm, that's strange.. I have just used the formula in the wolframalpha-link which is used to lately calculate the beti. I'm trying to check whether the wolframalpha-formula is not the same as what was used for the first beti-charts, but I'm still struggling with WA.


edit
In the past very different parameters have been used for BETI.

2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=470453.msg5739610#msg5739610
a = 0.00606
b = -1.83066

2017
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=470453.msg26854986#msg26854986
a:   0.003316
b:   -0.118770

And to make it worse, i have also added a BETI indicator to Tradingview.


Screenshot https://i.imgur.com/3GqkR6n.png

Hi guys. I've just translated the regression function used for this beti to a tradingview script.

Screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/lelTQrq.png

Did anyone think of creating a tradingview.com indicator out of this? It would be awesome!