Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 7,339 results by marcotheminer
As you may be able to tell by my trust score of the closer half of my account’s existence; negative feedback left has been rather aggressive, but importantly to me- largely speculated and even then, on falsehoods.
Both ‘sides’, we can argue to non-conclusions on the fact that there exists evidence to justify according to some of this “linking” me to problems, yes. That being said, I am able to clear my name with the reported allegations. I do not exist as a scammer nor continue to be active on this forum as a scammer; I do not owe none money and I am owed by only a few other members on here, presumed defaulted/scammed or pending. Problems may stem from my poor actions in the first half of my account’s existence (some things defendable some I cannot deny my foolishness). Since this transition, I have had issues with repayment on loans, which led to more negatives from external “observing” parties - but always settled them.
I have one account that I use here and can still verify my originally staked address. From here my claims can be narrowed down onto specifics and certain events. Now is the issue… All of this “clearing up my own name” will likely not reverse the tarnishes of certain “trusted members” (there should be a test to pass on this forum to be able to leave impacting trust feedback), I have reached out to most if not all at some point to try reason about and dive deeper with them and have them understand whichever situation first beckoned the negative tag. To no avail because we are both “minds made up”; only that I know I am not well represented by their feedbacks. This is not to say I do not owe a serious apology to many on here. For such; I feel the punishment has been dished out inappropriately.
Has the forum changed to the point where there isn’t that community standing in at least feedbacks? Or do I somehow rise to the occasion and continue proving that even in 10 years I will hop on from time to time and not have scammed anyone yet still.
BTC is the basis for this forum’s existence. Trust but verify as a verdict let’s me ask one last question: BTC believers, have we lost the original feeling of this place and the essence of p2p currency, or naturally we succumbed to the masses’ wild visions and never put a foot down?
Thank you if read and if responded even nicer of you
Nice continuation to all, hopefully the community continues to be strong on the technicals boards as they always were!
Both ‘sides’, we can argue to non-conclusions on the fact that there exists evidence to justify according to some of this “linking” me to problems, yes. That being said, I am able to clear my name with the reported allegations. I do not exist as a scammer nor continue to be active on this forum as a scammer; I do not owe none money and I am owed by only a few other members on here, presumed defaulted/scammed or pending. Problems may stem from my poor actions in the first half of my account’s existence (some things defendable some I cannot deny my foolishness). Since this transition, I have had issues with repayment on loans, which led to more negatives from external “observing” parties - but always settled them.
I have one account that I use here and can still verify my originally staked address. From here my claims can be narrowed down onto specifics and certain events. Now is the issue… All of this “clearing up my own name” will likely not reverse the tarnishes of certain “trusted members” (there should be a test to pass on this forum to be able to leave impacting trust feedback), I have reached out to most if not all at some point to try reason about and dive deeper with them and have them understand whichever situation first beckoned the negative tag. To no avail because we are both “minds made up”; only that I know I am not well represented by their feedbacks. This is not to say I do not owe a serious apology to many on here. For such; I feel the punishment has been dished out inappropriately.
Has the forum changed to the point where there isn’t that community standing in at least feedbacks? Or do I somehow rise to the occasion and continue proving that even in 10 years I will hop on from time to time and not have scammed anyone yet still.
BTC is the basis for this forum’s existence. Trust but verify as a verdict let’s me ask one last question: BTC believers, have we lost the original feeling of this place and the essence of p2p currency, or naturally we succumbed to the masses’ wild visions and never put a foot down?
Thank you if read and if responded even nicer of you
Nice continuation to all, hopefully the community continues to be strong on the technicals boards as they always were!Do not think you will be able to borrow money on this forum from anyone. Even no one will want to borrow you less than $1 on this forum. I think you are only adding to your negative trusts if you continue this behavior. Just leave this forum and never come back is the best. It is highly distinct that you are only posting on this forum to scam.
You do not know what you are talking about.
This amount, is larger than I expect to be easily filled. But I have had several loans on here and every single one has always been paid; with excess fees if it was late.
Signed message will be provided if a lender is confirmed.
If you sign a message that will make any guarantee of the repayment of the loan that you will take and/or which has already defaulted? If not then there is not necessary about the sign message.The only thing that can bypass any concern is offering collateral
No, no, bro! You can't say only one option. There is another option and that is repay previous loans which has been scammed by his/her alt account/accounts.Signing a message only serves to confirm the ownership of this account. And even then, it cannot be 100%.
I do not have any loans out. Your accusation of an alt account of mine is fals. That ordeal is another person’s problem and I hope they settle fairly with you one day.
@condoras I have no collateral available.
Hi all, I come to this board to ask for an advance on funds I expect within the next month and a half.
Repayment on or before October 25, 2025.
Loan: 0.004BTC (as of now ~450$ equivalent)
Repayment: 0.0052BTC
Signed message will be provided if a lender is confirmed.
Thank you for the consideration, feel free to message in PM or post here.
Funds use is for general expenses over the next month.
Repayment on or before October 25, 2025.
Loan: 0.004BTC (as of now ~450$ equivalent)
Repayment: 0.0052BTC
Signed message will be provided if a lender is confirmed.
Thank you for the consideration, feel free to message in PM or post here.
Funds use is for general expenses over the next month.
Re: BTC-valued Loan 6-12 months (with ceiling and floor repayment maximums?)
Wat. This forum is a like instant chat messaging nowadays..
So in a way this proposed loan is for a BTC-holder who is tending short (wants to hedge against price falls/stagnation).
So in a way this proposed loan is for a BTC-holder who is tending short (wants to hedge against price falls/stagnation).
Re: BTC-valued Loan 6-12 months (with ceiling and floor repayment maximums?)
I'm not asking for a loan of any size here. In the future I would, if there is in interest from lenders. Doesn't seem like it because BTC is a slow moving / rather-hold asset right now.
"which is the alt account of the borrower."
@shasan: You continue to speak lies, either make your statements truthful or declare something when you know it as fact. Some X years old wallet link is not proof. There are distinctly individual people involved here and continually coming back to the "it's one person" suspicion is just going to benefit the loan defaulter(s). And you as a lender should already know this.. How much time.. 6 years lending..?
I am giving 72 hours to repay the loan or make the schedule for how loans will be settled. If there is no positive response regarding this then I have to tag and create a flag for all those accounts that are connected and also will try to find as many accounts as possible which is the alt account of the borrower.
<users snipped>
And others who are the alt of these users.
1. So at creation-of-thread day, you couldn't wait those 72 hours? (Which would have possibly avoided me being 'dragged through your stain game')
2. You already have tagged everyone involved without trying to settle the matter privately it seems?!
3. If you wish to stay it, then stay knowledge-less and money-impaired... a fool... and keep going about your lawyer-istic exploits after non-repayment in a Bitcoin lending venture (thought you would have known that business a bit more by now ...... ah!, right, greed).
You haven't provided even a tiniest shred of rebuttal for the spend-linked addresses between you and banned/scammed accounts.
So far the only reason I can think for not disclosing the presumed buyer of that account or the existence of the sale itself (if that's what you're implying here) is that maybe there was no sale and you're the scammer. Would be trivial to prove me wrong if I'm wrong.
Years have elapsed, from the link time period to now; what has happened with forum accounts isn't trackable based off of that. Here's another reason: simple privacy, next: I could also be implicating yet another innocent person just to satisfy your thirst for knowledge under guise that it "helps the investigation" and "helps get a repayment" - it won't.
The "trivial to prove me wrong" statement is "guilty-until-proven-innocent"; not a great way, and not really supported in (normal) societies (apart from these cases where 'anything goes' because of the nature of BTC (I imagine?): accusations/allegations .. lead to this absurdity!).
Not to be snark but with how this began, do not expect my immediate cooperation. My initial stance remains truthful; and I still have not yet responded in-kind to the defamation I am experiencing. Probably can't be arsed to follow up on that, thickheaded minds are tough to reason with, let alone convince ;-).
Just to be clear.. If there's an obvious way I can help, and I can conduct that help, - I will. End of <response_number_fifty>...........
@shasan: You continue to speak lies, either make your statements truthful or declare something when you know it as fact. Some X years old wallet link is not proof. There are distinctly individual people involved here and continually coming back to the "it's one person" suspicion is just going to benefit the loan defaulter(s). And you as a lender should already know this.. How much time.. 6 years lending..?
For the record, I'm ready to rescind all my negative trusts when all 3 loans are repaid in full. I don't want it to be a "hindrance" to the loaned when formulating a morality in deciding whether or not they should repay the loans. I'm sure other leavers of negative trust would probably be inclined to do the same.
Along with your words, I want to add a few more things:I am giving 72 hours to repay the loan or make the schedule for how loans will be settled. If there is no positive response regarding this then I have to tag and create a flag for all those accounts that are connected and also will try to find as many accounts as possible which is the alt account of the borrower.
<users snipped>
And others who are the alt of these users.
1. So at creation-of-thread day, you couldn't wait those 72 hours? (Which would have possibly avoided me being 'dragged through your stain game')
2. You already have tagged everyone involved without trying to settle the matter privately it seems?!
3. If you wish to stay it, then stay knowledge-less and money-impaired... a fool... and keep going about your lawyer-istic exploits after non-repayment in a Bitcoin lending venture (thought you would have known that business a bit more by now ...... ah!, right, greed).
'Slanderous' feedback received by me, as it stands at present:
You haven't provided even a tiniest shred of rebuttal for the spend-linked addresses between you and banned/scammed accounts.
So far the only reason I can think for not disclosing the presumed buyer of that account or the existence of the sale itself (if that's what you're implying here) is that maybe there was no sale and you're the scammer. Would be trivial to prove me wrong if I'm wrong.
Years have elapsed, from the link time period to now; what has happened with forum accounts isn't trackable based off of that. Here's another reason: simple privacy, next: I could also be implicating yet another innocent person just to satisfy your thirst for knowledge under guise that it "helps the investigation" and "helps get a repayment" - it won't.
The "trivial to prove me wrong" statement is "guilty-until-proven-innocent"; not a great way, and not really supported in (normal) societies (apart from these cases where 'anything goes' because of the nature of BTC (I imagine?): accusations/allegations .. lead to this absurdity!).
Not to be snark but with how this began, do not expect my immediate cooperation. My initial stance remains truthful; and I still have not yet responded in-kind to the defamation I am experiencing. Probably can't be arsed to follow up on that, thickheaded minds are tough to reason with, let alone convince ;-).
Just to be clear.. If there's an obvious way I can help, and I can conduct that help, - I will. End of <response_number_fifty>...........
; the speculation is getting heady/spiraled. While we all wait, I, for one, sure hope the guy(s) repay or settle with at least shasan.. and now that I mention it, all other lenders eventually too.
If their defaulting is due to BTC price rises - a capped repayment (USD value still higher overall) could be an option.
If their defaulting is due to BTC price rises - a capped repayment (USD value still higher overall) could be an option.
For examples: a surplus of time, money, health (is that possible..?), ideas/abilities, etc
Curious I ask: how would you conduct yourself day by day? What 'tasks' are you getting done/focused on now that some 'limitations' are gone?
Curious I ask: how would you conduct yourself day by day? What 'tasks' are you getting done/focused on now that some 'limitations' are gone?
Can you add BTC payout?peerbet: marcotheminer
bit777: marcotheminer
bit777: marcotheminer
This address was used by both Mondy and 2double0, so this should remove any doubt that all 3 accounts are the same person.
He is also notserp, who went on to have a decent career here.
Tagging all accounts I mentioned here and earlier.
Quoting for the record. Well, notserp isn't here to defend themselves, they seem to have left a few years ago. Mondy doesn't seem like a still-in-use account I don't see how this is conducive to 2double0/stedsm repaying their loan(s). Curious to hear their replies/sort outs eventually though.. Meanwhile, I shall be painted! Painted as the supposed scammer!