Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 7,335 results by marcotheminer
Re: BTC-valued Loan 6-12 months (with ceiling and floor repayment maximums?)
Wat. This forum is a like instant chat messaging nowadays..
So in a way this proposed loan is for a BTC-holder who is tending short (wants to hedge against price falls/stagnation).
So in a way this proposed loan is for a BTC-holder who is tending short (wants to hedge against price falls/stagnation).
Re: BTC-valued Loan 6-12 months (with ceiling and floor repayment maximums?)
I'm not asking for a loan of any size here. In the future I would, if there is in interest from lenders. Doesn't seem like it because BTC is a slow moving / rather-hold asset right now.
"which is the alt account of the borrower."
@shasan: You continue to speak lies, either make your statements truthful or declare something when you know it as fact. Some X years old wallet link is not proof. There are distinctly individual people involved here and continually coming back to the "it's one person" suspicion is just going to benefit the loan defaulter(s). And you as a lender should already know this.. How much time.. 6 years lending..?
I am giving 72 hours to repay the loan or make the schedule for how loans will be settled. If there is no positive response regarding this then I have to tag and create a flag for all those accounts that are connected and also will try to find as many accounts as possible which is the alt account of the borrower.
<users snipped>
And others who are the alt of these users.
1. So at creation-of-thread day, you couldn't wait those 72 hours? (Which would have possibly avoided me being 'dragged through your stain game')
2. You already have tagged everyone involved without trying to settle the matter privately it seems?!
3. If you wish to stay it, then stay knowledge-less and money-impaired... a fool... and keep going about your lawyer-istic exploits after non-repayment in a Bitcoin lending venture (thought you would have known that business a bit more by now ...... ah!, right, greed).
You haven't provided even a tiniest shred of rebuttal for the spend-linked addresses between you and banned/scammed accounts.
So far the only reason I can think for not disclosing the presumed buyer of that account or the existence of the sale itself (if that's what you're implying here) is that maybe there was no sale and you're the scammer. Would be trivial to prove me wrong if I'm wrong.
Years have elapsed, from the link time period to now; what has happened with forum accounts isn't trackable based off of that. Here's another reason: simple privacy, next: I could also be implicating yet another innocent person just to satisfy your thirst for knowledge under guise that it "helps the investigation" and "helps get a repayment" - it won't.
The "trivial to prove me wrong" statement is "guilty-until-proven-innocent"; not a great way, and not really supported in (normal) societies (apart from these cases where 'anything goes' because of the nature of BTC (I imagine?): accusations/allegations .. lead to this absurdity!).
Not to be snark but with how this began, do not expect my immediate cooperation. My initial stance remains truthful; and I still have not yet responded in-kind to the defamation I am experiencing. Probably can't be arsed to follow up on that, thickheaded minds are tough to reason with, let alone convince ;-).
Just to be clear.. If there's an obvious way I can help, and I can conduct that help, - I will. End of <response_number_fifty>...........
@shasan: You continue to speak lies, either make your statements truthful or declare something when you know it as fact. Some X years old wallet link is not proof. There are distinctly individual people involved here and continually coming back to the "it's one person" suspicion is just going to benefit the loan defaulter(s). And you as a lender should already know this.. How much time.. 6 years lending..?
For the record, I'm ready to rescind all my negative trusts when all 3 loans are repaid in full. I don't want it to be a "hindrance" to the loaned when formulating a morality in deciding whether or not they should repay the loans. I'm sure other leavers of negative trust would probably be inclined to do the same.
Along with your words, I want to add a few more things:I am giving 72 hours to repay the loan or make the schedule for how loans will be settled. If there is no positive response regarding this then I have to tag and create a flag for all those accounts that are connected and also will try to find as many accounts as possible which is the alt account of the borrower.
<users snipped>
And others who are the alt of these users.
1. So at creation-of-thread day, you couldn't wait those 72 hours? (Which would have possibly avoided me being 'dragged through your stain game')
2. You already have tagged everyone involved without trying to settle the matter privately it seems?!
3. If you wish to stay it, then stay knowledge-less and money-impaired... a fool... and keep going about your lawyer-istic exploits after non-repayment in a Bitcoin lending venture (thought you would have known that business a bit more by now ...... ah!, right, greed).
'Slanderous' feedback received by me, as it stands at present:
You haven't provided even a tiniest shred of rebuttal for the spend-linked addresses between you and banned/scammed accounts.
So far the only reason I can think for not disclosing the presumed buyer of that account or the existence of the sale itself (if that's what you're implying here) is that maybe there was no sale and you're the scammer. Would be trivial to prove me wrong if I'm wrong.
Years have elapsed, from the link time period to now; what has happened with forum accounts isn't trackable based off of that. Here's another reason: simple privacy, next: I could also be implicating yet another innocent person just to satisfy your thirst for knowledge under guise that it "helps the investigation" and "helps get a repayment" - it won't.
The "trivial to prove me wrong" statement is "guilty-until-proven-innocent"; not a great way, and not really supported in (normal) societies (apart from these cases where 'anything goes' because of the nature of BTC (I imagine?): accusations/allegations .. lead to this absurdity!).
Not to be snark but with how this began, do not expect my immediate cooperation. My initial stance remains truthful; and I still have not yet responded in-kind to the defamation I am experiencing. Probably can't be arsed to follow up on that, thickheaded minds are tough to reason with, let alone convince ;-).
Just to be clear.. If there's an obvious way I can help, and I can conduct that help, - I will. End of <response_number_fifty>...........
; the speculation is getting heady/spiraled. While we all wait, I, for one, sure hope the guy(s) repay or settle with at least shasan.. and now that I mention it, all other lenders eventually too.
If their defaulting is due to BTC price rises - a capped repayment (USD value still higher overall) could be an option.
If their defaulting is due to BTC price rises - a capped repayment (USD value still higher overall) could be an option.
For examples: a surplus of time, money, health (is that possible..?), ideas/abilities, etc
Curious I ask: how would you conduct yourself day by day? What 'tasks' are you getting done/focused on now that some 'limitations' are gone?
Curious I ask: how would you conduct yourself day by day? What 'tasks' are you getting done/focused on now that some 'limitations' are gone?
Can you add BTC payout?peerbet: marcotheminer
bit777: marcotheminer
bit777: marcotheminer
This address was used by both Mondy and 2double0, so this should remove any doubt that all 3 accounts are the same person.
He is also notserp, who went on to have a decent career here.
Tagging all accounts I mentioned here and earlier.
Quoting for the record. Well, notserp isn't here to defend themselves, they seem to have left a few years ago. Mondy doesn't seem like a still-in-use account I don't see how this is conducive to 2double0/stedsm repaying their loan(s). Curious to hear their replies/sort outs eventually though.. Meanwhile, I shall be painted! Painted as the supposed scammer!
From the flawed belief that I am the borrower who took the loan or greatly contributed to this unfolding.. Huh allround wat.
You didn't take the loan? If you didn't take the loan by the name of 2double0 then you have purchased the account from that person or you have sold the account to that person. Linking the accounts means all the account was operated by the same person or operating by the same person. There is no other alternative.That's also one flaw: being adamant. Sadly, look at how CERTAINLY you are accusing me of this; after all these years - a default/two is what unraveled it all /s!
Hopefully, loans get settled, but anyway I can see the extra tarnish dished onto me remaining (just look historically). Teetering on a waste of time for everyone involved at this point. What you said is an possibility, yes. As is: account ownership changing, their being 'linked' when they were similar/involved together at times. Groups coordinating. And as you said: at some point. Surely you can see how your wallet links are a weak argument for claiming that I am the scammer.
Honestly: if you three just insist on my being guilty; what a whack witch hunt you're conducting. Shasan, you were not even around pre-2018 (if your account is your first), be careful informing yourself of 'history' on this forum; especially if you target the wrong person/people afterward.
@shasan have you still not received any reply from your borrower(s)? Here's to your solved case, good luck.
To which I say: there is no excuse in there.
OK. So there's no excuse. So repay the loan.
Do you see the flaw in your reasoning...? to jump the gun and tell me that? From the flawed belief that I am the borrower who took the loan or greatly contributed to this unfolding..
allround wat... Your opinion can pick up on whatever sounds it wants.
And the "not me" 'claim' is fact. It is such.
Your "wallet link" is from some years ago.
Your "wallet link" is from some years ago.
LOL that's not how facts work. And wallet links don't go bad like milk.
Sounds like you're trying to make shit up as you go. Are we supposed to assume that you sold the account, or your brother/cousin/SO/cat used it, or you got hacked, or got framed, or is it the whole bingo card?
You keep bringing up fiction. You can storytell all you want, it's just getting sad at this point.
You know what's really sad? Saying "it's not me" when there is a solid wallet link between you and the scam account. And it's not like you don't have time to address this issue - you are posting and sending frivolous trust ratings as if this doesn't concern you. Sad.
Pls stop being dense. Neutral point of view face it that the trust ratings I received in rapid/rabid succession are laughable. Your words are *literally* frivolous as you accuse of me (..my trust ratings being neutral remarks as an answer to this sudden group mad-up).
From direct degeneration as provided by the calm shasan lol, through whoever tf else chimed in, to you.... lol, Seriously! just take a moment and re-read your projecting chimes' of today mate: (haha, the actual borrower(s) got off easy rating-remark-wise compared to what I caught
).Quote
suchmoon 2024-12-09 Reference A loan scammer account got linked to marco though a wallet link. Marco did what a normal person would do, took the issue seriously and provided full det... j/k, he did what marco does, acted as a blithering scamming sociopath and blamed everyone else.
nutildah 2024-12-09 Reference long-time scammer returns to the forum to try one last con
DireWolfM14 2024-12-09 Reference I've long suspected that marcotheminer and 2double0 were alt accounts controlled by the same person. Through blockchain analysis marcotheminer appears to be connected to multiple accounts that have defaulted on loans.
shasan 2024-12-09 Reference Loan Defaulted!
nutildah 2024-12-09 Reference long-time scammer returns to the forum to try one last con
DireWolfM14 2024-12-09 Reference I've long suspected that marcotheminer and 2double0 were alt accounts controlled by the same person. Through blockchain analysis marcotheminer appears to be connected to multiple accounts that have defaulted on loans.
shasan 2024-12-09 Reference Loan Defaulted!
And the "not me" 'claim' is fact. It is such.
Your "wallet link" is from some years ago.
Quote
I understand the linking between via the addresses. Be aware it is from a long time ago is what I am saying, those addresses are not the current addresses that they are using; Stedsm/2double0/?/.
Finally, with a sigh of wasted type-breath, I tell you: I am replying as I can - actually first rather defending myself by just stating how it is.
To the group who bombarded/flung onto me with nonsense/indirect trust-reaction-ratings: you have added useless drama to the actual matter at hand which is the user(s) involved being at/near default/scam of their respective loans; of which I am yet to actually learn the details of because, hey, it's still news to me (oh.., I spent how much time wasting a reply here
d'Oh).As I said to shasan, we on-forum are probably going to help out where we can. None of this angry 'yelling' actually helps.
===
Now... with that aside.. Boy oh man glad to be back on these forums! Brilliantly odd - once again I shall be active around here, - time for a surf! ... "yeww which boards bro?!" ..... later
To which I have a reply of:
And the "not me" 'claim' is fact. It is such.
Your "wallet link" is from some years ago.
Your "wallet link" is from some years ago.
Quote
I understand the linking between via the addresses. Be aware it is from a long time ago is what I am saying, those addresses are not the current addresses that they are using; Stedsm/2double0/?/.
Really? That's your excuse? "It was a long time ago"... not "we performed a customized non-commercial coinjoin together" or "I sold those accounts after the transactions took place"? Frankly it doesn't matter. You'll not get another loan here, ever, but you should still pay back shasan for 2double0's default as its the right thing to do as basic human behavior would dictate.
To which I say: there is no excuse in there.
Now I am confused: what in the BTC world is "we performed a customized non-commercial coinjoin together"
& also if you could please clarify what you mean by yet another allegation: that "I sold those accounts after the transactions took place"?
And I doubt this will be anything new to lenders who wish to deal with me. The gambling board could have fun betting on your prediction,.. alas,..