16 saattir LTC çekme işlemim beklemede durumda bekliyor. Bu nasıl iştir?

LTC çekme işlemi yaptım. Beklemede görünüyor. Ortalama bekleme süresi nedir bilen var mı?

Thank you for your answers.

If I understand this correctly running SPV client instead of full node don't make me more vulnarable to evil miners because i would be low profile target for them. Of course i understand running full nodes secures network as a whole.

Don't these quotes contradict each other?

SPV client will consider longest chain valid without verifiying is it valid or not. So an attack factor is that some evil miner with big hashrate could create an invalid chain and beat the number of blocks on valid chain to fool SPV clients. But if that evil miner has the ability to create longer invalid chain he has the ability to make Selfish Mining attack also. Which will be much more profitable for him with the block rewards.

What protects full nodes from Selfish Mining attack? And if there is no protection what makes a full node more secure than SPV client?

Do you think it can't be accepted or it is technically not sound.

Yes you understand me correctly. This is very important for donation usecase. Video streamers are now forced to use other cryptos because of this. Half of all utxo are unspendible right now.

I thought this would be too easy and too good for not being offered before so i thought that i must have missed some obvious basic problem with this. I was hoping for someone to tell me where i make mistake.

Fees are very big and it gets even bigger if a transaction cointains many inputs. But good thing about many input transactions is that it generally contains only one public key so one signiture is enough.

This is transaction data from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction braces used to show new format.

Input:
Previous tx: f5d8ee39a430901c91a5917b9f2dc19d6d1a0e9cea205b009ca73dd04470b9a6 (Public Key)
Index: 0 (-1 means all transactions upto previous block)
scriptSig: 304502206e21798a42fae0e854281abd38bacd1aeed3ee3738d9e1446618c4571d10
90db022100e2ac980643b0b82c0e88ffdfec6b64e3e6ba35e7ba5fdd7d5d6cc8d25c6b241501

Output:
Value: 5000000000
scriptPubKey: OP_DUP OP_HASH160 404371705fa9bd789a2fcd52d2c580b65d35549d
OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG

It makes managing UTXO set more complicated but i think it is a good sacrifice considering it s a scaling solution and many UTXOs are unspendable right now.

I don't know anything like this ever suggested before or does it have any problems i have not thought. It may be merged to any blocksize increase HF.

Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks for advance

Why use registrar, instead we can make alias transactions to a specific burn address and if amount per time is greater than previous, alias is replaced. Minimum amount can be set to prevent spam and sybils.

Is there anyway to create a system with LN to create incentive for full nodes? I don't have enough technical understanding but i feel like it is possible to create such a system. Blocks would propogate with encryption, only a payment through a LN transaction will reveal key somehow. Money might be given as donations or miners may be involved as decreasing orphan probability or maybe UASF to channel some percent of fees to this system.

I don't get technical details but this makes sense. https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-February/013643.html

What I don't understand is that if soft-forks are backward compatible why would other miners reject it? Doesn't backward compatibility mean that new blocks are seen as valid by old clients? And if you wait everyone to update what is the benefit for soft-fork? Is there a con of Hard-Fork if it has 95% support?

Why wait 95% on a soft-fork? What happens if segwit miners starts mining segwit blocks right now?

Coin has distribution problem right now. 87% of all coins are at developer's possession. He tries to distribute it fairly with bitcoin binding. But it will take some time. This why this coin is worthless now.

Hi,

DAG (directed acyclic graph) seems to good to be true, no need for miners. No block size issue, no %51 attack. Finalization. More decentrilized.
What are the cons of DAG vs blockchain?
Can bitcoin somehow adapt DAG?

Thanks for answers.

I think coinmarketcap should publish an index about all Cryto-Currency market cap. Something like CRYPTO50 means total MarketCap of first 50 crypto currencies / 1M USD. Then exchanges can use it to create future contracts. I want to invest all cryptos without investing individually. What do you think about this?