Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 185 results by mchu168
wow and mchu is still denying it, shame on you LOOK AT MY HISTORY. For .01.. I guess some people have nothing better to do
YOU have nothing better to do! You didn't send me one bit of info, and you say I scammed you?
Fucking retard.
I'm glad you did. You fucking liar: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1950334.0
You should have red trust for opening a fake scam accusation anyways.
You should have red trust for opening a fake scam accusation anyways.
I was sent the 0.2 Bitcoin first, without escrow. What kind of scammer would send the PayPal, when they have already received the BTC? I returned 0.5 BTC to a user after a trade failed to go through as well, and these amounts are among the smaller amounts I've been trusted with.
One that is wanting to scam more via the same methods or do a chargeback at a later date which you have plenty of time to initiate. You also only sent it after he opened a scam accusation against you. There's enough red flags here for me to warrant the negative feedback but I'll happily remove it if you can provide reasonable proof that this is your account, but it looks to me like it very likely isn't.
No, I did not send it because he opened a scam accusation. I was PM'ing him before that saying I was on my way home, but he opened one anyways. If you noticed, I didn't send it instantly after he opened the accusation either. Please do not be like the OP here and jump to crazy conclusions like these.
I am not a PayPal scammer, if I am, prove it? My account is not hacked, if it is, prove it? There are absolutely no red flags. You are jumping a long way into these conclusions. I can call a trusted exchanger such as "sardasa" a PayPal scammer because he is able to chargeback at a later date. I can call a random member "hacked" and leave him a negative trust until he signs a message. But is that what anyone in their right mind does? Absolutely not. It's completely unfair to call me any names without a single piece of evidence. I am honestly shocked to see a member like myself have orange trust, it really is shocking that someone so respectable would do such a thing.
Sign that freaking message or another red tag from me.
Your red tag means nothing, you come on here every day to give red tags that do nothing. Wonder why you're trying to police the forum when you don't get paid, or even give insightful comments.
Re: Lauda and hilariousandco -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)
IP logs mean nothing now, and the only thing that matters is that you posted an address a long time ago, and that you still have control?
Yes.What kind of logic is this?
Re: Lauda and hilariousandco -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)
Anyone seeing how cocky and ignorant Lauda is? IP logs mean nothing now, and the only thing that matters is that you posted an address a long time ago, and that you still have control? It's a "fallacy" to think that Bitcoin is the only way to prove a FORUM account.
Re: Lauda and hilariousandco -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)
In cases like these, it is upon the accused to provide proof (which you have failed). Let me simplify why:
Okay, you are an African, black female girl. Provide proof you are not. No, it is never upon the accused to provide proof. Is that how court works? No, so why would it work like that here.
This does nothing. Them not leaving you a rating won't make me remove mine.
No, it will do something.
IP logs are not concrete proof of anything.
I'm pretty sure IP logs can show if the hacker logged in from a remote location or not, right? Or the only way to prove it was hacked is to "sign a message", am I right? Sign a message this, sign a message that. If you can't, you're hacked.
- Lauda 2017
You just called the second highest ranking staff member an "imbecile" and ask for lower ranking staff members to decide. I can see that intelligence is not your strong suite. 
If someone is ignorant enough to leave a negative trust without any proof, they surely are an "imbecile". Funny enough, there is actually proof for me to call you guys imbeciles, but there is no proof for you to call me anything.
Re: Lauda and hilariousandco -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)
Do you really think that we have been born yesterday?
The deal:
A trusted member, outside of this situation, who is on DT (e.g. monbux, Stunna, etc.) please message staff for the sake of justice. Ask staff if the IP for the logins made in 2015, and the logins made earlier this year match.
If they do: Lauda and hilariousandco agree to ask Hostfat and Blazed to be removed off of DT.
If they do not: my red trust sticks, and the rest of the community is free to leave me loads more of negative trust
Is this not fair?
Already *decided* by philipma1957. A trusted member, outside of this situation, who is on DT (e.g. monbux, Stunna, etc.) please message staff for the sake of justice. Ask staff if the IP for the logins made in 2015, and the logins made earlier this year match.
If they do: Lauda and hilariousandco agree to ask Hostfat and Blazed to be removed off of DT.
If they do not: my red trust sticks, and the rest of the community is free to leave me loads more of negative trust
Is this not fair?
Even if I do not have my trust restored as it should, users will continually be abused by fake assumptions, especially by Lauda. I think it's time for him to go.
You are a special little snowflake, aren't you? This post has not:
- Proved yourself innocent
- Proved myself guilty
- Added any information that might help
- Made anyone laugh
You replied for the sake of replying. Why not use your brain, and not your ass, and maybe do one of the above?
Re: Lauda and hilariousandco -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)
So you come back to the forum and this is what you do:
-Change your email address
-Possibly scam someone for 0.1BTC
-Change the style in which you write
-Insult people for believing that your account is hacked
I don't think you'll be winning any medals for "trustworthiness".
-Change your email address
-Possibly scam someone for 0.1BTC
-Change the style in which you write
-Insult people for believing that your account is hacked
I don't think you'll be winning any medals for "trustworthiness".
- Change your e-mail address months after the alleged "hack" happened
- Didn't scam anyone for 0.1 BTC
- Didn't change any style in writing
- Tell the truth about issues that must be given attention
Even if I do not have my trust restored as it should, users will continually be abused by fake assumptions, especially by Lauda. I think it's time for him to go.
Lauda and hilariousandco -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)
I would like to report two massive trust abusers: Lauda and hilariousandco
To keep things short, the two have left me negative trust that is fully based on this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1950334.0
I have messaged the two, however they seem very ignorant to the fact that they have made a very large assumption with no evidence when leaving me this red trust. They claim my account is hacked, when clearly it has not been.
The deal:
A trusted member, outside of this situation, who is on DT (e.g. monbux, Stunna, etc.) please message staff for the sake of justice. Ask staff if the IP for the logins made in 2015, and the logins made earlier this year match.
If they do: Lauda and hilariousandco agree to ask Hostfat and Blazed to be removed off of DT.
If they do not: my red trust sticks, and the rest of the community is free to leave me loads more of negative trust
Is this not fair?
I am not worried about philipma's change from green to red, as he has simply updating his trust to follow Lauda and hilariousandco's assumption. It's about time that corruption in the trust system stops being addressed, and action is taken. Please look at Lauda's post:
And hilariousandco's:
Am I hacked, or not? Let staff with proof decide, not two imbecile's running around jumping to assumptions and screwing over people's reputation for their own happiness.
To keep things short, the two have left me negative trust that is fully based on this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1950334.0
I have messaged the two, however they seem very ignorant to the fact that they have made a very large assumption with no evidence when leaving me this red trust. They claim my account is hacked, when clearly it has not been.
The deal:
A trusted member, outside of this situation, who is on DT (e.g. monbux, Stunna, etc.) please message staff for the sake of justice. Ask staff if the IP for the logins made in 2015, and the logins made earlier this year match.
If they do: Lauda and hilariousandco agree to ask Hostfat and Blazed to be removed off of DT.
If they do not: my red trust sticks, and the rest of the community is free to leave me loads more of negative trust
Is this not fair?
I am not worried about philipma's change from green to red, as he has simply updating his trust to follow Lauda and hilariousandco's assumption. It's about time that corruption in the trust system stops being addressed, and action is taken. Please look at Lauda's post:
I am almost 100% positive that this account is compromised. Unless proven otherwise, I will not be removing my rating (regardless of the validity of this accusation). Do not PM me again unless you have conclusive proof of being the same user as the one in 2014.
And hilariousandco's:
There's quite enough evidence against you to arouse suspicion. The fact that you haven't posted since 2015 and then come back trying to do trades straight away and can't prove the account is yours is good enough for the feedback as a warning. If you can prove otherwise then people will remove the feedback but it really doesn't look good for you.
Am I hacked, or not? Let staff with proof decide, not two imbecile's running around jumping to assumptions and screwing over people's reputation for their own happiness.
I am almost 100% positive that this account is compromised. Unless proven otherwise, I will not be removing my rating (regardless of the validity of this accusation). Do not PM me again unless you have conclusive proof of being the same user as the one in 2014.
This is a complete joke.
I will be opening a thread shortly. How can you be almost 100% positive, with absolutely zero evidence?
Lauda, corrupting the user-base like a poison, user by user.There's quite enough evidence against you to arouse suspicion. The fact that you haven't posted since 2015 and then come back trying to do trades straight away and can't prove the account is yours is good enough for the feedback as a warning. If you can prove otherwise then people will remove the feedback but it really doesn't look good for you.
You have an address posted here:
Hope this helps! If this works for you, I would gladly accept a belated Christmas present from you.
1vYG6NVr9nGqqyRL78jQXKLHqPcVX5NKSCan you sign a message from it?
That address is not a part of my wallet it must have been a single-off deposit address for a website
I am almost 100% positive that this account is compromised. Unless proven otherwise, I will not be removing my rating (regardless of the validity of this accusation). Do not PM me again unless you have conclusive proof of being the same user as the one in 2014.
This is a complete joke.
I will be opening a thread shortly. How can you be almost 100% positive, with absolutely zero evidence?
Lauda, corrupting the user-base like a poison, user by user.I was sent the 0.2 Bitcoin first, without escrow. What kind of scammer would send the PayPal, when they have already received the BTC? I returned 0.5 BTC to a user after a trade failed to go through as well, and these amounts are among the smaller amounts I've been trusted with.
One that is wanting to scam more via the same methods or do a chargeback at a later date which you have plenty of time to initiate. You also only sent it after he opened a scam accusation against you. There's enough red flags here for me to warrant the negative feedback but I'll happily remove it if you can provide reasonable proof that this is your account, but it looks to me like it very likely isn't.
No, I did not send it because he opened a scam accusation. I was PM'ing him before that saying I was on my way home, but he opened one anyways. If you noticed, I didn't send it instantly after he opened the accusation either. Please do not be like the OP here and jump to crazy conclusions like these.
I am not a PayPal scammer, if I am, prove it? My account is not hacked, if it is, prove it? There are absolutely no red flags. You are jumping a long way into these conclusions. I can call a trusted exchanger such as "sardasa" a PayPal scammer because he is able to chargeback at a later date. I can call a random member "hacked" and leave him a negative trust until he signs a message. But is that what anyone in their right mind does? Absolutely not. It's completely unfair to call me any names without a single piece of evidence. I am honestly shocked to see a member like myself have orange trust, it really is shocking that someone so respectable would do such a thing.
Post proof or this story is total bullshit. Got it? You can come in here slinging mud without facts. I don't believe you and no one else should either without proof.
hilariousandco has left me negative trust over this, which is surprising. I would not have thought such a member would fall for this thread. A scam accusation does not make anyone a scammer, it is simply an accusation. And this is the dumbest accusation I've ever seen, which makes me wonder how someone could leave a negative trust over this. I did not steal anything, I am always an honest trader.
There's a strong possibility that your account is hacked or looks to be that way. You have no posts from November 04, 2015 until 2017. You could still very likely scam via Paypal as well. Can you provide any reasonable proof that this account belongs to you? Can you sign a message from an address associated with it?
This is no reason to leave a negative trust, I estimate around ~50% of active users cannot sign a message. This account has always been completely under my control. It's *possible* that I can chargeback the PayPal, that my account is hacked, or that I created Bitcoin. But a possibility, especially not a high possibility at all, is not any fair reason from my view.
I was sent the 0.2 Bitcoin first, without escrow. What kind of scammer would send the PayPal, when they have already received the BTC? I returned 0.5 BTC to a user after a trade failed to go through as well, and these amounts are among the smaller amounts I've been trusted with. If any action should be done, the poster of this thread should receive a tag for making such an unstrustworthy claim, which actually turned out to ruin my name....
Post proof or this story is total bullshit. Got it? You can come in here slinging mud without facts. I don't believe you and no one else should either without proof.
hilariousandco has left me negative trust over this, which is surprising. I would not have thought such a member would fall for this thread. A scam accusation does not make anyone a scammer, it is simply an accusation. And this is the dumbest accusation I've ever seen, which makes me wonder how someone could leave a negative trust over this. I did not steal anything, I am always an honest trader.
https://gyazo.com/e32bee3de38415263b98ecc61e785b3d
Added me, and never sent me a single bit of information that could be used to steal his money. He never sent me a wallet file, any backups, or anything. This is ridiculous. If anyone believes this guy, I will honestly be in awe of stupidity. Why would I scam, when I was just trusted with 0.2 BTC in an exchange last night, and 0.5 BTC yesterday. Of course I paid up. You really think I stole your 0.1? This has got to be the worst assumption I've ever seen.
Added me, and never sent me a single bit of information that could be used to steal his money. He never sent me a wallet file, any backups, or anything. This is ridiculous. If anyone believes this guy, I will honestly be in awe of stupidity. Why would I scam, when I was just trusted with 0.2 BTC in an exchange last night, and 0.5 BTC yesterday. Of course I paid up. You really think I stole your 0.1? This has got to be the worst assumption I've ever seen.
I've got a thread up about buying 1.2 BTC, many offers from Jr members and newbies and users with dodgy trust ratings. And no more responses after speaking of escrow or middle man. A lot of scammers lurking around, that's for sure.
Can't really trust anyone, mb senior members with recent positive feedback. ALWAYS BETTER SAFE THEN SORRY!
I wouldn't even trust senior members. Ranking means nothing, really, because accounts are bought and sold all the time and it's unfortunate. Hopefully OP didn't get scammed here. Looks like the guy paid him.Can't really trust anyone, mb senior members with recent positive feedback. ALWAYS BETTER SAFE THEN SORRY!
Yeah I did haha, this gameristo guy just freaked out and started shit-posting about me... I won't leave him a negative rating but if I see him keep this up, I definitely will in the future.
