Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 51 results by mega22
So we have ASIC friendly kaspa, gpu friendly karlsen, and cpu friendly Spectre. I am just not sure where copy cat pyrin fits in. Indutsry veterans and influencers have started calling pyrin a scam.
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
you just jump on every accusation
What did Pyrin take from Karlsen? Besides, Pyrin is not called a scam -> you are lying again and distorting every statement
sick boy
Hahahaha.. What happened to your pet project you motherfucking piece of shit? How much did you make by robbing thousands of investors?
Pyrine discord has been deleted. Pyrine wake is being held at :
https://discord.gg/WqJ9QrbS
STOP THE STEAL!! STOP THE STEAL!!
https://x.com/DesheShai/status/1829467850702008538
Shai totally destroyed the incompetent and malicious pyrin "devs".
https://x.com/DesheShai/status/1829467850702008538
Shai totally destroyed the incompetent and malicious pyrin "devs".
So we have ASIC friendly kaspa, gpu friendly karlsen, and cpu friendly Spectre. I am just not sure where copy cat pyrin fits in. Indutsry veterans and influencers have started calling pyrin a scam.
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
Wen rug-pull?
gg ! project dead
It was pretty much dead after their first failed hard fork last year, but dumb culties and some smart marketing has kept it alive.
The devs copied Kaspa's 10bps code, and rolled it into production without testing. The 10bps chain is halted, people are mining and dumping on the old 1bps chain. Uyrin chillers need to hire competent devs.
DAA score = blue score + redblocks
Blue score = number of blue blocks
Spectre:
"virtualDaaScore": "3076607"
"blueScore": 3057922
3076607-260890=18.685 -> 0.607% redblocks
Karlsen:
"virtualDaaScore": "18242249"
"blueScore": 18179490
18242249-18179490=62.759 -> 0.344% redblocks
Pyrin:
"virtualDaaScore": "16615358"
"blueScore": "15094915"
16615358-15094915=1.520.443 -> 9.15% redblocks
Blue blocks are part of the main chain, while red blocks are not directly included in the main chain and are often referred to as 'orphans' or 'uncles'. Why does yrin sucks at every thing? They can't even ape properly
Blue score = number of blue blocks
Spectre:
"virtualDaaScore": "3076607"
"blueScore": 3057922
3076607-260890=18.685 -> 0.607% redblocks
Karlsen:
"virtualDaaScore": "18242249"
"blueScore": 18179490
18242249-18179490=62.759 -> 0.344% redblocks
Pyrin:
"virtualDaaScore": "16615358"
"blueScore": "15094915"
16615358-15094915=1.520.443 -> 9.15% redblocks
Blue blocks are part of the main chain, while red blocks are not directly included in the main chain and are often referred to as 'orphans' or 'uncles'. Why does yrin sucks at every thing? They can't even ape properly
So we have ASIC friendly kaspa, gpu friendly karlsen, and cpu friendly Spectre. I am just not sure where copy cat pyrin fits in. Indutsry veterans and influencers have started calling pyrin a scam.
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
It's unbelievable how lost you are right now. Where do you get the information for your accusations? Anyone who watches the cryptospace (especially the Kaspa forks) knows full well that Pyrin is where most of the FUD is spread. Why? I think because he's the only one to be taken seriously and you just have a problem with that. That's why you're spreading lies and lies again and you can't handle it.
I really have a problem with dishonest people, and pyrin is anything but honest. They stole the Kaspa Rust code and call it as their invention. They copied the KarlsenHash, changed one step and called it pyrinhash. Other than the web design is there any innovation? Probably website design is also stolen from somewhere. They wholesale banned people for bringing up ASICS. Why?
Dear Pyrin community members and investors,
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
the hard fork was decided by the community. you can read more details about it here.
https://medium.com/pyrin/pyrin-grows-and-expands-3e1183106afe
as far as I know, people only get banned for spreading FUD, there are no consequences for normal discussion.
LOL. It was decided by the bots. Pyrin devs have hundreds of alt accounts which they use to spread fud about the other forks Just ask the two retards -- TheCold and The Pacman-85.
Dear Pyrin community members and investors,
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
While I agree with your conclusion, I do not agree with all your reasons. Pyrin is not a fair launch project devs have mined close to two weeks of supply using better GPU miners and ASICs. It looks like they were successfull in dumping all the premine, and looking for one last hurray before a rug pull.
They are currently working on SC, but you can't understand that. You don't have the horizon for that, keep trolling around here and feel good.
By "working" you mean twiddling their thumbs, waiting for Kaspa to release SC on their testnet? When will Yrin do anything original? Oh wait, rug pull will be original for a kaspa fork.
We are excited to present the first of three parts of the #Pyrin #Whitepaper series.
https://pyrin.network/whitepapers
1️⃣ WP #Structure
2️⃣ WP #SmartContracts
3️⃣ WP #PAIW
https://pyrin.network/whitepapers
1️⃣ WP #Structure
2️⃣ WP #SmartContracts
3️⃣ WP #PAIW
I am happy for you that Yrin has finally accepted they stole the Rust code from Kaspa. At the same time I am disappointed that Urin WP doesn't mention that the rest if their code is a copy of Kaspa, and the Blake3 algo for Kaspa fork is copied from Karlsen. Their devs are so bad as copying that instead of replacing KaspaD with PyrinD, they replaced KAS by PYI to come up with the dumb pyipad name for their daemon.
Crypto is full of cheats and thieves, and Yrin is continuing that tradition. Are you guys planning to steal the SC code from Kaspa, or Karlsen? TheCold is the dumbest and most unhinged poster on pyrin discord. I was surprised why he was not kicked out by the mods. It's clear he is the alt profile of Urine dev. Why would a dev feel the need to create an alt profile? Yrin devs are shady fucks!
you must be really bitter for spreading lies here all the time. A fork is not theft. How many more pages do you want to bother us with your garbage? Don't you have a real life?
I have never met a more retarded and toxic person in my life than you, you may be the biggest son of a bitch liar in the history of the world. Keep messing with Pyrin, you're going to cry, you disgraceful karlsen dog.
Have you looked at a mirror? What is pyrin offering that's not already covered? It's a copy fork of Kaspa which has copied the blake3 implementation from Karlsen. Why do we another pissing fork? Funny you named it rymming with piss.
Get ready for the price dump, superscalar is releasing pyrin algo for their ASICS/FPGAs on April 4th. My sources are telling me that the cost to mine one pyrin will be less than a cent with the superscalar algos. Expect the devs to dump their pre-mined bags before the release. PYI is down 10% after the news.
https://superscalar.org/pyrin-pyi/
https://superscalar.org/pyrin-pyi/
Beware of Superscalar.org! After thorough investigation, it's evident that this site is a scam. Here's the proof:
The screenshot provided shows the original site as superscalar.io, not .org. This indicates potential foul play or an attempt to mislead users. Superscalar.org claims to offer ASICs for mining Pyrin.
!!!However, Pyrin is fully ASIC-resistant!!!
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/04/05/Voww3.md.jpeg
This fake news caused a big impact in the Pyrin price policy. As we can see in the following screenshot the price began to fall and reached his lowest point on 4th of April. The date when ASICS should start their work. Than when there were no ASIC hashrate impact, the price began to recover again in the following days.
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/04/05/VonRa.jpeg
Yeh, superscalar.org is a bit dodgy, and I am not sure what to make of it. But, I heard about it from the yrin devs/fanboys shilling it on Karlsen discord back in December '23.
Well, blake3 is not FPGA resistant, and until the latest price run-up no one ever gave a shit about implementing bitstream for pyrin. Well, that's about to end.
https://i.ibb.co/zFg0mTh/Shitting-Urine.jpg
It will be interesting to see what pyrin devs will do to dodge the FPGA bullet. If history is any judge they clearly do not know how to implement hard fork.
We are excited to present the first of three parts of the #Pyrin #Whitepaper series.
https://pyrin.network/whitepapers
1️⃣ WP #Structure
2️⃣ WP #SmartContracts
3️⃣ WP #PAIW
https://pyrin.network/whitepapers
1️⃣ WP #Structure
2️⃣ WP #SmartContracts
3️⃣ WP #PAIW
I am happy for you that Yrin has finally accepted they stole the Rust code from Kaspa. At the same time I am disappointed that Pyrin WP doesn't mention that the rest if their code is a copy of Kaspa, and the Blake3 algo for Kaspa fork is copied from Karlsen. Their devs are so bad as copying that instead of replacing KaspaD with PyrinD, they replaced KAS by PYI to come up with the dumb pyipad name for their daemon.
Crypto is full of cheats and thieves, and Yrin is continuing that tradition. Are you guys planning to steal the SC code from Kaspa, or Karlsen? Pyrin, a new coin with its own special algorithm! It's resistant to ASIC mining hardware and super affordable right now. More miners are starting to notice, which could make its price shoot up. There is a decrease in the block reward soon, same as for example in the Bitcoin-halving. On Pyrin this will cause a big effect because of the low liquidity. Trust, miners will not sell cheap when the miner reward goes from 17 PYI per block to 14 PYI per block. Plus, Pyrin will soon support smart contracts and let people create their own tokens on its blockchain! Even though miner rewards are low right now, I think Pyrin has the most potential out of all the coins you can mine. This could be a upcoming sensation.
Well you don't know until it happens. Devs released the uyrin with an ASIC friendly algo, ooopsy! Then they claimed that the reward reduction would happen in Dec. '23 , oopsy! Now FPGA's are getting ready to dump, oopsy!
https://i.ibb.co/0B1qHd2/Urine-Fuck-Up.jpg
Shut up, idiot. You've been proven to have lied so many times and you're still talking shamelessly.
What lies dude? Are you saying Yrine token wasn't restarted after dev mined millions using ASICs? You are a lier , and a fucking retarded lier
Dude were you born retard and your mother dropped you head first as a baby? Or you are the scammer behind the scam coin pyrin?
Urine stupid devs released the webwallet disguised as a desktop wallet.
Q - And what type of retard names a crypto token after a protein responsible for inflammation?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698799/
A - TheCold
Urine stupid devs released the webwallet disguised as a desktop wallet.
Q - And what type of retard names a crypto token after a protein responsible for inflammation?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698799/
A - TheCold