Thanks for the suggestion. Sorry for the confusion, point 3 and point 4 was meant as alternatives. In the past, some would trade 1 coupon without escrow, which is point 3. Flexibility. Also to be clear, coupon expires 31st March 2019.
USD340 x 17 pcs -for sale USD34 per coupon USD250 x 17 pcs -for sale USD25 per coupon USD160 x 17 pcs -for sale USD16 per coupon USD65 x 17 pcs -for sale USD5 per coupon
For sales for BTC only.
Notes: 1. For Bitmain coupon, coupon value can be used for max 50% of miner value. (e.g. using USD340 coupon for S9 priced at USD312 does not make the miner free). 2. For exchange with value in BTC only. 3. I accept 50% of payment->I transfer coupons->50% complete payment if there are worries. 4. Escrow strongly encouraged. 5. You must existing Bitmain account to receive coupons.
I have a couple of USD55 coupons that can be donated. PM me. On the other hand, if anyone could spare >100 USD coupon, 2 pcs. PM to donate to me. Thanks.
300 PH! Is this a failover or big miner coming over?
Post
Topic
BoardDigital goods
Re: WTB Bitmain $420 coupon
by
mercurye
on 31/08/2018, 03:17:02 UTC
Not everytime there are USD420 available. You cannot use a coupon beyond 50% of the miner price. e.g. in order to fully utilize the USD420 coupon, the miner should be above USD840. What this means is that if you think you can purchase a S9 (USD499), you would not be able to use the coupon. You cannot expect to pay USD79 for the S9.
I am selling genuine coupons USD55 which I have had successful transactions. A lot of other high value coupons, are something you need to double check on the authenticity.
Block! from 1FX Welcome to the acclaim board and the giveaway board That's a 0.5 BTC bonus for 1FX since he's ramped up to above 5PH and below 9.5PH for that block
That transaction "Congestion" was completely manufactured to create urgency and panic. Supply and demand works great, just let it.
Not surprised; generally wanting to know:
Was that by purposefully disregarding transactions, or purposefully flooding the network with transactions to create "fake demand"?
First "fake news"; now "fake demand"! It never ends!!!
It was transaction flooding. The intention was to create a fake congestion, not fake demand. Anyhow, I believe the system should be enabled to handle higher traffic.
Even at 8MB, the 100+ MB mempool at peak congestion fould be cleared in 2 hours. Then we are back to sub 1MB blocks.
Anti big blockers tend to calculate the full blocks for years on end, which artificially inflates the whole block chain size.
Thanks for clarifying. I guess nothing is moving forward on the bigger block solution for the time being. Until the next Great Congestion in the bull run up.
Will you be able to build consensus on the bigger block since it is a minor code change. Fingers crossed.
What is the reason the mempool is not cleared even when blocks are not full?
2 reasons: 1) some pools ignore lotsa transactions or worse, produce empty blocks on every network block change 2) segwit was a scam - it's aim was to centralise bitcoin with centrally controlled lightning networks it didn't resolve the block size problem as can CLEARLY be seen early in the year
1. Is it in the code to ignore transactions? Cause it is happening to all major pools which I dont see blocks utilizing all the space.
2. In your opinion, What is the next solution apart from Segwit and Lightning? Since big blocks are out of the question?