I'd love to see some sort of timeline for when the wallet will get done. Even if it's subjective, it would be nice to just have a general idea. It would give people who havent been following the thread more reason to be interested in the coin/community.
Also one of the biggest problems for me is consolidating coins in coin control because you can only send about 67 blocks at a time due to the large transaction size. Which as Grafschmidt mentioned might create problems with trading.
As has suggested beforehand ...
The new wallet will NOT happen unless the OZC CodeBase and new wallet is completed first. This is due to a number of factors, but the main being that OZC is the 'experimental' Coin that has the more recent CodeBase, and will also have the new Algo as well. This means that the CodeBase that OZC is completed with, will be the template CodeBase for all the coins we have under our development wing.
As for the consolidation - it is necessary due to the high volume of blocks, transactions and fragmentation of the transactions within the wallet/database. The best way to do this is to send coins to an internal wallet address, starting at a small number of coins (to consolidate a number of transactions) and keep increasing the number of the coins sent to that same address until ALL the coins in the wallet can be sent to that same internal wallet address. Obviously if you know how to use the coin control feature, then you need to use the smaller number of blocks and defragment the transactions within the wallet that way, so that the wallet can access the coins easier with less blocks to consolidate per transaction. This unfortunately restarts the Coin Age (back to zero), and Coin Weight (increases weight), which is never a bad thing when staking.
This should be resolved in the new CodeBase (which currently is based on the BTC 0.17.1.0 Code).
#crysx
Thanks for the reply, most of this I've already read about and I understand that OZC will be first. However it still would be nice to have some sort of timeline on any development being made (on OZC) that way we can have a general idea of whats going on. I understand the process is slow and you all are working. I've seen the daily posts on the discord channel and I appreciate the work/consistency, but maybe some more in depth updates are necessary to start building a community around the coin and the other coins that you'll transfer the codebase to. It's probably more marketing than anything but I think it could help with future growth!
And I've done what you're saying I just wanted to mention the issues with consolidation due to the coin being listed soon, not sure if it will have a major effect or not.