Hi everyone,

A miner that we're using shows a hash rate of 370 MH/s, but the pool shows only 200-300 MH/s. Is it possible that pool takes so much as a fee?

We're mining on miningpool.shop

Anything can be profitable. Even dirt. In theory, you need only 2 traders for a good to have some value - one of them is holding the good, and the other one is asking for it based on who-knows-why. If you don't belive me, just watch the movie Indecent Proposal (1993), and you'll see that everything has a price   Signatum will have a value until there are traders that want to buy it, regardless of whether Signatum is a clonecoin or not. I know that I don't want to hold a coin that does not bring anything new, it's far too risky, and the potential benefit does not justify the risk.

I'm not a professional trader, but I have to agree with cryptodevil. Everything that he/she says makes perfect sense. Does this mean that he/she is right? Absolutely not, but there is a very high chance that he/she is, and everyone should be careful with its investment.

It is very hard to tell whether Signatum developers are behind this or not, but there is a dozen of "little things" that don't go in favor of Signatum. I don't think that Signatum will crash in the next few days, at least not while "big holders" don't dump their Signatum coins little-by-little. But, this is not a coin for a long-term investment. Money can still be made out of this, I earned more than 35% on trading, but one should be smart enough to decide when to completely get out of this coin.

As for fake volume on YoBit, anyone can see how these trading bots operate. But this was not happening on Cryptopia, so my guess is that this has something to do with YoBit traders, and not with the developers.

I really have to say that what cryptodevil and MarcusDe are proclaiming could be true. I'm not saying it is true, but it makes sense. None of the developers have answered properly to issues posted here.

I've seen the Doc's reply on Discord on recent FUD:


However, this doesn't answer to many of the problems stated here. For example, "ASIC resistant" algorithm that is practically useless for POS phase, or the fact that some of the blocks were premined at very low difficulty. As an investor, I would like to see a detailed response by developers. It is their job to convince investors that they're doing something great. And please don't say that they're doing this for the community. They're not, and I'm OK with it. No one should work for free!

Another very interesting thing is that most of the users that are promoting SIGT have very low activity. I'm not saying that all of them are bots, but it is an indicator that something weird is going on. Especially considering that these users have bombed this thread from the very beginning, and that was claimed to be one of the pros for the SIGT - a big and healthy community.

As for "exposing cryptodevil for Ponzi scheme", please stop doing that, because anyone could see that he has practically exposed the cryptodevil.com and cryptodevil.net Ponzi scheme. Anyone interested in details, please see his post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1579412.msg15858939#msg15858939

The OP in that thread has stated that he/she has chosen that domain name because, and I quote, "this is called smart advertising because cryptodevil is involved in HYIP, Bitcoin, bitcointalk and many other keywords that make cryptodevil.net more visibile on search engines". For more details please see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1579412.msg15860287#msg15860287

I really hope that this is not another scam coin, and I hope that developers will prove cryptodevil wrong. But for now, I've suggested all my friends to get out of this coin while the price is above 1000 sat.

Peace.

There are around 10M coins in a limbo, sent from pools to Cryptopia.

My bet is that the price will drop significantly once they fix the wallet.

I currently have a buy order at around 750 sat, but my guess is that it will drop below 600, as it takes only 3.5 BTC (around 500k SIGT) to do just that.

It will never be like Monero for a simple reason - circulating supply is 10x compared to Monero's supply.

It would be great if SIGT reaches 5-10 $ in few years time. That would be awesome.

Let's hold and see 

Can we expect a major price drop once wallet has been fixed at Cryptopia? 

Download Authy mobile application, and register on https://authy.com/

Is web wallet now fully functional? Can I transfer my SIGT there without any concerns? 

You should look at the USD/SIGT price, which is more or less stable at 0.05 $.

BTC/USD is rapidly rising (over 4702 $/BTC at the moment), I don't expect for SIGT/BTC to rise that fast.

As I've predicted, SIGT went well below 1100 sat/SIGT.

Unfortunately, I didn't have balls to wait, I bought at 1101.

It's not a "subtle FUD". I like the project, and I'm keeping my SIGT, no matter what.

If you are a miner, and your only interest is to sell SIGT as soon as you mine, you can sell at lower BTC/SIGT price, since USD/BTC is high enough.

I went through past several weeks, and it does not seem that BTC/SIGT price correlates with USD/BTC price.

I don't expect that SIGT will rise while USD/BTC is rising. I expect SIGT to fall below 1100 sat.

P.S. This is not FUD, I like SIGT project 

Anyone mining with Gtx 650 Ti? I get only around 2 MH/s, is this normal?

It seems so. 

Just before first halving, the price went up to 5000 sat. Is this a general rule, or there is no rule at all when it comes to halving and price?

Until when SIGT is going to be mined? Until block 100.000 has been found? If this is true, this could take months, since we're at block 49108 at the moment.

Is there going to be next halving? Where can I find more information about this?

Thanks!

What can we expect with SIGT in short term? Can we expect for price to drop below 1000 satoshi or even more?