Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 228 results by mikelsmith2020
Adkinsbet are a big liars!
They are back and now they opened new self moderated topic with their new hired account mikelsmith2020 who never before has done something similar.
This is their new topic and they started to use other shill accounts to post there:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5322032.0
Topic should be deleted by moderators because it is duplicate of their original locked topic.
They clearly tried to avoid showing negative trust in this way with some disclaimer and deleting any comments they dont like.
Should red flag be created for this or negative feedback given?
They are back and now they opened new self moderated topic with their new hired account mikelsmith2020 who never before has done something similar.
This is their new topic and they started to use other shill accounts to post there:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5322032.0
Topic should be deleted by moderators because it is duplicate of their original locked topic.
They clearly tried to avoid showing negative trust in this way with some disclaimer and deleting any comments they dont like.
Quote
(3 posts by 1 user deleted.)
Should red flag be created for this or negative feedback given?
I've been handling bounty campaign, it's I don't know what are you talking about I've stated on my design that I am no related to the Adkins Interactive Group N.V. and they me to create design and post it.
🏆⚽| Adkinsbet.com | Sportsbook | In-Play | Powered by Betradar | ⚽🏆
⭐ Merited by wildan88 (20) ,BitcoinAccepted (20) ,gadado (10) ,nasipadang (10) ,yayayo (7) ,Cacingkemi (6) ,BlackFor3st (6) ,qory (3) ,BTCGOLD (2) ,coin.princess (1)
Hi everyone! I am looking for a mailing list and/or SMS database, all should be gambling or cryptocurrency related.
Please let me know, either drop your telegram address here or contact me in Personal Message.
Thank you.
Please let me know, either drop your telegram address here or contact me in Personal Message.
Thank you.
It does take a bit of trust to be among the first to install a new release, but you can also verify for yourself that the download is safe.
First and foremost, you should learn how to verify the download using ThomasV's PGP signature. This will ensure that you've downloaded the official version signed by the developer. Even if Electrum's website gets hacked, and the download link is directed to a malicious version, this will mitigate your risks. Here's a tutorial I wrote: [GUIDE] How to Safely Download and Verify Electrum [Guide].
If you still don't trust the binary releases, you can always take some time to verify the code hasn't been manipulated with nefarious intent. If you go the Electrum repository, you can browse through the changes made in real time. You can confirm for yourself that only the changes published in the release notes are implemented into the code.
And if you're still doubtful about the binary releases, you can even run electrum right from the source code. It's fairly easy if you're running Linux and have all the python dependencies installed (which you probably do if it's a recently released OS.)
Electrum's github.com repository: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum
Electrum's Release Notes (change-logs): https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES
Electrum's previous releases: https://download.electrum.org/
First and foremost, you should learn how to verify the download using ThomasV's PGP signature. This will ensure that you've downloaded the official version signed by the developer. Even if Electrum's website gets hacked, and the download link is directed to a malicious version, this will mitigate your risks. Here's a tutorial I wrote: [GUIDE] How to Safely Download and Verify Electrum [Guide].
If you still don't trust the binary releases, you can always take some time to verify the code hasn't been manipulated with nefarious intent. If you go the Electrum repository, you can browse through the changes made in real time. You can confirm for yourself that only the changes published in the release notes are implemented into the code.
And if you're still doubtful about the binary releases, you can even run electrum right from the source code. It's fairly easy if you're running Linux and have all the python dependencies installed (which you probably do if it's a recently released OS.)
Electrum's github.com repository: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum
Electrum's Release Notes (change-logs): https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES
Electrum's previous releases: https://download.electrum.org/
Yes it's true usually I look here for some users to create new topic about new electrum release and I'm afraid about the new version even if I can verify it. By the way it seems good I've been using it now for hours. I'll lock this thread now.
You are right, those warnings in different colors are flag related. If creator of the thread has Type 1 flag active against him, there will "yellow" warning and in case of Type 2 and 3 flags there will be a "red" warning.
In order for Flag Type 1 flag to become active it needs support of at least 1 DT2 member, wholesale forums flags Type 2 and 3 support of DT1 members is needed.
In order for Flag Type 1 flag to become active it needs support of at least 1 DT2 member, wholesale forums flags Type 2 and 3 support of DT1 members is needed.
What do you mean by wholesale forums flags Type 2?
No for me it does not affect my game play. I've been betting in sports betting since them and my minimum bet stays in 1.5 mBTC when the time Bitcoin crashes still my bet is still 1.5 mBTC so I don't think the price would affect my gameplay after all.
# Release 4.0.4 - (Oct 15, 2020)
* new feature: "Cancel tx" (#6641). The Qt/kivy GUI allows cancelling
an unconfirmed RBF tx by double-spending its inputs to self.
* new feature: "Cancel tx" (#6641). The Qt/kivy GUI allows cancelling
an unconfirmed RBF tx by double-spending its inputs to self.
I haven't update to Electrum 4.0.4 yet, but hopefully there's short explanation about it or some people will assume Bitcoin transaction could be canceled.
Is it safe to update it to 4.0.4?
So far no one reported bug on Electrum version 4.0.4, so it should be safe as long as you update it correctly (download from official and verify it's signature).
Alright thanks!
Re: The server returned an error when broadcasting the transaction.
Thank you everyone for your answers, I think it's just about my slow internet connection but I've seen that it synchronized immediately and I also tried using different servers and I let it pass a day and now it works. Thank you everyone I'm going to lock this topic now.
The server returned an error when broadcasting the transaction.
Hi everyone I am experiencing this when i'm going to do with the transaction with my electrum wallet do you know how to fix this? My electrum is up to date by the way.
Quote
The server returned an error when broadcasting the transaction.
Consider trying to connect to a different server, or updating Electrum.
Unknown error
Consider trying to connect to a different server, or updating Electrum.
Unknown error
Thank you so much for your replies I appreciated all your suggestions I think I should wait for Black Friday or maybe if I can manage to save some I should by a Nano Ledger S. I think I've read things that I needed to know I will now lock this thread.