Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 381 results by mkimid
This exchange is acting as scam !!!
My account has been frozen also..
There is not specious access, just access using my computer and my phone...
I wanna leave this scam exchange as soon as possible ...
My account has been frozen also..
There is not specious access, just access using my computer and my phone...
I wanna leave this scam exchange as soon as possible ...
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
I have tried to sync, but,
I feel as it shows an error even the first block, and fail to sync, How I can pass it ?
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Info] Distinct operation block found! My:Block:0 Timestamp:1485450859 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:0B6776314AF7907A013A7C08E6E40C65317004F1773A307C939022CAC0BE34D0 remote:Block:0 Timestamp:1470934813 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000003A29C32E84A539ADE24397D41D30116A6FAFEC17B7D9CED68A4238C92 Errors: Invalid target found:19000000 actual:19000003
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Error] Received a distinct block, finalizing: Block:1 Timestamp:1470935312 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000009C81199431ACCC786CE5A1DDAA7381DC55261E56E096AA2B8389502F4 (My block: Block:0 Timestamp:0 Reward:0 Fee:0 PoW:)
I feel as it shows an error even the first block, and fail to sync, How I can pass it ?
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Info] Distinct operation block found! My:Block:0 Timestamp:1485450859 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:0B6776314AF7907A013A7C08E6E40C65317004F1773A307C939022CAC0BE34D0 remote:Block:0 Timestamp:1470934813 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000003A29C32E84A539ADE24397D41D30116A6FAFEC17B7D9CED68A4238C92 Errors: Invalid target found:19000000 actual:19000003
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Error] Received a distinct block, finalizing: Block:1 Timestamp:1470935312 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000009C81199431ACCC786CE5A1DDAA7381DC55261E56E096AA2B8389502F4 (My block: Block:0 Timestamp:0 Reward:0 Fee:0 PoW:)
did you opened the correct port? firewall etc should be set rightly, i launched the client and it worked for me without much effort
When i installed it, it just import and no server connection
And, i have finished it , it makes 216 error
I have repeated couple of times,
I have deleted data foler to sync at begining,
Around 70 client connections and 4 server connections,
But, no sync at all
I have checked log file, and find the error
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
I have tried to sync, but,
I feel as it shows an error even the first block, and fail to sync, How I can pass it ?
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Info] Distinct operation block found! My:Block:0 Timestamp:1485450859 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:0B6776314AF7907A013A7C08E6E40C65317004F1773A307C939022CAC0BE34D0 remote:Block:0 Timestamp:1470934813 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000003A29C32E84A539ADE24397D41D30116A6FAFEC17B7D9CED68A4238C92 Errors: Invalid target found:19000000 actual:19000003
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Error] Received a distinct block, finalizing: Block:1 Timestamp:1470935312 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000009C81199431ACCC786CE5A1DDAA7381DC55261E56E096AA2B8389502F4 (My block: Block:0 Timestamp:0 Reward:0 Fee:0 PoW:)
I feel as it shows an error even the first block, and fail to sync, How I can pass it ?
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Info] Distinct operation block found! My:Block:0 Timestamp:1485450859 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:0B6776314AF7907A013A7C08E6E40C65317004F1773A307C939022CAC0BE34D0 remote:Block:0 Timestamp:1470934813 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000003A29C32E84A539ADE24397D41D30116A6FAFEC17B7D9CED68A4238C92 Errors: Invalid target found:19000000 actual:19000003
2017-01-26 12:14:18.532 TID:0000538C [Error] Received a distinct block, finalizing: Block:1 Timestamp:1470935312 Reward:1000000 Fee:0 PoW:00000009C81199431ACCC786CE5A1DDAA7381DC55261E56E096AA2B8389502F4 (My block: Block:0 Timestamp:0 Reward:0 Fee:0 PoW:)
I am trying to improve the performance for CL Kernel and it's calling.
and, I have tried to compile, but I have failed,
can I get an idea about the compiling environments ?
I have tried
(1) install MinGW
(2) install All Packages
(3) compiled and installed jansson-2.8
(4) copied, AMD_SDK 3.0 x86 (bin/lib/include)
(5) I have tried to compile using Makefile it can not compile
it has generate an error : inconsistent operand constranint in an 'asm'
so, temporary, I have disabled
void cryptonight_hash_aesni in cryptonight.c & main.c
(6) I got so many errors,
so, I have added
-lws2_32
(7) But, some error has not been cleared,, Could you give me an advice ?
and, I have tried to compile, but I have failed,
can I get an idea about the compiling environments ?
I have tried
(1) install MinGW
(2) install All Packages
(3) compiled and installed jansson-2.8
(4) copied, AMD_SDK 3.0 x86 (bin/lib/include)
(5) I have tried to compile using Makefile it can not compile
it has generate an error : inconsistent operand constranint in an 'asm'
so, temporary, I have disabled
void cryptonight_hash_aesni in cryptonight.c & main.c
(6) I got so many errors,
so, I have added
-lws2_32
(7) But, some error has not been cleared,, Could you give me an advice ?
Quote
net.o:net.c:(.text+0x97): undefined reference to `getaddrinfo'
net.o:net.c:(.text+0x121): undefined reference to `freeaddrinfo'
net.o:net.c:(.text+0x14c): undefined reference to `freeaddrinfo'
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [all] Error 1
Administrator@ENG ~/xmr
$
net.o:net.c:(.text+0x121): undefined reference to `freeaddrinfo'
net.o:net.c:(.text+0x14c): undefined reference to `freeaddrinfo'
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [all] Error 1
Administrator@ENG ~/xmr
$
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v6.1 (Windows/Linux)
on 6.1.3, after starting my fans resets to autospeed, but if I set the option -tt 0 I can`t keep track of temperatures
Try this:
https://mega.nz/#!HphjhRyI!ynSMiXk4NfNWsLbjmD03noY93Zk5mboCq1UacB-S570
Excellent !!! everything is working
OK, after 15 hours solo I have 9 blocks rejections and no one confirmed that something was wrong with 6.1.4b+parity 1.3
I go back to Genoil ....
even getwork error has fixed in this version, but, still have an error when submit share,
If the miner doesn't work with some pool - let me know its address and port, I'll check it.
Hi,
I have tested with Parity v1.3.0,
with Miner 6.1 version can support eth_getWork() but, I think, you have forgot to update eth_submitWork()
Code:
22:56:51:051 8e0 eth: job is the same
22:56:51:051 8e0 new buf size: 0
22:56:51:082 1398 ETH: put share nonce cac153d80d7fd593
22:56:51:082 1398 ETH round found 1 shares
22:56:51:097 8e0 ETH: 08/17/16-22:56:51 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
22:56:51:097 8e0 http send request: {"id":4,"method":"eth_submitWork","params":["0xcac153d80d7fd593","0xd53369c5e3fa6087c7513a92e666643c3289f0027ddaf38a07434b610076c121","0x22d5cfb6500ef4654c3347dd60a67bd05783f209bc623dc595f86c7e50490223"]}
22:56:51:097 8e0 http got answer: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32600,"message":"Invalid request","data":null},"id":null}
22:56:51:097 8e0 ETH: Submitted share rejected!
22:56:51:269 8e0 parse packet: 253
It is the same error which has been before
Code:
**** with Claymore's Dual Miner
2016-08-15 10:25:09 TRACE rpc Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:09 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")
2016-08-15 10:25:10 TRACE rpc Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:10 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")
**** with Ethminer
2016-08-15 10:25:30 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:30 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:32 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:32 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:33 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x62f2","0x0d2d291fe73cba1bfc69c5605a3d3e0af93a2f8c7d210d53cb4c1c263cd3d525"]}
Technically, RPC command in Claymore's Dual Miner is not an issue.
Actually, I have tested with RPC command windows in the parity UI, this command is working well.
but, with Miner, it shows as the error.
I feel as some kind of line termination code error ? or something, strange error has been happening,
Headers are not displayed here.. The Content-Type needs to be set, as already mentioned before
Thank you for your comment,
I have missed your post which has made before,
Thank you.
Code:
**** with Claymore's Dual Miner
2016-08-15 10:25:09 TRACE rpc Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:09 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")
2016-08-15 10:25:10 TRACE rpc Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:10 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")
**** with Ethminer
2016-08-15 10:25:30 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:30 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:32 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:32 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:33 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x62f2","0x0d2d291fe73cba1bfc69c5605a3d3e0af93a2f8c7d210d53cb4c1c263cd3d525"]}
Technically, RPC command in Claymore's Dual Miner is not an issue.
Actually, I have tested with RPC command windows in the parity UI, this command is working well.
but, with Miner, it shows as the error.
I feel as some kind of line termination code error ? or something, strange error has been happening,
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred/Siacoin GPU Miner v5.3 (Windows/Linux)
To all requests: I will check them a bit later, don't want to postpone new version again and again.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.0 with nvidia support, temp/fan management for amd 4xx cards and "-ttli" option to reduce overall mining intensity when GPU is overheated.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.0 with nvidia support, temp/fan management for amd 4xx cards and "-ttli" option to reduce overall mining intensity when GPU is overheated.
Please, support solo mining with Parity v1.3.0
No problem, as soon as someone can explain me how to make it work. Step by step: download link, how to start/configure, etc. Because I spent a lot of time and still don't have any ideas why it does not download blockchain though Mist wallet works on same system.
I think, JSONRPC command packet which request the work from the wallet(parity), is not compatible with Parity and it just return Invalid Message Error, I am not sure the how packet has configured from this miner (if there is any option to see the message, let me try with Parity manually), or Could you show me the message in solo mining mode such as 'http://127.0.0.1:8584';
Note: after fully synced with parity 1.3.0;
I have tried with ethminer.exe from CPP-Ethereum;
I feel the packet from this miner has recognized by parity successfully
Thank you for the good support always,
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred/Siacoin GPU Miner v5.3 (Windows/Linux)
To all requests: I will check them a bit later, don't want to postpone new version again and again.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.0 with nvidia support, temp/fan management for amd 4xx cards and "-ttli" option to reduce overall mining intensity when GPU is overheated.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.0 with nvidia support, temp/fan management for amd 4xx cards and "-ttli" option to reduce overall mining intensity when GPU is overheated.
Please, support solo mining with Parity v1.3.0
Claymore's
What the name of this dual miner?
i want to recommend the dual mining ETH or ETC with SIA
This miner is best for the dual mining
If it can support Solo Mining with Parity 1.3.0
Maybe
ETC (solo) + SIA (pool)
It will maximize the profit
This miner is best for the dual mining
If it can support Solo Mining with Parity 1.3.0
Maybe
ETC (solo) + SIA (pool)
It will maximize the profit
Question is one miner better than another when it comes to HAsh Rates?
I am trying to set this Claymore up but cant seem to get it squared (yes I have pagefile set to 25Gb min and 5Gb max)
Have used SGminer for X11 coins worked Fine
Cpu miner for X11 coins worked fine
Nicehash uses Genoil and it works fine but I want to keep my mined ETH not give away my power.
Any suggestions for ETH solo/pool mining or dual ETH mining with additional coin??
Thanks
I am trying to set this Claymore up but cant seem to get it squared (yes I have pagefile set to 25Gb min and 5Gb max)
Have used SGminer for X11 coins worked Fine
Cpu miner for X11 coins worked fine
Nicehash uses Genoil and it works fine but I want to keep my mined ETH not give away my power.
Any suggestions for ETH solo/pool mining or dual ETH mining with additional coin??
Thanks
I feel as v5.3 version is not compatible with Parity v1.3.0 solo mining ?
It just return an error -32600 :
I have tested with ethminer (cpp version and genoil version), all working well.
I think, it is a problem with this miner
-or- maybe some kind of special option
It just return an error -32600 :
I have tested with ethminer (cpp version and genoil version), all working well.
I think, it is a problem with this miner
-or- maybe some kind of special option
i want to recommend the dual mining ETH or ETC with SIA
This miner is best for the dual mining
If it can support Solo Mining with Parity 1.3.0
Maybe
ETC (solo) + SIA (pool)
It will maximize the profit
This miner is best for the dual mining
If it can support Solo Mining with Parity 1.3.0
Maybe
ETC (solo) + SIA (pool)
It will maximize the profit
Question is one miner better than another when it comes to HAsh Rates?
I am trying to set this Claymore up but cant seem to get it squared (yes I have pagefile set to 25Gb min and 5Gb max)
Have used SGminer for X11 coins worked Fine
Cpu miner for X11 coins worked fine
Nicehash uses Genoil and it works fine but I want to keep my mined ETH not give away my power.
Any suggestions for ETH solo/pool mining or dual ETH mining with additional coin??
Thanks
I am trying to set this Claymore up but cant seem to get it squared (yes I have pagefile set to 25Gb min and 5Gb max)
Have used SGminer for X11 coins worked Fine
Cpu miner for X11 coins worked fine
Nicehash uses Genoil and it works fine but I want to keep my mined ETH not give away my power.
Any suggestions for ETH solo/pool mining or dual ETH mining with additional coin??
Thanks
I feel as v5.3 version is not compatible with Parity v1.3.0 solo mining ?
It just return an error -32600 :
I have tested with ethminer (cpp version and genoil version), all working well.
I think, it is a problem with this miner
-or- maybe some kind of special option
It just return an error -32600 :
I have tested with ethminer (cpp version and genoil version), all working well.
I think, it is a problem with this miner
-or- maybe some kind of special option
I feel as v5.3 version is not compatible with Parity v1.3.0 solo mining ?
It just return an error -32600 :
I have tested with ethminer (cpp version and genoil version), all working well.
I think, it is a problem with this miner
-or- maybe some kind of special option
It just return an error -32600 :
I have tested with ethminer (cpp version and genoil version), all working well.
I think, it is a problem with this miner
-or- maybe some kind of special option
The new BitQuark Core 0.10.0 will have both 32 bit & 64 bit clients, as well as an installer!
Can you describe briefly for this numbscull what the benefit of Core 0.10.0 will be for BTQ??I think, there is no practical major benefit now, due to the low transaction numbers.
(1) fixed all known security issues from bitcoin v0.8.x & v0.9x
(2) relativeley smaller and faster and lighter (especially for large transaction)
(3) more flexible and secure multi signature supports, and compatible with 3rd party bitcoin multisig codes
(4) more secure handling of priv key while sending coin by mutil address spending
(5) single public hash key mining for solo miner using getwork no more waste with temporary keys
(6) better fork handing and detections
(7) better update code flow ~
ASIC coming soon for X-series algorithm coins!! This would also include Quark algorithm coin!
ASIC for X11, X13, X15 is very easy since they are a linear sequence of calculations, so regardless if 11, 13 or 15 rounds they always happen in the same sequence.
Quark algo has random hashing rounds so it is much harder to make an ASIC, not impossible but it would be much much more difficult than the X series algos so I do not believe it woud be included on ASIC hardware designed for X series. I'll believe it when I see it.
There is two type of design, modula or hardwire. I think, modula design will be better for the flexibility.
And, even in hardwire structure, Quark algo can be processed as whole types of algorithm. And just select the valid data in end stages. Such as
A - (B or C) - D
ASIC can designed to thru A - B (v) C (v) D
And, (v) will decide to use the pre-processed data or post-post processed data
But, to support multiple algorothim,
They designed common input matrix mux and output maxtrix mux with feed back bus,
And, control the mux and path using small logic
I think, not much complex,
just some algo has requipred too many gates that is only issues
Currently someone could jump on the network with a big hashrate and gobble up 20 blocks until the difficulty goes up and then leave the other miners to struggle with the higher difficulty. Wash rinse repeat. right?
It could be a wise decision. Any drawbacks though?
It could be a wise decision. Any drawbacks though?
Yeah that's the exact concern that I have. 20 block retargeting allows drop in miners to clean house and then leave smaller miners to pick up the pieces. As far as I know, there aren't any drawbacks to DGW3. If I can get everything up and going in time, I will release BTQ-r19 and have the DGW3 start at block 1,000,001.
How about supporting some internal explorer and rebuild using btc core 0.10?
Addtionally
- memory pool list view for transaction
- latest block list usng blockindex map (block track information)
Just an idea,
Currently someone could jump on the network with a big hashrate and gobble up 20 blocks until the difficulty goes up and then leave the other miners to struggle with the higher difficulty. Wash rinse repeat. right?
It could be a wise decision. Any drawbacks though?
It could be a wise decision. Any drawbacks though?
+1
It makes the block time is stretched by 120-130% (36-39 sec)
this problem is happening due to the overall network hash is just 60-80MHPS,
BitQuark v 0.8.3r18 now available for download @ http://www.bitquark.info/wallet.php
In this update:
In this update:
- New Splash Screen
- New GUI layout & graphics with 10 different 'skins'
- "Money Supply" on main page
- "Network hashrate" on main page
Nice, good job !!!!