Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 73 results by moiraine
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Mining for the non-profit sector. Need to exceed 2 mBTC per day per 1070…
by
moiraine
on 07/07/2017, 03:10:39 UTC
Funny that even people as dumb as this can acquire "funding" these days, once it fails hopefully you'll realize you're delusional (Maybe at least your funders will). Of course you're an "economist"(read: PM), anyone can tell you're not an engineer.

The sad thing is, if he's telling the truth he's fucked non-profit investors through sheer ignorance.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion (Altcoins)
Re: Poloniex account hacked and all monies traded away, TICKET NUMBER # 273741
by
moiraine
on 27/06/2017, 14:33:29 UTC
Yup basically accept it and move on, it's not anyone's fault but yours. Polo has no control over who has your pw, so it's not their problem. I wouldn't contact japanese police either, you can't expect them to do anything, especially just based off an ip which really just provides a general location. They'd probably just laugh you off.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: Ethereum bloodbath dumping
by
moiraine
on 25/06/2017, 20:06:58 UTC
Insiders are making a killing and now bagholders are coming in, these scam ICOs after scam ICOs no longer going to help.
Look like Polo got hacked and not by their side anymore, so damn much bugs, chance Polo got hack because of these bugs.
This scam vaporware is done.

Very insightful. I too believe the illuminati has risen, and with the recent claymore hacks by noobs the apocalypse itself may be upon us. I 2000% agree that polo got hacked and it's for sure not by their side anymore, it's the other side this time! Scam vaporware ponzi pyramid indeed.

Please contribute more, I really do enjoy your posts!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.5 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 15/06/2017, 20:34:58 UTC

Hi Claymore,

I'm trying to figure out approximately when my 3GB cards will stop working due to DAG growth. How much extra storage do you need in the GPUs beyond the size of the DAG?



Yes please tell me. Also I would like to know if I can mine eth with my 2gb 280x?Huh!?Huh!1?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.5 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 15/06/2017, 18:04:38 UTC

Hi everyone, can some one help me with this please!
r9 380
17.1.1


The very first line in that terminal window tells you the problem. Also take screenshots not photos.

Hi, I have the same issue as moiraine. Same GPU also.

Am i suppose to understand that it no more possible to do mining with 2gb gpu cards? Is there another way to use my rig to mine?

Thanks for the help.

You can't mine eth with 2gb. Mine something other than eth.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.5 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 15/06/2017, 15:56:46 UTC

Hi everyone, can some one help me with this please!
r9 380
17.1.1


The very first line in that terminal window tells you the problem. Also take screenshots not photos.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.5 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 13/06/2017, 12:27:13 UTC
Hey guys, im only getting 12.6 mh/s with an r9 280x, it should be 20+... how can i ensure that the miner is using the crimson 15.12 that i installed? virtual memory is set to 16gb. mining ethereum only, with recommended initial settings.

WRONG - you're reading SUPER-outdated info. As I said earlier in the thread - GCN 1 devices suffer as the DAG increases in size... even though it can fit the whole DAG in its memory, due to the memory controller having issues with shit that big, I think. Your hashrate is as expected.... and it's only gonna get worse.
That is actually starting to scare me. I've got a bunch of 4GB RX 570 cards, how long do you reckon until the size of the DAG starts impacting me?

...this is really REALLY getting old. You could seriously have googled the words "ETH mining 4GB" and got your answer. 4GB will supposedly become an issue in 2019, but supposedly eth will go POS before that. If you have no idea what that means, you could google "eth pos".
Actually, googling the words "ETH mining 4GB" does not give a decent answer, smartass.
I was just chiming into the discussion. You on the other hand seem to be trolling quite a bit, looking at your last few posts.

you're right, I didn't spoonfeed it. Sorry. If calling people out for their inability to google is trolling, then you got me.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.5 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 13/06/2017, 12:06:00 UTC
Sooooo was Claymore hacked last night (UK time)? Connection dropped on mine and my housemate's rigs for about 15 mins, we were getting the failed to connect, retrying after 20s error. Since then, for the past 8 hours, my Ether balance has not increased.

CLAYMORE GOT HACKED CONFIRMED! Nice first post!

/s
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.5 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 13/06/2017, 12:03:54 UTC
Hey guys, im only getting 12.6 mh/s with an r9 280x, it should be 20+... how can i ensure that the miner is using the crimson 15.12 that i installed? virtual memory is set to 16gb. mining ethereum only, with recommended initial settings.

WRONG - you're reading SUPER-outdated info. As I said earlier in the thread - GCN 1 devices suffer as the DAG increases in size... even though it can fit the whole DAG in its memory, due to the memory controller having issues with shit that big, I think. Your hashrate is as expected.... and it's only gonna get worse.
That is actually starting to scare me. I've got a bunch of 4GB RX 570 cards, how long do you reckon until the size of the DAG starts impacting me?

...this is really REALLY getting old. You could seriously have googled the words "ETH mining 4GB" and got your answer. 4GB will supposedly become an issue in 2019, but supposedly eth will go POS before that. If you have no idea what that means, you could google "eth pos".
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v12.4 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 21/05/2017, 20:19:42 UTC
0k, i will take your word for it. edited my post above to strike out that line. guess ive been lucky.
what tools do you use?

As I said, I wrote them myself - the closest analog to what I'm working on and polishing is WattTool for Windows, I think. Allows you to see VRM temps, set/get voltages, set/get offsets, change VRM switching frequency, and more - but WattTool can only give you this control over IR3567B and compatible VRM controllers. Mine supports four controllers that are used in AMD cards as main controllers (and sometimes this main controller is used for other purposes in the card besides core volts - for example, XFX RS 470/480 cards use the NCP81022's main output (VDD) for core (duh) but use the other one (VDDNB) for the IMC voltage (VDDCI.)) I've also added basic support for one controller that's more of a secondary one, which I found on my DirectCU II 290X. It controls MVDDC.

sounds like a dangerous tool in the hands of a noob. those are the best kinds of tools IMO Smiley

any chance of your releasing it at some point?

At some point? Possible - but it would be a while in the future. I actually sold a couple (limited) copies before I considered it mature, cause they kinda just happened. Right now, I'm focusing on rounding out the feature set.

Another thing that makes it not just dangerous, but possibly deadly: I can not just adjust the thresholds for protections like OCP/OVP/OTP... I can disable them. Tongue

Actually, if you run the AMDGPU-PRO drivers, you CAN mix them in a rig. The Fiji card may perform slightly worse than with fglrx, but it works.

Since AMDGPU Pro drivers only support GCN3 or newer cards, I couldn't get it to work with my Pitcarin and RX 480 rig on Arch Linux. I had to switch to Windows 7 to be able to use all my cards Sad

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xorg#AMD



The support is labeled "experimental" but it IS there.



some cards do not display vrm temps. but if the core is cool, chances are the vrms are ok also.

Please don't give people who don't know any better terrible advice like that - I was mining on my linux dev/test rig, Naomi, just a day ago, and had strange crashes when core was under 70C.

I used one of my tools to check the temps on the VRM controller feeding the core - it was over 106C.

Also, I assume that under Windows, the tools you guys have should show VRM temps on all cards except those with an NCP81022 feeding the core - because I can't get temps off it either; cheap piece of shit has no sensor.

ok, i will take your word for it. edited my post above to strike out that line. guess ive been lucky.

what tools do you use?

As I said, I wrote them myself - the closest analog to what I'm working on and polishing is WattTool for Windows, I think. Allows you to see VRM temps, set/get voltages, set/get offsets, change VRM switching frequency, and more - but WattTool can only give you this control over IR3567B and compatible VRM controllers. Mine supports four controllers that are used in AMD cards as main controllers (and sometimes this main controller is used for other purposes in the card besides core volts - for example, XFX RS 470/480 cards use the NCP81022's main output (VDD) for core (duh) but use the other one (VDDNB) for the IMC voltage (VDDCI.)) I've also added basic support for one controller that's more of a secondary one, which I found on my DirectCU II 290X. It controls MVDDC.

Are you doing this all via i2c commands on linux? I've been digging a bit but cant seem to get a i2cdump anywhere near what I get with aida under windows, so I don't even know where to start :/. Also, how are you checking that the vddci is getting set on those ncp81022 cards? afaik there's no sensor, so are you manually checking em? How

I don't want to give too much away - but basically this: I access the card using direct HW access (this requires root, of course.) NCP81022 only lacks a temperature sensor. VDDCI is on the second output of NCP81022 on XFX RS cards, so you have to first select the second output by writing to one of its regs, THEN reading the voltage out.

If you're trying to get i2c access by using tools like i2cdump - you're doing it wrong. This relies on the AMDGPU driver, which is a little "special" if you get my drift. Gotta do it by paw.

Thanks for the hints, I appreciate it! At least now I know to abandon my i2cdump attempts. Direct hw access eh..
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v12.4 (Windows/Linux)
by
moiraine
on 21/05/2017, 16:08:49 UTC


some cards do not display vrm temps. but if the core is cool, chances are the vrms are ok also.

Please don't give people who don't know any better terrible advice like that - I was mining on my linux dev/test rig, Naomi, just a day ago, and had strange crashes when core was under 70C.

I used one of my tools to check the temps on the VRM controller feeding the core - it was over 106C.

Also, I assume that under Windows, the tools you guys have should show VRM temps on all cards except those with an NCP81022 feeding the core - because I can't get temps off it either; cheap piece of shit has no sensor.

ok, i will take your word for it. edited my post above to strike out that line. guess ive been lucky.

what tools do you use?

As I said, I wrote them myself - the closest analog to what I'm working on and polishing is WattTool for Windows, I think. Allows you to see VRM temps, set/get voltages, set/get offsets, change VRM switching frequency, and more - but WattTool can only give you this control over IR3567B and compatible VRM controllers. Mine supports four controllers that are used in AMD cards as main controllers (and sometimes this main controller is used for other purposes in the card besides core volts - for example, XFX RS 470/480 cards use the NCP81022's main output (VDD) for core (duh) but use the other one (VDDNB) for the IMC voltage (VDDCI.)) I've also added basic support for one controller that's more of a secondary one, which I found on my DirectCU II 290X. It controls MVDDC.

Are you doing this all via i2c commands on linux? I've been digging a bit but cant seem to get a i2cdump anywhere near what I get with aida under windows, so I don't even know where to start :/. Also, how are you checking that the vddci is getting set on those ncp81022 cards? afaik there's no sensor, so are you manually checking em? How
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: AMD Rebrand - RX570 / RX580 - Official Thread
by
moiraine
on 10/05/2017, 18:03:50 UTC
Just flash them with a lower voltage !

Not that easy - AMDGPU ignores PowerPlay changes (DPM state mods), and there's no init regulator section in VoltageObjectInfo to add an offset. You gotta get creative.

Finally was able to do it though bios, takes offset just like IR3567B, just different register values, and some weird read write bit stuff as seen in http://www.overclock.net/t/1621800/would-appreciate-help-in-finding-editing-the-voltage-offset-in-the-rx480-bios/100 . Otherwise works like a charm! VDDCI seems to work too!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Topic OP
rx 480 VDDCI offset vs VDDC?
by
moiraine
on 15/04/2017, 23:11:21 UTC
After many hours I was able to successfully add VDDC and VDDCI offsets to my rom, and can confirm that the VDDC offset at least works, however I can't seem to do anything with VDDCI. Sure I can set an offset of +50mv/100mv but it seem to actually *do* anything(mem can't clock higher, still stuck at ~1925 for shitty hynix). I'm currently undervolted by a quite a bit, so my question is this, is the VDDCI offset bound to the core voltage in any way? ie. does the vddci NEED to be below the vdcc? I can't actually measure the live vddci in linux anywhere, so I have no idea how to test this other than bumping core to 1.1 and then bumping the mclk up and seeing if it's stable.

(I'm currently getting 28mh eth+dcr @ 1130/1925 on a 4gb 480)

Any help would be appreciated!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why do we never get a topic on inflation in this section? (poll)
by
moiraine
on 14/11/2014, 15:24:40 UTC
Again only garbage talk with you...  Insults ? If i see that you are lied or wrong doesn't mean i insult you. If you can't take this then stay off the altcoin section.

Do you know what happend with the lost BTC's from the MT.GOX fiasco ? Karples was caught using Blockchain.com to send them into smaller address almost down to 10btc.

Don't believe me ? Google it.

That doesn't constitute proof that anyone has 250k btc...sigh. If you think I lied or am wrong then provide proof instead of saying "my thinking isn't there yet".

Also, you haven't replied regarding my points to POS. Or should I wait for you to catch up because "your thinking isnt there yet"?

EDIT: I also just looked at your trust section, why was I wasting my time LOL. For some reason I thought you we're a respectable person, now im REALLY out.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why do we never get a topic on inflation in this section? (poll)
by
moiraine
on 14/11/2014, 15:07:52 UTC
You can insult me all you want, I wont even bother linking the wiki ad hominem page.

The fact that you think btc success is because of holding is enough to tell me that this conversation is over as you are beyond help.

 Also, lol about the richlist. yup if I has 500k btc i'd split it into 5 wallets for sure.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why do we never get a topic on inflation in this section? (poll)
by
moiraine
on 14/11/2014, 15:00:07 UTC
So you would accept that going from owning 1% of a coin today, then 0.9% in a year and ~0.5% in 5 years is good for long term value?

Inflation effects everyone at the same rate, it doesn't matter how much you hold.

This is why PoS is so great. If you hold long enough your coins you will always end up in with the same value but with more coins.

Great idea! fuck adoption, all we need are people hodling and posting about how great it is then we can dump after our 1500000% stake matures! Cool Dude!
/s

A low level of inflation is healthy, it's when you let it get out of hand that it becomes an issue. You need people to spend a coin in order for it to have any chance of success.

NOT POS

Because they just removed the "miners" and said the Holders will mine. So wake up your mind what do you want ? Holders of Miners who sell always to pay their hardware or electricity.

Garbage talk is garbage. No real profound points against PoS like always

What are you talking about? Holders are NOT mining they just hold. And you know what happens when they hold? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Holders get more coins, and you know what they do? THEY HOLD THEM.

 Miners might sell, sure, but they're USING it. In order to sell, they have to TRADE which creates VOLUME which is GOOD.

If you can't see the difference that mining vs staking has on a coin....

Do you have any idea how even PoS is working ? People who hold and stake are increasing the difficult of their blockchain. Holders don't need to sell coins unlike Miners who have to sell just to cover pay the big electrical bill from the last month.

Thats exactly the point.... if they're not selling the coins they just sit.. and stake .. and stake.

also about your next post ill just post this:
http://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100

im surprised a senior member is so ignorant.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why do we never get a topic on inflation in this section? (poll)
by
moiraine
on 14/11/2014, 14:40:32 UTC
and lol? you going to bring up big holders on bitcoin? Look at the btc coin distribution and market cap.

lots of 250k btc holders? get real. you do realize you can check the size of the largest wallets right?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why do we never get a topic on inflation in this section? (poll)
by
moiraine
on 14/11/2014, 14:37:12 UTC
So you would accept that going from owning 1% of a coin today, then 0.9% in a year and ~0.5% in 5 years is good for long term value?

Inflation effects everyone at the same rate, it doesn't matter how much you hold.

This is why PoS is so great. If you hold long enough your coins you will always end up in with the same value but with more coins.

Great idea! fuck adoption, all we need are people hodling and posting about how great it is then we can dump after our 1500000% stake matures! Cool Dude!
/s

A low level of inflation is healthy, it's when you let it get out of hand that it becomes an issue. You need people to spend a coin in order for it to have any chance of success.

NOT POS

Because they just removed the "miners" and said the Holders will mine. So wake up your mind what do you want ? Holders of Miners who sell always to pay their hardware or electricity.

Garbage talk is garbage. No real profound points against PoS like always

What are you talking about? Holders are NOT mining they just hold. And you know what happens when they hold? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Holders get more coins, and you know what they do? THEY HOLD THEM.

 Miners might sell, sure, but they're USING it. In order to sell, they have to TRADE which creates VOLUME which is GOOD.

If you can't see the difference that mining vs staking has on a coin....
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: [FACT] End of month dumping..
by
moiraine
on 14/11/2014, 14:31:41 UTC
Which coin are you referring to? BTC? alts? or just everything?

I notice that stocks seem to slouch around sept-oct, not sure if the same can be said for alts.

Also, if this is true I wonder what triggers the dumping at the end of the month?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: PoS is far inferior to PoW - why are so many people advocating switching to PoS
by
moiraine
on 14/11/2014, 14:25:39 UTC
The fact that POS encourages holding alone dooms any POS coin imo. For any coin to succeed it need adoption, which implies actual spending. At least with POW there's often a better distribution of coins which leads to a decently sized community working for adoption, as opposed to POS when there's like 3 whales staking 70% of the supply spamming posts about how amazing a coin is...

Sure you can argue that POW coins can have a similar situation with insta/pre mine but assuming a fair coin reward system, once the mining community matures for a POW coin the coin distribution will always be fairer than a POS system, which is the first step towards adoption.

just my 2c ofc

PoS doesn't encourage hodling any more than PoW encourages hodling. For example, profits from forging with your NXT stake is less than 0.5%/yearly, anything gives better return that that, NXT assets in the first place. But to buy NXT assets on the asset exchange you need to actually spend your NXT, which goes against the idea of hodling.

I'm not familiar with nxt assets, I was referring to POS in general. Having ANY POS whatsoever discourages spending and thus kills adoption. Having no POS encourages spending, because your money will be worth less than it is tommorow. Alt-coins are supposed to be just that, coins, a currency. If you dont want your currency to devalue you invest it somewhere(get interest at a bank, buy stocks w/e), you shouldn't expect the act of holding to be rewarded.