Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 413 results by monkeydominicorobin
Post
Topic
Board Pilipinas
Re: Ang dahilan ng btc pump (tesla)
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 12/03/2021, 14:56:06 UTC
Bago ako mag out sa work ko ay sinilip ko ang price ng bitcoin tapos pagdating ko sa bahay silipin ko ulit akoy nagulat 44+ na pala sa binance. Share ko lang po ito kasi isa ito sa nakita kong dahilan kung bakit nag pump ang presyo ni bitcoin (ATH)


Maraming reason pero isa itong magandang balita at nagtulak ulit para magpump ang bitcoin. Angry


Ang totoo niyan wala naman talaga siyang kaugnayan sa pagtaas ng presyo ng Bitcoin. Ang media sa boung mundo ay idinadahilan lang iyan pero mula ng malampasan ng Bitcoin ang 20,000 dollars ay naging matibay na ang Bitcoin. Tatlong taon na ako dito sa Bitcoin Talk kaya alam ninyong hindi ako katulad ng iba na sumasakay lang sa uso. Laos na ang lumang pera dahil sa over printing ng pera. Ang Bitcoin sinisigurong walang magaganap na elasticity ng supply kaya walang inflationary pressure na magaganap.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: This is the Spirit folks, this is how you will get bitcoin killed
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 03/08/2018, 23:26:39 UTC
Writing or Laughing at so called "nocoiners" (socialists, lawyers MBA economists) in new york times square



will not just get the bitcoin even more unpopular as it will be seen by many as arrogant.

it will create more and more cryptocurrencies, cryptocurrency indexes and so on.

it will be more and more be question why the energywasting bitcoinsect itself had legitimacy to out of audacity take the first move of creating something and calling it decentral money,

bitcoin will sooner or later dissappear in the conflict that many of its arrogant owners are sparking.

the main issue is that bitcoins initial support came much less from its appeareance but much more from the unsatisfaction with the national banking cartels, as they were causing poverty.

bitcoin marketing moved from

we are a good solution against the established unefficient banking cartel

towards:

Bitcoin is King of all Coins.

just look what vitalik said:



reagards

You just cited a classic example of a very innefective ad campaign. Nobody in the crowd can ever get the message of the campaign since it is too cryptic to say the least too nerdy for the snowflakes.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: will bitcoin become obsolete?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 03/08/2018, 23:13:25 UTC
Analysis : Blockchain, the technology behind Bitcoin, is predicted to be the leading technology in the future, but this technology will become obsolete.

Is it possible that bitcoin will be obsolete in the future?

In the future everything is possible. Bitcoin will be obsolete in the far future but your Fiat currency will be obsolete in a few years time. That prediction is better than the Bitcoin is going to ... scenario.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: How can we bitcoin transaction refundable?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 22/07/2018, 05:19:59 UTC
When I was reading an article, I came across a disadvantage of bitcoin that stated that there "No Chargebacks or Refunds" in bitcoin transactions. What do you think can be the way forward in solving this problem? Many, regardless of whether you are pro-bitcoin or anti-bitcoin, your interest is in making sure that transactions where currency is involved have a Charge-back or Refund policy.

Below is what the article said on this point: "No Chargebacks or Refunds"
One of Bitcoin’s biggest drawbacks is a lack of standardized policy for chargebacks or refunds, as all credit card companies and traditional online payment processors have. Users affected by transaction fraud – for instance, they purchase goods that the seller never delivers – can’t request a refund through Bitcoin. In fact, Bitcoin’s decentralized structure makes it impossible for any single party to arbitrate disputes between users. While miners take responsibility for recording transactions, they’re not qualified to assess their legitimacy.
Some newer cryptocurrencies, such as Ripple, have rudimentary chargeback and refund functions, but this feature has yet to be built into Bitcoin.


You mentioned Ripple. Have you ever used Ripple.  If you ever lose your backup wallet you will lose all your Ripple. Refund will only work if you have the backup file but once you you lost it is as frustrating as other cryptocurrencies. If you want refund use escrow services or better yet a smart contract. You are always looking for chargebacks and refunds even though the fiat system fails as well when it comes to this issue.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: RECENT BITCOIN BULL RUN GOOD BAD OR UGLY
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 22/07/2018, 05:03:40 UTC
Well as everyone can see btc has made somewhat of a recovery in the last couple days i was interested in some opinions  if people really think this is the run that will take us to a new high or will it be short lived and will we see a even lower low in the coming weeks,   please feel free to to give your opinions.

A recovery proves that free fall is not going to happen. A recovery proves that this is not a bubble since a bubble never recovers. Maybe next year will also be a bubble if you believe the central banking crowd. Since we don't consider their opinion. Bitcoin is going to be strong.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Guys please no more talk of Bitcoin better than gold
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 10/07/2018, 14:10:08 UTC
Each thing is a thing to itself. If you say btc will replace gold you are saying btc will replace all metals of value. It
Makes no sense. Will Bitcoin replace bonds cause btc can have a higher yield. Remember, some day btc is replacing tulips at the moment. Open your minds a bit more and realize btc is not the end all be all. I love it, and have quite a bit, but I also have a safe full of gold. They are two separate entities, at one point it was confiscated from the people of the us and was illegal to hold. Those of you who keep saying this make me think you are not diversified and it's not always a good idea so stop this stupid gold comparison

Gold bullion is still illegal to hold. I know for sure that you don't know anything about Gold. It will be confiscated by the government and you can't stop them from taking your gold since it is illegal to hold. All of the Chinatowns in the world are serving as black marketplace for Gold since it is illegal to trade person to person. Only Gold Bullion Certificates can be sold. It is not Gold. They are just certificates. Bitcoin will replace your gold. Gold is not being sold like pancakes. But you can send and receive Bitcoins any time of the day.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Do you actually use Bitcoin?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 10/07/2018, 13:52:37 UTC
As far as I am more and more in it, I can do some conclusions.

1) People are mostly not using the Bitcoin (altcoins as well);
2) Crypto-enthusiasts are real enthusiasts only when the price goes up;
3) Even considering there are more crypto-companies appear which offer their services, and more people join our community - the level of crypto education and adoption is still very low;

Almost 95% of all people in crypto I know personally are holding or trading, but not using it to its functionality. I cannot judge anyone for this, but let's be honest - it won't bring you any money if you just will buy it and wait.

So, there is a question: "How much of you use Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency to its full capacity?" I am curious about this because as for now it looks like there is only a small group of people making some contributions.

They are trading but they are not using Bitcoin's functionality? Are you listening to what you are saying? Trading Bitcoins is best way to prove that Bitcoin is being used for its functionality. Bitcoin allows them to trade 24 hours straight which is also a functionality of Bitcoin. Bitcoin allows them to earn even on legal holidays since there is no holiday when it comes to Bitcoin which is also its functionality. The functionality which states that there is no central authority. Nobody can dictate that Bitcoin should be closed for a day. Nobody not even your ignorance can stop the functionalities of Bitcoin. No matter how you badmouth Bitcoin you can never stop its functionalities.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin mining is costly...
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 05/07/2018, 14:13:00 UTC
One thing to say mining bitcoin consumes a large amount of electricity and it would take lots of equipment to manned the mining. There should be a development in making the cost of bitcoin lower; given that lower mining cost could yield a higher profit. However, it matters on trading and exchanges.

This is about the old propaganda about electricity consumption. Everything that you can plug on a wall socket specifically ASIC miners are not consuming extra amounts of electricity. They are just computers with cooling fans. On the contrary gaming consoles are a problem. You spend too much from the gaming media to the console to the LCD screens to the electricity consumption but you can't earn while doing it. Mining Bitcoins is different. It will consume electricity but there will be rewards. Which would you rather choose. Gaming or mining?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Crypto crash! Bitcoin bloodbath nears dot-com levels
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 30/06/2018, 16:21:39 UTC
Bitcoin’s meteoric rise last year had many observers calling it one of the biggest speculative manias in history. The cryptocurrency’s 2018 crash may help cement its place in the bubble record books

You wish!!! This goes to show that you are way too old. The moment you mentioned the dot com crash. You revealed your age since nobody around here remembers that. Only fake stream media would rehash this story since they know nothing. You are stupid to believe that propaganda about dot com crash. It is a stupid analogy. Bitcoin is not similar to dot com mania.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin 2013-14 Historical Statistics Repeating itself?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 30/06/2018, 03:50:22 UTC
Hi,

Bitcoin had a 78% decrease from 2013 all time high from around $1200 to $250. All time high for 2013 was on Nov 30th. To get to $250 boring volatility it took 1 and a half years and a further 6 months wait to see some uptrend totalling 2 years to wait to catch the slow bull train from the 1st train station stop. In summary this bear market lasted 2 years.

The 2017 crazy bull market started from May 1st 2017 from $1300 all the way to $20000 in Dec 2017 that took 8 months. This is 1438% increase. If we do get another bull run like this passing 20k all time high then new ATH will be $288000 in Dec 2021 then a repeat 78% retracement of this $over a quarter million figure? Isn't this bad health for bitcoin?

So using these statistics is it best to buy bitcoin at $4400 by boarding the 1st train stop departure in June 2019?

I know I will get a reply saying bitcoin's popularity and exposure wasn't as big in 2013-14 compared to now however can someone give me reasons why history wont repeat itself?

I know I will get another reply saying bitcoin died many times in past and survived however everyone knows this latest crash from 20k so how can bitcoin survive from this well exposed crash high from the sky?

Has the 78% crash from 20000 to 4400 scared the average public away to invest in it?

What must bitcoin do to gain the confidence from public again apart from lightning network and store door front logos appearing everywhere? Will it be the upcoming another economic recession like in 2007/8? Will average public able to afford bitcoin in a economic recession? Also how we stop average public driving up prices by 1438% in the future as it's not healthy growth.

My final question is how can bitcoin have a steady slow healthy growth without 78%'s retracements in its future?

Bitcoin doesn't have to do anything. Since it is doing enough. You just cited some historical data but you want Bitcoin to do something? If you are a stickler to statistics then you should know by now that Bitcoin is resilient. It is not dictated by fake news sentiments.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin doing monopoly business in cryptocurrency platform !
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 29/06/2018, 06:32:24 UTC
I think the only bitcoin can make this cryptocurrency market stable. BTC was doing monopoly business over last few years. It's time to do some competition with other good currency. Am I right or wrong?

You think that there's no competition among cryptocurrencies. You have to realize that there is. It is just that majority of supposed Bitcoin investors are clueless as to what is really happening. They are clueless since they are treating Bitcoins as though they are shares of stock. It is not. They converting Bitcoins into whatever hoping that will get profits from changes in the market as though they are Forex traders. Bitcoin is not fiat. The trend nowadays is due to ignorance. Bitcoin is a different animal. 
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: WIll ETH pass BTC in 2019 ?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 27/06/2018, 10:40:35 UTC
WIll ETH pass BTC in 2019 ?

More likely 2026. Ethereum is a very attractive cryptocurrency but 2019 is just impossible to achieve in terms of surpassing Bitcoin.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Mining capacity v Transaction speed
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 27/06/2018, 10:25:53 UTC
If we have this huge pool of miners out there, then why are transaction speeds so slow?  Surely the more miners, the faster it should go.  If not, there is something fundamentally wrong with the algorithm.

Mining has nothing to do with the speed of the transaction. Please study more about Bitcoins before posting something that will blow in your face. If you want speed then use Steem with 3 second transaction but it is worth only 1.35 dollars as of writing. Ethereum with 15 second transaction but is worth less than 500 dollars as of writing. What about Bitcoin? It is worth 6,000 dollars as of writing. You complain that it is slow. Try to learn how to sweep private keys and you will feel the speed.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Someone hacked blockchain? Look at this
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 27/06/2018, 02:10:55 UTC
Thats the thing, in order to make them look like regular coins you'll need a way to add them to the chain. I'll be happy if experts say all is good with the blockchain system and those huge transactions are surely no hacks but due to the recent price drops and blockchain developments, interests in this technology the price fall is kind of paradox so looking at those transactions made me think if all is in order.



The address came from ViaBTC mining pool.
 


It is a null data transaction. Data was embedded in the blockchain. What's important is to utilize other block explorer before sowing doubt and confusion. The 12 BTC was obviously a block reward since it is a mining pool. Blockchain.info or soon to be Blockchain.com is not the only block explorer around for your information. Two outputs were created the other one doesn't contain anything since it is embedded data but blockchain.info is being used to create more doubt even though it is imperative that you should know something about embedding data in the blockchain.



Even walletexplorer.com knew that the error message from blockchain.info is  not an address. Stupidity is being spread by stupid people.


thanks for looking into it, appreciate your time.

So if those amounts came in from a mining/ block reward. Would you be so kind and also look into this address: 18cBEMRxXHqzWWCxZNtU91F5sbUNKhL5PX

thats about 120k+ btc

That address is owned by ViaBTC mining pool. Use Blockchain.info and you will see for yourself. 120,000 BTC is not impossible to achieve since ViaBTC owns more than 30% of the total Bitcoin mining industry. It is based in China.



Just look at the official data. 120,000 is peanuts to miners which is why mining is a sought after way of earning Bitcoins. Now you learned that they are not hacking Bitcoin. They are mining Bitcoins. Don't agonize over stupidity. You are a noob for a reason.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Someone hacked blockchain? Look at this
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 26/06/2018, 14:44:21 UTC
Thats the thing, in order to make them look like regular coins you'll need a way to add them to the chain. I'll be happy if experts say all is good with the blockchain system and those huge transactions are surely no hacks but due to the recent price drops and blockchain developments, interests in this technology the price fall is kind of paradox so looking at those transactions made me think if all is in order.



The address came from ViaBTC mining pool.
 


It is a null data transaction. Data was embedded in the blockchain. What's important is to utilize other block explorer before sowing doubt and confusion. The 12 BTC was obviously a block reward since it is a mining pool. Blockchain.info or soon to be Blockchain.com is not the only block explorer around for your information. Two outputs were created the other one doesn't contain anything since it is embedded data but blockchain.info is being used to create more doubt even though it is imperative that you should know something about embedding data in the blockchain.



Even walletexplorer.com knew that the error message from blockchain.info is  not an address. Stupidity is being spread by stupid people.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Is bitcoin a "private" currency?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 26/06/2018, 02:59:46 UTC

I think it is wrong to call bitcoin a "private" currency.

On the contrary, imo bitcoin is much more of a public currency that any national currency is.


It is public since the public owns the nodes and miners. Although they are considered by state as private individuals.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: What stops governments from using the Bitcoin/ Ethereum open source code?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 25/06/2018, 09:17:53 UTC
The thought came to my mind, when everything about Bitcoin and Ethereum is legit open-source, and posted on GitHub; there's every line of code available in the open for any government to make a Bitcoin/ Ethereum clone of their own.  So, whey aren't they doing that, if not seriously, then at least proof-of-concept?

Even if blockchains come with patents, there's the phrase called 'compulsory licensing' that has long been used by third world countries to manufacture patented drugs at dirt-cheap prices.  Likewise, blockchains too could be 'compulsorily licensed' even if patented.

Whey then doesn't any country, say China or India, declare such a blockchain to be an essential 'public good' and clone Bitcoin or Ethereum, whatever is utilitarian for their purposes?  At least they'll save on the Ether prices for their DApps!


Copying source codes is a sign of weakness. Governments are about propaganda and mind conditioning. If they copy Bitcoin's source code everyone will notice. They cannot flex anymore. Flexing is the name of the game.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Different sites report different blockchain sizes?
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 23/06/2018, 13:37:52 UTC
Different sites report different blockchain sizes. Some of that might be explained by base-2 or base-10 sizes, but that's not enough to explain the large difference between the extremes.

Is there a site that accurately reports in bytes both the raw size and Core's on-disk size (without the UTXO set)?

201.57 GB (= 187.72 GB2 if it's GB10) - BitInfoCharts (block 527,582)
178.99 GB (= 192.18 GB10 if it's GB2) - Coin Dance
171,292 MB (= 179.61 GB10 if it's MB2) - Blockchain.info (updated once per day)
161.20 GiB (= 173.08 GB10) - Bitcoin.com


There are disparities like this since they are using fast synchronizations. Other web application in your list with larger blockchain file sizes are using the full on option. This is just about the parameters that they use when syncing with the Bitcoin blockchain. The disparity that you examining are not intended to modify the whole blockchain itself. It is not even intended to create doubt. They are just avoiding the lag that they will experience if they download the whole blockchain in their blockchain file folder.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 60% of world population cannot access computer so Bitcoins will fail.
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 22/06/2018, 09:08:17 UTC
...compared to say u.s. dollar bills which you can hold in your hand or stuff in your mattress.

this is why bitcoins will not go mainstream because majority of human beings on this planet do not have access to a computer.

successful gold standards are things like toyota trucks, ak-47's, u.s. c-notes which thrive in places like afghanistan and africa.

They have access to a fast computer. A smart phone is a miniature computer. The gold standard is having access to smart phone devices. Use a simple Blockchain.info app and you have Bitcoins. You don't even need your Windows computer all you need is your smart phone. Are you living under the rock all this time. They need their smart phone more than food.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: BTC payments in PHILIPPINES
by
monkeydominicorobin
on 22/06/2018, 08:49:16 UTC
You've just visit the philippines? So what country you came from, based on your post history you're a local of philippines, right?
But hey, that's a good thing, if the store is using any other wallet or merchant I guess sending money would take for several minutes unless they used coins.ph and there client as well, so btc/fund will be transfered instantly without waiting of any confirmation.

It will not take several minutes. If you know how to swift private keys it is noticeably faster than Master card and Visa. Even faster than Steem which produces blocks every three seconds. Philippines truly is the haven for Bitcoin but creating a cloud of doubt, including stating that you need coins.ph for faster processing is fake news.If you know how to use Bech 32/Segwit it will be faster and the mining fees are less by almost 90%. Learn more about Bitcoin before saying that the processing is slow. Remember that you only need six confirmations for your transaction to be accepted. If you don't know that it might be because you are using online wallets.