Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 123 results by moonstruck
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Looking for 3080 & 3090 cards
by
moonstruck
on 30/09/2022, 23:26:18 UTC
I suggest you to post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=75.0

This is only a section to talk about mining, but above is the link to >  Marketplace > Goods > Computer hardware
You can post a thread to buy hardware, and you can look there too if anyone is selling

Thanks, I did that as well but I figured many might overlook it there.

.
.
.

I am in NJ,USA

I will check to see exactly how many of them I have and I will go lower than 7480. If you are USA based.

I may or may not have the boxes.

I'm based in EU, I handle import clearance etc. so it's straight forward, just box 'em and ship 'em.
Looking forward to hear what you have available.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Topic OP
Looking for 3080 & 3090 cards
by
moonstruck
on 29/09/2022, 13:07:48 UTC
I'm looking for people who are looking to get rid of RTX3080 & 3090 cards now that mining is dead.
Please only PM if you have at least 8 units of the same model.
Post
Topic
Board Goods
Topic OP
Buying RTX3090 - RTX3080 in bulk
by
moonstruck
on 29/09/2022, 12:21:02 UTC
I'm looking to purchase RTX3090 and RTX3080 in bulk.
Please only PM if you have at least 8 units of the same model.
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: Possible covert mining attack (in progress???)
by
moonstruck
on 17/07/2021, 08:21:33 UTC
Sounds like a plausible scenario to me, there's definitely an incentive to ruin the largest cryptocurrency to promote regulation.
Even with 51% they'd have enough if they are creating a separate chain altogether instead of competing for every block.
They easily could have stockpiled enough equipment or older gear that was taken out of use to get the additional single digit % needed.

Although as a counterargument, one would expect the decline in hashrate would have happened much faster if it was coordinated.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Proof of Capacity's existence got validated by Bram Cohen's Chia
by
moonstruck
on 10/05/2021, 13:27:58 UTC
Well, they do not even mention Burstcoin  in their paper:

https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/893

Yeah we are aware. They want to make it look like that they are the first in Proof of Capacity. But they do mention and criticize it in the FAQ of their site.

All attack vectors on PoC will be removed once Burst upgrades to PoC2.

PoC2 explained: a needed security upgrade

.


So now that Chia (finally) went online, can you compare the two again?

Given that the current (low) estimate of power usage of Chia is closing in on 5MW (1/1000th of Bitcoin), it looks like they definitely failed to make a 'green' coin.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: [ANN] Bittrex - Next generation exchange (btc/ltc/eac/ppc/rdd/ftc/and more)
by
moonstruck
on 08/06/2020, 08:41:11 UTC
I hope your funds weren't in there (in fact never ever leave your valuable assets in any exchange in case you are going to be off trading for a long time)
These crypto exchanges are like unstable weather, you never know what kind of requirements or regulations they can come up with tomorrow.

The personalised links could have been tailored for the territory you come from since different territories have slightly different regulations.

A few months ago I removed most of my funds which might have triggered something. I have been a verified user for several years though.


I don't see many users getting the emails asking for the source of funds though so I guess my account is fine. I don't see any reason to panic if they ask for the source but I'd like to know if a lot of us received the email and goes on without worries after submitting documents. I checked my email which I find nothing is sent to me about it.

I have not logged to my account for a year but I have few tokens I kept like ADA but nothing much.

Check the document for the source of funds, it'd be impossible for me to even provide the documentation asked.
Luckily I caught it in time to remove my remaining assets.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Bittrex - source of funds
by
moonstruck
on 06/06/2020, 11:02:44 UTC
Good choice. A little unusual that they still let you withdraw despite asking you for all this information though.

At first I thought they didn't let me, it luckily was only an issue because I gave a segwit address which they don't support still.
I've been a fully verified customer for several years though so would not expect them to go so far as to freeze my funds without any notice, luckily I caught it in time since my access will be blocked in a few days.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: [ANN] Bittrex - Next generation exchange (btc/ltc/eac/ppc/rdd/ftc/and more)
by
moonstruck
on 05/06/2020, 21:52:08 UTC
I received following mail from Bittrex:

Quote
Thank you for being a valued customer of the Bittrex Global platform.

Per our protocols, we are required to obtain source of funds information from select users. Please fill out the form which you will find at --personalised link was here-- and submit it along with the respective supporting documents within 7 days in order to continue utilizing your Bittrex Global account. This is similar to what other cryptocurrency exchanges in regulated jurisdictions require.

Our privacy policies are available here: ---personalised link to their privacy policy--- which are part of our Terms of Service. Additionally, all of your personal information is kept on an encrypted server.

The link was to this pdf: (image taken from a post from another user on Reddit who received the same)
https://imgur.com/a/c86smPQ

I've barely used the account the past year, I think they try to disable inactive accounts to seize the assets.
The account was used more intensively before that and has been properly verified for at least 2 years.

The fact that they use personalised links is quite disturbing, I definitely won't be using Bittrex any longer.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Merits 6 from 1 user
Re: Bittrex - source of funds
by
moonstruck
on 05/06/2020, 20:00:21 UTC
⭐ Merited by LoyceV (6)
I'd tell them to fuck off and abandon the account myself, or I'd charge them for my time in getting the info together not that I could be arsed to get shit notarised, but I doubt it's massively out of the ordinary since they now have fiat dealings. They probably spring it on random customers so they can show the authorities that they're being proactive when they come snooping.

Other exchanges do the same thing every now and then. I've only ever had a bank do it once which says something, and I made it all up and they went away.

Are there any funds in there right now?

I removed all funds as soon as I saw the mail, I've read about a few people having the same thing (not recently though) and they got their funds frozen despite complying. I've got little interest in getting into a never-ending struggle to maintain control over my own funds.


Asking for sources fo funds is a different story though. Is there any reason that you think why or could you possibly be linked to someone they think to suspect?

I moved & sold most of my funds several months ago, might have triggered something (eg. they are forced by -fill in favourite intelligence agency- to share transactions to or away from their platform adding up to a certain amount).
Little doubt that they had to make a proverbial pact with the devil to enable fiat trading.

I used to be quite fond of Bittrex and Bill Shihara but this has hastily changed my opinion.
What really disturbs me is the fact that they use personalised links in the mail so they can easily track which users are complaining about it online & copy paste the mail.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Merits 15 from 4 users
Topic OP
Bittrex - source of funds
by
moonstruck
on 05/06/2020, 16:16:43 UTC
⭐ Merited by suchmoon (7) ,malevolent (4) ,OmegaStarScream (2) ,o_e_l_e_o (2)
I received following mail from Bittrex:

Quote
Thank you for being a valued customer of the Bittrex Global platform.

Per our protocols, we are required to obtain source of funds information from select users. Please fill out the form which you will find at --personalised link was here-- and submit it along with the respective supporting documents within 7 days in order to continue utilizing your Bittrex Global account. This is similar to what other cryptocurrency exchanges in regulated jurisdictions require.

Our privacy policies are available here: ---personalised link to their privacy policy--- which are part of our Terms of Service. Additionally, all of your personal information is kept on an encrypted server.

The link was to this pdf:
https://imgur.com/a/c86smPQ

Anyone else had this lately? I've barely used the account the past year, I think I'm either under investigation or they try to disable inactive accounts to seize the assets.
The fact that they use personalised links is quite disturbing. I couldn't find many others having similar issues.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: What is happening ?
by
moonstruck
on 12/03/2020, 12:14:56 UTC
Well should the logical reaction not be that assets like gold and bitcoin go up?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Bitmain S11 20.5 TH
by
moonstruck
on 14/12/2018, 10:11:01 UTC
It looks more like selling old hardware they never planned to release in an attempt to stay in business.

Bitmain not looking too good...
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener
by
moonstruck
on 30/08/2018, 13:41:24 UTC
This works like a charm, except on my Asus strix 1080ti cards.
It seems to pull down the core clock as soon as I start the pill.
Post
Topic
Board Marketplace (Altcoins)
Re: Buying Keccakc hashrate - 0.0002 BTC per GH/s - Higher than NH price
by
moonstruck
on 25/07/2018, 07:15:17 UTC
Why not use nicehash? You are offering double of nicehash?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: XMR-stak-JK 2.4.4 Compiled with no devfee
by
moonstruck
on 27/06/2018, 04:08:29 UTC
@JaredKaragen   Did you ever compile XMR-STAK-2.4.8 ?  Thx

2.4.5 is all that fierce-uk has released thus far.....    is it another fork or something?




Update:
Im working on my 5th attempt on compiling 2.4.5.    VS 2017 is uninstalling as I type this, and Ill have to rip out all IDE's and start over by installing fresh... again.

Probably going to DL and install the latest version of the cuda toolkit as well.... hopefully they play nice.

Try CUDA 9.1, you'll slow it down with 9.2 unless you know what you're doing.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: RX580 8GB mining at 50mh/s
by
moonstruck
on 26/06/2018, 06:11:49 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Mining speculation
Antminer S9 - 23 TH/s possible?
by
moonstruck
on 15/06/2018, 11:37:42 UTC
Although the title may have persuaded you to simply say 23TH/s is impossible, the rumour was started by Kristy (OhGodAGirl) in this interview;

https://youtu.be/A3i3jpJqgoo?t=10m8s

What do you guys think? Is this even remotely possible? As far as I've seen, anything above 15TH/s needs some exotic form of cooling and has insane power usages with much lower efficiency.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: GPU Mining will NEVER die - List of GPU only Champions
by
moonstruck
on 16/05/2018, 16:53:23 UTC
I really can't believe that luxCoin devs said that they try to remain FPGA resistant! That's awesome, respect for LuxCoin. LuxCoin devs are serious, i will visit their post soon.

Bitcoin gold & private have an ASIC.
Monero's slightly changed algo is already being mined by FPGA.
Bitcoin Gold and private will fork soon. At current rate, FPGAs won't increase difficulty of Monero for gpu miners anytime soon.

Also I do want to pay my respect to Ethash which was really the hardest algo to make a ASIC for. Ethash bought power to GPU mining, can't really talk trash about it even if the ASIC has been developed.

'Soon'... Well let's add them to the List of GPU only Champions when they have forked perhaps? And I wouldn't go so far as to say FPGA's won't increase the difficulty of Monero, they are already increasing the difficulty of Monero... But you don't need to take my word for it, you can be surprised all over again when the hashrate drops over 50% next fork and bounces back in a matter of weeks due to quick adoptation of FPGA & ASIC.

ASIC development cycle is getting shorter and shorter and FPGA/ASIC hybrids will be the doom of GPU mining. Good riddance as it's a waste of energy to use GPU for such purpose, the main reason people want to keep GPU mining alive is because of greed as they would see their hardware become obsolete. And I'm saying that as a GPU miner.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: GPU Mining will NEVER die - List of GPU only Champions
by
moonstruck
on 16/05/2018, 15:55:27 UTC

List of GPU only mine-able champions include:
*List updated daily

-Monero
-Sumokoin
-Bitcoin Gold
-Bitcoin Private
-Bitcoin Z
-Safe Coin
-Ravencoin
-LUX
-Haven



Long live Cryptocurrency freedom!

Bitcoin gold & private have an ASIC.
Monero's slightly changed algo is already being mined by FPGA.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: DIY FPGA Mining rig for any algorithm with fast ROI
by
moonstruck
on 16/05/2018, 07:30:12 UTC
⭐ Merited by 2112 (1)
Really not meaning to offend anyone, this has been a very interesting and entertaining thread, even inspiring all around in a way that leads to substantially more decentralization.  However, as an energy industry professional I must say that a kw/h and a kWh is substantially exactly the same thing.  Not sure what you guys are onto here... a kW is a unit of energy, it is a 1,000 Watts.  Watts are convertible to Joules or Therms or any other unit of energy.  And a kW/h is the number of kiloWatts consumed in an hour, as is a kWh, the number of kiloWatts consumed in an hour.  a kW is a measurement of power, and a kWh is a volumetric measurement of energy.  you can use 100kW in one hour is 100kWh or you can use 50kW for 30 minutes and 150kW for 30 minutes and it will also be 100kWh.

You can convert Joule to Wh, it is indeed a measurement of amount of energy.
Watt's cannot be converted to Joules directly as much as velocity cannot directly be converted to distance without the input of other parameters to build an equation.

Quote
And a kW/h is the number of kiloWatts consumed in an hour, as is a kWh

A kWh is not the number of kiloWatts consumed in an hour, same difference as you can't say that 'distance is the is the number of meters travelled in an hour'.
In the analogy with distance, velocity & time; kW/h would be acceleration (how much the energy flow changes per unit of time), kW would be velocity (amount of energy flow), kWh would be distance (how much energy has flown)

You can not 'use' xx kW in one hour, you can use xx kWh in one hour though. kW/h is simply the wrong unit to use. But as an energy industry professional you of course know better Wink

This is not really on-topic though but it is simply confusing to people who have little knowledge about this. It might be that most understand that it's an error but using the wrong units on purpose because everyone understands is not productive. I will not go deeper into this as we might as well be discussing whether the earth is flat or not.

Just saying... of course seeing is believing, but not really any reason not too here.  If Bittware or anyone else is trying to just unload a bunch of hardware, do they really need to do it in a bitcoin talk forum? I think there is more going on out in the world than what people are making out here.  Healthy skepticism sure... but look at the size of this thread!  People realize this is a really important topic, there is a reason for it.  Centralization of hashing power and ASIC's in general are beginning to threaten the security of crypto software... the very thing it was meant to solve.  Not good...

Let's see how it turns out, I do think though that they see what profits NVidia and AMD have gotten and want a piece of the pie. A healthy dose of skepticism is never a bad idea.
Possible profits remain to be shown but I think the claims and motivation behind the project are not unreasonable, time will tell.

I own two VCU1525's, I sent the OP a PM.

I'll help confirm the feasibility of this.

Curious to see first results!