BDRatings, it's fine, I understand your point. I would just rather have more facts and less judgements and name-calling, like the loudmouth dice-peddler above.

I am quite aware of that. Maybe I'm not making my point clearly. My objections were related to the work BDRatings was doing and definitions he chose, not the history of bytecoin.

Look, I don't disagree, a lot of stuff around bytecoin is extremely shady. However, given premine in bytecoin, it's no surprise they are trying to protect their identities.

More importantly, if you are doing work on behalf of community, transparency, etc, you should be a more careful in your definitions, it doesn't serve anybody when accusations are stretched beyond facts.

While I commend the OP for his work on uncovering this stuff, my question is: where is an actual scam in all of this? Seems to me the allegations are pretty much shilling on social media under aliases? Certainly, such things do not add trustworthiness to whoever is running bytecoin, but this does not constitutes scamming in my book. There are certainly many questions regarding bytecoin and what transpired this year alone, so this seems pretty minor compared to everything else.

Some of our miners reported missing funds yesterday, so please be very careful.

We appreciate your kind words. The workers have been implemented, we are working out last quirks, hopefully soon it will be live.

The pool is not offline, it's working. Most likely I have banned your ip for some reason, find me on telegram, so we can talk it out. https://t.me/joinchat/HDOioA315XobboIsPJ-72g. Or pm me here.

In other words, it's all just talk, right? Your etn address is public key, there is no problem divulging it in public. You send it to the pool and over the internet all the time anyway. You can even send it in private to me. But suit yourself. Assuming you've been mining at least a week judging by your claims, the effort of the pool over the last week is 106%.
So I'm gonna go ahead and say it's impossible for your claims to be factually accurate. I mean pool effort is completely transparent and public knowledge. We have almost 1500 people. You think we are underpaying by 50% and people would still be there?

I assume you either extrapolate a short period or something is wrong with your miner. Obviously as a somewhat small pool we are subject to variance day to day, but not to the extent that you claim. We have not had a single day that would pay 3 times less than calculator, now matter how approximate that is. So I'll make you an offer. Post your ETN address and prove what you are saying and you don't have to mine to the minimum, you can GTFO now and we will send you your balance.

The pool has never been offline for more than 60 seconds since its inception.
As podvodnik said, we had to restart pool couple of times when we were updating it. Everything is back to normal and hopefully even better than before. Only time will tell.