Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 30 results by msallak1
Re: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/CuckooCycle miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 14.3.0
I don't know why you having that much rejected.
I only mine with 1 gtx 1080 ti on win 7 pc and I am having [ 2566 accepted shares / 151 rejected shares ].
Edit: mining pool f2pool.
When I used spark pool I got like 33% rejected, and with grinmint most shares were rejected because of low share difficulty.
hashrate 1.34
No over clocking, and power limit 95%
Re: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/CuckooCycle miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 14.3.0
We’re pleased to release Bminer 14.3.0.
Improve the performance for Cuckatoo31.
Support 2080Ti for Cuckatoo31.
Reduce the CPU usages for Grin / Aeternity by default.
Reduce the likelihood of rejected shares for Cuckatoo31.
Please see https://www.bminer.me for more details.
Please see https://www.bminer.me/performances/ for performances of Bminer on mining different coins.
Happy mining!
Improve the performance for Cuckatoo31.
Support 2080Ti for Cuckatoo31.
Reduce the CPU usages for Grin / Aeternity by default.
Reduce the likelihood of rejected shares for Cuckatoo31.
Please see https://www.bminer.me for more details.
Please see https://www.bminer.me/performances/ for performances of Bminer on mining different coins.
Happy mining!
Tested on 9x 1080ti
Hashrate seems fine, 1.3-1.2 per card, running 190w +100/+1000 OC
However there is a problem with rejected shares still
50% rejected shares on F2pool
100% rejected shares on GrinMint
Any suggestions?
I don't know why you having that much rejected.
I only mine with 1 gtx 1080 ti on win 7 pc and I am having [ 2566 accepted shares / 151 rejected shares ].
Edit: mining pool f2pool.
When I used spark pool I got like 33% rejected, and with grinmint most shares were rejected because of low share difficulty.
Re: GMiner v1.24 Equihash 96,5/144,5/150,5(BEAM)/192,7/210,9/CuckooCycle(GRIN, AE)
+1 !!
+1 !!!Re: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/CuckooCycle miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 12.1.0
I have some issues:
1) When I run the miner on windows 7 with nvidia drivers +415 and it has x1 1080ti and x2 1050s, my pc crashes and I have to hard restart it.
2) I tried to run the miner on another desktop with rx 580 but it tells me no cuda dlcs missing so which version I must use for AMD cards?
3) I can only download lite version of your last version as the complete miner download link is broken.
4) How can we download old versions as you have removed download links for all previous versions of miner?
1) When I run the miner on windows 7 with nvidia drivers +415 and it has x1 1080ti and x2 1050s, my pc crashes and I have to hard restart it.
2) I tried to run the miner on another desktop with rx 580 but it tells me no cuda dlcs missing so which version I must use for AMD cards?
3) I can only download lite version of your last version as the complete miner download link is broken.
4) How can we download old versions as you have removed download links for all previous versions of miner?
Quote
Same as with previous release, 32 bit version performs faster in some algos (x16/x17 etc) ...
Have just tested 32vs64 bit on 1080ti's - no difference noticed, niether between 1.19 and 1.20. T-rex miner on the other hand now at least 15% faster in x16r, but way slower in lyra2z.
What is your hashrate per 1080ti with z-enemy 1.20 and with t-rex 0.6.5? And for how long you have conducted the test?
.
Re: Open Source XPM (Primecoin) GPU Miner & Pool xpmforall.org
How can we be sure that this is the REAL eXtremal and the other one is hacked?
I hope you can regain access to your original account. Thanks!
Well, he included the new miner and this note regarding his original account in his original pool ( http://xpmforall.org/ ) .I hope you can regain access to your original account. Thanks!
Update of CUDA miner with bugfix:
Linux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
Quote
failed with error CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS at C:/build/xpmclient/src/xpm/cuda/xpmclient.cpp:657
Windows 64bit: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-win64-cuda.tar.gzLinux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
I could pay 5% fee to a miner with Tdx's performance in Windows :/
working on it...
We are still waiting
Any good news??
Re: JUST RELEASED: UberMiner auto-mines the most profitable coin & pays in BitCoin
What happens if I install a new version of UberMiner? Will I lose the coins mined so far?
No because you are mining to a pool with the entered wallet address. You can also track your earnings here : https://zpool.ca/?address=Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 10000 miners
Hi team,
can you have a look/add T-Rex miner, please?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4432704.0
It is mining really faster on 1080Ti (latest drivers 398.x), on all Supported algorithms (on some a WAY FASTER:
lyra2z
phi2
hsr
c11
x17
phi
tribus
(for now?)
can you have a look/add T-Rex miner, please?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4432704.0
It is mining really faster on 1080Ti (latest drivers 398.x), on all Supported algorithms (on some a WAY FASTER
:lyra2z
phi2
hsr
c11
x17
phi
tribus
(for now?)
Yeah I am getting over 4.3 mh/s , with cryptodredge about 3.6
https://i.imgur.com/61bUhFq.png
I tried installing Ubuntu on windows 10 and installed most drivers, except amd blockchain drivers which gave me an error while installing, and my conclusion is I had zero luck running the miner on windows 10 via Ubuntu platform.
The issue is I get error that it failed to list opencl platforms, is there anyway to get the miner to recognize my gpus?
https://i.imgur.com/LS1hgn9.png
The issue is I get error that it failed to list opencl platforms, is there anyway to get the miner to recognize my gpus?
https://i.imgur.com/LS1hgn9.png
Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 10000 miners
Is there any plan to add "lyclMiner" AMD miner for Layra2rev2
https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner/releases
https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner/releases
Re: [ANN] Avermore miner - optimized sgminer (AMD) fork for x16r/x16s/xevan(beta)
strange, but I actually get lower rates with 1.2 on RX480 8G with Uber 3.1 mem timings
(running with -g 2 -w 64 -X 256 --benchmark)
X16r Avermore-1.1 8.4 mh
X16r Avermore-1.2 7.743 mh
X16s Avermore-1.1 8.366 mh
X16s Avermore-1.2 7.711 mh
(running with -g 2 -w 64 -X 256 --benchmark)
X16r Avermore-1.1 8.4 mh
X16r Avermore-1.2 7.743 mh
X16s Avermore-1.1 8.366 mh
X16s Avermore-1.2 7.711 mh
Interesting. Can you compare the Hamsi kernel hashrates between 1.1 and 1.2? (run with --benchmark-sequence=BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB). It's possible some of the changes I made caused regressions in cards other than the RX580.
exits immediately when I use --benchmark-sequence=anything (even 0123456789ABCDEF) in both 1.1 and 1.2
edit:
I also noticed that I'm hitting the thermal card power limit and it starts throttling
in 1.1 the GPU clock gets throttled to ~1200Mhz and temperature stays around 80c, so it can probably reach even higher speeds with better cooling
in 1.2 the GPU clock is ~1300Mhz and temperature is ~75c
580 is basically the same card, with slightly higher clocks, so should perform similarly
I'll take a look into why --benchmark-sequence isn't working on Windows.
I did some testing on my test rig, and the results are weird.
The Hamsi kernel, when benchmarked by itself (i.e. repeated 16 times), is indeed 35% faster on 1.2 compared to 1.1 (4.2 MHs -> 5.7 MHs). Also, when I benchmark the rest of the algos (0123456789ACDEF), the hashrates are the same between the two versions (as expected, since the only change was with the Hamsi kernel).
However, when I test running all of the algos (0123456789ABCDEF), v1.1 is indeed slightly faster than v1.2 (7.9 MHs vs 7.7 MHs). I'm a bit stumped right now on why this would be the case. So anyways; if you're getting better results on v1.1, then stick with that version for now. I'll see if I can get a patch to v1.2 to address this issue.
All tests were done with -g 2 -w 64 -X 64, by the way. Found this to be the optimal xIntensity on my RX580. When running with -X 256, v1.2 did beat out v1.1 (7.1 MHs vs 6.8 MHs), but both were slower than with -X 64.
https://i.imgur.com/V9GjWNF.png
Re: JUST RELEASED: UberMiner auto-mines the most profitable coin & pays in BitCoin
I think there is nothing to worry about, it is just a profitability switching tool that switch to different algorithms on zpool.ca pool.
1) It would be nice if they add option to show command window so we can see mining progress like accepted shares ... etc
2) Also please try to add all profitable algorithms not just 10 algos.
3) when people have different cards on same system, it will be nice if cards can mine different things depending on their most profitable algo.
4) Last thing, releasing dedicated version for AMD card will be great.
Thank you very much.
1) It would be nice if they add option to show command window so we can see mining progress like accepted shares ... etc
2) Also please try to add all profitable algorithms not just 10 algos.
3) when people have different cards on same system, it will be nice if cards can mine different things depending on their most profitable algo.
4) Last thing, releasing dedicated version for AMD card will be great.
Thank you very much.
msallak1,
Just a bit of warning from my personal experience - I killed one card and damaged 3, 1080ti, with too much overclocking. Don`t push them. I overclocked too much and they lasted just 18 hours, then died
WOW I just restored default settings, I think the extra 40 hashes doesn't deserve the risk!!! .Just a bit of warning from my personal experience - I killed one card and damaged 3, 1080ti, with too much overclocking. Don`t push them. I overclocked too much and they lasted just 18 hours, then died
I will stick to stock clocks then and hope will reach ROI