Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 27 results by mueller37
OK, i can understand you do not agree with the 2 weeks delay between launch and mining. But simply ask dev to propose a vote instead of making those sort of lobbying.
I'm not against the idea, just the form.
It's a bit to late for that anyway. If you want a vote to be representative, dev should send a mailing to all investors + public vote - so you need a voting frame like at least a week.
I'm not against the idea, just the form.
It's a bit to late for that anyway. If you want a vote to be representative, dev should send a mailing to all investors + public vote - so you need a voting frame like at least a week.
Agree, this vote is not fair.
I'm a first stage investor and not even allowed to vote in this poll.
(Is there some minimum Activity required?)But people not even involved in exo are allowed to vote here, right? If you want a fair vote, let devs make a real poll like the logo vote on exocoin.org.
Re: [PoS+PoW] eXocoin [EXO]-gen 2.0- dev. from scratch! Give-Away | Open Beta
mail applicants: each valid application will get at the moment 6,000,000 / 1500 people =~ 4,000 EXO (equals a 2nd stage investment of 0.033 BTC)
Note: mail applications have not been verified yet. So the number still can decreases or increases. The possibility to apply for the mail giveaway will end on 23th April 23:00:00 GMT.
Everything is fine, I agree with them except the mail applicants processor.
Firstly , as your said , each valid apply could get 4,000 exo -- equals a 2nd stage investment of 0.033 BTC, its absolutely not fair to those people who invest
less than 0.15 BTC ( may be 0.1 BTC ). These investors take risk and spend much time to this coin, but they get less than the email-giveaways. I cannot believable that.
Secondly , its no double that some people have several account at this forum, maybe 3 accounts, 10 accounts or even more, they did nothing but spent little
time to have a high value, and even steal our coin from investors , e.g:3 valid email applicants = 0.1 BTC, 30 applicants = 1 BTC ,as I mentioned above , this
could have a damage to the investors.
At last, I know the cheat phenomena cannot be prevented, so I recommend the best price of each should between 0.015 BTC and 0.02 BTC , it means the valid
at least 2500 people.But if the number cannot reached, we should reserve the remainder coin to those people who will help our ecnomicsystem and develop application for exoCoin, like Android wallet, build log..., and more.
By the way , we could regard those people who had gave suggestion and report debug as a valid email giveaway, We must thanks for those people.
Its my opinion.............
very much agree with you
everyone still just trying to get the biggest stake?
all the people who agree in giving more exo to new accounts are profiles (sockpuppets?) created after 23.01.2014
Re: [ANN] [eToken] eToken is retaken. 100k Bank Blocked -> New wallet
added a new logo in 2 versions: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hspyjpwshhsjblm/QwDsJnLnJe
Is that what you mean with metro style Mjollnir ?
Is that what you mean with metro style Mjollnir ?
Uhuh
I like the style of etok 5. Maybe doing something with capitals but besides that
2 new versions of #5..same link as before
i like the style of the 8. one, but the spaces between the the words in the circle are different
and i'm not sure if the circles are concentrical
I like this one more.
And it`s round...exact 1:1 ratio
Still same link
Concentric means all the circles should have the same central point
But the circle with writing has another central point as the white circle. This bothers me a bit
Re: [ANN] [eToken] eToken is retaken. 100k Bank Blocked -> New wallet
added a new logo in 2 versions: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hspyjpwshhsjblm/QwDsJnLnJe
Is that what you mean with metro style Mjollnir ?
Is that what you mean with metro style Mjollnir ?
Uhuh
I like the style of etok 5. Maybe doing something with capitals but besides that
2 new versions of #5..same link as before
i like the style of the 8. one, but the spaces between the the words in the circle are different
and i'm not sure if the circles are concentrical
Re: [ANN] [eToken] Rare | Website 11 languages | New version -> mandatory update
I got 5k from the dev fwiw. After the pool crashed, I solo mined almost 2k more. Make sure you won't delete my coins.
Why did you get that coin? And pls post your transaction here.
Because I was mining in the dev's pool that crashed. He paid everyone the coins back + a little extra for the troubles the pool caused even though no one asked him to. Very stand up thing of him to do imo.
Status: 28548 confirmations
Date: 8.1.2014 10:12
From: unknown
To: e9JGP8Sc89TdnESfxJnfykFq9cS3APKXzB (own address, label: Imported private key from Mogui (Mined in the first pool))
Credit: 5000.00 eTOK
Net amount: +5000.00 eTOK
Transaction ID: cf3a80596693f6e0c7b2be21d644b66853384caffc19d7c8fd985ecf3108b533
Then that was your 5k i listed before. Sorry for that. I just didn't think anyone got such a big amount
But since only the 100k bank is going to be removed your coins are safe.
Re: [ANN] [eToken] Rare | Website 11 languages | New version -> mandatory update
I made a screenshot on the 1. pool:
http://s1.directupload.net/images/140127/5kuhbr2h.jpg
I was hashing @ 750kh/s and got 400 etok.
It is possible that the one with 9000kh/s got 5000 etok and the one with 4000kh/s got 2500 etok if they were on the pool the whole time.
http://s1.directupload.net/images/140127/5kuhbr2h.jpg
I was hashing @ 750kh/s and got 400 etok.
It is possible that the one with 9000kh/s got 5000 etok and the one with 4000kh/s got 2500 etok if they were on the pool the whole time.
Re: [ANN] [eToken] Rare | Website 11 languages | New version -> mandatory update
Why does it look shady? There are people who got 5k private keys from Mogui for mining in the crashed pool.
Ok sry if it belongs to anyone else
It seems strange for me, that there is 5k input from the bank (like all the other 5k blocks too) and no output.
But you are right, its only 100% save to cut out the 100k bank.
Re: [ANN] [eToken] Rare | Website 11 languages | New version -> mandatory update
there are other addresses besides the 100k which need to be removed, but its hard to find out
i think dev owns this address too: http://cryptexplorer.com/address/e6yaE81WjCajAwSUWYam6rgc4LcL5t2VAs
or did anyone get 14,5k etok directly from the bank but didnt spend anything?
edit2:
with the other blockexplorer it is possible to look into the address of the 1. pool owned by dev: http://altexplorer.net/address/eFwbiVtB1iwqRK8ofQ5oMhgziEk9B3SZR6
seems like most of the 20k from the pool got distributed
i think dev owns this address too: http://cryptexplorer.com/address/e6yaE81WjCajAwSUWYam6rgc4LcL5t2VAs
or did anyone get 14,5k etok directly from the bank but didnt spend anything?
edit2:
with the other blockexplorer it is possible to look into the address of the 1. pool owned by dev: http://altexplorer.net/address/eFwbiVtB1iwqRK8ofQ5oMhgziEk9B3SZR6
seems like most of the 20k from the pool got distributed
updated my post
I'm sorry, but the information about the 1. pool was wrong. You can only see the transactions of this address with the other blockexplorer.
Re: [ANN] [eToken] Rare | Website 11 languages | New version -> mandatory update
Okay, I've read a few posts back now and it seems you're willing to give to original dev 38k coins, right? For what if I may ask?
No i dont. This 38k was used to pay miners in the first pool (owned by the dev). The pool crashed. So we got no coins from it. So he paid us (the miners) with those 38k (as far as i can track it down).
In my case (with 580khas and only 2 hours of mining) it was not much. But some miners must have had many thousends of coins. There where a lot of miners. And bounties like 500 e-tok for 1 wallet etc. where paid from it.
All those coins where being used and mabey sold to other people. If we delete those. A lot of people whould lose there coins. I think that would be very bad. People suddenly loosing coins they earned or bought. There would be no trust in the coin anymore.
but dev got also the coins from first pool that crashed (8000 blocks = 20k etok) so he had a total of 158k
not everyone contacted dev to get his coins from the pool i think. maybe 15k got paid to the first miners
about 10k to 15k were giveaways and bounties
if only the 100k get removed we can be sure dev still has 20k+
i think it would be better to start a new coin (or just new etoken blockchain beginning with block 1) and give people the chance to exchange their pre-fork etoken to the new coin
Re: [ANN] [PMC] Premine! - 100% Premine / 100% Distribution - Mining TX fees only
haha mined a 5PMC tx fee
http://img21.myimg.de/pemine9b925.jpg
my address: 17UUgE95P88Hbnk9cUiSKPT1VV3nNqg7KU
http://img21.myimg.de/pemine9b925.jpg
my address: 17UUgE95P88Hbnk9cUiSKPT1VV3nNqg7KU
Re: [ANN] [eToken] Rare | Website 11 languages | New version -> mandatory update
The trades after fork are not the big problem i think, because many of the trades were old coins that already were on coinedup, so it isn't necessary to revert all trades.
The problem are the coins that were deposited to coinedup after the fork and then exchanged.
It should be possible to get the data from coinedup about the deposited amounts of etoken after fork. It shouldn't be that many deposits, because the most etok after fork were mined by a few solo miners.
Then we can collect donations for coinedup, to replace the exact amount of etoken deposited to coinedup after fork.
If it is too much, the exact amount of missing etoken could be included in the new fork and send to coinedup?
That way, the etok balances of the user accounts at coinedup would just remain the same since when the exchange went offline and nobody would lose anything.
(I don't know how coinedup deposits work, but i expect it to be a single wallet with different adresses for deposit? If thats true it should be possible like i explained.)
The problem are the coins that were deposited to coinedup after the fork and then exchanged.
It should be possible to get the data from coinedup about the deposited amounts of etoken after fork. It shouldn't be that many deposits, because the most etok after fork were mined by a few solo miners.
Then we can collect donations for coinedup, to replace the exact amount of etoken deposited to coinedup after fork.
If it is too much, the exact amount of missing etoken could be included in the new fork and send to coinedup?
That way, the etok balances of the user accounts at coinedup would just remain the same since when the exchange went offline and nobody would lose anything.
(I don't know how coinedup deposits work, but i expect it to be a single wallet with different adresses for deposit? If thats true it should be possible like i explained.)