Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 1,008 results by myagui
Re: ☑☑☑[ANN][BSD] BitSend -The first Segwit Masternodecoin 0.14.0.5 New Version
Hi guys!
I have not received my airdrop recently, likely due to inactivity on my bitcointalk account.
Could someone confirm, and is it ok that I signup again while checking that I remain active?
Thanks!
Edit: I figured out where to check now. Got removed due to inactivity.
I have not received my airdrop recently, likely due to inactivity on my bitcointalk account.
Thanks!
Edit: I figured out where to check now. Got removed due to inactivity.
I had stopped looking for any updates on this a while back, but coincidentally, checked reddit just today and found one post that might be of interest for some. I would not get my hopes up just yet, but maybe, just maybe, there's still some chance for this one to succeed.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ziftrCOIN/comments/6ioz43/big_updatenews_for_ziftrcoin/
Cheers!
https://www.reddit.com/r/ziftrCOIN/comments/6ioz43/big_updatenews_for_ziftrcoin/
Cheers!
Qual seria o preço pelo qual venderia a Ducati atualmente ? (se já não estiver vendida).
Olá Continuous.
Realmente a BTC continuando assim, qualquer dia o preço será uns 0.xx BTCs?
Por agora então, deixava a motita partir por 4 BTCs (com revisão a fazer por minha conta).
Re: [ANN]ROUND - Start playing CS:GO NOW! 26.03 Weekly Tournament. Prize pool 500$
Good fun testing the tournament. I sucked and got myself out pretty quick, but still fun.
It's really difficult to get started, but if participation is properly automated, you do have an interesting project here.
Cheers!
It's really difficult to get started, but if participation is properly automated, you do have an interesting project here.
Cheers!
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
While I am not really a fan of such activities, I would note that the increasing tone and frequency of trolling & fud, is just indication of wider reach and strong hint of greater interest in Decred. Trolls and fudster's are only really around in numbers when there is value in doing so, and they are purely driven by the desire to (re)buy at lower prices, nothing else.
Do not feed these buggers please.
Do not feed these buggers please.
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
^ The script you had imported would have just created the necessary account for pool ticket purchasing & voting. You can just configure (or re-configure) your wallet to buy tickets into another pool, or to buy them in solo mode. There's nothing really to "revert", so to speak.
(sidenote : there is something that could be reverted, but I don't think you'd care for all the details, and it's not really helpful to your case)
Tickets that you had bought in the past, will eventually get picked to vote, or get missed, or finally expire. The very longest that you can expect for the last of your tickets to be returned, is about ~4.7 months, which is the expiration time. Most likely, the majority of your ticket funds (if not all), will return to your account much sooner than that.
(sidenote : there is something that could be reverted, but I don't think you'd care for all the details, and it's not really helpful to your case)
Tickets that you had bought in the past, will eventually get picked to vote, or get missed, or finally expire. The very longest that you can expect for the last of your tickets to be returned, is about ~4.7 months, which is the expiration time. Most likely, the majority of your ticket funds (if not all), will return to your account much sooner than that.
Thanks Myagui. The pool is telling me I have 0 live tickets, just voted tickets yet my balance is 10% of what it should be. Is this normal?
That really looks off lmaonade80.
If the pool reports you has having 0 live tickets, maybe you never really bought pool tickets?At least 2 possibilities come to mind with regards to your missing balance: maybe you bought your tickets as "solo tickets", regardless of having joined the pool, or maybe you bought "pool tickets", but entered the addresses incorrectly, in which case, your coins might be in someone else's hands by now...
The following commands might give you further insight:
dcrctl --wallet getbalance * 0 all
^ will give you your total balance, including any coins locked for voting, in all addresses that you own.
dcrctl --wallet getstakeinfo
^ will give you your detailed ticket stats, voted, live, expired, etc (both pool and solo tickets, there's no distinction there)
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
^ The script you had imported would have just created the necessary account for pool ticket purchasing & voting. You can just configure (or re-configure) your wallet to buy tickets into another pool, or to buy them in solo mode. There's nothing really to "revert", so to speak.
(sidenote : there is something that could be reverted, but I don't think you'd care for all the details, and it's not really helpful to your case)
Tickets that you had bought in the past, will eventually get picked to vote, or get missed, or finally expire. The very longest that you can expect for the last of your tickets to be returned, is about ~4.7 months, which is the expiration time. Most likely, the majority of your ticket funds (if not all), will return to your account much sooner than that.
(sidenote : there is something that could be reverted, but I don't think you'd care for all the details, and it's not really helpful to your case)
Tickets that you had bought in the past, will eventually get picked to vote, or get missed, or finally expire. The very longest that you can expect for the last of your tickets to be returned, is about ~4.7 months, which is the expiration time. Most likely, the majority of your ticket funds (if not all), will return to your account much sooner than that.
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
https://dcr.stakeminer.com/ is offline?
What happens if they had my coins that were staking? I believe I imported a script and they could not actually steal the coins, but I am missing 90% of my DCR from my wallet and I'm still fuzzy on how PoS works.
What happens if they had my coins that were staking? I believe I imported a script and they could not actually steal the coins, but I am missing 90% of my DCR from my wallet and I'm still fuzzy on how PoS works.
It's impossible that they have stolen your coins because the POS pools doesn't keep your coins during stake.
The coins still are in your wallet, but blocked.
Only on evolution you send your coins
If you've bought tickets for stakepool voting, and the pool shuts down or goes offline, your tickets/votes will get missed. Once they do, your wallet can revoke those missed tickets and you'll see your balance restored (minus a tx fee, and absent of voting rewards).
Importantly, even if you've bought all your tickets for stakepool voting and the stakepool completely shuts down, you can always have your own wallet online and voting as well, so your votes can still be submitted.
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
Anyone have some insight on when the best time to buy tickets now is, and how to estimate fees?
It looks like there are four points per cycle on the oscillating ticket price graph: 40, 80, 120, and 80 DCR, approximately. I've heard that fees go insane when ticket price hits that low point around 40ish, but I'm not seeing any fee info on dcrstats or in wallet with getstakeinfo command or whatever.
Any advice or suggestions appreciated...
It looks like there are four points per cycle on the oscillating ticket price graph: 40, 80, 120, and 80 DCR, approximately. I've heard that fees go insane when ticket price hits that low point around 40ish, but I'm not seeing any fee info on dcrstats or in wallet with getstakeinfo command or whatever.
Any advice or suggestions appreciated...
To avoid the fee wars, I'd suggest buying in the 40's and 50's range. These will usually go through even at the default/minimum ticketfee.
Lower ticket prices get quite competitive, but even then, on a couple of recent occasions, I've been able to pickup some tickets in the 30's range, with a ticketfee setting of 0.0666/Kb.
Personally, I stay clear of the 20's ticket prices, as I'm not a fan of the fee wars that ensue. To succeed at that range of ticket prices, I suppose one must really be using ticketbuyer (and conceding a large portion of the voting reward to ticket fees).
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
What's with the puzzle? Where will it lead?
My guess, it'll be leading down the proverbial 'rabbit hole'
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.
The problem is that ocminer has the pool source and hasn't release it to the public. If we could convince him to do this, we could have more even hashrate distribution. I reached out to him about this a few days ago but have not gotten a response. If others feel inclined to plead for his mercy, please do so.
I think myself and a few others might join you on your protest. Between us, we have 1000's of tickets.
Maybe I missed some point you were making there dbt1033, but suprnova is one of the smaller PoW pools at the moment, has mostly been well under 15%. Coinmine.pl on the other hand, has usually well over 60% (checking right this instant, dcrstats shows it having 75% of the nethash). There's at least some 7 PoW pools for people to spread out their hashes already, so I don't think that the pool sources are missing generally speaking...
I do appreciate any joiners to this protest though!
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.
[...]
its funny reading these posts though ... especially how sp calls his customers 'dickheads' ... and everyone STILL pays him ... hehehe ...
#crysx
its funny reading these posts though ... especially how sp calls his customers 'dickheads' ... and everyone STILL pays him ... hehehe ...
#crysx
I'm inclined to think that 'dickheads' is a reasonably accurate description.
See, paying upfront, and sometimes ongoing fees, for something that might be a wee bit faster, on only some model cards, on some magical clocks, on a limited set of operating systems, ignoring the additional rejects, and never really receiving an upgrade that matters, takes a special kind of person. You know... A 'dickhead'.
It's really only a couple of people that continue to release their open source work for the benefit of the nvidia miners. In particular, and referring generally about recent times, I'm most thankful for Epsylon3 and Alexis, with casual but valued contributions from other folks who know who they are. Big thank you guys!
SP_ please ignore the distraction. By all means proceed with your sales of whatever-shitalgo-0.0001%-spmod to the 'dickheads'.
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
But But ... Accumulation ...
Take your time folks. By and large, the most historical volume happened upwards of 0.0024.
More importantly, can't wait to exercise voting on stuff that matters! Eventually, I would suggest taking up a vote for a fixed tail emission rate (similar to Monero perhaps). This would ensure that both PoS and PoW remain economically meaningful, if not primarily so. Would very much welcome other opinions on this. Cheers!
Take your time folks. By and large, the most historical volume happened upwards of 0.0024.
More importantly, can't wait to exercise voting on stuff that matters! Eventually, I would suggest taking up a vote for a fixed tail emission rate (similar to Monero perhaps). This would ensure that both PoS and PoW remain economically meaningful, if not primarily so. Would very much welcome other opinions on this. Cheers!
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
sambiohazard, all stake pools have the same code base, and to stop your fear, uncertainty and doubts I'm constantly update Dcrstats Stakepool to newest versions and add new security features to protect your accounts (2FA coming very soon, it's been successfuly tested in Evolution already).
So, first of all, if attackers will find a vulnerability in the stakepool or decred software, they won't attack only one biggest pool, but all of them. And you know it doesn't matter then 1 pool with 25% or 5 pools with 5%. Actually, yes, it matters, because I don't know how serious are all 9 pool operators, but our reaction and hot-fixing will be super fast.
Even if hackers can take control under all 10 existing stakepools (c0 + 9 from rfp), what can they do in the short terms? Do not include transactions in next 10 blocks? To destroy next 10 blocks? Even if they will take control of all stake pools, it cannot be a 1-minute attack. Hackers will have to maintain all the infrastructure and pay for the hosting of more than 40 servers, which are not cheap
PS: so far you are the only person who don't like something and who is going to attack the network.
So, first of all, if attackers will find a vulnerability in the stakepool or decred software, they won't attack only one biggest pool, but all of them. And you know it doesn't matter then 1 pool with 25% or 5 pools with 5%. Actually, yes, it matters, because I don't know how serious are all 9 pool operators, but our reaction and hot-fixing will be super fast.
Even if hackers can take control under all 10 existing stakepools (c0 + 9 from rfp), what can they do in the short terms? Do not include transactions in next 10 blocks? To destroy next 10 blocks? Even if they will take control of all stake pools, it cannot be a 1-minute attack. Hackers will have to maintain all the infrastructure and pay for the hosting of more than 40 servers, which are not cheap
PS: so far you are the only person who don't like something and who is going to attack the network.
I definitely agree with sambiohazard in this respect, and I'm pretty sure others do as well. I've voiced my concern for a healthier network distribution before, and this initiative, to me, is a step in the wrong direction. Nonetheless, you're providing a staking alternative for the less technical users, so kudos for that.
Folks, please consider joining any of the smaller PoS pools. Thanks!