Anyone have problems with blockchain drivers (tried both versions) giving 0h with cards (R9 Nanos) ? The problem is with ASM mode ON it seems because when i disable it miner works, and ASM work with older drivers just fine + On ETH miner ASM works just fine...
So actually i am the one and only one with this problem? Claymore any tip?
you need older drivers, it is written in the first page of this thread. either 16.12 or 16.3 or something. nano is pretty much the same as the fury line. So you cant really mix and match a nano and a 480
i dont understand what you mean by mixing and matching nano and 480, but as i have said i will repeat myself:
Nanos + blockchain drivers works in ASM mode for ethereum but dont work for zcash Nanos + older drivers works both ways
And since you metioned 480
480 + blockchain drivers dont work on eth with ASM on but on older drivers it works fine..
I have machines with both types of cards (and cards are not mixed they are separated)
Probably asked this question a lot, but what is the amount what person with knowledge could make example weekly with 1 BTC deposit example?
You can expect to make anywhere from 1 to 2% a day with GUNBOT.
you can make much more (from personal experience) but it depends of your "knowledge" lvl and a bit of luck.
P.S. you could also lose much more than you think you will/could lose, especially if you are greedy. Honestly it is kinda irrelevant question coz too many factors are included and neither i gave the right answer, nor Henkkaa, nor could any1 for that matter.
Expecting and actually making is 2 very different things..
When 64 anti.virus detect it as safe and only kaspersky detects it, you might want tho think to a false positive. Their website gives you suggestions how to handle that here https://support.kaspersky.com/viruses/general/1870
Sure thing, but just wanted to ask if any1 else had same situation since it wasnt the case before with earlier version.
And just to clarify i wasn`t thinking about it as you did smth bad or so, actually i was thinking more like is it false positive (which could explain the fact that earlier supergun.js was a script and now the script itself is in executable file supergun.exe so that might alarm the AV) or is it github itself (what happens these days it would not be surprise). It wasn't ment to raise suspicion of any kind. You did your part very well and beyond my expectation especially the support you provide even thou i try to ask minimum of it just coz i respect your time and effort you put into this. - i personally dont know how you manage to catch up with everybody, but again great work.
Does any1 have issue/warning with new version supergun.exe being AdWare.Win32.ELEX.bel? that does not seems to appear in earlier versions or did i downloaded corrupted archive?
Does any1 have issue/warning with new version supergun.exe being AdWare.Win32.ELEX.bel? that does not seems to appear in earlier versions or did i downloaded corrupted archive?
