Australian Cinema-on-Demand Distributor Launching Cryptocurrency To Reward Film Enthusiasts


Australian-based Demand Film has released a new virtual currency to reward users who promote and watch movie trailers.

Demand Film is officially releasing the cryptocurrency, known as ‘Screencreds,’ before the company launches in Germany next Tuesday.

The new digital coin is the latest example of how digital currencies and blockchain technology are making waves in the film industry.

Paying People To Watch Movies 
The idea behind Screencreds is to give people an incentive to market and promote offerings from Demand Film.

The company organizes theatrical screenings for films and documentaries based on consumer demand.

Demand Film CEO and managing director David Doepel told the Hollywood Reporter that people who watch and share movie trailers will be able to earn the cryptocurrency as a reward.
https://www.ccn.com/australian-cinema-on-demand-distributor-launching-cryptocurrency-to-reward-film-enthusiasts/

I respect your opinion but its not always about habitat , many country even lived beside polluted river , just to get a waste food so their family can eat, Too many children in a family is a crucial things to them, first the children can't go to school because of poverty, second the they don't have a house and if theyre going to relocate , it I's much harder to them to adopt where they will be placed.

There are a lot of problems we, as individual and as a society, faces everyday. Whether it be physically, mentally, environmentally, pyschologically or morally it seems that these problems are inevitable.

The role of the government is to stabilize and provide the basic needs of a citizen including the order and organization among individuals. While the religion is to ensure that faith and morale of the citizens are still in equilibrium with whatever aspect.

In terms of the political issues that arises between the government and the opposition, should the sector of religion interfere with whatever the citizens and the government must decide?

We are into gadgets, most of the people are addict on it.
We spent more of our vacant time facing our Cellphones and Ipads.

Playing games and downloading some apps on the store require payments, Is this the best time for those stores to open their payment method with cryptocurrency specially Bitcoin?

This question is impossible to answer in the present situation. Had it been posed one or two hundred years ago, we could say education was key. Now that human population has reached epidemic proportions, band-aids are insufficient. Nothing short of a radical reduction of birthrates worldwide, coupled with mechanisms to keep human growth in check, would have any effect. Given the global misery in store if we do nothing, how is this unethical? The only solution I have seen is in fiction. Dan Brown's supposedly evil protagonist in his latest novel ‘Inferno,’ did come up with just such a solution, at the genetic level, which had no impact on the current generation but great benefits to all future generations. Would this could be made a reality.

I get your view. I have a follow up question, Does this mean that every place that humans have not occupied has to be occupied? what about other living species? And lastly, Don't you think that places where are not yet occupied by human are not that favorable for survivor in the long run?

I do not believe in this topic. Humans are not so many as we think. Even if we were so many, why reduce for what? Many people think that food will not be enough in the future but it is not true. We have a lot of places where we can cultivate. Countries like Canada and Russia are actually empty. People can easily move there if there are nowhere to go. With science, we can easily plant anywhere. We are already eating modified fruits and vegetables. We are doing great. We do not need to kill people or to reduce the population.

In a new report published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Associate Professor of Communication Studies Jeffrey Hall found that it takes roughly 50 hours of time together to move from mere acquaintance to casual friend, 90 hours to go from that stage to simple “friend” status and more than 200 hours before you can consider someone your close friend.

I have been telling folks around me for a while now and I will mention it here. I really think we're focusing on the wrong stuff. The big question is do we really need to reduce human population? Because the more we think we need to, the more crazy unethical ideas spring up. The major question we should be facing is how can we increase the quality of the existing human population? This earth is rich, irregardless of what speculators say. We will keep discovering more and more of its resources. And I think this will be an unending process. People crowd up in cities and developed places just to escape the rigour of developing other regions. And I think this is our undoing.

what I would suggest is to change the social structure of developing nations while at the same time introducing economical advancements steered toward cultural evolution.

here a few methods

education can help curve fertility rates,but how useful might that be in a male dominant society where forced marriage is still the norm?
the solution:introduce norm that empower freedom and independence, while shaming those infringing on those right as if there committing a taboo, and that it acceptable for couple to have no children at all

2. the senior population might want more grandchildren for various economical and personal reason. diminishing workforce,more retiree then economic supporters,old mcgutget family-owned farm need more child labor etc.

the solution: keep advancing technology to at least substitute for the difference in the job market while the population is in transition for a smaller demographic

3. especially in developing nations, the main reason why people procreate vigorously is to better there odds of passing there legacy and that one will be a success in a poverty stricken area, more children mean better their chances.

the solution: make the opposite true; offer programs for single-children (or that has only one biological sibling) that allow various resources to be accessible to them. I don’t think they would want 7 or 8 gosling in a polluted pond if they know that stopping at one will ensure they (under-tale reference) will become a geese thriving in a crystal clear lake (world)

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

The main question is who will regulate decentralization at the world level: the system itself or the government?

How Déjà vu Can Happen?

Have you ever come to a place for the first time, and feel familiar with the place? In French, the recurrence of such an event is called the Deja Vu. But why did Deja Vu happen? Is our life like a soap opera whose story is repeated again?

If you are Chinese, and you are ready for marrying an Indian girl without a dowry, then on average you will get a girl who looks like this:

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CnUsFZpfUB4/V7CobjlB08I/AAAAAAAAhLo/LuEFe2UwyzMbM51OMgGmgoxwBA8Lk-ddgCLcB/s640/SHE%2BPURE%2B2016.jpg

If you can spend $10,000, then you will get a girl who looks like this:

http://www.badlegaindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/17.jpg

If you could spend $100,000, then you will get a girl who looks like this:

http://indpaedia.com/ind/images/f/f8/Bhavana6.jpg

But why stick with India? You will get far better deals in Thailand.

the french have a truly misguided national trust, they arent creating anything high quality.

and their language culture, is lightyears appart from their written culture.

why are they still called with germany together europes economic  powerhouse?

Most of the stuff out there is very unnatural and quite unsettling, I think these kind of stuff is warping our brains with what is really meant to be.