Yes. You can check various chainanalysis tools. Recipient address appears to belong to Coinbase according to one of the tools. Source in 2013 .. not much interesting, partly also Coinbase, Mt. Gox, some other exchanges. I have never seen the bech32 transfer to 100 different addresses before.. it's reasonable to assume it was done by an exchange.

Brazio is a project of the same company - OBC. Practically a copy of the same coin. How do these coins relate since they are launched by/for the same company?

Oh well, I guess that would have been my short answer too..

Well, and I feel you are just trolling me here ..to make me respond to your rather insulting comment how my statement was ignorant. But I don't see exactly, what I was ignoring:

1. Don't play by the rules - that was an expression, if you did not get it, that is your problem. What I meant is that there are companies that are only profit-driven with no social responsibility whatsoever. Those exploit the system put in place by the developers of the digital currencies to gain unfair advantage over other participants in the "free market" (look at Nicehash or Bitmain). And even free market must be protected with some rules.

2. What you are saying is true, but I think we both know that this is different in this case, because that product of the company directly messes up with the entire system. I would not mind ASICs developed in cooperation with the community of a given coin (wouldn't I? I don't know, that's probably not going to happen anyway). You're just taking my statement way too seriously ..

3. I think the extent of such testing will be clear in few weeks. I would prefer if they tested such product (see point 2) on their private blockchain. But of course, slap me with the obvious fact, the shocking revelation that you need to "test" your product before launch on the market. And why not earn few hundred milion bucks doing it. You are so smart and I am so stupid I did not know that. Congratulations.

4. Still, there are some basic consumer protection laws in place in many developed countries. I am in no way defending such laws, but there is no way you can be sure that the product you purchase has not been extensively used. Therefore I used the term unsuspecting public..

I don't see how you have constructively added value to this discussion, all you did was take my rather half-serious statement apart and comment on the obvious things. I personally did not learn anything new from your clever comment, but please continue with your education. Anyway, I am out of here, not much has ever came out of internet discussions anyway and this is as much as I was willing to write this year.

I agree.. as long as there are companies that don't play by the rules, secretly develop and manufacture ASICs, mine with them and then sell them with profit to unsuspecting public.. despite having only Nvidia cards not suitable for cryptonight, I am mining and supporting Monero today. I would not mind updating my files for any coin every so often to keep the money distribution fair and mining decentralized (as much as possible).

Well, I almost started to worry about the fate of the coin since no block was mined for a week, but if the team of Mktcoin programmers is on it ... this really gives me some comfort. I might as well start mining soon. Mktcoin to the moon.

Reading his previous posts, I don't think that was the issue here. It seems he swapped his coins. Maybe some exchange issues? I don't understand either

14500 blocks with 120 coins reward per block were mined on the old blockchain. There was a transition to new algo beginning of february (from lyra2v2 to lyra2z) and new blockchain, the coins could be swapped if you requested it.. so there are enough coins for MNs.

You can see the old ANN thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2747895.0

I don't think that CRS is currently traded anywhere. The Roadmap on Criptoreal website clearly mentions that exchanges are planned in the beginning of April. Let me know if I missed something.

The day Arcpool goes down along with Nicehash will be the day I open a bottle of Champagne, same as I did on 6th December 2017. Nicehash is the cryptomining equivalent of IOI from the Ready Player One, no wonder it got hacked.

I would really like to know how the mining difficulty adjustment works in case of this coin. Is it possible to read more about it somewhere? Maybe when you issue the whitepaper or is it the same as for the other Neoscrypt coins? Thanks for the answer.


To me this does not seem like hashrate attacks, but Nicehash "abuse" of the coin's mining difficulty re-adjustment mechanics. Just increasing NH profits. NH has been using this practice for quite some time on various Neoscrypt algo coins (not sure if it is some sort of bots or NH users). Regular pool miners are then left to mine blocks with high difficulty while NH only mines when the difficulty is low.

Maybe changing the mining difficulty adjustment mechanics could stop this, making mining fairer and the base hashrate more stable.

Hey guys, I can confirm it worked for me too. I actually used the above tips (including the registry edit) to run 5 GPU rig. Yesterday, after the update, my 5th GPU stopped working. After removing the edited registry, it works flawlessly, now even with 6 cards.

Yeah, I had the same issue - out of sync for 7 hours. New wallet installation worked for me - just backup your wallet.dat file and import it again.