Search content
Sort by

Showing 16 of 16 results by neillm
Post
Topic
Board Services
Topic OP
Bitcoin/Litecoin/Dogecoin/Feathercoin hot/cold wallet site software for sale
by
neillm
on 15/07/2014, 14:38:00 UTC
Purchase everything you need to start your own Crypto wallet site!

I have written a Bitcoin/Litecoin/Dogecoin/Feathercoin wallet service website that keeps 10% of user funds on a hot wallet machine (separate from webserver, but configurable) and 90% of the funds are moved to configured offline paper wallets (or other addresses of your choosing). Hot wallets are encrypted, user account passwords are hashed, etc in the interest of security. E-mail notifications are sent to alert the admin(s) that withdrawals are pending and when more funds are needed in the hot wallet. You can change the ratio as needed to optimize (10% hot, 90% cold by default) so as to manage risk and convenience for your audience.  (Optional) Fee percentages and transaction fee amounts are also configurable.  "Premium accounts" bypass normal fees.  2 Factor authentication support is built in (Google Authenticator).  E-mail verification for new accounts and password resets are standard features.  Adding support for new coins was kept in mind during the design stage, so your dev team will be able to do this easily.  Code is very clean and maintainable, with minimal external dependencies.

I am looking for offers (BTC/LTC/USD) for the software so that you can get it up and running. It could use a graphic designer to spice things up and properly brand your service, but the site is fully functioning and if you need initial assistance to get it going, I'm happy to help and offer support with you or your dev team for a limited amount of time.

This is NOT a license for the software. This is software for sale for your EXCLUSIVE use, reselling, or licensing. All related copyright and intellectual property in the code and infrastructure is included in the sale.

Closed demos available for seriously interested parties.

About the developer: Over 15 years professional experience, with a background in security. Has written and licensed code to government contractors in the past, and worked in both academia and government funded projects. Has contributed to many open source projects (including the Linux kernel).

Serious inquiries only (please PM offers).
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: NXTL: Next Coin Lite - Register accounts for investors.
by
neillm
on 16/04/2014, 04:00:41 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
neillm
on 24/01/2014, 01:45:09 UTC
neillm, my guess-from-1,000-miles-away is that the main board is broken/defective. I'd check with wherever you bought it to see if they'll replace it.

I was afraid of that, but appreciate your input.  Will do!
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
neillm
on 23/01/2014, 15:30:34 UTC
Hello,

I've been running 2 cubes powered by a Corsair CX750M for a couple months now and all was great.  Recently I started having the random resets on one of them (call it unit A), and found that it was due to the fan needing replacement.  After the fan was replaced in the unit causing problems (unit A), everything was back to happily hashing.  But then a few days later the other cube (call it unit B) stopped completely (I noticed because the fan was stopped and no lights were blinking, but "SB PWR" was lit).

I powered down the rig (both units) and replaced the fan in unit B, thinking it might be related.  After powering on the rig, the working one came back normally (unit A), but the now 'broken' one (unit B) starts the fan spinning, has "SB PWR" lit up, but nothing else happens.  No ethernet connectivity, or LEDs.  No 'click' when power is applied, like it used to have before.  The Status light never blinks red -- nothing.  I took all the blades out and everything looked fine.  The board doesn't have any visible damage.  I tried replacing the fuse, but the same thing happens.  Any ideas on this?  I held the factory reset button for a long time, but absolutely no response.  Please help!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: [Guide and Giveaway] Mining Protoshares on Digital Ocean and Giveaway too!
by
neillm
on 13/11/2013, 03:35:32 UTC
PiaLkTiWTokLbKnCvCFnqNKHhtKE3z4WYq

Giving this a try, thanks!
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Pooler CPU Miner on Linux
by
neillm
on 26/08/2013, 14:37:11 UTC
Problem is that I cannot install required dependencies. Some are already present like gcc, make but I need to install curl-devel.

Is it possible to not build it from source and instead download a pre-built binary?

You can download the binaries from here (assuming you haven't tried it already):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55038.msg654850#msg654850

Those have worked on a number of Ubuntu and Debian based machines here.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: [FREE BITCOINS GIVEAWAY] ** Free 0.0003 BTC ** Easy task
by
neillm
on 26/08/2013, 14:29:28 UTC
Registered as: neillm

BTC: 1KxggZ3Y4EWbAZged7APUYssXGZ8tq3zTQ
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Get .0005 BTC Free ...Help my Daughter Win A Contest
by
neillm
on 23/08/2013, 15:41:05 UTC
Voted!

1KxggZ3Y4EWbAZged7APUYssXGZ8tq3zTQ

Based on poll results, looks like this is working :-)

Best of luck.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Topic OP
KNCMiner
by
neillm
on 22/08/2013, 23:27:58 UTC
I see a lot of ads here for KNCMiner and they are claiming to ship in October.  What do you think of them?  Think it'll be a better experience than the people here had with BFL?  I see mostly negative things about BFL at this point, but not much about KNCMiner.  If I've just missed something on them, please point me to some references!
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: What's your Mhash/s? (Pissing contest here)
by
neillm
on 21/08/2013, 01:49:01 UTC
About 4500MH/s currently.

Running 13 x ASICMiner USB miners (333MH/s), and 1 ATI 7770 (~170MH/s).
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Topic OP
MiningBuddy: New Pool Monitoring site
by
neillm
on 20/08/2013, 17:47:04 UTC
Hello,

Posting about (yet another) Mining monitoring site that I just got up and running.  It's pretty hard on the eyes and rough around the edges, but I'm looking to improve it over time.

I tried many other monitoring sites, but this one supports all of the pools that I'm a part of, including LTC and FTC.  Actually, the only pools it supports right now are Slush's Pool for BTC, WeMineLTC for LTC, and WeMineFTC for FTC.

http://miningbuddy.org

Feedback appreciated!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: [FTC] Free FeatherCoin Giveaway for Everyone! Over 700 coins left to give away!
by
neillm
on 19/08/2013, 00:36:54 UTC
I'm very excited about it, thanks!

6qmTCNV5peMviaw3na7LbAvQjW2x5P5HEG
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Is 100% rejection normal?
by
neillm
on 14/08/2011, 04:47:42 UTC
Hello,

Thanks for the response, but unfortunately it doesn't help at the moment either  Sad

The credentials should be good, as I can use the GPU miners with the same credentials I reserved for the CPU only miners.  I do have 4 registered workers (2 for GPU miners that work great and 2 for the CPU miners that despite constant computation have all shares rejected; except for the couple I just verified with a GPU miner in a matter of minutes).

I appreciate the suggestion also to try a different client, but I chose cgminer for the CPU mining machine since it appeared to be a reasonable option for them.  They are both GNU/Linux servers that don't have graphical displays installed and have some firewall issues not worth discussing here, but in short, GUIs are out of the question.  I have also tried poclbm, and while it's much slower than cgminer, it also never had shares accepted.  I originally thought that was because the hashing speed was too low, but I stopped thinking that when I saw that cgminer was reporting a higher hash speed than my slowest GPU.

I'm surprised no one has run into this!

The stats of my latest run make me ill:

----------------------------------------------
$ ./cgminer -a 4way -o http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 -u USER -p PASS

Summary of runtime statistics:

Started at [2011-08-12 10:51:19]
Runtime: 36 hrs : 36 mins : 24 secs
Average hashrate: 12.7 Megahash/s
Queued work requests: 10475
Share submissions: 382
Accepted shares: 0
Rejected shares: 382
Reject ratio: 100.0
Hardware errors: 0
Efficiency (accepted / queued): 0%
Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min

Discarded work due to new blocks: 10415
Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 3
Unable to get work from server occasions: 28
Work items generated locally: 10985
Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0
New blocks detected on network: 277
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Is 100% rejection normal?
by
neillm
on 13/08/2011, 13:46:53 UTC
Thanks for the response!

I know ~13 MHash is low, but one of my GPU miners is making steady progress and reporting only ~8 MHash.  I'm not trying to compete here, just trying to figure out why this isn't working and looking for any insight on this.  If any of the shares were accepted, I wouldn't worry as much about the electricity cost, but since it appears everything is rejected, it looks like a completely fruitless venture.  I'd really like to know why though since my non-CPU miners are chugging along properly (albeit slowly as well).

My first guess is that it's some kind of configuration issue with cgminer, but it appears to be working properly and connecting to the right miner site with my proper username/password.  I just can't imagine a miner can be computing at that rate for this long and not have a single accepted share, or any indication of what's going wrong.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Is 100% rejection normal?
by
neillm
on 13/08/2011, 13:30:40 UTC
Hello again,

It's a bad feeling thinking that I'm literally just wasting electricity and heating up my computer only to have *everything* rejected using cgminer for CPU only mining.  Does anyone out there have any experience using it that is contrary?

Here are my current stats (with an edited username and block id).  You can see the A (accepted) column is 0 across the board, and the R (rejected) column is incrementing steadily.  Please help!

 cgminer version 1.5.3 - Started: [2011-08-12 10:51:19]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [(5s):13.2  (avg):12.9 Mh/s] [Q:6205  A:0  R:231  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
 TQ: 1  ST: 4  LS: 0  SS: 2  DW: 6145  NB: 185  LW: 6443  LO: 21  RF: 0  I: 0
 Connected to http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 as user MYUSERNAME
 Block: 000000e5ff30f0NNNNNNNNNN0c04ef6b...  Started: [07:42:15]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [_S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 CPU 0: [3.5 / 3.2 Mh/s] [Q:1542  A:0  R:47  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
 CPU 1: [3.5 / 3.2 Mh/s] [Q:1440  A:0  R:55  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
 CPU 2: [3.3 / 3.2 Mh/s] [Q:1491  A:0  R:64  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
 CPU 3: [3.2 / 3.2 Mh/s] [Q:1474  A:0  R:65  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2011-08-13 04:45:00] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:46:04] Rejected 6c1dd24b CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 04:46:28] Rejected 7083ac50 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 04:47:27] Rejected 7c401f1e CPU 1 thread 1
[2011-08-13 04:48:18] Rejected 2c473a4e CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 04:49:59] Rejected 54d8a53d CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 04:50:06] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:51:07] Rejected dc326b18 CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 04:57:14] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:57:15] Pool 0 http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 not responding!
[2011-08-13 04:57:15] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:57:15] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:57:15] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:57:15] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:57:15] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 04:59:19] Rejected a4891100 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 05:00:51] Rejected 34b59436 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 05:01:05] Rejected 4ce6a851 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 05:04:41] Rejected bc3c841b CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 05:09:29] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:10:30] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:11:25] Rejected 4ca96738 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 05:12:36] Rejected 00230846 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 05:14:36] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:14:37] Pool 0 http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 not responding!
[2011-08-13 05:22:46] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:27:53] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:28:55] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:32:16] Rejected 00612249 CPU 1 thread 1
[2011-08-13 05:37:36] Rejected e8c02c4e CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 05:38:50] Rejected a4a27808 CPU 1 thread 1
[2011-08-13 05:39:40] Rejected 04474b06 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 05:41:08] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:42:20] Rejected 28460d4a CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 05:46:22] Rejected 04590948 CPU 1 thread 1
[2011-08-13 05:47:21] Rejected 3cfa1019 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 05:52:22] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 05:52:22] Pool 0 http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 not responding!
[2011-08-13 05:56:38] Rejected 940dd332 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 06:01:45] Rejected 741f3933 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 06:02:45] Rejected ccdc6a4b CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 06:03:47] Rejected 8cc6a74b CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 06:11:42] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 06:13:10] Rejected 94ace435 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 06:18:50] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 06:18:51] Pool 0 http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 not responding!
[2011-08-13 06:23:43] Rejected f441eb39 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 06:35:07] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 06:36:02] Rejected 7cba7f22 CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 06:55:34] Rejected 5c0e6719 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 07:22:55] Rejected acf99a58 CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 07:30:03] Stale share detected, discarding
[2011-08-13 07:32:30] Rejected 74482d38 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 07:37:51] Rejected 140e813b CPU 3 thread 3
[2011-08-13 07:42:15] New block detected on network, waiting on fresh work
[2011-08-13 07:43:54] Rejected dcfbf21d CPU 1 thread 1
[2011-08-13 07:44:13] Rejected 34943d3a CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 07:53:37] Rejected 680e394b CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 07:55:17] Rejected 1ca52e22 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 08:02:31] Rejected 6c7c2452 CPU 2 thread 2
[2011-08-13 08:05:30] Rejected 5cf3b720 CPU 1 thread 1
[2011-08-13 08:06:37] Rejected 0c2ee453 CPU 0 thread 0
[2011-08-13 08:17:21] Rejected a4c51702 CPU 2 thread 2
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Topic OP
Is 100% rejection normal?
by
neillm
on 12/08/2011, 15:20:30 UTC
Hello,

I'm new here and can't seem to find the answer to this, so I wanted to ask out right.

I have two machines with GPUs that are chugging along making some progress in the pooled mining over at bitcoin.cz.  I have two other machines that do NOT have GPUs and I just got cgminer installed on them since it can do CPU-only mining.  The problem is that I've been running them for days, and each day I check the stats.  Typically, they look like this:

------------------------------------------------
$ ./cgminer -a 4way -o http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 -u USERNAME -p PASSWORD

Summary of runtime statistics:

Started at [2011-08-11 11:08:37]
Runtime: 13 hrs : 31 mins : 20 secs
Average hashrate: 13.0 Megahash/s
Queued work requests: 3516
Share submissions: 173
Accepted shares: 0
Rejected shares: 173
Reject ratio: 100.0
Hardware errors: 0
Efficiency (accepted / queued): 0%
Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min

Discarded work due to new blocks: 3261
Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 1
Unable to get work from server occasions: 0
Work items generated locally: 5591
Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0
New blocks detected on network: 95

Summary of per device statistics:

 CPU 0: [3.0 / 3.2 Mh/s] [Q:830  A:0  R:34  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
 CPU 1: [3.0 / 3.3 Mh/s] [Q:786  A:0  R:39  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
 CPU 2: [2.8 / 3.3 Mh/s] [Q:936  A:0  R:47  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
 CPU 3: [3.0 / 3.3 Mh/s] [Q:826  A:0  R:53  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.00/m]
------------------------------------------------

I realize the computation rate is very slow compared to a GPU, but I'm wondering if something is wrong with the setup.  One of my GPU machines has an old GPU (ATI RV710) that computes at only ~8 MHash, so compared to that, this 13 MHash rate shouldn't be totally worthless.  Except everything is rejected by both of my CPU miners 100% of the time, and even the slow GPU miner is getting acceptable rates (e.g. ~2500 accepted, ~20 stale/invalid).

Any information here is appreciated, thanks!