Search content
Sort by
Showing 2 of 2 results by nemjp
Please don't be so rude and racist.I'm a Chinese but i still don't hate Japanese.people always make mistakes.
on behalf of everyone here i want to wish you welcome to the forum and all of crypto !
i mean it we all love you guys and want everyone around the world involved.
we can always use more Chinese and Japanese people
i will say sorry if his original comment offended any of you.. i think he was joking around.
most people would agree with me too.
we all mostly want all countries involved in the world of digital currencies and have no problem with Asians or whom ever.
I apologized for what Japanese had done in history.
To be fair, I can understand.We've never forgotten Atomic bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki too.
Re: ***NEM*** Should NEM organize the second stakeholder list auditing ?
I'm not going to engage in any of the FUD I had to read through in this thread. We've addressed this stuff on multiple occasions.
What I do want to address is the whole second audit thing. There will be no second audit of the list as it is at least not from the core team. It just doesn't make any sense.
We're certainly not going to consider any results from NODE since little information is revealed on how they are identifying puppets and imho what they're doing isn't the right way to handle such things.
We are however in the process of desgining how stakes will be claimed. We're looking to make it as hard as possible and as time consuming as possible to claim multiple stakes from one machine. We all know that this isn't a 100% deterrent but we think it's the only thing left that makes sense and is fair.
Think about what puppets will do with their stakes anyway. They're going to sell them which is only distributing NEM further. As long as there are no huge whales around (which is exactly what we're trying to avoid with a technical approach) a few puppets won't hurt NEM. What will hurt NEM is starting this puppet hunt all over again.
Why open up votes on btt ? Every single person on btt can vote even the ones who haven't heared about NEM before - how much sense does that make ? Wanna have a vote among the community do it in our forum
YES: NEM have many socks and second auditing is needed.What I do want to address is the whole second audit thing. There will be no second audit of the list as it is at least not from the core team. It just doesn't make any sense.
We're certainly not going to consider any results from NODE since little information is revealed on how they are identifying puppets and imho what they're doing isn't the right way to handle such things.
We are however in the process of desgining how stakes will be claimed. We're looking to make it as hard as possible and as time consuming as possible to claim multiple stakes from one machine. We all know that this isn't a 100% deterrent but we think it's the only thing left that makes sense and is fair.
Think about what puppets will do with their stakes anyway. They're going to sell them which is only distributing NEM further. As long as there are no huge whales around (which is exactly what we're trying to avoid with a technical approach) a few puppets won't hurt NEM. What will hurt NEM is starting this puppet hunt all over again.
Why open up votes on btt ? Every single person on btt can vote even the ones who haven't heared about NEM before - how much sense does that make ? Wanna have a vote among the community do it in our forum
This does not make sense as I buy off AE exchange. So you want to bother me as much as possible if I buy and support NEMstake in the AE exchange? You guys should be clear about what you want. If you don't want me to buy more than 2 then say it then I am going to sell off everything I have but be clear about it.
I thought we were talking about the stakeholderlist are we not ? If you bought on the NXT AE then you are not on that list.
Obviously we're not going to regulate the free market.
Okay. Thanks.
Many socks are voting.It is not fair.