Search Posts

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] BigBang Core Re-energize the IoT

netmebtc

on 13/12/2020, 06:56:08 UTC

Great project. I have been paying attention for a year, BBC is indeed a good project to do things seriously

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] [DMC]Tree-Graph+CryptoNote+Ring—CT+Bulletproofs+Dandelion+Smart contract

netmebtc

on 23/10/2019, 08:22:41 UTC

How to run the linux version?

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.7 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 16/08/2019, 13:58:00 UTC

Quote from: UnclWish on August 16, 2019, 01:40:57 PM

Quote from: netmebtc on August 16, 2019, 11:07:54 AM

Problem: crash when running version 0.5.2 or later version

Rig: windows10 6 x vega64 (Samsung MEM) amd driver: 19.4.3

When running TRM 0.5.2 (or later version), rig crashed and said error "POSIX..."

When running TRM 0.5.1, It is normal.

What is the problem of my rig?

You really think that you wrote enough info? You even didn't point what algo you mine...

CNR, CNV8_UPX2

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.7 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 16/08/2019, 11:07:54 UTC

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.5 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 15/07/2019, 00:03:31 UTC

@todxx, Hello, When will TRM support turtle's new algo "chukwa" and loki's new algo "RandmXL"?

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.1 - native algo switching

netmebtc

on 14/07/2019, 23:56:37 UTC

@doktor83, Hello, When will SRBminer support turtle's new algo "chukwa" and loki's new algo "RandmXL"?

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.2 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 01/07/2019, 13:09:06 UTC

Quote from: kibatronic on July 01, 2019, 11:32:56 AM

Quote from: seefatlow on July 01, 2019, 06:23:07 AM

Quote from: netmebtc on July 01, 2019, 05:00:55 AM

.....

Hello mate, very appreciate for your guiding.
Unfortunately, I set the core 1300mhz and mem 975mhz and voltage below 820mv, then vega does not work, it is easy to crash.

@netmebtc
I can't do <850mV voltage either for my Vega56s even though my settings and ppt tables are the same. Think this has something to do with the temperature are cards are running at. Like yours, my cards run at temp >60C. Just think this might be the reason why we can't run at lower voltages. This is also the reason why the mem tweak settings don't work on my cards either. Setting my REF higher than the default value will crash my cards.

Did you make sure to disable all other powertstates in Overdriventool except P5?

If you flash a Vega 64 BIOS you will also get a higher voltage to the HBM adding stability.
[/quote]

I done it. I just change the SOC clock to 1028Mhz, and set voltage to 810mv, then all vegas working normal.

GPU_P0=852;800;0
GPU_P1=991;800;0
GPU_P2=1084;800;0
GPU_P3=1138;800;0
GPU_P4=1150;800;0
GPU_P5=1202;800;0
GPU_P6=1212;810;0
GPU_P7=1337;810
Mem_P0=167;800;0
Mem_P1=500;800;0
Mem_P2=800;810;0
Mem_P3=975;810
Mem_TimingLevel=0
Fan_P0=30;11
Fan_P1=50;12
Fan_P2=55;25
Fan_P3=63;48
Fan_P4=75;78
Fan_ZeroRPM=0
Fan_Acoustic=2400
Power_Target=0

But with these setting, the power consumption on wall is still too high at 1400w, It seems that only lower the core clock could lower the power consumption.

By the way ,I have not used AMD Memory Tweak tool

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.2 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 01/07/2019, 05:00:55 UTC

Quote from: kibatronic on June 30, 2019, 03:36:55 PM

Quote from: netmebtc on June 30, 2019, 09:45:39 AM

Quote from: Mashy81 on June 30, 2019, 02:01:53 AM

Quote from: netmebtc on June 30, 2019, 01:20:32 AM

Hello everyone, I have 6 vega64 (Samsung memory) rig windows10 18.5.1drive, core 1408/900mv, mem 1100/900mv, when I use the 0.5.2 version to mine XMR, each card can reach 2.4Kh, the wall power consumption of the whole machine is 1800 watts. Except for the power consumption of the motherboard of 200 watts, the average power consumption of a vega64 reaches 267w. Is this power consumption normal?

Is there a way to reduce the power consumption of vega to less than 185w, even if it is a little less than 2.4kh?

That power use is very high.
Undervolt. Power table mod. All the usualy things people do. Read a bit more of the thread and you will get plenty of ideas

I do some undervolt and ppt moding . set cclock to 1100/860mv mclock 1100/860mv , I got the 1450w power consumption at wall and 11.7Kh mining cnR

running trm 0.5.2 with cn_config 15*14:AAA

[2019-06-30 17:39:10] Mining cnr with 6 GPU workers
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 (06:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2408 RPM) Core 1062 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 (19:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2446 RPM) Core 1058 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 (13:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 51C Fan 58.00% (2874 RPM) Core 1055 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 (16:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 52.00% (2575 RPM) Core 1053 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 (03:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 56.00% (2788 RPM) Core 1069 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 (09:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 53.00% (2599 RPM) Core 1040 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV
[2019-06-30 17:39:10]
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] Current CN configs:
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 15*14:AAA
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 15*14:AAA
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 15*14:AAA
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 15*14:AAA
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 15*14:AAA
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 15*14:AAA
[2019-06-30 17:39:10]
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:16:53
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.951kh/s, avg 1.951kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.949kh/s, avg 1.950kh/s, pool 1.393kh/s a:14 r:0 hw:0
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 [51C, fan 58%] cnr: 1.937kh/s, avg 1.945kh/s, pool 2.290kh/s a:23 r:0 hw:0
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 [63C, fan 52%] cnr: 1.939kh/s, avg 1.942kh/s, pool 1.892kh/s a:19 r:0 hw:0
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 [62C, fan 56%] cnr: 1.957kh/s, avg 1.962kh/s, pool 2.191kh/s a:22 r:0 hw:0
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 [62C, fan 53%] cnr: 1.928kh/s, avg 1.927kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0
[2019-06-30 17:39:10] Total cnr: 11.66kh/s, avg 11.68kh/s, pool 12.54kh/s a:126 r:0 hw:0

I modified the PPT with the registry.

GPU_P0=852;800
GPU_P1=991;810
GPU_P2=1084;820
GPU_P3=1138;830
GPU_P4=1150;840
GPU_P5=1202;850
GPU_P6=1212;850
GPU_P7=1100;860
Mem_P0=167;800
Mem_P1=500;800
Mem_P2=800;810
Mem_P3=1100;860
Fan_Min=1588
Fan_Max=4900
Fan_Target=63
Fan_Acoustic=2400
Power_Temp=75
Power_Target=0

The above parameters I have been through a number of tests, found a relatively stable data, if the voltage is set below 860mv, some cards will randomly appear crash

How can I further optimize and reduce the power consumption to 1200w?

If you are running the core at such so low frequency you should be able to lower the vcore to 810-820, but only if you also lower your HBM to 1028MHz or less. The reason is that the SOC will need more voltage, ie 860mV at 1107MHz than at 1028MHz. And the SOC frequency always needs to be higher or the same as the HBM. These are my settings for 4 Vega 56 pulling 650w from the wall:

http://m3server.se/img/QuadVega56XMR.png

Hello mate, very appreciate for your guiding.
Unfortunately, I set the core 1300mhz and mem 975mhz and voltage below 820mv, then vega does not work, it is easy to crash.

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.2 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 30/06/2019, 09:45:39 UTC

Quote from: Mashy81 on June 30, 2019, 02:01:53 AM

Quote from: netmebtc on June 30, 2019, 01:20:32 AM

That power use is very high.
Undervolt. Power table mod. All the usualy things people do. Read a bit more of the thread and you will get plenty of ideas

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.2 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 30/06/2019, 01:20:32 UTC

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN][BTCN] BitcoiNote - In privacy we trust

netmebtc

on 17/06/2019, 22:43:59 UTC

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.2 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 16/06/2019, 06:31:03 UTC

Quote from: todxx on June 16, 2019, 04:32:57 AM

Quote from: netmebtc on June 16, 2019, 12:32:14 AM

Hey,Guy，

The 0.5.2 DEV donation has a big problem. I ran 4 vega machines last night. Today I found that only one is connected to xmr pool(minexmr.com). The other three are running normally from software window showing, but I dont know what pool they are connectting to.The pool went, I guess it is connected to your dev pool, donated for about 6 hours, It is very terrible!

Can you please post a snippet of the output/log from one of these machines?
What makes you think that the miner was not connected to the pool if it was running normally?

The miner does not switch between dev and user pools, they are both run at the same time.
If the user pool connection cannot be established for any reason, all mining stops.
The miner prints the name of the connected pool for every share that is submitted to the user pool, so it should be easily visible from the log which pool it is connected to. (Also we currently only support one user pool, so not much of an option there)

q:What makes you think that the miner was not connected to the pool if it was running normally?
a:Just a geuss . Because I can only look one mechine worker on minexmr.com,and other mechine is offline for 6 hours.

`The miner prints the name of the connected pool for every share that is submitted to the user pool, `---Yes I'm sure all the print is corect ,but minexmr.com showing that they are offline for 6 hours, So Maybe I guess is your problem, or maybe is pool's problem.

I have restarted all mechine. Continue to observe and see if this problem will reappear

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN][SPC] SpermCoin - [NO PREMINE] High anonymity Cryptonight

netmebtc

on 16/06/2019, 04:50:35 UTC

const uint64_t DIFFICULTY_TARGET = 30; // seconds
const uint64_t EXPECTED_NUMBER_OF_BLOCKS_PER_DAY = 24 * 60 * 60 / DIFFICULTY_TARGET;

One day can be mined blocks: 24 * 60 * 60 / DIFFICULTY_TARGET = 2880 block

One day can be mined SPC: 2880*0.00036=1.0368

One year can be mined 378.432

100mil can be mined for 100000000/378.432 = 264248.2665313716 years

What a great joke coin!hehe...

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN][SPC] SpermCoin - [NO PREMINE] High anonymity Cryptonight

netmebtc

on 16/06/2019, 04:39:08 UTC

Number of coins: 100000000 ? 10mil or 100mil Huh

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN][SPC] SpermCoin - [NO PREMINE] High anonymity Cryptonight

netmebtc

on 16/06/2019, 04:36:54 UTC

Current height is 14139 and total mined amount is 14139*0.0036=5.09004

hehe，Very funny， sperm,sperm, tinny boy go go go...

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN][SPC] SpermCoin - [NO PREMINE] High anonymity Cryptonight

netmebtc

on 16/06/2019, 04:18:18 UTC

Hey guy

One block reward is 0.0004 SPC? What a tinny reward,Is it a joke？

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.2 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power

netmebtc

on 16/06/2019, 00:32:14 UTC

Post

Topic

Board Mining (Altcoins)

Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.8.7 - native algo switching

netmebtc

on 30/04/2019, 02:49:00 UTC

Hey,

upx2 algo,my 2 vegas machine run unstable. often stuck

https://i.loli.net/2019/04/30/5cc7bd39d378c.png

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [ANN] TRITON [XTRI][SAO] Updated 3/30/2019

netmebtc

on 21/04/2019, 18:19:46 UTC

Hello, https://discordapp.com/invite/VAcnW6Zrd is expired. Is there a new available link for discord?

Post

Topic

Board Announcements (Altcoins)

Re: [INX] SIGNAL APP & P2P EXCHANGE - INZIDERX.IO [INX]

netmebtc

on 21/03/2019, 14:26:25 UTC

Quote from: InziderX on March 21, 2019, 02:48:26 AM

Quote from: netmebtc on March 21, 2019, 12:48:04 AM

Hello admin.

When I conpile the github source code, meet the following error,How to solve it?

Building CXX object tests/CMakeFiles/CoreTests.dir/CoreTests/Upgrade.cpp.o
Scanning dependencies of target SimpleWallet
[ 79%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/SimpleWallet.dir/SimpleWallet/PasswordContainer.cpp.o
[ 79%] Linking CXX executable inxd
[ 80%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/SimpleWallet.dir/SimpleWallet/SimpleWallet.cpp.o
libCryptoNoteCore.a(RocksDBWrapper.cpp.o): In function `CryptoNote::RocksDBWrapper::init(CryptoNote::DataBaseConfig const&)':
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:55: undefined reference to `rocksdb::DB::Open(rocksdb::Options const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, rocksdb::DB**)'
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:70: undefined reference to `rocksdb::Status::ToString[abi:cxx11]() const'
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:61: undefined reference to `rocksdb::DB::Open(rocksdb::Options const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, rocksdb::DB**)'
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:67: undefined reference to `rocksdb::Status::ToString[abi:cxx11]() const'
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:63: undefined reference to `rocksdb::Status::ToString[abi:cxx11]() const'
libCryptoNoteCore.a(RocksDBWrapper.cpp.o): In function `CryptoNote::RocksDBWrapper::destoy(CryptoNote::DataBaseConfig const&)':
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:100: undefined reference to `rocksdb::DestroyDB(std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, rocksdb::Options const&)'
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:105: undefined reference to `rocksdb::Status::ToString[abi:cxx11]() const'
libCryptoNoteCore.a(RocksDBWrapper.cpp.o): In function `CryptoNote::RocksDBWrapper::write(CryptoNote::IWriteBatch&, bool)':
/root/inx/INX-MASTER/src/CryptoNoteCore/RocksDBWrapper.cpp:144: undefined reference to `rocksdb::Status::ToString[abi:cxx11]() const'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
src/CMakeFiles/Daemon.dir/build.make:134: recipe for target 'src/inxd' failed
make[2]: *** [src/inxd] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:498: recipe for target 'src/CMakeFiles/Daemon.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/Daemon.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

It compile without flaw on my side.
Be sure you get all the dependencies and follow the INX building command.

By what I can se you have a rockdb error - this can be related to you libboost version.
Aint sure what I have on my linux but by memory it was 1.55 and later.
Also, this been build on 16.04 version - if that help.

Building a coin is a quest by itself if you vener done it.
So my best tips is that you search you error on google and debug it from there - best way to learn.

Kind regard.

root@ubuntu:~# gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 5.5.0-12ubuntu1~16.04) 5.5.0 20171010
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

root@ubuntu:~# cmake --version
cmake version 3.13.2

CMake suite maintained and supported by Kitware (kitware.com/cmake).
root@ubuntu:~# dpkg -s libboost-dev | grep 'Version'
Version: 1.58.0.1ubuntu1

root@ubuntu:~# uname -a
Linux ubuntu 4.9.137-0409137-generic #201811131541 SMP Tue Nov 13 20:44:19 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

root@ubuntu:~# cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=16.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=xenial
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 16.04 LTS"

Evrything are in line with the requirements of the compilation, but it is unable to compile successfully.