Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 50 results by ngdias
Post
Topic
Board Bounties (Altcoins)
Re: [BOUNTY][GIVEAWAY] MegaCryptoPolis decentralized city on Ethereum blockchain
by
ngdias
on 05/10/2018, 17:20:50 UTC
Ok. I probably need to specify my thoughts. The whole "gameplay" doesn't make any sense. There is actually no gameplay.. it is only "buy tiles, buy real estate"; hope that others will do the same., so you will get a "tax-share". It is a pyramid scheme. Only early birds can make a profit... IF stupid ppl will come in later and buy overpriced tiles.

Very short sighted indeed! I can only guess you didn't read the whitepaper? It is frustrating to see such ignorance!

I read the whitepaper, more than once, and I also agree that there is no actual gameplay and this is a pyramid scheme. Unless you consider buying out other tiles to maximize your influence as gameplay. But that's only true when the land plots you need to buy are actually put up for sale...
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: WARNING: request rejected because http work queue depth exceeded
by
ngdias
on 12/05/2018, 17:57:47 UTC
Thanks for the reply, but there is still something I don't fully understand... the node accepts HTTP and RPC requests during regular operation, from other nodes in the network? This means anyone can spam my IP with these sort of requests to bring the node down?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Merits 1 from 1 user
WARNING: request rejected because http work queue depth exceeded
by
ngdias
on 12/05/2018, 15:28:49 UTC
⭐ Merited by ETFbitcoin (1)
I'm getting this error message on a VPS node that I am not using for RPC calls. It's just online and I don't do anything else than let it run.

Quote
WARNING: request rejected because http work queue depth exceeded, it can be increased with the -rpcworkqueue= setting

.conf is set to rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 so no outside RPC calls are allowed.

The node stops working when this happens and resumes normally after a reboot.

1. What could be triggering this error?
2. What can I do to avoid it? Settings recommended [ DO NOT POST SESC LINKS ]here[/url] fix it or just delay the problem?
3. Is there a log or a command that allows me to query and monitor the number and origin of RPC quests over time?
Post
Topic
Board Criptomoedas Alternativas
Re: Masternodes mais lucrativos
by
ngdias
on 23/04/2018, 16:50:47 UTC
Eu também não tenho coragem de investir nisso. Tem opções muito mais rentáveis que isso de investir em masternodes.  Cool

Que opções são essas, mais rentáveis?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⚡[ANN]⚡ ▐░Espers [ESP]░▌▐░PoW/PoS░▌▐░HMQ1725 Algo░▌ ▐░New Features░▌
by
ngdias
on 02/04/2018, 11:44:06 UTC
Hi @all,

i'm interested in mining this coin and my wallet is just synced after 3 days. On masternodes.online i can see this coin is upcoming, my question is:

Are there future plans to setup masternodes for this coin or is it still active? Will i need 25,000,000 coins to setup one?

thx

From the Whitepaper, https://espers.io/download/Espers-White-Paper-v1-Final.pdf page 17:

"Instead, X-Nodes are completely opt-in meaning that any community member may participate in the system regardless of their current balance or previous experience."

"A participating user may then also lock any desired amount of their balance which will effectively become frozen as the participant will no longer be able to stake them until they are unlocked from the X-Node and in doing so have the balance act as a multiplier to the compensation rate provided."
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PFR][EtherDelta] PAYFAIR | Decentralized escrow and P2P exchange
by
ngdias
on 19/03/2018, 12:02:58 UTC
anyone know if this coin is minable?

since is a ERC-20 does anyone know what pool support it?

THX

You are a bit confused.
You mine ETH, you cannot mine ETH tokens... so makes no sense to have mining pools for tokens...
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PFR][EtherDelta] PAYFAIR | Decentralized escrow and P2P exchange
by
ngdias
on 17/03/2018, 10:26:23 UTC
Trust node supports the stability of the PFR token and extracts profit from transactions.


So trust nodes just create buy pressure and remove coins from circulation to help keep the price up.

... and I guess if the dev team holds a lot of them, it's a way to finance their efforts and reward their hard work if successful.

I can live with this, it's just that if this is the case, the need/importance for trust nodes is a bit exaggerated, it seems to me.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PFR][EtherDelta] PAYFAIR | Decentralized escrow and P2P exchange
by
ngdias
on 16/03/2018, 14:21:24 UTC
I don't understand where is the problem with the edcrow nodes ... you have a transaction on payfair your money is hold until buyer says il all went fine then the money is released to the seller. It cost 1%. But if the deal goes wrong the escrow solves it and it costs 3%.

My question is with trust nodes, not escrow nodes...

Escrow nodes needs a person with a brain to actually do some work and monitor the transactions; Trust nodes, you just lock the tokens in the ETH blockchain through a contract and wait for passive income. There is nothing else to do, so what exactly is locking these tokens doing that could not happen without this feature?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PFR][EtherDelta] PAYFAIR | Decentralized escrow and P2P exchange
by
ngdias
on 16/03/2018, 11:58:29 UTC
Yes, yes, I already read that a few times, the same wording in a few different places.

But what I want to know is exactly how sending tokens to an ETH contract contributes to the "job of maintaining, updating, and securing the PayFair ecosystem".
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PFR][EtherDelta] PAYFAIR | Decentralized escrow and P2P exchange
by
ngdias
on 15/03/2018, 15:40:00 UTC
I was reading your whitepaper, because there is something I don't understand. You say that a 'trust node is a critical element', but what exactly does it do?

Does it run any code in the ETH blockchain to settle transactions? And if it does, why do you need many accounts loaded with tokens and registered to accomplish... whatever the trust nodes are going to accomplish?

Does it provide any other service than an incentive to buy tokens?

From what I could read, it seems to be just a way to keep some buying pressure on the token, much as all those scammy Dash clones popping up every week.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] SuperNET NXT asset 12071612744977229797, SUPERNET KMD assetchain in summer
by
ngdias
on 02/12/2017, 22:31:00 UTC
Can we check the txs in a block explorer? I tried the first few in https://kmd.explorer.supernet.org/ but it returns no matching records...
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [AIRDROP] To ALL ETH Wallets VIU Token Video Platform Airdrop 🚀🚀🚀
by
ngdias
on 22/11/2017, 12:16:46 UTC
https://imgur.com/a/knUK1

Registration is buggy?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Linux Driver for Blockchain Compute 17.30.1029
by
ngdias
on 05/11/2017, 19:35:50 UTC
I tested the drivers in Ubuntu 16.04.3, from http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMDGPU-Pro-Beta-Mining-Driver-for-Linux-Release-Notes.aspx
The test GPU was a Radeon R9 Fury X, which is listed as compatible.

At first the drivers were breaking boot (tried 2 versions in different AMD support pages), there was no GUI. To uninstall, you can press Ctrl+Alt+F1, login with your credentials and run
Code:
amdgpu-pro-uninstall
.

Then I started googling and found https://askubuntu.com/questions/880523/cant-login-after-installing-amdgpu-pro-16-60 other people that were able to get the drivers working by using one of the options of the install script, either
Code:
./amdgpu-pro-install --px
or
Code:
./amdgpu-pro-install --compute

Everything else was working as per the official AMD support pages.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v10.1 (Windows/Linux)
by
ngdias
on 31/10/2017, 16:08:19 UTC
I'm trying to figure out if the latest version is compatible with R9 Fury X cards. OP mentions "1. Install Catalyst v15.12 for old AMD cards; for Fury, Polaris and Vega cards use latest blockchain drivers." and then "This version is for recent AMD videocards only: 7xxx, 2xx and 3xx, 2GB or more."

First, what are "blockchain drivers"? Was this a mistake? It seems that Fury is ok from this part, but then this card is not included in the "recent AMD videocards only: 7xxx, 2xx and 3xx" group.

Can someone clarify please? Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
ngdias
on 11/02/2017, 01:00:37 UTC
I'm not sure... maybe you can ask someone in Slack? I for one still haven't received any bytes yet.

If you're fast and the snapshot didn't happen yet, you may still be able to fix the issue.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
ngdias
on 11/02/2017, 00:53:21 UTC
Snapshot already happened right? For some reason my btc address (trezor) that used to show a positive balance in the chat app now shows 0btc in it. Wtf happened`? Huh Huh

Did you move any coins, even a small amount, after you last checked the linked balance? If you did, the remaining coins should be in another address in your wallet and you'd need to transfer them back to the linked address.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo ICO - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
by
ngdias
on 31/01/2017, 17:53:50 UTC

Take note, anyone running Komodod and KMD-nomp, can setup their own mining pool.

The guide has it setup to run locally for the miners, and the payment processing is off because there are bugs. But someone could fix it  Smiley

https://github.com/xRobeSx/kmd-nomp



Payment processing is off, ok, but if you find a block the coins have to go somewhere, and that is a a main address you set up in the NOMP pool or an address generated by the wallet created by komodod? Either way if you're solo mining, payouts feature doesn't matter as long as blocks rewards go to an address you control, correct?

1% of KMD not sure how much that amounts to. How many blocks is that in 24h on average and roughly how many coins for the same period?

Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo ICO - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
by
ngdias
on 13/01/2017, 18:11:08 UTC
The swap rate 1:50 will decrese for a maximum of 5% i am right?

Ok, but why this rate is so fixed? It should be more variable? I mean, 1 year from now the price of btcd may fall near 0, is a coin that is no more supported. so 6 month from people could buy btcd and may get the 1000% more of komod. Is this fair?

There are people doing arbitrage all the time, which means that BTCD price will closely follow KMD because if BTCD falls behind too much there is profit to be made by bringing the values closer together.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [BCN] Bytecoin. Secure, private, untraceable since 2012
by
ngdias
on 03/12/2016, 14:49:25 UTC
I have a wallet file created with the GUI client 1.0.9. That wallet file doesn't seem to work with the reference client 2.0.0. Can anyone confirm this? I even changed the wallet's password to avoid special characters. I can open a new wallet created in 2.0.0.

I'm not in a hurry to move the coins. If I wait for GUI 2.0.0, will this be fixed? Or should I just send all the coins to an exchange from the 1.0.9 wallet and then send it to a new 2.0.0 wallet?

Also, this 2.0.0 wallet is creating the wallet file in the program directory instead of the (usual) ~/.bytecoin location.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [*BLITZ*] Blitz Coin| BlitzNodes | BlitzPay| TheViralExchange | BlitzMM |
by
ngdias
on 27/04/2016, 16:43:06 UTC
There are 2 repositories (that I know of) for the Blitz wallet:
- The one posted in ANN here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=848186.0): https://bitbucket.org/blitz-dev/blitz-public
- Another one used for the Azure submission: https://github.com/KemBits/blitz-coin

I cannot run the qt wallet or the daemon and I get the same problems with both repositories. The system runs on Lubuntu 15.10.
Lubuntu currently installs Boost 1.58, where wallet docs indicate 1.37.
I have berkeleydb 4.8 installed from bitcoin ppa, and also the most recent version that comes with Lubuntu. Apt-get tells me I should remove the 2 packages for 4.8...

While compiling the Qt wallet, I get this error (I left everything at defaults, upnp etc when issuing qmake):
g++: error: /usr/local/src/blitz/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a: No such file or directory
g++: error: /usr/local/src/blitz/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a: No such file or directory
Makefile:810: recipe for target 'blitz-qt' failed
make: *** [blitz-qt] Error 1


Those 2 files do not exist and are in fact listed in .gitignore, in the folder they were supposed to be in.
I don't know if this is related, but /src/leveldb/build_detect_platform already comes with execute permissions (at least when cloned from the bitbucket repo).
I solved this part by following this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2774736#msg2774736
Basically I compile the 2 missing files before the 'main' qmake/make:
Code:
cd src/leveldb
make libleveldb.a libmemenv.a

After this problem goes away, I get a few Boost errors:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_system-mt
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_filesystem-mt
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_program_options-mt
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_thread-mt
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_date_time-mt
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_chrono-mt
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:804: recipe for target 'blitz-qt' failed
make: *** [blitz-qt] Error 1


And according to this http://askubuntu.com/questions/486006/cannot-find-boost-thread-mt-library
The mt (multithreading) has been removed and is not needed any more. Fixes are: either update the code or symlink to the correct (-mt less) files. I created all the symlinks and make finally completed successfully.

Then at run time, execution was halted (its a VNC session):

./blitz-qt
Qt: XKEYBOARD extension not present on the X server.
QGradient::setColorAt: Color position must be specified in the range 0 to 1
QGradient::setColorAt: Color position must be specified in the range 0 to 1
Abr 26 20:46:12.469 [err] tor_assertion_failed_(): Bug: src/tor/memarea.c:127: alloc_chunk: Assertion realign_pointer(res->next_mem) == res->next_mem failed; aborting.
Abr 26 20:46:12.500 [err] Bug: Assertion realign_pointer(res->next_mem) == res->next_mem failed in alloc_chunk at src/tor/memarea.c:127. Stack trace:
Abr 26 20:46:12.500 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x8114e63]
Abr 26 20:46:12.500 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81fa050]
Abr 26 20:46:12.500 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81a7d8c]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81a7e67]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81f21c5]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81bdc69]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81bddf5]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81be165]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81be3ca]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x814590f]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x814a73d]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x814aa6f]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81b83fd]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x81b9436]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x82e2af7]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt(_Z12ThreadTorNetPv+0x3f) [0x82e2bef]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     ./blitz-qt() [0x8268b80]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libboost_thread.so.1.58.0(+0xdc05) [0xb71eac05]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x61aa) [0xb368c1aa]
Abr 26 20:46:12.501 [err] Bug:     /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e) [0xb33d202e]
Aborted (core dumped)


At this point I'm stuck and I cannot find any solutions searching in Google. Is this a Boost update problem, something about the Tor code, something wrong with my Boost installation or is it something else?

Regarding the daemon, I was able to compile, but then I also got runtime errors:
/usr/local/src/blitz/src$ ./blitzd
Apr 18 03:33:50.855 [err] tor_assertion_failed_(): Bug: tor/memarea.c:127: alloc_chunk: Assertion realign_pointer(res->next_mem) == res->next_mem failed; aborting.
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug: Assertion realign_pointer(res->next_mem) == res->next_mem failed in alloc_chunk at tor/memarea.c:127. Stack trace:
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x825ea5e]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x83443ba]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x82f01a6]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x82f0278]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x83372ee]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x8306a54]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x8306bc7]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x8306ee8]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x830711e]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x828f979]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x82944f1]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x829481a]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x830127f]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x83022cc]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x81732df]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     ./blitzd() [0x81733be]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libboost_thread.so.1.58.0(+0xdc05) [0xb76a5c05]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x61aa) [0xb71ea1aa]
Apr 18 03:33:50.873 [err] Bug:     /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e) [0xb6f2102e]
Aborted (core dumped)


The runtime problem seems to be quite similar in every case.
Has anyone been able to compile and run this in Ubuntu recently?