We're currently operating with losses and our players overall won much more than they deposited.

Part of this is due to the lot of wins from group with coordinated betting which is prohibited by our rules, and can be punishable with account suspension, but we instead still give ability to play and withdraw with lowering limits for the group of players which were violating our terms, a lot of bookies would just suspend accounts as rules permit.

For the latest response, we've commented earlier regarding the limits.
And overall all your withdrawals were always payed, and you've already withdrew much more funds than you have deposited, so regarding "running" it is just lies.

So this accusation comments are completely unfair, as we're paying out all withdrawals, from operating with negative profits, paying out from own, and not the players funds, and even for users which were strictly violating our terms and caused this losses.

this is like a ponzi sistem,

limitted the withdraws , wait until most deposits enter, paying, smalls to not be called scams, and when  they can't disguise it anymore, they run away,with all money


like ponzey, is old that,not in cripto bookies

Hello, our message regarding limits changes(due to Country limitations and rates) are also related to withdrawal limits.

Hello, your last withdrawal have been processed.
We just want to note that all your requested withdrawals, more than your deposit, overall for 160mBTC($7000+ with current price) were processed.





Regarding the limits change, we have limitations for particular Countries, that's why after completing KYC there were changes in limits, and in addition initial limits are set in fiat value equivalent, and with 50% btc price increase over time, it also affected the limits.

Thanks for the explanation. At first sight I get it wrong, I thought we were talking about 1 player but now it appears the case is about 2 players.
So in summary nikica99 thought he could steal some money from Adkinsbet because he read a rival of John Wall was not going to play and tried to take advantage about it?
I believe this is the exact arbitrage betting that bookmakers are suffering from. Why do I have the feeling that Adzivu is somehow related to nikica99 

He placed a bet on another player (John Wall) to score more points because the absence of James Harden means that player will play more minutes and will take more shots because Harden takes 24 shots per game. So those 24 shots will be distributed among other players, but since some players have more "shooting privileges" than other that means that player will take bigger % of those 24 shots.

Let's take for example game between Houston and Sacramento that was played on December 31st.
Harden played 38:18 minutes and scored 33 points from 24 field goal attempts and 11 free throw attempts.
John Wall played 36:34 minutes and scored 22 points from 20 field goal attempts and 4 FTA (free throw attempts).

Houston and Sacramento then played on January 2nd (the game in which Harden did not play)
and John Wall played 37:14 minutes and scored 28 points from 22 field goal attempts and 6 FTA (free throw attempts).

From what I can read is that you're pretty good at making trouble with bookies, aren't you? You accuse Adkinsbet of swapping a bet. Where is your proof? Normally when you make such bets, you just take a screenshot of it. Shall we say Radex90 or nikica99?
Please provide us your screenshot about your bet?
Also very coincidentally that someone else starts an accusation topic, and just 1 day later you create one and your bet is suddenly twisted.
Prove it. What you are writing now is just a story. I am not a big gambler but your story is wrong.
You write that Harden was out before placing your second bet. Then your liquidity is incorrect. If you were to create a backup for yourself, you would have bet an amount.

Your bets: for over/under (according to you)
153 * 1.64 = 250 mbtc

50 * 1.96 = 90 mbtc

So you just have to walk around. I think you are not an experienced gambler at all. An experienced gambler would ensure that his ROI for this bet would be the same. so a bet of 55 mbtc

In that case you would always have a very small loss as a backup.

over/under

55 * 1.64 = 90 mbtc
50 * 1.96 = 90 mbtc

Would leave you with a loss from 15 mbtc. Not a good day of course, but what you did now does not make any sense. You claim to backup your bet by placing 153 @ 1.64
What if the bet from 50 mbtc would have won? then you would have lost your bet from 153 mbtc. and only gain 40 mbtc from your won bet.

If you really wanted to protect your bet, then you should have made this bet.
And not a bet from 153. Or maybe was it the alcohol that your math did not work out?

So there is absolutely nothing correct about what you say. I think you are not even knowing what you are doing actually.
You just bet rudely hoping that your information from your match would be correct, but you were unlucky and lost.