Since it took them many months to list on just 1 exchange, I think it makes ya LOL at the current joke of a price.

All them miners mining for months before 1 exchange must be haunting everyone now.

0.00000010   <-- = shitcoin level  hahaha
When 0  ?

 deleted

deleted




 

This coin desperately needs listed on an exchange. For the love of crypto someone please list them, I would like to trade some spacecoin at some point in this lifetime.  The owners and such are mainly in discord btw, contact them there.

The Obelisk Units should have been in the update, yet again this management team is disappointing its customers.

The partnership with clearos is really good, except I really don't think clearos is going to be able to compromise with this management the way it is, knowing they cant even code simple file sharing or even copy and paste another coins working UI since its launch a long time ago.

Edited to dumb it down: Im happy its code is being copied and better teams will pick up while (sia) continue to take LONG A$$ TIME to release anything worthwhile. They will be left behind as space dust.

Everyone speculates about whether SIA will rise or fall, but how many take the time to read up on what SIA is and why it might be used?  I thought, hey let's find out what it takes to actually use this system.  What do I have to do to host?  How cheap or expensive is it to rent storage space?  Interestingly, Siatech doesn't have this basic information (why not?).  You eventually find a link to a "third party" site called SiaSetup.

Right now, I would say SIA is way too complicated to gain wide user adoption.  And the website says it is not aimed at individuals, it is more for 'enterprises' which I think is a huge strategic mistake.  I think SIA could take off if it focused on individuals first and not enterprises.  Win over loyal individuals and they will market your product to the enterprises they end up working at.

Whether a hoster or a renter, your SIA wallet needs to be running most if not all of the time.  If, as a host, your computer goes down, you pay penalties (loss of posted SIA collateral).  If as a renter you do not "top off' your credits every 6 weeks, your 3 month contract may elapse and when it does, your data goes POOF.  There are too many penalties as I read SiaSetup for hosters and renters.  The average storage price, 18 SIA per Terabyte, per month, is attractive.  But by default SIA slices and dices your data and distributes it to 30 hosts, and you have pay for a contract with each host.  The contract rate, at least as it appears on SiaSetup is more expensive than storage which doesn't make much sense.

And you can only retrieve your data from the same computer you uploaded your data from.  Think about that.  Well, actually, you can backup all your SIA data files and copy them over to another computer.  But the first time you upload or download a file, then you have to recopy everything all over if you want to retrieve the files from a different system.  I had to re-read this part it is so incredibly user unfriendly.  If my files are chopped up and encrypted in the cloud, half of the value proposition to me is that I can grab them from anywhere there is an Internet connection.  But not so with Sia.  This is one of those wtf are you thinking types of flaws.

I use Mega and it is easy, relatively intuitive, convenient, and not that expensive.  I was attracted to SIA because I thought it might be a distributed, more redundant, more secure, better type of Mega for storing files.  SIA is not that in its current incarnation, which is a shame.  I love the idea of distributed, redundant, encrypted hosting.  That's a powerful capability.  But I think renters, for example, should have some sort of grace period if they are late on topping off their credits before their files are deleted.  And I wonder (it's not explained on Siasetup) whether auto-notifications warn renters about the impending deletion of their data?  And while I understand the thought behind making hosts pay when their computer goes down, I think the cost to the hosting entity should be smaller.  There are power losses beyond the ability of conscientious people to avoid those mishaps.

For hosting, you need a minimum of 4 free TB or you are penalized.  And you start out being penalized because you haven't earned "trust" yet and it takes six weeks or more to climb out of that hole.  This seems to do nothing more than skew hosting towards those who were early in setting up their storage and who now have, by virtue of time, a higher trust score.  I don't like this.  If you want to measure trust, it should be based on some short rolling average of up-time for the host.  Maybe it is, but this is not well explained on SiaSetup.  And if I am correct, this is a somewhat suspect way to tilt the field towards those who got into SIA right from the beginning.

It's no wonder to me that there is plenty of empty, un-rented, unused storage at the moment.  SIA is not friendly or easily accessible to individuals in the way that Mega is.  I hope that the developers really work on making the entire ecosystem much easier to jump into -- both for persons who wish to rent out unused HD space, and for persons (not just enterprises!) that want a better alternative to Mega, or Amazon, or the greatest privacy destroying data sponge of them all -- Google.

SIA is a great idea.  But the implementation for end users is too complicated to gain widespread adoption anytime soon.  KISS.  This is all fixable and I hope to see more efforts both on the main webpage and in the software to make hosting and renting storage space an easy, painless, experience.  The world doesn't need another payment token.  The world does need a better way to store files privately and beyond the ability of governments and other individuals to spy on that data.  The developers clearly recognize this but they aren't making it easy for Joe sixpack to use their system.  At least not yet.

In the meantime, just because I like challenges, I am going to set up hosting.  And maybe someone should have a talk with Kim Dotcom.  Just saying.
[/quote]

I agree pin this!!! devs need to take notes / get off your high horse and pay attention to feedback like this.

Priority in my book:
              Restore files from seed
              Sharing files public or to another sia wallet address.
              Streaming stored video files to anyone
              WTF is taking them so long? should have been done already....

Development needs to accelerate at record levels for sia to become the standard. It sure will take a lot harder work/time/+additional devs than at current rates to place sia in the top 10 util coins.

Price may decide to follow accelerated developments, and may fall hardcore when its taking them to dang long to code and release a feature.

Dedication to code improvement and faster new releases is a must DO here.... Then we shall visit the moon together....



 

Awesome looking forward to the new releases. Thanks for all your work on this project.

Another way to make this work with more OS's is to compile in QT 5 in such a way to include all depends so others don't run into cant launch the wallet issues. As many different flavors of linux would make it compatible with all. Like the original version does.

Proof of Burn will (eventually) destroy enough coins to offset the new ones being mined

Being able to recover files via seed on any pc and have extended time-frame contracts, file sharing with anyone is paramount IMO for this to ride the rocket ship. Devs need to step up their game and get these features to market like yesterday, even if they have to subcontract the work to be done quicker than the turtle pace we have now.

We need RABBIT speed on this!!! set all other projects on hold and get er done its not hard to do keyword is subcontract and have it within the week.......
 

Greetings,
The new linux wallet is broke on linux mint 18.3 fresh install even with qt5-default installed...the original bitcedi wallet launches perfectly.

./bitcedi: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Network.so.5: version `Qt_5' not found (required by ./bitcedi)
./bitcedi: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Gui.so.5: version `Qt_5' not found (required by ./bitcedi)
./bitcedi: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5: version `Qt_5.9' not found (required by ./bitcedi)
./bitcedi: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5: version `Qt_5' not found (required by ./bitcedi)
./bitcedi: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Widgets.so.5: version `Qt_5' not found (required by ./bitcedi)
./bitcedi: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.22' not found (required by ./bitcedi)

Good luck with that theory easy to change firmware to match any fork attempts no matter the miner used. It’s really not a bad thing and will increase the price IMHO.

Can hope bitmain only accepts sc for payments on a batch that may jump it big time.

Beware the many trolls / jealous innovators saying it’s bad for new hardware miners. I like this project a lot and want it to become mainstream.

Think about marketing it to replace outdated faxing for nursing homes,hospitals,states,schools etc they should target that market like gangbusters.

stop complaining/crying about a new A3 etc etc just work on the project to be EXTREMELY user friendly pronto, add the ability to share files like (gdrive via email or link) and explain how the data is encrypted/get it certified for HIPAA/ iso 9001/ iso 27001.

Much more valuable dev time could be spent on further/faster advancement than trying to stop asic miners witch could be a never-ending loosing battle.

GLTA

Yes I set the firewall blocked a lot of non us-ca-mx-uk countries IP's by default, I have just opened it up.

Can you try now? thanks

 Thanks mobnepal! Yes its a bought clone version of that at present that Ive re-coded php functions to be more transparent. Your right may have to add more domains. This is temporary as a awesome open-source develops further and faster that I truly see the site functioning with. Until then its something to use in the "mean time".

Plus the "domain name" is a really good one IMO .. so if someone really wants to build it better ... I will consider all HUGE BTC offers....lol



      

The same argument could be said for your "decentralized" "Social Network Service" you bought domain / you pay hosting / you own servers so please spare me the debate on that. Its just yet another "word" anyone using bitcoin services anywhere should treat it as such.


"Is there any way we as a ""customer"" / User can check that? That would be very nice."
May be a way to do that by showing web access logs publicly. Have to consider that....

[/quote]
How would you integrate something like sending emails in a blockchain? That sounds overly complicated, but i'm very curious to see how you'd do that.
[/quote]
a upcoming open-source I will integrate as it is developed  == hint one word "Volcano"

Theres plans in the works to integrate into blockchain, and I can understand your concerns. This is beta v0.1, and frankly no one says anyone has to use it. Just trying to help others not get spam on basic sites like forums etc. I know I will use it for sure glad I took the time to make it work to my privacy standard.

So if your worried/paranoid don't use it for any serious sh**, keep it basic.  ....Nuff said....
 

I do not keep a log of what everyone receives it auto-deletes every log every 25 min.

For your protection and mine Ive set a cron job to delete all log files every 25 minutes via " find /var/log/* -exec cp /dev/null {} \; " It does use a simple cookie for user sessions, so the emails are always unique.

It would be useful for places you wanted to try out. The TOS has more information.


  

Announcing a new free site for anonymous temporary emails.

https://bitcoinemail.org

If you find this service useful please send BTC donations to:
131nxu7sMqwNrg7FWXzSeCR4d1aYGUQYWv


Thanks all! Enjoy!