Yes, 万 (wan) is 10K.  200 万 is 2 million. 

Bumping - I'm still waiting for my 10+ BTC "refund" from this sad life lesson...

You won't feel nearly as foolish as when you realize how much you would have made if you had just bought and held bitcoins directly. 

I have used coinbase for about 30 buy or sell transactions, starting in April of this year.  I've never had a transaction cancelled despite some wild swings in pricing over that time. 

You will lock in the sell price and get that exact amount.  The last time I sold on coinbase. (20 BTC back when it was in the 140 range - so sad) I had the cash in around 3 days, I think.

It's not a trading platform, so you can't do complex orders.  There is, however, an API.  I haven't used it, but my understanding is that you could script buying and selling if you really wanted to wait for a specific price to buy/sell. 

Register a second account using your other email address at Havelock to receive the shares, and then transfer them to the account you want to manage them. (look for the "xfr" link next to the asset on your accounts page)

For shares that have traded hands, how does the current owner know where he stands with regards to "longest holders".  I have to assume the shares traded on Havelock are at the bottom of stack since there wouldn't seem to be any way you could possibly track that or know in advance if you are buying a "good" (some chance of being paid out) share or a "bad" (effectively worthless) share. 

If you don't switch to a revenue share model or a more transparent buyback model, I think you should at least update the Havelock investment information to clarify the status of traded shares. 

Yes.  This would probably be ideal, if it can work with the group structure.  Otherwise, structuring buybacks as a reverse auction out of after-dividend funds (which is essentially what repurchasing from havelock lowest ask would be) would be the next best alternative.  

I don't see why you think you deserve special treatment over the person who got a share for .001.  A share is a share.  It doesn't suddenly become worth less because it was traded.  I wasn't under the impression that this is a pyramid scheme where people at the top get all the rewards where people at the bottom are left with nothing.

Are these bonds numbered and prioritized?  How do you know where you sit in the queue?  If you have a high priority share and trade it, does it move to the back of the line?   What's the point of even allowing shares to transfer hands if they suddenly become worth nothing?

Sorry.  I didn't see it really discussed much prior.  I'm not an original investor, and my stake is very small.  I still don't understand how anyone could support using 1 BTC to buy out 1 share when it could buy out 3 shares, unless they were blinded by greed under the expectation that they will collect 1 BTC at the expense of all the other investors.

But, as I said, I have little skin in this game.  I was just trying to understand the thought process.  Fortunately the Havelock market while weak, still exists, and I can exit my position at any point with relatively little loss.  That's something many of you guys can't say, so I really can't criticize too much. 

Thanks.  I was just curious.   Perhaps there should be some threshold whereby you prefer repurchasing shares from the exchange at a discount?  I'd rather see each 1 BTC go towards buying back 3 or 4 shares than 1 share.  That increases everyone's expectations in the long run.  But, that may simply not be possible due to commitments you've already made.

Uut of curiosity, why did you decide to do repurchasing the way you are doing it rather than repurchasing at discount from the open exchange orders?  Wouldn't everyone benefit most by clearing the maximum number of outstanding shares possible?  Why take N shares off the market when you can take 3N or 4N shares off the market providing increase value to everyone? 

I'm not complaining.  I'm just curious what the thinking is.

I received mine.  Thanks for taking the time to do the bonus round. 

I paid on 8/1 and you confirmed by email. 

I didn't realize we could ask for more than our initial order on the second time around.  Is the window closed on the leftovers for the second round?

No SSD on my failure.

20 @ .4

I also see this on 8.2 today after a couple weeks of using an 8.2 (rc and then release) without a problem. 

40 @ .25

It was a smaller, more technical meetup.  There was a lot of discussion of some possible bitcoin projects/businesses, and a couple of us worked on some code to call various exchange APIs to get current BTC/LTC pricing to embed in web sites.