Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 14,748 results by nutildah
Re: Possible cheating in Betpanda campaign
⭐ Merited by mcdouglasx (3)
So, screw the cheaters. And screw the lazy ones.
Screw campaign manager that doesn’t accept you because you can post more?
That's not what he's saying at all. He's saying he posts more because he genuinely enjoys posting (I know its impossible for you to believe, but some people actually enjoy posting here). In all probability he doesn't have a host of alt accounts either, so he has more time to post what he wants, when he wants. Imagine that...
Above post quota is already considered as overtime without pay.
This is perhaps one of the stupidest takes I've ever read about this forum. And I've seen a lot of stupid takes.
So if you are working 8hrs at job, you will extend up to 12hrs without pay because you are not lazy? Following the work guidelines is not a sign of laziness. You’re just a hypocrite.
Its not a "job", its a privilege.
Have you used FixedFloat after two successful hacks[1] 
.
The @op scam was in January before all the chaos happened but ff.io has lost a lot of trust since then.
.The @op scam was in January before all the chaos happened but ff.io has lost a lot of trust since then.
Its probably for the same reason that some people still use Trust Wallet -- they have great SEO rankings and somehow manage to skirt any kind of legal repercussion or ISP takedowns, despite having an overwhelmingly poor reputation online.
I remember hearing about FixedFloat's problems years ago in a case where they confiscated a large sum of XMR and demanded documentation proving where it came from. The way they proceeded with subsequent confiscations of BTC and ETH really bothered me: instead of leaving the coins in the customer's deposit address, they immediately transferred them to their main wallets. Since they claim to be performing AML checks on coin sources, the appropriate thing to do would be leave the coins in their freaking outputs rather than mix them in with other funds. This way they could instantly refund users funds, or I guess give them over the law enforcement
which I doubt they've ever actually done.Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)
⭐ Merited by babo (1)
I actually want to apologize to babo. I had no idea bringing this up would cause any sort of drama. Since the account he left the red trust on has been inactive since 2021, the action of leaving the trust was harmless either way. It just caught my eye because a new entry appeared on LoyceV's list maintained in this thread. Anyway, I'm glad the situation has now been resolved.
Here's the problem: Google is now using the same type of LLM for Google Translate that something like ChatGPT uses, which means its going to get flagged as AI-generated.
What better way to explain the situation than by asking ChatGPT itself:
So basically Google Translate is taking the gist of what a user is trying to express and then repackaging it in the same AI format used by the hundreds of other posts reported in this thread.
It would be considered a conundrum except for the fact that ultimately it still comes down to whether or not a post is considered "spam" by moderators. If a post is not saying anything meaningful and that has already been said a thousand times before, I'd say it should still be deleted as spam.
What better way to explain the situation than by asking ChatGPT itself:
Quote
AI detection tools like ZeroGPT often classify text produced by Google Translate as AI-generated because of how both systems process language:
1. Google Translate Uses AI (NMT)
Google Translate's Neural Machine Translation (NMT) system generates text using deep learning models — the same kind of technology used by generative AI like ChatGPT. Since it's literally AI-generated text, detection tools can pick up on that.
2. Text Patterns Resemble AI-Generated Output
AI-generated text tends to have certain statistical features:
- Fluent and grammatically consistent structure
- Even distribution of vocabulary
- Low randomness or burstiness
Google Translate often produces uniform, polished, and pattern-consistent sentences, similar to those produced by large language models, which can trigger AI detectors.
3. Lack of Human-Like Variation
Human-written text often includes:
- Idiomatic expressions
- Minor grammatical inconsistencies
- Personal style or emotion
Translated text from Google Translate can feel overly clean or synthetic, making it more likely to be flagged — even if the original text was written by a human.
1. Google Translate Uses AI (NMT)
Google Translate's Neural Machine Translation (NMT) system generates text using deep learning models — the same kind of technology used by generative AI like ChatGPT. Since it's literally AI-generated text, detection tools can pick up on that.
2. Text Patterns Resemble AI-Generated Output
AI-generated text tends to have certain statistical features:
- Fluent and grammatically consistent structure
- Even distribution of vocabulary
- Low randomness or burstiness
Google Translate often produces uniform, polished, and pattern-consistent sentences, similar to those produced by large language models, which can trigger AI detectors.
3. Lack of Human-Like Variation
Human-written text often includes:
- Idiomatic expressions
- Minor grammatical inconsistencies
- Personal style or emotion
Translated text from Google Translate can feel overly clean or synthetic, making it more likely to be flagged — even if the original text was written by a human.
So basically Google Translate is taking the gist of what a user is trying to express and then repackaging it in the same AI format used by the hundreds of other posts reported in this thread.
It would be considered a conundrum except for the fact that ultimately it still comes down to whether or not a post is considered "spam" by moderators. If a post is not saying anything meaningful and that has already been said a thousand times before, I'd say it should still be deleted as spam.
Again, none of this changes the outcome of your situation, so I don't know why you continue to bring any of this up. For the 10th time, you have no evidence to support your claims. Therefore, there is nothing that anyone here (or anywhere) can do to help you. It seems like you are just slinging mud at Duckdice, who already said they will not give into your demands. This will be my last post addressing your concerns as this conversation has clearly run its course.
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
stolen from twitter, not crediting nobody
Re: Why nutildah give trust on me.??
Hello sir.
And a good day to you sir.
C'mon bro. There's like 20 different accounts that copy/paste stuff from the Bitcoin Magazine X account in the Wall Observer thread.
I didn't understand many users posting from TikTok adding source.
LOL. I think you mean X. But whats the difference really.
So why me 
I've given several other accounts the same type of tag... I wouldn't be surprised if you were the owner of at least a few of them. You're absolutely right though -- I should neutral tag every account that copy/pastes stuff from Twitter. This account in particular should be banned for outright plagiarism though.
Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)
⭐ Merited by LoyceV (4)
This one struck me as particularly odd:
Their negative trust reads:
Meanwhile, this user hasn't logged in since Dec 2021. I wonder what good updating this feedback from neutral to red does. I don't really understand why the neutral was left in the first place, although the thread in the reference does seem like some kind of "entrapment."
Their negative trust reads:
| babo | 2025-01-03 | leaking confidential information, for good of all - is ethical? in 2025 i think not |
Meanwhile, this user hasn't logged in since Dec 2021. I wonder what good updating this feedback from neutral to red does. I don't really understand why the neutral was left in the first place, although the thread in the reference does seem like some kind of "entrapment."
We started a bounty program at the time and paid the manager weekly for it. After we noticed that the costs did not justify the benefit, we stopped the bounty program and did not make any further payments. It is very difficult to successfully do marketing for new projects because there are so many scammers.
Both bounty managers you hired are indeed scammers as they have the habit of enrolling multiple accounts under their control into the same bounty campaigns. This means that the quality of their output will be reduced, if they are even doing anything at all.
Please explain to us why you call Ava Area a scam?!
To be fair to your project, neither OP nor anyone presented any evidence that it is a scam, and I don't really know why they said that.
Re: [alt account hunters] Which posted address formats should I look for?
A regex to search for would be even better
Don't hate me for using AI.
^(?:0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$|
[13][a-km-zA-HJ-NP-Z1-9]{25,34}$|
bc1[a-zA-HJ-NP-Z0-9]{25,90}$|
[LM3][a-km-zA-HJ-NP-Z1-9]{25,34}$|
r[0-9a-zA-Z]{24,34}$|
(?:bitcoincash:)?(q|p)[a-z0-9]{41}$|
X[1-9A-HJ-NP-Za-km-z]{33}$|
D{1}[5-9A-HJ-NP-U]{25,34}$)
would work with Bitcoin Legacy, SegWit, Bech32, Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, BCH and Monero.
This is great.
To reduce the workload, I would only include the following networks:
- Bitcoin
- Any network whose addresses start with "0x" (Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Polygon, etc.)
- TRON
That covers 99.9% of contests, giveaways, bounties and signature campaigns.
Some block explorers allow you to have private address tags. To give you an idea of the popularity of each network, I have the following # of tagged addresses in each block explorer:
bscscan - 1105 addresses
etherscan - 486 addresses
tronscan - 42 addresses
I posted a hunter's Proof of authentication copy from for work purposes.
You didn't. It never existed before you posted it.
I have stopped the Ava_area project, please remove the tag from my account.
Your tag is not for managing the Ava_area bounty, its for being a cheating bounty hunter. I will not remove it.
I posted a hunter's Proof of authentication copy from for work purposes.
You didn't. It never existed before you posted it.
Re: [Duelbits.com]- $71,338.44 Stolen via Predatory Practices & Deceptive Operations
Yeah, “weird” how I believe two images that are literally identical are the same person. God forbid someone uses facts and evidence on this forum instead of groupthink and circlejerks.
This isn’t “they kinda look alike.”
This isn’t “similar shirt, different guy.”
This is a 100% match — same photo, same angle, same facial expression, same everything — used by two different “VIP hosts” on two different casinos. One named “Albert” on Duelbits, the other “Alexander” on Stake.com.
This isn’t “they kinda look alike.”
This isn’t “similar shirt, different guy.”
This is a 100% match — same photo, same angle, same facial expression, same everything — used by two different “VIP hosts” on two different casinos. One named “Albert” on Duelbits, the other “Alexander” on Stake.com.
You are completely out of your mind. The dudes don't really look similar at all and here you are claiming the images are "literally identical." Nice move slipping in extra pictures to my quoted post. I don't really understand the point of doing that because it doesn't help your point. They are quite obviously two different people.
Still laughing?
Yes actually. You're a ridiculous human being.
The reason I know you are Nicolas_park is because Nicolas_park never applied for a bounty using the same combination of Telegram + ETH address as you. It was only the 2nd time the Telegram name "@BTC_BULT" had been used, and the first was by Nicolas_park with no additional information. So your claim of copying "another hunter's Proof of authentication" post is false as it didn't exist before you posted it.
What's funny is I know you are also connected to Rima90, SKBKT, @pkdj9, Games.Bitcoin, David Dj, shagorkh55, Akramulbd10, and a whole host of other accounts mentioned here. I'm sure you have dozens of other accounts as well.
What's funny is I know you are also connected to Rima90, SKBKT, @pkdj9, Games.Bitcoin, David Dj, shagorkh55, Akramulbd10, and a whole host of other accounts mentioned here. I'm sure you have dozens of other accounts as well.
Wow! You sure are good at making BitcoinTalk posts, for this being your first day here.
He's not good at making Bitcointalk posts, ChatGPT is. FWIW I have never seen an AI-generated scam accusation that was actually valid. Its too easy to spam the forum with such accusations & there have been dozens of accounts now that use AI to throw shit against the wall and see what sticks. Any accusations that come back as 70%+ AI according to these detectors should be dismissed:
https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector
https://app.gptzero.me/
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector
Both of OPs posts come back as 100% AI-generated for all 3 detectors.
Goodness fuckin' gracious
https://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/258aa538o412ok/grand-theft-auto-vi-is-now-coming-may-26-2026
How many months will it be delayed after this, now, is the question. Only 57 weeks to go...
https://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/258aa538o412ok/grand-theft-auto-vi-is-now-coming-may-26-2026
How many months will it be delayed after this, now, is the question. Only 57 weeks to go...
Let us not forget your nonsense answer:
Ask a nonsense question, get a nonsense answer.
That clearly confirms that you are not qualified to post in this thread.
Its funny that you present yourself as an expert in anything relevant, but really you're just an expert in trollish ass-hattery.
Sure, keep believing this u and KingBJ are the only one supporting this theory. I cannot produce another person that backs your claims.
That's true -- not a single person has come to the defense of either of these fools. Whatever they think they are doing has backfired massively as nobody will ever believe a single thing they have to say for the rest of their Bitcointalk careers.
Today, I was surprised to receive a message that my post had been deleted. I didn't know why at first, but when I saw this thread, I understood.
I was discovered using AI in my posts by the brilliant member @Dark.Look, who put a lot of effort into discovering me. He deserves admiration for discovering me now, after more than seven years in the forum, writing thousands of posts, and participating in dozens of signature campaigns on the forum. I hadn't been discovered by the experienced campaign managers on the forum, but member @Dark.Look did a great job and discovered my deception.
Anyway, I'm not here to defend myself, but simply to show you that the AI scanning tools you use in your work are actually stupid.
I made a simple edit to the text that was rated 100% AI. I simply removed the dash from the word "Long-term" and rewrote it with "Long term."
The result changed to 0%. What is this amazing AI 
I was discovered using AI in my posts by the brilliant member @Dark.Look, who put a lot of effort into discovering me. He deserves admiration for discovering me now, after more than seven years in the forum, writing thousands of posts, and participating in dozens of signature campaigns on the forum. I hadn't been discovered by the experienced campaign managers on the forum, but member @Dark.Look did a great job and discovered my deception.
Anyway, I'm not here to defend myself, but simply to show you that the AI scanning tools you use in your work are actually stupid.
I made a simple edit to the text that was rated 100% AI. I simply removed the dash from the word "Long-term" and rewrote it with "Long term."
The result changed to 0%. What is this amazing AI
I dunno. Your example reminds me of the story about Thomas Edison electrocuting large animals using Alternating Current to demonstrate how "bad" it was (his inventions and patents involved the competing Direct Current). "Look how dangerous this is!!!" Yes, any tool used improperly can be "dangerous". You got caught using AI in a single post. Its no big deal. I wouldn't worry about it. Just don't use it in the future if you don't want your posts deleted.
The reason why one single change can flip the analysis result from "AI" to "not AI" is because LLMs don't output whatever the change was.
I've been thinking about a new data project for a while: once in a while someone finds the same address that is posted by different users, and I assume they find those by searching for that one address. How fun would it be to list all addresses ever posted on Bitcointalk, and add all usernames that posted it to each address on the list? It'll be a lot of data to process, and I'm a bit afraid the resulting list will be very long with many false positives and many already handled cases. But I'm pretty sure this data will bust a lot of alt accounts
It'll be a lot of data to process, and I'm a bit afraid the resulting list will be very long with many false positives and many already handled cases. But I'm pretty sure this data will bust a lot of alt accounts Ha!
You absolutely should do it.
TryNinja's resource is already pretty good at it, but you have to know which account name or address you are looking for first. There has never been something that tied it all together. Like, any address that has been mentioned 2 or more times by 2 or more accounts. I suppose that would be the basic starting criteria.
Yes there will be a lot of false positives but you can let me sort through them
