Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 8,199 results by o48o
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Dominant forces in the sport
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 17:56:58 UTC
In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?
Why wouldn't i? Isn't the whole point excitement and decent odds? I am pretty sure that huge portion of us don't always bet the one with lowest odds, or the one majority's favorite.
It would be pretty boring just to bets the front runner on betting odds. I know because i tried this and imho it's counter productive as well, because those odds often won't add up enough to cover the costs in the long run. So why wouldn't i add a random black horse from time to time. In fact those situations are the times i have made most money. Not that i wouldn't be on negative still when it comes to overall betting.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 16:52:46 UTC
I am from Venezuela, a country which has been suffering a economical crisis for years now, to the point there are millions of people who have decided to flee this country and spread around the world. We don't only suffer from an economical disaster, we also have a very corrupted and autocrat system where the military is at the top of the power management.
I assume it is not only about the number of gamblers, but also it may have something to do with sanctions the United States and the European Union have imposed over this country. So stake does not want to get in trouble with any western government, only allowing people from here to deposit through Bitcoin and other alternative cryptocurrencies.

I also think it would be a hassle for Stake to try to keep liquidity and manage our local currency, which is always losing value...
They do allow tokens that drop in value, like $Trump, so i am not sure if it's about volatility or price drop. I would have put my money on being in restricted countries, but i guess they are not on that list.

I have heard that people in Venezuela rather prefer some other currency themselves, so maybe there's no demand for that currency. It would be the simplest explanation imho. Also new fiat money is always extra hassle to deal with. Unlike crypto that works 24/7, even if some country would have problems with their infrastructure.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Should religion speak on gambling for the whole country?
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 16:36:37 UTC
If you do not know, Philippines is heavily Catholic. 85 million individuals are Catholics in The Philippines and that makes up 78.8% of the country. A lot of the laws and beliefs in the country are influenced by the Catholic church. Even matters like divorce and LGBT rights are decided with the influence of the religion.

Now that gambling is booming in the country, it is expected that the Catholic church will intervene. The Philippine Church has described this as "a deepening crisis in the country" and is sounding the alarm about a social and cultural scourge that is destroying the lives of young people and entire families.

Obviously, we should respect the religion and the beliefs upheld but what about those who are not Catholic and would wish to continue to gamble? Does religion have the right to be included in conversations regarding gambling if their beliefs cloud their judgement?
It's not just about gambling, is it? Question is if religion should speak for any activity for the whole country.

As an atheist, i wouldn't want to live under laws that are designed for one specific religion, no matter what that religion is. And it would be really easy to argue how someone's random religion shouldn't harm me, but in the end it all comes to values and what kind of values that region wants to share.

If majority of them don't need other reasoning then how they feel about something, then laws don't always make sense. Because it's hard to argue what laws should or should not do in any logical sense, when those laws have been based on something that denies logical reasoning and scientific method. Yet they are adopted by majority.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Gambling and companionship
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 16:26:22 UTC
   I will like to pass a serious message from the ugly incidence I had witnessed. I have this friends that were couple and have been couple for a long time this guys always share even thing together especially same orientation about life, I was open to them that I do gamble they don’t like it at all but I made them understand that I am an adult and that’s my life, recently the lady found that the guy do gamble and he owned up that he has been doing it for a while too. They are broken up now on the grounds of mistrust.

I will like people to learn from this because many people gamble in secret for what ever reason and the have companions who knows nothing about this and when exposed can cause the relationship to split or have cracks.

If you gamble it is of your interest and that of your spouse, you both need to share same orientation about gambling or given a chance to understand and respect the other person gambling choice and if they won’t then either they go or you reconsider your choice. Why should an adult keep their gambling choice away from their lover that’s deceit to me. Gambling is not a dirty secret.
People constantly do things they are ashamed of, and you don't need to tell all of those to your spouse if you don't want to. But when it comes to money, it's usually significant amount of money people are ashamed of losing. Because i don't think that couple would break over one just lottery ticket that didn't win. It's usually a pattern that's been happening a while to be a shameful secret.

Because when it comes to money, couples living under a same roof often have shared plans, that are planned around that money. So when half of it suddenly got missing, there's a problem. And it's not the gambling what's the problem, but the fact that other one is lying and deceiving. Then it becomes issue of trust that would be hard to earn back.

It's easier to understand if you think that your partner is cheating you. After that, not only it's hard to trust your partner, it can affect so much that person doesn't trust their next partners in life either. It's a matter of trust and hiding the fact how you lose money is just one way to lose that trust.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Government banning of casinos are at their own loss.
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 16:14:50 UTC
-cut-
If there's any government officials reading this, it is important you all understand that the ban doesn't in anyway stopped your citizens from still accessing these gambling platforms online with their phones either through VPN. And this evening makes the citizens risk losing their money to the casino whose ToS is against the use of VPN. Your citizens now lose more to these casinos without the country receiving any royalties as revenue raising. Invariably, it all ends in favour of the casinos at the end of it all. Because you can't really stop your citizens from gambling at this digital age, except you plan on manning one policeman to a citizen 😜 , which is not possible.
-cut-
VPN is good way to go around government bans when it comes to seeking information, but it's pretty weak argument when it comes to gambling. Because i don't think that majority of people would risk making accounts on sites where their country is restricted.

They would just risk their money that way, and it's not like anyone is helping them legally when their money is seized. Even if it's just by a scam, because when it's you who is breaking the law (no matter how stupid that law is) who would you go to resolve the situation exactly?

But i agree with you that there are more effective ways to combat gambling addiction, and those programs could be used broadly to educate people about addictions in general, and they could be helpful in teaching about personal finance plans.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Content creation
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 16:04:23 UTC
Lots of people are into content creation because it's easy money. People go live on TikTok these days and strangers donate gifts to them. A friend of mine, who had a monthly salary of $300, started to earn $2000 per month from TikTok lives. All she does is to turn on TikTok, speak some nonsense, be in live with other TikTokers to start a battle and during these battles, people donate gifts to help her to win and then she converts these gifts into real money.
My another female friend is a fitness influencer. She posts pictures of her butt and has 100k followers. Lots of companies try to contact her, give free products and thousands of dollars to promote their products via Instagram post and reels.

It's funny that some people attend Universities or do very hard physical labour but content creators without degrees or any experience, earn significantly more money while having fun every day and don't need to wake up at 6 am.
When something looks easy, it's often not. Trading seems easy when you got lucky with some random token that got you millions overnight. People used to say that making music was easy too: "just press some buttons and wait for those millions." Even though majority of those people won't make it. Same goes with being an influencer. Most of them are working their asses off just to see getting their content stolen.

People who get followers because of their physique often train that physique like there's no tomorrow, because their paycheck depends on preventing aging. And it's just a matter of time until there will be 100x younger ones taking your place.

Whole creative work and entertainment work is hard and nearly impossible to cash out with, as the whole scene is saturated with competition. This is the age when you do what you can for money, because AI is coming and renders majority of it irrelevant. If you find the market that can provide your living, it doesn't really matter what the source is.

I just find it funny when people say it's easy when you can only see fraction of those people succeeding that did try to make it.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Betting on the impossible
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 15:54:04 UTC
Do you allow yourself to bet on ridiculous things?

Like in sports betting, do you sometimes just bet on an option that has very low chances of actually happening but seems fun to bet on at the time? Some people might do it for fun but what would be amazing is if it actually happened and you won.

A friend shared to me how he had betted on an athlete for fun and won big. If you follow Formula 1, you would have heard of an amazing news. Last sunday held the race at Silverstone, United Kingdom. British weather was particularly awful that day as it pours over the track.

A driver, Nico Hulkenberg, started at 19th place. To set the picture, this driver made his debut in Formula 1 way back 2010. He has had 238 race starts and yet he has never finished on the podium. At age 37, he is the driver with most race starts without a podium but last Sunday it finally changed. From 19th, he finished 3rd. The entire community was happy for him even those who are not his fans. It is insane to me that he basically did what seemed the impossible.

This got me thinking how sometimes betting on the impossible could give you insane benefits. I know this will not happen all the time but those who had chosen to bet on Hulkenberg that day for fun got insanely lucky and won big.
I like Kevin Malone attitude:



And yeah, i have taken them. Last time was in eurovision, when i had 200x bet for winner. I thought it had potential and probably would got more attention if John Oliver would have praised that video beforehand and not afterwards.

And i totally missed out on eurovision bet last time, when our local betting provider had offered over 5000x combination bet for top 5 acts. I only heard it afterwards from my friend. They were even likely combination according to youtube's view count. Funny how i regret not taking that bet even though it wasn't a winning bet.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: If you had infinite money, would you still gamble?
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 15:42:44 UTC
Gambling includes plethora of games, various sports to bet on but doesn't it all boil down to money in the end? More the money involved, more the thrill.

Suppose, as title says — you had infinite amount of money, would you still gamble?

Personally, I can't see myself giving two fucks when I don't care for money in first place. Would you?
Whole idea of having infinite money doesn't exist in this reality, and even if it would exist, don't you think it would render the whole act of "gambling" pointless. You should call it playing then, because gambling part wouldn't exist. You wouldn't be able to lose money, and winning it would be pointless, thus you aren't "gambling" per se.

But when it comes to playing, i sometimes play demo modes in slots just to calm my brains, and there's no financial incentive. I don't call that gambling but i probably would do that sometimes. Although, it's hard to imagine how i would spend my time when i had endless resources and sky would be limit with possibilities. It's fair to say that i might find something else to do.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Banning gambling, would this solve the problem?
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 15:35:23 UTC
I came across news that there’s a senator pushing to ban gambling in our country.

So I’d like to ask fellow gamblers here, do you think this move is justified? Or is it too harsh?

We all know that gambling is addictive by nature. No matter our financial status, anyone can fall into addiction. But is banning it entirely really the only solution?
And what could be the possible consequences if gambling were banned in a country? Can you share some thoughts or examples?

Let’s have an open discussion ...
Solve what problem exactly? I would need to hear the reasons in order to hear if it's justified or not. Even though my opinion wouldn't count as it's probably based on culturally different values, so i am biased here.

I don't know which country you speak of, nor i don't know how much damage that industry costs and how do they measure it. It could be religious reasons that i don't understand or would accept as legit reasons, but then again i am from a secular culture.

How ever, in some cases forcing ban or protection for everyone because you need to protect few is sometimes justified. It doesn't matter if it's about gambling or not, as long the law itself is not harming the people.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 🔥BetFury.com | 👑#1 VIP CLUB | 🎁FREE BTC DAILY | 🤑Up to $10 500 BONUS
by
o48o
on 14/07/2025, 15:27:20 UTC
-cut-
It is difficult to tell exactly what the BFG team is planning, but it is not impossible that they have such plans already in the pipeline.
Listing to CEX didn't cause price growth. Only thing it might have caused was faked volume that CEXes like that bring into table. Imho when it's on DeX, the volume and price as well represent the token value more realistic way.

And you guys are aware that they need to pay for listing? Where do you think that money is taken from? And many CEXes require significant amount of those tokens when listed, so they can play with their fake volume.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: CBDCs: Privacy Nightmare or Inevitable Future?
by
o48o
on 13/07/2025, 21:20:08 UTC
Okay, let's talk CBDCs. More and more central banks are pushing these, and honestly, the privacy implications scare me. On one hand, it's digital money, supposedly more efficient. On the other, it feels like a step towards total financial control. Are we just sleepwalking into a future where every transaction is tracked, or am I overreacting? What's the biggest threat you see with widespread CBDC adoption, and how can the crypto community push back?
I am pretty sure that at least in under EU regulations, GDPR will require a ton of confidentiality for that tech, before any kind of CBDC could be even considered.
And i am not sure how that would look like, but it's nothing like current blockchains. It would need to be build on zero knowledge tech or something similar, and i am skeptical if some complex, decentralized experimental state of the art zk contracts would be cheaper solution then current banking.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Musk calls for the creation of a truly American party
by
o48o
on 13/07/2025, 21:01:42 UTC
-cut-
If you ever understand the things at this website - https://suspiciouslinkremoved - you might possibly begin to understand what is really going on in the US.
-cut-
That's not an argument, but a spam link. And it's not hard to see what's going in US right now.
Instead of assuming what's happening based on weirdest conspiracies and religion, you could accept the idea, that explanation with the fewest assumptions is usually correct (AKA Occam's razor).
Man is a wobbling definition of a narcist with a mental decline. And a drug addict that wore a hat saying that trump has been right about everything is now making his own party.

Really difficult stuff.  Grin
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Changing strategy to win !
by
o48o
on 13/07/2025, 20:39:46 UTC
When it comes to slot machines, it's virtually impossible to come up with a real strategy because they operate on a fixed algorithm. And even if you somehow managed to understand that algorithm , which is highly doubtful and unlikely, it still wouldn’t allow you to win consistently. So building a strategy around such games is a myth and self-deception. I can confidently say that not a single millionaire has been made this way, except the casino itself. The only real strategy here is to clearly define the amount you're willing to spend on a game of chance. If you're lucky, you win. If not ,well today just wasn't your day.
Not virtually impossible, but just impossible. At least with the online slots.

I know of a one local case where man managed to find patterns by analyzing video material of slot playing in physical casino. Casino didn't explain how he did it, and they sued him for cheating. I wasn't only one who was very surprised about the fact that he had to pay back the casino. This makes me think that there was something more then analyzing going on. Maybe exploiting a bug or something... What ever it was, it wasn't a winning "strategy" in sense of the word.

Someone could look my gambling history and say that changing strategies have brought money, but they also might have caused me lose money. And in the end i don't believe that strategy has nothing to do with it. It's just a confirmation bias in action.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Musk calls for the creation of a truly American party
by
o48o
on 13/07/2025, 10:39:34 UTC
-cut-
And that's the point where Trump started going bonkers in some of his operations.
-cut-
Imagine going so bonkers that you lose BADecker, the guide of bonkerland.



He is not here to educate anyone, he is trying to get revenge.

BTW you can say Elon here, we are not in TweeteX and he does not read any of this nor has the ability to censor - as far as I know, this forum is full of surprises.

Anyway, Elon (AKA Elmo) wants to get just a few seat which in the current context would be enough to manage and contain the worst of Trumps policies. And while he cannot win the Presidency (not now anyway), he could perfectly be able to get a few key seats and achive some degre of leverage on Trumpy.
Fair enough. What ever causes dispersion inside the conservatives, i am personally all for it. I would have thought that Elon had burn enough bridges, but maga don't really care about bridges as they burn them inside of their own families as well.

Ironic thing in here is that while magas are fighting between themselves, they don't seem to realize that next time pendulum won't swing back in the middle where democrats have been, (which right likes to call communistic left), but way over that to the left. I am amazed how they don't seem to be aware, how are causing a counter movement.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Bad government instigate more crime
by
o48o
on 12/07/2025, 09:39:02 UTC
I was ashamed and embarrassed when I heard a Nigerian who scammed Trump of $250,000 and now our government is running here and there looking for the boys, we should think about the future of this boys, most of them are graduates and after several years of job hurting, they could not bear it again because the bad government can not provide jobs and their frustration led them to opportunity of crime scene, though am not in support of their actions and crime but poor leadership and poor economy system can cause their issues of crime. Thank God $40,000 is currently recovered from those guys and instigation is still on going. What do you think about this fraudulent criminals and government? Aren't they the same?
No one knows what you are talking about here. I feel like i have to explain why...

So, free of charge, here's basics of writing a topic:

1: Assume that no one knows the backstory and start from beginning. You don't explain how did they scam, or if they scammed Trump directly or his office. I also fail to understand any moralism in this. Trump has been notorious scammer his whole life, so why would it be morally wrong to take some of it back? I know it's legally wrong, but legality can clash with morality.

2: Link to the sources. Anyone can say anything with pseudonymous accounts in the internet. So why would anyone just believe it's true?

3. This isn't a story you are telling for a group of friends outside. This is written text, so consider using paragraphs. Text walls (even small ones) are just an example how little you actually care if anyone reads it.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Musk calls for the creation of a truly American party
by
o48o
on 12/07/2025, 09:20:53 UTC
I am trying to educate...
-cut
Have you considered that your hostile attitude might be the reason you got kicked out thrown away from your education position in the first place?

I understand that you hate elmo, and people who adore elmo, but instead of speaking about your feelings, or explaining your reasoning any further, you are downright just insulting everyone. That's not constructive. That's not teaching, and lacks empathy that's needed for communication.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: USA announces 50% tariffs on Brazil
by
o48o
on 11/07/2025, 17:30:10 UTC
I'm not sure if you’ve been following the news, but President Donald Trump has just announced 50% tariffs on Brazil. Some say it's politically motivated retaliation, while others believe it's a way to economically target a country that, under its current government, has been favoring dictatorships and communists, attacking freedom of expression, and going after American companies, especially those in the tech sector. So, what do you think about this?
-cut-
So, how that what you described as a reason wouldn't be a political motivated retalation? What do they think political means?

Funny enough Trump is the one who wants to control the market prices and looks up to dictators as a wannabe dictator. If Biden would have done even fraction of that Magas would say that he is a faschist and communist dictator.

Imho trump just acts on the things that he has heard just while ago, before fact checking any of them. And he seems to repeat rumors and lies and use them as a reason. So i don't think there's anything deeper with this either.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Any good faucets around?
by
o48o
on 11/07/2025, 16:25:47 UTC
Apart from faucets being gone, there are no more giveaways either. I remember back when I started with bitcoin (2015-16) the Doge community on reddit was very active and they were regularly giving away free Dogecoins to users almost daily.
A couple of months ago I tried getting my hands on some free Doge to test some trading ideas I had and I couldn't find anything which was disappointing. Sad
Giveaways make only sense for coins which don't have real community, and they are probably coming back at some point. They are probably tied to learning about that crypto like in coinbase.

But whole space is so saturated that i don't think that most of us even hear about some low cap giveaways, and since they can be worth less then a transaction cost, no one is interested about them either. And they can't give away too much because it's mostly added to sell pressure.

Everyone knows about bitcoin, so it doesn't need giveaways to advertise. Especially with price trajectory like this people rather hodl everything they have.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Elon Musk endorsing Bitcoin on X
by
o48o
on 11/07/2025, 15:20:59 UTC
I'm mostly wondering why he didn't try to join the Libertarian party and make some adjustments where appropriate instead.
-cut-
Isn't that obvious? He likes to be seen as inventor, that's why when he makes hostile takeovers he is placing himself as a founder.
Man even renamed Twitter so that it would seem more like his creation. Libertarian party wouldn't be as easy to take over.

Also it's not very libertarian to become rich from government contracts. so i am willing to bet many libertarians in that party don't see him as one.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Content creation
by
o48o
on 11/07/2025, 15:11:34 UTC
I'm sure it will survive.

Many "losers" aka middle class and below mostly spend their time on social medias because they don't have enough money for entertainment and lazy, scrolling and watching videos on cell phones are cheap and effortless.

But, even though this niche can survive, only few content creators can survive from the beginning to present because content creators mostly depends on hype/trend/algorithm.

It's not just lazy people scrolling for entertainment though. People follow for others that teach tricks and skills of woodworking, leathercraft, stretching, history of language and anything imaginable. There are ton of educational videos on assembling, fixing and building basically anything, and ton of that stuff is free.

Some people take advantage of that free education. So naturally some people are being followed for a good reason. Before internet, just finding a course about something specific would be hard. And i don't think it's just few creators that will survive, because while most of them don't, that field will only grow in every sector, including the entertainment.