Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 21 results by onepuzzle
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 08/08/2025, 08:21:27 UTC
Don't say this nonsense in this thread. What I said has nothing to do with standard transaction sending methods. Everyone has been using this method since the beginning of Bitcoin. Your nonsense is a misleading way of breaking the standard and normal principles of sending transactions. So stop telling your lies. Are you getting paid by Slipstream for these ads?

We all know what happened to the people who sent the transaction the normal way, and we know what happened to those who used Slipstream.

We’ve already played this game once; in the end, I won that round. There are already tests:

Mempool bot competition #2:

Address: 12B2uyEpoRsLDmJDLHJK5n4LeG946XtqM2
Puzzle 75 address space.
30 usd price.
Public key will be exposed tomorrow 27 June 2025 between 13.00 and 14.00 UTC.
Every participant BTC address which will be visible at least once in mempool RBF timeline will get 10 usd in BTC.

Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 07/08/2025, 15:23:43 UTC
⭐ Merited by mcdouglasx (1)
Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

The public keys of multiple 5 puzzles were intentionally revealed, which opens the way to the possibility of using kangaroo, which allows for a faster solution of the problem, something that is not possible with puzzles 71, 72... that do not end in 5 or 0, which makes them difficult to solve because only conventional (slow) brute force can be applied. However, if for example you solve puzzle 71 and do not use the Mara service, when sending the transaction, you are exposing its public key to the world, which will cause bots to use kangaroo and replace your transaction, taking away your prize, since the difficulty of puzzle 71 lies in the fact that the public key is hidden, but once an attempt is made to spend it and it is included in the mempool, the public key is leaked.

For this reason you should use mara Slipstream for these puzzles, because mara does not broadcast the transaction publicly, which means it does not reveal the public key until the transaction is confirmed (included in a block) and at this point, this is not reversible, so you will have collected the reward without problems.

Thank you for the answer! The explanation was simple, but I just didn't pay attention. I thought there were several puzzles with known public keys, but I hadn’t noticed that it's specifically the ones that are multiples of 5.

I personally have no trust in intermediary sites like Slipstream Mara. These are all delusional thoughts that are expressed. Anyone who can solve Puzzle 71 can create a transaction with a gift of 1 million Satoshi and broadcast it on the network. Rest assured, with this reward, miners will not hesitate for a moment to accept it. Your transaction will be confirmed and there is no need to worry until the robots try to reach the public key from the private key.

Bullshit.

Even if you accept a 6 BTC fee, a pool still has to find a block in the end. And as we’ve seen before, many vultures are active and would use the replace-by-fee method to overwrite the transaction. Just admit it—you want to steal the money and nothing else. So far, slipstream has always worked; why wouldn’t it work now? Especially with Marapool behind it. For Marapool, 7 BTC is like $1,000. No one there would try to steal—it’s at least extremely unlikely.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 05/08/2025, 13:45:52 UTC
Cheers Grin


There's just one thing left. How do I get the WIF from puzzle 71?   Undecided

I accidentally found it when i was typing  18 random numbers, i will send you so you can be happy Grin

What are you talking about?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 05/08/2025, 13:00:54 UTC
This Python script generates a fully signed raw Bitcoin transaction that can be used with the MARA Slipstream service (or any other broadcast method).

Automatically:
Fetches UTXOs (unspent outputs) from mempool.space

Code:
import base58
import requests
import ecdsa
from bitcoin import *
import hashlib

def decode_wif(wif):
    b = base58.b58decode(wif)
    if len(b) == 38 and b[-5] == 0x01:
        return b[1:-5], True  # compressed
    elif len(b) == 37:
        return b[1:-1], False  # uncompressed
    raise ValueError("Invalid WIF format")

def get_pubkey(priv_bytes, compressed=True):
    sk = ecdsa.SigningKey.from_string(priv_bytes, curve=ecdsa.SECP256k1)
    vk = sk.get_verifying_key()
    x = vk.pubkey.point.x()
    y = vk.pubkey.point.y()
    return ('02' if y % 2 == 0 else '03') + f"{x:064x}"  # Always compressed

def get_address(pubkey):
    pubkey_bytes = bytes.fromhex(pubkey)
    pubkey_hash = hash160(pubkey_bytes)
    return pubkey_to_address(pubkey)  # Always compressed P2PKH

def is_legacy_address(address):
    return address.startswith('1')

def fetch_utxos(address):
    if not is_legacy_address(address):
        raise ValueError("Only legacy addresses (starting with '1') are supported")
    
    try:
        url = f"https://mempool.space/api/address/{address}/utxo"
        r = requests.get(url)
        r.raise_for_status()
        return r.json()
    except Exception as e:
        print("Failed to fetch UTXOs:", e)
        return []

def estimate_fee(num_inputs, num_outputs, fee_rate):
    # Legacy transaction size estimation with compressed pubkeys
    input_size = 148  # Standard for P2PKH with compressed pubkey
    output_size = 34   # P2PKH output size
    total_size = 10 + num_inputs * input_size + num_outputs * output_size
    return total_size * fee_rate

def create_transaction(wif, to_address, amount_btc, fee_rate):
    # Validate addresses are legacy
    if not is_legacy_address(to_address):
        raise ValueError("Only legacy addresses (starting with '1') are supported for recipient")
    
    priv_bytes, _ = decode_wif(wif)  
    pubkey = get_pubkey(priv_bytes)
    from_address = get_address(pubkey)
    
    if not is_legacy_address(from_address):
        raise ValueError("Only legacy addresses (starting with '1') are supported for sender")

    utxos = fetch_utxos(from_address)
    if not utxos:
        raise RuntimeError("No UTXOs available")

    # Sort UTXOs by value (descending) to minimize number of inputs
    utxos.sort(key=lambda x: x['value'], reverse=True)

    inputs = []
    total = 0
    for utxo in utxos:
        inputs.append({'output': f"{utxo['txid']}:{utxo['vout']}", 'value': utxo['value']})
        total += utxo['value']
        if total >= int(amount_btc * 1e8) + estimate_fee(len(inputs), 2, fee_rate):
            break  # We have enough including fees

    if total == 0:
        raise RuntimeError("No UTXOs available")

    send_amount = int(amount_btc * 1e8)
    fee = estimate_fee(len(inputs), 2, fee_rate)

    if total < send_amount + fee:
        raise RuntimeError(f"Insufficient funds. Need {send_amount + fee} satoshis, have {total}")

    change = total - send_amount - fee
    outputs = [{'address': to_address, 'value': send_amount}]
    if change > 546:  # Minimum dust amount
        outputs.append({'address': from_address, 'value': change})
    elif change > 0:
        fee += change  # Add remaining change to fee if it's too small

    tx = mktx(inputs, outputs)
    for i in range(len(inputs)):
        tx = sign(tx, i, wif)
    return tx

# === Example Usage ===
if __name__ == "__main__":
    WIF = "<wif_private_key>"
    TO_ADDRESS = "1YourLegacyAddressHere"  # must start with '1'
    AMOUNT_BTC = 6.70013241
    FEE_RATE = 20  # sats/vB

    try:
        raw_tx = create_transaction(WIF, TO_ADDRESS, AMOUNT_BTC, FEE_RATE)
        print("Raw Transaction:", raw_tx)
        
        # To broadcast the transaction (uncomment to use)
        # broadcast_url = "https://mempool.space/api/tx"
        # response = requests.post(broadcast_url, data=raw_tx)
        # print("Broadcast response:", response.text)
    except Exception as e:
        print("Error:", e)

Example script output

Quote
Raw Transaction: 0100000002b3138da741af259146ca2c4895bac7e0c08147679f88ce3302fb4db0584bf31205000 0006b4830450221009131a350b98aab71d77f5a9a94dd5bac9a5602e2b761a2dc605ba03cb996df ff0220480b53128af0cf7c9b74fa8d625e2a9d143d15fdaa2fd24e421d4d0d29c1532201210279b e667ef9dcbbac55a06295ce870b07029bfcdb2dce28d959f2815b16f81798ffffffff6441384445 a0f426ee689e2532e41fc6947dda41558026b80f5b1dfd7c58455d130000006a473044022032ccf 651486b1055ea188d95645dc61329e9fa89a18b33417d33dc0aa61484d602206bbb8e8cf1b2a6e8 ea64f78f7d7625d05014f593c76438c7127d5e2b147d971601210279be667ef9dcbbac55a06295c e870b07029bfcdb2dce28d959f2815b16f81798ffffffff023997ef27000000001976a914751e76 e8199196d454941c45d1b3a323f1433bd688acafb2f501000000001976a914f6f5431d25bbf7b12 e8add9af5e3475c44a0a5b888ac00000000


Cheers Grin


You don't have to reinvent the wheel.

https://github.com/onepuzzle/btc-transaction
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 30/06/2025, 20:37:15 UTC
How did you come to the conclusion that he used Python? Just because it's easier?


If you were a Puzzle BTC creator in 2015, you could have used Bitcoin Core, Electrum, or Armory. Electrum (written in Python) was already popular in 2015, and its wallet format is well-documented. Importing keys via the command line (electrum importprivkey) would be trivial with Python-generated WIFs.

Python’s random.seed() function ensures deterministic key generation, unlike C++’s std::rand(), which varies across implementations unless carefully controlled.

Python’s random uses a Mersenne Twister, while C++’s std::rand() depends on the compiler.

Since Electrum itself is written in Python, a Python script would integrate seamlessly.

The same code works unchanged from 2015 to 2025 (thanks to Python’s stability).You just need to know the seed.



1. Mnemonic → Seed (BIP-39)

A sequence of 12–24 words (the mnemonic) is fed into PBKDF2-SHA512 with 2,048 iterations and the salt "mnemonic" + optional passphrase to produce a 512-bit seed. This seed is the secret starting point for the entire wallet.

Code:
Seed = PBKDF2(passphrase=mnemonic, salt="mnemonic"+optional_passphrase, iterations=2048, HMAC-SHA512)

2. Master-Key + Chain-Code (BIP-32)

The 512-bit seed is processed with HMAC-SHA512 using the key "Bitcoin seed". The left 32 bytes of the output become the Master Private Key, the right 32 bytes the Master Chain Code. Together they form the root node for all subsequent key derivations.

Code:
I = HMAC-SHA512(key="Bitcoin seed", data=Seed) 
Master_PrivateKey = I_L (left 32 Bytes) 
Master_ChainCode  = I_R (right 32 Bytes) 

random.seed("some string") + random.randint() is deterministic, but not secure, standardized, or hierarchical. Real HD wallets use strictly defined KDFs (PBKDF2, HMAC-SHA512), chain codes, and mnemonics to ensure maximum security and interoperability.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExamJmZXVuNGxybGszb2Qyand1dGpwNWF3dTY4c2hjdzcyd3Y1a3dqbiZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/15BuyagtKucHm/giphy.gif
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 30/06/2025, 20:13:01 UTC
@mcdouglasx my friend,

Don't bother yourself.
"Some people say the sky is only blue." They console themselves by saying that it will change color and go back to being blue.



How did you come to the conclusion that he used Python? Just because it's easier?
"Satoshi" wrote Bitcoin in C++. A true Satoshi fanboy — like saatoshi_rising — would only use C++.
Also, the random function in C++ gives different results than in Python.
The programming language does matter here — unless HMAC is used.

Could it be JAVA?   Cool

Satoshis last message:

Quote
I do hope your BitcoinJ continues to be developed into an alternative client. It gives Java devs something to work on, and it’s easier with a simpler foundation that doesn’t have to do everything.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 30/06/2025, 19:44:27 UTC
Ok, I think I see my mistake... I just went back to the original comment, and I realize now that I had read "a single master seed" as "master seed phrase" and not "a seed used to prime a RNG" ... Meaning, I thought the idea being proposed was that the puzzles were initially created by, like, using some off-the-shelf wallet software to automatically create a new wallet, complete with a BIP-39 seed phrase and a list of associated private keys, and then changing/masking those private keys to make the puzzles' keys, which (of course) would have disassociated them all from the original BIP-39 seed phrase... And I couldn't for the life of me figure out how that would be easier than just generating them all the way you show above...

So, I am dumb, just not the way I'd feared Tongue


Personally, if I were the creator, I would use this simple python script.You could straight-up import all them keys from 1 to 160 into Electrum right from the command line. Move all the bread in two clicks, no cap. Me? I’d use a Social Security Number as the seed, toss in ‘SatoshiNakamotoPuzzle’ plus the puzzle number, and bam, we locked in. I wouldn't even lie that I used a wallet.  Cool



How did you come to the conclusion that he used Python? Just because it's easier?
"Satoshi" wrote Bitcoin in C++. A true Satoshi fanboy — like saatoshi_rising — would only use C++.
Also, the random function in C++ gives different results than in Python.
The programming language does matter here — unless HMAC is used.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 30/06/2025, 12:35:37 UTC
You are really writing for nothing.

The creator,
- He did not create this puzzle to sue anyone.
- He is not a cryptographer but a high level mathematician and software developer.
- Don't think that he is simple about seeds. (Even the seed examples he uses in software tests are complicated.)
- He played a developer role in wallet creation software.

He has not entered the forum for a long time. Maybe he can come after his camp and trip are over.

A little note to the creator = Finally "ResCU"

So how do you know this guy?

Maybe he’s saatoshi_rising, and he wants to confuse us with prefixes
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 30/06/2025, 10:43:03 UTC
Today is luckiest day for me,
Electric shock destroy my desktop system
Power supply, motherboard, ram goes dead
Processor i3 6100 and gpu GTX 460 , HDD ok
Asus  b250 motherboard, 32gb ram, power supply need
Who can rescue me with 150 to 200 bucks
Will appreciate
Thankx

I’ve remembered your name. As soon as I find the puzzle, we’ll buy you a nice PC and a vacation.









ChatGPT fragen
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 30/06/2025, 05:50:49 UTC
You are really writing for nothing.

The creator,
- He did not create this puzzle to sue anyone.
- He is not a cryptographer but a high level mathematician and software developer.
- Don't think that he is simple about seeds. (Even the seed examples he uses in software tests are complicated.)
- He played a developer role in wallet creation software.

He has not entered the forum for a long time. Maybe he can come after his camp and trip are over.

A little note to the creator = Finally "ResCU"

ResCU? What prefix language is that?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 29/06/2025, 22:01:14 UTC
A deterministic wallet takes a single master seed and runs HMAC-SHA256(seed ∥ index) to sequentially produce all 256-bit private keys.

Isn't trying to find the seed of all keys basically just a little harder than breaking the key of Puzzle 256? Which means it's harder than all the puzzles combined, including the ones after 160, and then some.

saatoshi_rising once said: “By way of excuse, I was not really thinking much about the puzzle at all.”
I believe he chose a simple seed—perhaps a single word or a short phrase. And I think he was a programmer (or at least a mathematician), because he came up with the idea of generating the wallets bitwise—programmers love automation, especially when dealing with 256 wallets. Of course, it’s possible he hand-picked each puzzle; but if he did use a seed, it would be far easier to solve all puzzles with that one seed than to brute-force them.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 29/06/2025, 17:09:36 UTC
Guys, I’ve always wondered: is brute-forcing really the only solution? At some point I read the one and only final message from saatoshi_rising, where he said he used a deterministic wallet to create this puzzle. He distributed the prizes in 2017, which means he must have either recorded every private key (perhaps in a file) or retained the exact master seed. That way he can reconstruct all wallets at any time—maybe he even had it tattooed. After a lot of research I wrote two C++ scripts that generate the exact same puzzle game, probably just like he did. I’ve tried countless seeds without success—maybe you’ll get lucky and uncover all 918 BTC. If you do, please stay fair and split half with me.

I offer two C++ scripts that let you replicate the Bitcoin Puzzle by saatoshi_rising.
Both scripts deterministically generate private keys, apply bitwise masks, compute P2PKH addresses and WIFs, and display progress through the keyspace.
The monolithic variant resides in a single file with direct OpenSSL and HMAC calls in main(), and outputs the index, private key (hex), address, WIF, and status (MATCH/FAIL)—it most closely matches saatoshi_rising’s original script from 2015/2017.
The modular variant is organized into meaningful functions, adds a %Range column and flexible seed handling, and is ideal for developers looking to integrate the code into modern projects.
If saatoshi_rising sees this script, he’ll be amazed at how many ways the same principle can be implemented—and perhaps a little nervous, since now anyone can scan all the puzzles in seconds.

Good Luck! https://github.com/onepuzzle/puzzle-generator

Seems not so usefull from what i see.. what if some of them is manually handpick 🤔🤔


Quite the opposite is true. saatoshi_rising himself explains that he did not hand-pick 256 separate keys, but used a deterministic wallet generator:

Quote
It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000…0001 to set difficulty).

A deterministic wallet takes a single master seed and runs HMAC-SHA256(seed ∥ index) to sequentially produce all 256-bit private keys. He then zeroes out the top i bits and sets bit i–1 to 1, so that exactly i bits are pre-known and the remainder must be brute-forced.

Had he really picked each key manually, he would have needed to record or store 256 hex strings—far more cumbersome than simply remembering one seed and the masking rule. With this method, he can reconstruct all puzzle wallets in seconds—no manual handling required.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 27/06/2025, 21:21:41 UTC
Guys, I’ve always wondered: is brute-forcing really the only solution? At some point I read the one and only final message from saatoshi_rising, where he said he used a deterministic wallet to create this puzzle. He distributed the prizes in 2017, which means he must have either recorded every private key (perhaps in a file) or retained the exact master seed. That way he can reconstruct all wallets at any time—maybe he even had it tattooed. After a lot of research I wrote two C++ scripts that generate the exact same puzzle game, probably just like he did. I’ve tried countless seeds without success—maybe you’ll get lucky and uncover all 918 BTC. If you do, please stay fair and split half with me.

I offer two C++ scripts that let you replicate the Bitcoin Puzzle by saatoshi_rising.
Both scripts deterministically generate private keys, apply bitwise masks, compute P2PKH addresses and WIFs, and display progress through the keyspace.
The monolithic variant resides in a single file with direct OpenSSL and HMAC calls in main(), and outputs the index, private key (hex), address, WIF, and status (MATCH/FAIL)—it most closely matches saatoshi_rising’s original script from 2015/2017.
The modular variant is organized into meaningful functions, adds a %Range column and flexible seed handling, and is ideal for developers looking to integrate the code into modern projects.
If saatoshi_rising sees this script, he’ll be amazed at how many ways the same principle can be implemented—and perhaps a little nervous, since now anyone can scan all the puzzles in seconds.

Good Luck! https://github.com/onepuzzle/puzzle-generator
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 27/06/2025, 18:07:21 UTC
Yes, my bot was running when 69 got sniped, but it had a bug and it never managed to reach the gigantic existing fee before the TX got mined.

Otherwise, I was even in front of the computer when that shit happened

This is exactly what happened with me also on 69. Tried to fix it in real-time, but didn't have time.
Don't wanna this again on 71-84 Wink

you guys failed at stealing. I’m sorry about that. 😏
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 27/06/2025, 17:36:48 UTC
Hey everyone! 🚀

I just pushed my open-source puzzle tool to GitHub: 
https://github.com/onepuzzle/btc-transaction

Fully transparent and virus-free (no shady Electrum hacks here)!

If I ever crack a puzzle myself, you’ll get your fair share. But don’t forget: I’ve got a Lambo to buy and some chill time in Dubai on my mind! 😎
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 27/06/2025, 16:32:00 UTC
Who actually stole 69?

Do you really think anyone’s gonna confess? Look at ‘em. Everyone’s dead silent, like they got drowned out or somethin’.  Smiley

I think that either kTimesG or nomachine stole it. By the way, having $750 k still isn’t enough to be financially independent—maybe that was true 15 years ago. Check out @RetiredCoder: he battled a puzzle for a year and hasn’t spent any of his winnings. Is he stingy, already rich, or just waiting for Bitcoin to hit $1 million? Sorry, I got off-topic. I wouldn’t use Electrum anymore. I’ll soon release a script that lets you generate raw transactions really quickly.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 27/06/2025, 14:11:48 UTC

I had 12 successfull push replacements in total, but many of them went to nodes that weren't up to date with the latest TXs, so they were eventually refused by mempool.space.

Is it possible to view entire RBF timeline somehow?


You'd have to ask every node to give you a list of their mempool history.

Anyway, thx for the experiment. I got my TXs sit there for 15 minutes in total.


@3dmlib Thanks from my side too. It was fun. Who actually stole 69?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 27/06/2025, 13:32:14 UTC
I won and you lose @kTimesG. Don’t cry 😛. But somehow the rich just get richer—like at work, mmm.

As a reward, I’ll buy myself a piece of gum.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 26/06/2025, 20:59:33 UTC
Guys, even if we do end up solving the puzzle, we’re going to fall into deep depression. Or some of you already have—especially those who’ve been in it from the beginning. With that kind of money, you could afford a good therapist. The real question is: will we ever be able to feel happiness again?

@satoshi_rising you may have made 0.001% of the people richer — and the rest depressed. Thanks for that.

Now time to rent 24,000 GPUs to solve 71.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
onepuzzle
on 25/06/2025, 20:59:12 UTC
@bibilgin I don’t believe in your theory, but if you do, then prove it:

Code:
79EBD97F5EF1EF7B46
1PWo3JeB9jpsTbuCPumgqhpq5VRwKGyr5C
f6f5431d25bbf71badfcc241f76aca68cd6146ac

7A38AA4343C6130922
1PWo3JeB9k3NzZGpbMSkzsXYHVQxM8DSZi
f6f5431d25bbfc4ed9e2ce09a9fb6c0079cbb4b9

what exactly do you want me to prove?

Other 1PWo3JeB9j prefix calculation (jump)?
Or sister wallet wallet?
Or something else? Which one do you want?

How exactly do the prefixes help you solve the puzzle? Or which prefixes have you found?