Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 86 results by over45
More wack-job posts by Anonymous Coder who can't fathom that Armstrong's service is valuable and in demand by tens if not hundreds of thousands of users worldwide.
He just held his annual conference with physical & virtual attendance at all-time highs. His books have sold out in hours on ebay and amazon. He has been dead on about the whole COVID crisis and lockdowns which are coordinated as a lead in to The Great Reset. He was the first one to pick it up via international cash flows as part of Socrates.
Since AC here has been bashing away - Armstrong has been growing his paid user base and followers. And many of us that have posted here are supposed to be Armstrong himself taking the time to engage this delusional fool.
He just held his annual conference with physical & virtual attendance at all-time highs. His books have sold out in hours on ebay and amazon. He has been dead on about the whole COVID crisis and lockdowns which are coordinated as a lead in to The Great Reset. He was the first one to pick it up via international cash flows as part of Socrates.
Since AC here has been bashing away - Armstrong has been growing his paid user base and followers. And many of us that have posted here are supposed to be Armstrong himself taking the time to engage this delusional fool.
Quote
Where is the proof he sent a letter to the president? And to think the president would take advice from a convicted felon? The news would tear him apart.
You are just being childish and belligerent. Classic denial symptoms. Seek professional help.
Quote
Your posts are filled with lies and nonsense.
My posts are clearly written and understandable. People have independently verified this without solicitation.
One last time because you are hard of hearing or just plain stupid:
The $5000 gold call was made as to what gold could reach in the event of a currency crisis and loss of faith in the system. You saying that has to be tied to a specific date in time is ludicrous and idiotic. A child could understand this.
This quote of mine:
Quote
You are misinterpreting what he is saying. He is saying that the fact that we can forecast any (meaning even one) event to the day PROVES that markets are by no means RANDOM.
addresses the misconception and misinterpretation by another user who tried to insinuate that Armstrong claims all forecasts can be made to the day. He does not and never has. What he means is exactly what I wrote -- that the fact that any (even one) can be made to the date means the markets are by no means random. He HAS made many large calls to the day and is famous for it. That is partially why the govt. went after him.
If you can't comprehend what I have written above - there is no help for you.
Here is another sample of flawed logic by Anonymous Coder. Her words:
This petition was not started by Armstrong - but by someone who thinks he can help fix the system. It is not advertised anywhere to speak of and the only way I learned of it was here. There is no way to know who other Armstrong readers or subscribers are - so no way to promote it amongst them. He is not tooting his own horn - others want his help. Most people have no idea who he is.
So to say he does not have support is a lie. And there is a pretty good chance his letter to the President and congress swayed some thinking. He is trying to help and you bashers here do nothing but waste time and take up space on earth. Every charge made by the peanut gallery is biased and driven by bruised egos.
Quote
To stay within the scope of the current events, we stick with the coronavirus petition Bring in the expert Martin Armstrong to stop the destruction of the world economy (target 100,000 signatures).
Signing this does not cost a thing, so everybody with only half a brain who knows how to fill a form can do it. I can afford to even advertise it here which is the ultimate irony Smiley Apart from the self-documenting incompetence and recklessness of our Charlatan-in-chief as he becomes a Coronavirus Expert overnight.
At this time, the signature count is topping out below the 1% mark somewhere at 850. That is all the support Martin Armstrong has. This bitcoin Armstrong forum gets more viewers in four days. He basically shot himself in the foot by showing everyone that nobody believes him.
Signing this does not cost a thing, so everybody with only half a brain who knows how to fill a form can do it. I can afford to even advertise it here which is the ultimate irony Smiley Apart from the self-documenting incompetence and recklessness of our Charlatan-in-chief as he becomes a Coronavirus Expert overnight.
At this time, the signature count is topping out below the 1% mark somewhere at 850. That is all the support Martin Armstrong has. This bitcoin Armstrong forum gets more viewers in four days. He basically shot himself in the foot by showing everyone that nobody believes him.
This petition was not started by Armstrong - but by someone who thinks he can help fix the system. It is not advertised anywhere to speak of and the only way I learned of it was here. There is no way to know who other Armstrong readers or subscribers are - so no way to promote it amongst them. He is not tooting his own horn - others want his help. Most people have no idea who he is.
So to say he does not have support is a lie. And there is a pretty good chance his letter to the President and congress swayed some thinking. He is trying to help and you bashers here do nothing but waste time and take up space on earth. Every charge made by the peanut gallery is biased and driven by bruised egos.
Just like there's plenty of "demand" for phone, internet and email scams, right? 
Your posts don't make any sense.
Quote
The other example is his book he sells at amazon in 200 lots and then claims it is sold out the fastest ever. He limits it to get the effect. He simply does not have more supporters than that roughly.
The poster who said this, Anonymous Coder, simply can not admit that Armstrong's work is in demand and people want his books. The books on Amazon sold out TWICE, and then he listed 200 more on EBAY which sold out in about an hour.
Simply based on these actual results - Armstrong has 3x as many supporters than AC says he doesn't have. I am guessing that he has over 500,000k happy Socrates subscribers. I am one of them.
It is not difficult to understand the bashers motives - regardless of what they say their intent is. Their ego took a hit and they seek to vilify one of the most knowledgeable men in economics.
Don't even bother replying if you can't keep up. Read and understand what is written - you clearly don't.
With this Coronavirus scare - might be a good time for you bashers here to take a course in reading comprehension.
With this Coronavirus scare - might be a good time for you bashers here to take a course in reading comprehension.
Quote
Year End Report 2015, publish date: December 1 2015:
How can you have a year end report before the end of the year?
Quote
Additionally, we have a Quarterly Bearish Reversal at 1112. Therefore, a yearend
closing below this level should also warn of a drop
least to test the 875 to 904 former high of 1980. A monthly closing beneath 904
would also point to a drop way down to the 680 area.
closing below this level should also warn of a drop
Quote
becomes possible
[/u] atleast to test the 875 to 904 former high of 1980. A monthly closing beneath 904
would also point to a drop way down to the 680 area.
Emphasis added. Learn to read.
Quote
Martin Armstrong self forged lies
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/the-real-implications-of-forecasting-more-profound-than-you-think/
REPLY: The fact that we can forecast any event to the day PROVES that markets are by no means RANDOM.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/the-real-implications-of-forecasting-more-profound-than-you-think/
REPLY: The fact that we can forecast any event to the day PROVES that markets are by no means RANDOM.
You are misinterpreting what he is saying. He is saying that the fact that we can forecast any (meaning even one) event to the day PROVES that markets are by no means RANDOM.
Quote
Martin Armstrong
Gold Call $5,000 +
with target date 2016
Will Gold reach $5,000 +? (Click on link to get context)
Quote
P13:
A 21 year bull market in stocks points to 2015 and a 17.2 year high in gold points to 2016.
P14:
However, if gold exceeds this level and it too forms the subsequent support, now we are looking at the
$3,500 to $5,000 target zone. This is where we see the potential for Gold is a true economic meltdown of Confidence.
GOLD $5,000 + (Click on link to get context)
Quote
P13:
Technical support will be at the $800 level for 2010. Holding this will keep the bullish momentum in place. We should see a temporary high in 2010-11 with a retest of support perhaps into 2012-13 with a rally into 2016.
Gold Call $5,000 +
with target date 2016
Will Gold reach $5,000 +? (Click on link to get context)
Quote
P13:
A 21 year bull market in stocks points to 2015 and a 17.2 year high in gold points to 2016.
P14:
However, if gold exceeds this level and it too forms the subsequent support, now we are looking at the
$3,500 to $5,000 target zone. This is where we see the potential for Gold is a true economic meltdown of Confidence.
GOLD $5,000 + (Click on link to get context)
Quote
P13:
Technical support will be at the $800 level for 2010. Holding this will keep the bullish momentum in place. We should see a temporary high in 2010-11 with a retest of support perhaps into 2012-13 with a rally into 2016.
Anyone who wants to see the lengths and depths Anonymous Coder will go in an attempt to disparage Armstrong need only look at this quoted post above and then click on the links where she says to get context. They are copies of hand written reports written in 2009, throughout which there are continuous statements that "if this were to happen than we could see this" ... etc. In other words -- everything has to be taken in context.
I suggest everyone read these reports because it will show you just how knowledgeable Armstrong really is - and how lame Anoymous Coder is for even attempting to present this information the way she did.
well you are an idiot if you deduce from what he wrote (the snippets you provide outside of the complete postings) says that gold is going to $5000 in 2016 - even though your argument is that it is supposed to be to the day.
everything has to be taken in context.
Next...
everything has to be taken in context.
Next...
Quote
Bullshit excuse. What kind of forecast is that - eventually.
Quote
Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.
Quote
Armstrong and his supporters claim the ECM can predict things to the date, otherwise what is the point of having specific dates? Then you say people are idiots for thinking so.
This subject is his call on gold reaching $5000 or so when there is a currency crisis and people lose faith in govt. You would have to be a complete idiot to assume that this call is being made to a specific date in time. Clueless if you believe that.
An explanation of the ECM was provided. The turn dates are exactly what is stated - change in trends. Sometimes something happens to the day on the stated change of trend that is noticeable, sometimes not. This is not rocket science to understand.
Learn to read and comprehend what is written.
Quote
Don't mind me asking, have you checked today's date?
Yes. I know today's date. Historically gold should fall big-time and a lot of people are predicting inflation - but the amount of deflation is unprecedented - so any money entering the system is substantially far less than what is getting destroyed. Forget the stock market - it's rigged. We are just at the tip of the iceberg. Or maybe not. I know an elderly millionaire who recently sold all of his gold and moved into something else. I thought he was crazy until he explained his logic.
Quote
So basically you're saying if something does happen then he right, but nothing happens then he's not wrong?
Is that what your comprehension is of the ECM statement I just posted? Seems pretty clear to me what the ECM is -- and isn't.
Quote
Wow, you just admitted Armstrong is an idiot. I guess you forgot about his ECM?
No - it's just that I know how to read and understand language:
Quote
About
The Economic Confidence Model (ECM), sometimes referred to as the Pi Cycle, is a proprietary core model developed to help comprehend the global economy by tracking international capital concentration. While the ECM does not track an individual security or market (and should not be used to define a specific trade strategy), it helps reveal a timeframe for potential shifts in confidence that may lead to major economic events, up or down.
The Economic Confidence Model (ECM), sometimes referred to as the Pi Cycle, is a proprietary core model developed to help comprehend the global economy by tracking international capital concentration. While the ECM does not track an individual security or market (and should not be used to define a specific trade strategy), it helps reveal a timeframe for potential shifts in confidence that may lead to major economic events, up or down.
Last try:
To put it very simply - one more time - the $5000 gold call is what he thinks gold could go to in the event of a currency crisis. That is not difficult to understand and totally makes perfect sense. That is like any other forecaster making a call of what gold could get to when there is a currency crisis. It is not exclusive to Armstrong.
I went to that link you posted on Armstrongs post on gold - and he was very consistent in his calls. Goldman Sacs also proposed sub $1000 gold. For all we know we may see $700 gold soon... or less.
I'll make a prediction on Bitcoin: $2100 or less by 4/2021. Lower if the Coronavirus escalates.
To put it very simply - one more time - the $5000 gold call is what he thinks gold could go to in the event of a currency crisis. That is not difficult to understand and totally makes perfect sense. That is like any other forecaster making a call of what gold could get to when there is a currency crisis. It is not exclusive to Armstrong.
I went to that link you posted on Armstrongs post on gold - and he was very consistent in his calls. Goldman Sacs also proposed sub $1000 gold. For all we know we may see $700 gold soon... or less.
I'll make a prediction on Bitcoin: $2100 or less by 4/2021. Lower if the Coronavirus escalates.
He also emphasizes in his forecasts that time plays a critical role - probably the most important role.
[...]
He has always said that he expects it to get to around $5000 at some point.
[...]
He has always said that he expects it to get to around $5000 at some point.
Quote
Bullshit excuse. What kind of forecast is that - eventually.
Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.
What are you going to eat for dinner in 47 days?
The point is: that $5000 call is what he has said gold will go to when their is a currency crisis. That's not a bullshit call. The bullshit is you thinking it has to be pegged to a specific date and not an event. Do you bashers even comprehend written language ?
don't listen to Anonymous Coder - she's an idiot.
the $5000 gold call is an end-game call -- as in -- as people start to lose confidence in the currency call.
AC is short sighted, bitter and has had her ego hurt.
the $5000 gold call is an end-game call -- as in -- as people start to lose confidence in the currency call.
AC is short sighted, bitter and has had her ego hurt.