I like the logo as it is. needs to be polished up a bit and maby bezled on the edges to resemble a coin.

Nonetheless, the concepts are intriguing and I am willing to be an early pledge.


I pledge to back with:

5 DGC
3 Million Infinite Coin
400 Megacoin
1000 Alpha Coin
5 ARG


who else is with me?!

wow its getting easier and easier to find the innovative topics , just look for the ones the Bittards are bashing…


I’m in support - I can suggest call it "ANT"

much more descriptive - and people will say i have so many ants - it’s a common word and it will catch on -

also don't underestimate names and psycological symbols - people want to know what an Ant is , becasue they have a human idea in their mind about what an Ant should be.

plus then the symbol becomes simple .

etc etc - more awareness -

one question:

so an Ants value is derived by the backing of those that pledge other currencies to it ?

is there a restriction on the currency list ? or is it open , you say wha tis traded on Cryptsy , does that include BTC and LTC ?

put me down for an Ant ! - {sorry its just what i'm going to call it}

i'll buy in ! - mostly becasue of that angry cunt that was calling it shit lolz

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS47YGxiNA0l9d3mvS1DuM_rpp-IrLAi9UW-eQepNBmGw1JX0peKw

Running 100+ hours, but no results.....

How can we succeed with this CL Mining?

Maybe, how many you got?

WTS 50 ARG for 10 BTC, if they are as rare ad as good as its suppost to be, then this should be a steal .

Registration Beginning: 15th June** subject to delay

Tentative Ship Date: TBD/TBA

What: Microsized asic devices intended to maximize performance while minimizing space required

Subject to the following terms:

You put a deposit down to cover shipping(.239)
You sign an NDA to not reveal anything about the testing.
You do not post videos or pictures or talk about the device in general.

Specs:

Chip Architechture: TBD/TBA**

Manufactured By: Chip: Avalon;  Cases: KangZhou LTD. Powersource: TBD/TBA**
Name, Quantity Offered, and Median Performance in Giga-Hashes:

CN-1000                20 @ 100 GH/s

CN Deluxe Jr.          1 @ 500 Gh/s

CN Ultra Deluxe       1 @ 780 Gh/s

FX Enterprise          1 @ 12500 Gh/s

FX E-farm              1 @ 16000 Gh/s

FL1 Warrior            1 @ 20000 Gh/s **additional costs may apply

FL2 Warrior Dual     1 @ 40000 Gh/s **     "          "      "      "

Terms: You complete the tasks, survey and provide the log file from the provided mining software. once approved, you recieve your initial deposit (minus shipping costs) and the ASIC device is yours.

my crypto will have ether  60 bilion total coins or 600 bilion its undecided at the min lol take a look https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226582.0

i would be interested in feedback / what people want

pretty easy, i';m thinking of making an automated scam coin generator

I'd hardly call the actions of one failtroll as a catalyst sparking "extreme negative sentiment towards DVC". Extreme negative sentiment towards himself? Definitely. Towards the whole currency? Nowhere even close...


If anything, these events have only made the DVC community stronger in the end. And I, for one, will continue using the currency.

yes, and 5333 for dgc stratum

fyi when there is an extreme sentiment that is when market will change, this troll sparked extreme negative sentiment towards dvc so I expect it to do the opposite of what most ppl feel and to go up I'm probably the only one expecting this but it will be a fun ride knowing most ppl are not on the bus but those who had a bit of patience.

CreateAbstractWallet(ACLEZ37|Darktongue);

Proof?
Also, how's your new coin coming along?

Scam?  It's an ethical cryptocurrency, right?  One of a kind I think.

Is Shaggy the DVC dev?

The number of possible addresses is so large that you could have every computer on the planet continuously generating addresses for as long as the universe has existed and you would still not expect to see the same address twice.

Yes, it is possible to generate the same address twice. There is nothing in the Bitcoin protocol that enforces that an address you have in your wallet is not also generated by someone else. But the numbers make it so mindbogglingly unlikely that there´s no point in worrying about it.

You finally said something true. But it was in the form of a question... But I guess it is also the first question you've asked, instead of just spewing non-sense just because you don't know anything.