Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 58 results by pass75
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 02/01/2021, 20:34:00 UTC
I'm keeping alive one of the last 2 nodes out there since 2 years at least but it seems nobody is interested to revive this fair coin.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 14/01/2019, 10:11:25 UTC
Re-enabling the stake on my wallet seems to have digged out the blocks generation from the stall. Now the time block seems to be again 30 seconds or so.
I don't know why I'm trying to keep this coin alive... maybe because it was one of my favourite ones, maybe for nostalgia...
But frankly speaking, with no money, no time, no dev, no people involved, no advs, its destiny seems to be already marked  Sad
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 11/01/2019, 09:20:26 UTC
any explorer and which now block ?
Block Explorer is currently unavailable ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/# ).  I synchronized my wallet to block 2675680 and turned off staking.

It will be very useful to restore the block explorer.
Does anybody know how to do it?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=571254.0
I do not remember the cost of use. This address is to receive payment for the use of block explorer for BEE COIN.
https://blockchain.info/address/19FvTou8RRg2mzcAXo27YoNxKSvBVg9pdN

Thank you!
I wrote to them. Let us see how much they will ask.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 10/01/2019, 08:47:19 UTC
any explorer and which now block ?
Block Explorer is currently unavailable ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/# ).  I synchronized my wallet to block 2675680 and turned off staking.

It will be very useful to restore the block explorer.
Does anybody know how to do it?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 09/01/2019, 20:53:20 UTC
It looks a bit better now: new blocks are generated even if very slowly (we are now at 2675681) and the blockchain seems to going on in some way Smiley
I think the staking is necessary for PoS to generate new blocks. So I restarted my wallet with staking enabled but it needs time to stake my coins.
Let us see what will happen. If I'm not wrong block time for BeeCoinV2 should be something like 30 or 60 seconds. Actually we are about 1 block per hour :-/
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 08/01/2019, 23:51:02 UTC
It's just POS since long time.
Here is the link to the latest wallet
http://www.mediafire.com/file/0s200taomra572i/BeeCoinV2+1.0.3+Windows+Wallet.zip
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 08/01/2019, 22:10:59 UTC
I see you but it seems you are a lot behind
"startingheight" : 1288999,

I think it will need some days to complete the sync.
Anyway let us see what will happen Smiley

Thank you!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 08/01/2019, 08:17:03 UTC
Hi guys, first of all Happy New Year to all the BeeCoiners!  Smiley
Then I want to say the blockchain seems to be stuck at block 2675634.
Can you confirm or is it just my sync problem?
My node (5.189.154.154) can see just 2 active connections and it seems both are blocked at 2675634.

getpeerinfo

[
{
"addr" : "1.34.180.245:1108",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1546934083,
"lastrecv" : 1546934075,
"conntime" : 1546934073,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/TheHive:1.0.3/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 2675634,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "144.76.64.49:1108",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1546934083,
"lastrecv" : 1546934079,
"conntime" : 1546934078,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/TheHive:1.0.3/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 2675634,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PHI1612][POW+MN][GOVERNANCE] FONERO – New Generation of Digital Curren
by
pass75
on 28/10/2018, 09:07:08 UTC
Hi guys,
I've noticed just now about the Fonero swap  Shocked
Am I still in time to change my old Fonero coins for the new ones?  Huh  Cry
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions
by
pass75
on 10/06/2018, 08:00:28 UTC
From the last 2 posts on their blog I suspect this is more because they are afraid Fireice will attack their network. I think they've panicked and switched back to CN to archive bigger network hashrate to prevent 51% attack... Still worst decision ever. They are ruining their coin anyways due to huge drop in exchange rate & volatility.

As you noticed... the coin was under attack. I assume it was a last call to save the project. And frankly... it worked. Of course a lot of people sold in panic. But as usual... panic and fear are bad advisors.

The future will tell if the coin manages to recover....
_Was_ under attack or your were suspecting attack based on rumors? Your claim that ASICs provide "protection" and "decentralization" are incorrect. You don't know who stands behind that hashpower. It could be same group who could easily attack the network and fake transactions. The only reason not to withdraw for them now it to wait when exchanges will unfreeze trades and then it ruined. Surely this is only one of the possible worst case scenarios. But still old-CN coins have no future now. It's only a milch cow for ASIC owners while it lasts. No sane person would invest in such coin now.

I absolutely agree. When I saw Sumo switched back to old CN I has really shocked! It's more easy to put a network under attack with ASICs that are produced and belong to few companies than with GPUs that are spreaded on people all over the world. IMHO alt-coins based on ASICs have no future now because they loose their essential nature and purpose: to be decentralised and then free.
Fortunately I didn't invest a lot on this coin.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions
by
pass75
on 10/04/2018, 15:56:57 UTC
I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...



It's a very good result!
I also have RX550 but 2GB (Sapphire Pulse).
Is it also possible to reach same hashrate with my card?


Here is my promised video about saphire RX550 setting to achieve over 400H/s per card on SUMO HEAVY Algo ....

https://youtu.be/88O1jRQhnWw

if you have any additional question do not hesitate to ask me



Aha... Your beasts are based on Baffin... I was hitting the wall trying to squeeze out the same HR from the poor Lexa I have on my test rig :-/
Anyway THANK YOU VERY MUCH for sharing your VERY VERY INTERESTING settings for Baffin.
I'll give it a shot on my Baffin 550s when I can.
Thanks again! ;-)
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions
by
pass75
on 10/04/2018, 06:45:54 UTC
I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...



It's a very good result!
I also have RX550 but 2GB (Sapphire Pulse).
Is it also possible to reach same hashrate with my card?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
[ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions 🔏
by
pass75
on 07/04/2018, 13:40:17 UTC
With XMR-Stak I'm getting about 290 per card  Undecided
The best intensity for me on CN was 432 and I was hashing @460-480 x card. People says to half the intensity with the new CN Heavy but it seems I'm still lot far from the best performance.

I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...


can you share your settings ? and what miner you use ?

 I am preparing some short video about it .... i will public it here soon...
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3
by
pass75
on 07/04/2018, 11:22:27 UTC
Please, add RX 550

Yes, please add support for RX550. Thank you!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] #3 [XUN] UltraNote is READY, Everyone is welcome to mine.
by
pass75
on 31/03/2018, 10:05:25 UTC
Any plans to fork POW like XMR or this going to let ASICs mine?
Developers told me that they will review the different anti ASIC strategies


Ok, good news! ;-)
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ANN - [BEE] - 2014 -2018 - BEE COIN - the original BEE ===
by
pass75
on 22/03/2018, 20:07:49 UTC
I can also do it if you need. Just let me know.
Thank you.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Alloy [XAO] | The Next Generation Anonymous Cryptocurrency
by
pass75
on 02/03/2018, 06:05:49 UTC
But wasn't Alloy CryptoNight/CryptoNote even before? I'm mining it since some weeks with cryptonight algo... So what's the change?

I downloaded the new ver 2.2.0 and having this errore continuosly even if the balance seems to look correct:

2018-Mar-02 03:55:26.200844 WARNING CHECKPOINT FAILED FOR HEIGHT 15261. EXPECTED
HASH: 4009419ee181ef6ec47baaf7ab5bb2c5f251e0ddfd24af9eba6dfa77be01bec2, FETCHED
HASH: 1ff666c906af8e716832f49553d64ad4b9132f6603b764907f0a0b19f750f717

What to do? Does it need to be fixed in some way or should I just ignore it?
Thank you!

You can ignore those warnings. They are generated from the older clients on the network.

We are still on cryptonight but plan to move to a custom POW algorithm in the future.

At block 17500, we will activate the new miner fairness algorithm (new diff algo) to make it easier for smaller miners to compete with nice hash, etc.



OOOK!!!
Now it's clear!
Will the new algo still be mineable with GPUs?
Thank you very much.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Alloy [XAO] | The Next Generation Anonymous Cryptocurrency
by
pass75
on 01/03/2018, 21:02:18 UTC
But wasn't Alloy CryptoNight/CryptoNote even before? I'm mining it since some weeks with cryptonight algo... So what's the change?

I downloaded the new ver 2.2.0 and having this errore continuosly even if the balance seems to look correct:

2018-Mar-02 03:55:26.200844 WARNING CHECKPOINT FAILED FOR HEIGHT 15261. EXPECTED
HASH: 4009419ee181ef6ec47baaf7ab5bb2c5f251e0ddfd24af9eba6dfa77be01bec2, FETCHED
HASH: 1ff666c906af8e716832f49553d64ad4b9132f6603b764907f0a0b19f750f717

What to do? Does it need to be fixed in some way or should I just ignore it?
Thank you!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] #3 [XUN] UltraNote is READY, Everyone is welcome to mine.
by
pass75
on 27/02/2018, 09:34:07 UTC
Hi guys, is the statement in the first post true? I mean the cryptoknight is not a reliable pool?
Is it just for XUN or it's valid for all the other coins mined there?
One more thing... They are saying:
"Be careful, the Xun network is still broken. It may lockup for a while when blocks are found too fast. Hashrate is wasted during that period. Look for drops in the profit charts."
What does it mean? Is it true the XUN net is broken?
Thank you in advance for your attention.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][COAL] BitCoal - MANDATORY UPDATE - CPU/GPU MINING - CRYPTONIGHT
by
pass75
on 27/02/2018, 08:55:08 UTC
Hi guys, I'm new of BitCoal...
I would like to know who are the devs and wether is there a team behind this coin.
The poster seems not writing here since long time.
Thank you.