How u can compare something what cannot be compared. First problem is u are getting values from totally different days. Second problem is network change every second and now is over 4GH/s hashrate and 64GH diff.
Pool mining u share rewards between all miners. Solo mining u are getting full reward. So usually solo mining giving u more but with current diff its just about luck and with these parameters u will get maybe 150-200 SOIL.
My experience with the soil-miners pool is that I pretty much got rewards for blocks I found, less the pool fee. You just need to look at the stats on the site e.g. I found 601 blocks while mining on there and the total reward was 1775.52985500 of the approx 1803 I would get just mining those 601 blocks..... which is ~98% - now even if you deduct the 1% fee the pool still performs slightly worse than solo mining, but fairly close. This doesn't take into account additional coins from transactions (you should get at least some, but granted not many).
You just need to look at the rewards for the addresses mining..... pretty much finding a share = finding a block on there (certainly while I was mining).
Do i understand this well, and nobodies knows for 100% how this work? Just for know, why would you hold a old version from ethereum? This version was sick, ill, not worth it anymore. That's why the hard fork...
Good luck to this anyway, but remember, 99% from the people move to the new release/fork.
You have been woefully mislead I'm afraid. There is absolutely no change in the basic functionality between ETC and ETH since the hard fork WAS ONLY a quick fix to recover coins. Your 99% assessment is also wrong. Read up a little, do some research. You will be surprised at what you can find out.
Well they became a more or less centralised crypto, but Vitalik was in charge all the time, no secrets there. Eth still has more money, and the dev team. Etc stated to copy all the code from eth in the future, this will not make this the winning chain Imo. (I don't own Eth or Etc, I don't believe it can work. I think blockchain/ sidechains is something for the core devs to make secure and not for everyone who wants to give it a go. Look at the DAO. But still I think Eth will be pumped and maybe become a valuable centralised crypto)
Prices go up, prices go down. It's still early days. I just don't get the excitement, gutters, fight-or-flight, or what ever you call it like i used to. Just had to grab a few at 3.8mbtc though. Bitcoin takes for ages. Anyhow....
One thing i have not heard people talking about is DAG size. If we go to a Hybrid PoW/PoS and defuse the difficulty bomb at the same time, are we going to do something with the DAG? You can mine Expanse (Ethash) with a 1GB GPU as far as i understand. You need a minimum of 2GB GPU to mine Eth and Etc. But the DAG file is growing up over 1.5GB. Later this year 2GB GPUs will be no good on the current chain. Do we just lose those smaller cards?
The newer, more power efficient cards have 4 or 8GB memory now as standard anyway. Good for a while yet. Even the 3GB Radeon cards have a good bit of life left in them.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Expanse (EXP) - Fair Launch, No ICO, Community DAO, based on Ethereum
It actually is supported at exp.suprnova.cc port 2222 but you'll need to patch your eth-proxy because on my pool you don't use wallet address as username.
Just a heads up but Dwarfpool Expanse pool is seriously ill at the moment. Delayed payouts (17hrs) and now not recording shares correctly. It may be a front-end issue and recover but since there are no notices it's kind of hard to tell.....
If ocminer supported the Dwarfpool-style proxy for EXP I would be too. I like to be able to switch about easily.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Expanse (EXP) - Fair Launch, No ICO, Community DAO, based on Ethereum
by
paulc010
on 07/08/2016, 11:17:46 UTC
Just a heads up but Dwarfpool Expanse pool is seriously ill at the moment. Delayed payouts (17hrs) and now not recording shares correctly. It may be a front-end issue and recover but since there are no notices it's kind of hard to tell.....
I plan to put this to Charles, what do people think?
If it were possible then I would suggest that once the difficulty bomb has been defused then multi-algo POW mining (a la DGB) would create a coin that's unstoppable. I think following Ethereum's POS plan would kill ETC dead and simply extending POW as-is would be placing all the mining power into the hands of miners who have been hostile to the coin.
is it true that ETC coin supply is more less coins than ETH. after the fork (block 1920000) the wallet holders with coins have only ETH and not ETC. the account holders on exchange have both ETH and ETC. So i was thinking there is more ETH coins than ETC.
EDIT: Think I misunderstood. The ETH chain is a higher block number, so yes, there's more ETH than ETC.
thanks, this means ETC have more value
The difference in the number of coins is pretty small. At the point of the fork both chains had an identical number of coins, so the difference is only about 16,000 coins.
There are probably many coins that weren't held on exchanges that may never be touched on the ETC blockchain as the users may be unable (don't understand how to) or unwilling to use them.
is it true that ETC coin supply is more less coins than ETH. after the fork (block 1920000) the wallet holders with coins have only ETH and not ETC. the account holders on exchange have both ETH and ETC. So i was thinking there is more ETH coins than ETC.
EDIT: Think I misunderstood. The ETH chain is a higher block number, so yes, there's more ETH than ETC.
Etc is not profitable unlesh yoy have free electricity or cheap.
You also need to take into account people mining on the speculation that the price will increase. I've done that with great success before. Following raw profitability can sometimes end up with you getting the worst of all worlds, due to the delay in getting the coins to an exchange