Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 29 results by paulzag
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 30/05/2013, 07:29:03 UTC
Hi Dooglus

Is there an update? 1 June is nearly here.

Just curious.

Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 12/03/2013, 13:24:01 UTC
Yes I got aught in the blockchain fork, but all good now. Of course MtGox has come off $6 in that time :}
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 12/03/2013, 03:13:45 UTC
Thanks Dooglus

What time PDT did the payouts begin?
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 18/02/2013, 11:39:33 UTC
Thanks Dooglas, got the PM advice.

Now I need to work out what I'm owed, as I'm now on a new computer.

Post
Topic
Board Currency exchange
Re: Bitcoin<--> Paypal via Spendbitcoins.com
by
paulzag
on 03/04/2012, 02:27:13 UTC
Cashing out through SpendBitcoins costs the 2.9% + $0.30 though, which is fantastic if there's no other option where you can cash out without worrying about getting scammed.

To avoid that fee though you might also want to consider trading on the #bitcoin-otc marketplace.  There are often buyers who would like to pay using PayPal and have a trust history rating on the #bitcoin-otc Web of Trust (WoT).  Often the rates offered are 1:1 versus market MTGUSD or at the current market price.

 - http://www.bitcoin-otc.com
 - http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#bitcoin-otc-foyer
 - http://bitcoin-otc.com/trust.php


I'm one of the buyers on #bitcoin-otc who has a good Web-of-Trust rating and pays Mt.Gox USD rates.

 - http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#bitcoin-otc
 - http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=paulzag

We don't bite (well not much anyway).
Post
Topic
Board Currency exchange
Re: WTB : 1 bitcoin
by
paulzag
on 03/04/2012, 01:02:52 UTC
let's discuss it in #bitcoin-otc
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 25/03/2012, 14:29:01 UTC
I take your point on trusting what i post here to be an exaggeration or untruthful, i just can't confirm anything until the investigation has completed  for me it's now a legal matter that is out of my hands now and i am restricted in what i say here.

Finally i got myself in this mess and thank you for offering to bailing me out,(I am no bank and thats exactly who got me into this mess) but id like to fix this myself it's how i work, mate i don't know where exactly you are digging this crap up!!!!!.... but please do some research before you decide to  defame my already depleted reputation.

I had to respond........it just pissed me off.

Andre

You got pissed off? Imagine how I feel and the rest of your clients.

You accuse me of defaming you. Please specify where I have done so in any of my postings. I will readily post a retraction, clarification or apology.

The last conversation I had with you was (I think) Thursday 16 February when you said my transfer had gone through (I can check and confirm the actual date but it was before 24 Feb). Since then it is impossible to talk to you via phone or email.

The only response from you has been identical cut and paste nonsense to (what seems like) every email in your inbox dated 12 March 2012.

What crap am I digging up? 1) Chris denied being your Technical Lead; 2)there is not WBX team; 3)you told me on the phone, you'd transferred my other withdrawal requests to my Westpac account when you had not.

If you are talking about a fraud investigation or small claims. I'm not digging those up. They are actively being considered.

What I'm trying to do is work out how to get some advocacy and communication going. We aren't talking sheep stations here*. But there are enough people saying you have their money and you are not giving it back to them. Worse you are not telling me enough information to encourage me to wait quietly (or come to your defense).

Andre as you know I am in Australia. I can coordinate the "disgruntled clients of Andre Jensen". I thought you would want to avoid creating an angry group of clients, and instead pursue an orderly resolution of affairs.

I don't think you are a crook or a scammer. I think you ended up in a bad place as the meat in the sandwich. Personally I suspect criminals used EFT to transfer more AUD into the exchange than you have admitted to me. But nothing you have said or done encourages me to hope for an orderly resolution.

*for non-Aussies "sheep stations" are huge land-holdings in the Australian outback - some are bigger than small counties. "Playing for sheep-stations" means playing for big stakes.

Post
Topic
Board Currency exchange
Re: WTB LRUSD for BTC
by
paulzag
on 23/03/2012, 10:32:13 UTC
Okay - look forward to hearing from you.

"tomorrow" is a strange concept on forums. It's 9:31pm on Friday night as I write this in Sydney Australia.

 Grin
Post
Topic
Board Currency exchange
Re: WTB LRUSD for BTC
by
paulzag
on 23/03/2012, 02:36:06 UTC
Pm sent !

Regards
idev

PM answered

I'm still selling BTC for LRUSD
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: How do you split fees between buyer and seller on a stock exchange?
by
paulzag
on 23/03/2012, 02:11:31 UTC
Thats not entirely true, although I'm on your side as I think its pointless, Intersango's new fee structure does make business sense: it delivers on the goal of reducing spreads. Their thinking is a tighter spread will lead to more customers. For those who unknowingly sign up, the buys will be more expensive then they expect. I think this is stupid, however it has made the exchange favour sellers. If you dont mind using two exchanges, you can use this to your advantage for your trading activities.

I think you're being imprecise with your word choices "favor sellers". It actually favors liquidity makers. They can be buyers or sellers, so long as they do not accept the bid/ask on the other side of the transaction.

The new system actually discourages participants from accepting a highest bid/lowest ask. Instead it encourages the order to be off that by 0.00000001 BTC (or whatever the lowest increment the market supports).

Hopefully the market throws a warning like "your commission if you click okay will be 0.095% which is equal to $x.yy . So the newbies don't get surprised.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: How do you split fees between buyer and seller on a stock exchange?
by
paulzag
on 22/03/2012, 11:26:42 UTC
By the way, any plans to have the issuer of the share get a portion of the trading fee?
Why would the primary issuer get a cut of the secondary market?

The issuer get the advantage that a secondary market gives them liquidity. If the issuer gets a cut, then the transaction fees must go up.

If the issuer wants to make a margin they can set up their own secondary market, but I'd never invest in them. I want them to stick to the knitting.

Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: How do you split fees between buyer and seller on a stock exchange?
by
paulzag
on 22/03/2012, 09:44:13 UTC
Everybody has explained it already, but basically buyers AND sellers pay fees, you can rebate fees for liquidity makers in v2. v3 may even pay Market Makers more in rebates than they'd pay in fees effectively giving them a revenue stream.

The fees are set in the base currency, in this case BTC as others have said. Stock buyers pay the stock price plus fee. Stock sellers receive BTC less the fee. Stock exchanges work like that. You buy shares you spend $x00 per share plus $y commission. you sell shares you receive $x00 per share less the $y commission.

Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 22/03/2012, 07:01:14 UTC
Andre I'm glad you resurfaced and answered some questions.

At this point in time I hold you personally responsible and liable for all client funds in the exchange. You no doubt have your own advice on that, however I point out that you accepted deposits and made withdrawals in your own name and from your personal bank accounts. Furthermore you knowingly traded while the company was deregistered.

You have exaggerated or been untruthful on the phone and on the site. One example is Chris is not your "Technical Lead", another is there is not a "WBX Team" behind WBX news - it's just you. Lastly you told me on at least two occasions that my AUD withdrawal had gone through. I am not the only person you said that to.

Your selective response to questions, your extended periods of silence on email and forums, and your refusal to answer phone calls further exacerbate your personal liability in this matter.

I offered you a recapitalization option which you ignored.

Yes you haven't done a runner with the remaining BTC, but you have not been open and honest with your customers and clients. Especially as many of us have a vested interest in helping you sort out the mess with your bankers. Many people can research and pressure the banks to release some of the funds. Unless that too is an exaggeration or untruth.

Even if the worst case is that you've been scammed and intend to earn the money to pay everyone back, the only way to do that is to be honest about the situation.

Do you really want the pain of a fraud investigation or a series of small claims court claims?
Post
Topic
Board Currency exchange
Topic OP
WTB LRUSD for BTC
by
paulzag
on 22/03/2012, 05:41:23 UTC
Hi everyone,

I'd like LRUSD and can exchange bitcoin for it.

The rate I'm offering is MtGox Ask or some other rate you'd like to offer.

PM or reply or hit me up in #bitcoin-otc

My #bitcoin-otc web-of-trust is http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=paulzag

If you want USD quick I can also pay by Paypal (eeek) or USA ACH (subject to funds availability).

Regards

Paul
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 13/03/2012, 22:56:19 UTC
Sorry for the cheap shot at my kiwi cousins... I went to primary school in Christchurch one autumn/winter. I held a financial services authority once too - for raising film funds.

Yes the legal framework in Oz is quite good. So you'd think Andre would man up and start talking rather than risk the legal ramifications of anybody calling the authorities.

Sadly I suspect it will come to criminal and civil proceedings as Andre is burying his head in the sand and ducking everyone.
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 13/03/2012, 12:43:59 UTC
I think the Orange NSW address you are thinking of is for CryptoXChange's legal registered office address.

The ABN looks like it predates the move to Qld.

The absence of Annual Return filings reinforces a view that the company was deregistered automatically for not lodging annual returns.

However the company was not up-to-date with ASIC paperwork before it started the exchange. Strike 1 to piercing the corporate veil (and thus making Andre personally liable).

ASIC also regulates the provision of financial services in Australia. They love to go after shonky Queensland-based Kiwi get-rich-quick peddlers. And a company called "High Net Worth Property Pty Ltd" sounds like the perfect target. ASIC has powers to ban a director from working in the financial services industry, ban the holding of more directorships, or just ruin a director's reputation.

ASIC can also pierce the corporate veil and go after the director personally.
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 13/03/2012, 01:11:34 UTC
He probably didn't de-register the company, ASIC probably deregistered it for not filling annual returns.

Furthermore, bank account payments to and from WBX are in Andre's name not the company. So again he's personally liable.

Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 12/03/2012, 01:01:13 UTC
I also notice there is not announcement here or on the site's News page to match Andre's numerous copy & paste emails of today.

It seems like he sent the same reply to every email in the support queue.
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: {ANNOUNCEMENT} WBX Exchange Frozen
by
paulzag
on 11/03/2012, 23:03:21 UTC
The problem is that Andre stayed silent most days since before 14 February.

There should have been a daily "nothing new to report" or "I can't say anything more while the lawyers are looking it over".

In today's announcement there is no timeline for the return of clients' funds.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: Market depth relevance
by
paulzag
on 22/02/2012, 03:09:11 UTC
So why is the price <$5, and is there anything we can do to the market depth to convince people to stop selling them so cheap?
If you think <$5 is too cheap, then there is a really easy fix, buy them yourself.

At current returns on mining, you can work in fast food and buy BTC quicker than mining them. Temporary aberration in the market?

It's not like the BTC are being destroyed by trading them.

supply and demand means that BTC are worth more than the equivalent fiat for the buyer, and sellers would marginally prefer the cash.