Search content
Sort by
Showing 6 of 6 results by pda713
Since this ended up in Pol/Soc, I'll go that direction with this portion of the theory as well ^_^
I'm sure that many athiests have read the Bible indeed, and have become athiests as a result of misguided interpretation of its messages. I know that my view isn't necessarily mainstream, and outright "sacrilege" to some, but I see it as a consolidated collection of historical events recorded by many hands in different regions for the purpose of future generations to learn from our past.
The religious texts of the world's major franchises of faith are eerily similar. But dissimilar enough to cause unrest and hatred among one another due to differing opinions of the meanings of its words.
Therefore, recording history and future predictions within the blockchain (as was in the Genesis block, for example!) will circumvent other future world powers from modifying its contents for nefarious self-serving purposes.
I'm sure that many athiests have read the Bible indeed, and have become athiests as a result of misguided interpretation of its messages. I know that my view isn't necessarily mainstream, and outright "sacrilege" to some, but I see it as a consolidated collection of historical events recorded by many hands in different regions for the purpose of future generations to learn from our past.
The religious texts of the world's major franchises of faith are eerily similar. But dissimilar enough to cause unrest and hatred among one another due to differing opinions of the meanings of its words.
Therefore, recording history and future predictions within the blockchain (as was in the Genesis block, for example!) will circumvent other future world powers from modifying its contents for nefarious self-serving purposes.
31000 line of code is not a big task for any programmers because I am just a moderate level programmer and writing 1000 to 2000( or may be more then that ) line of code is daily time table so I think writing 31000 line for a revolutionary technology is not behind our imagination. its possible to do that may he had some assistance or if he was alone then also writing 31000 line would hardly 1 month and for logics and algorithms and testing I will give him 1 year to write those and I think its enough
I don't think he's saying that 31,000 lines is too much for a human; he's saying that it's not too much for a computer. With that aside, I don't think that there are AI's capable of writing that kind of complex code, especially when bitcoin was created in 2008. Do you know if there are code-writing AI's yet? Because I feel that logic itself is too complex for an AI to create even a fizzbuzz program, or something else simple.
thegrid.io
I read some of satoshi posts and I don't think its A.I. At the same time I can't imagine what man on earth can restrain oneself from touching such fortune that satoshi has. And it will be conveniently for A.I. to invent Bitcoin to take control of men finances because it doesn't understand dollars
What if he is a genius and has the wealth to back it up,and what if rather than the amount of publicly known coins he might have mined a lot more like the rest of the early miners and might have made a good fortune and left the initial coins alone. One thing everyone accepts is that he is a genius.I say non-AI, as I can relate to this individual. I've lost a devastating amount of funds that while in the past were worth just a few hundred, they could comfortably retire my entire family now... all by losing access to keys.
Or perhaps a new anonymous 1% and it is all an NWO scheme, keeping them anonymous yet still owning a major portion of funds available to the world.
Has anyone considered that right under our noses is the distributed ledger of history of the past few thousand years, and it is ironically concurrent although translated differently throughout the world?
I've spent a bit of time in this area, and I've noticed that we've perhaps unwittingly started "Bible 2.0", essentially a more streamlined historical document with higher distribution and more direct and unmistakable correlation to date recorded.
I've designed a thought experiment around this concept, and along with visiting other metaphysical topics, it makes complete logical sense.
I'm not sure of the reception to expect if I run the entire TL;DR past the community as composed, so here is the free trial on this topic. Burn at stake, or viably consider?
I've spent a bit of time in this area, and I've noticed that we've perhaps unwittingly started "Bible 2.0", essentially a more streamlined historical document with higher distribution and more direct and unmistakable correlation to date recorded.
I've designed a thought experiment around this concept, and along with visiting other metaphysical topics, it makes complete logical sense.
I'm not sure of the reception to expect if I run the entire TL;DR past the community as composed, so here is the free trial on this topic. Burn at stake, or viably consider?
『Trust BTC supplier』Theresa bitcoins buying/selling shop『MB/PP/MP/WU/My cash/MG』
It's been too long! Forgot my old account and email. 
Would like to buy BTC. Will leave good feedback on successful transaction
I'll see you on chat.
Would like to buy BTC. Will leave good feedback on successful transaction
I'll see you on chat.