Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 50 results by pdaddy
Re: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast
Who the fuck asked you?!?
Have fun with them other TROLLS on my Ignore List!
STFU and GTFO and in your words, welcome to my ignore list.
Re: [ANN] 1GH.COM - AUR / HVC / MAX / MMC / PTS Anonymous Pool ★
Heavycoin GPU miner updated on http://hvc.1gh.com, hashrate is improved, please upgrade.
Thx, went from 14.3 to 18.7 Mh/s on my 7950.
Re: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast
as i said couple of pages ago .... these results of the 750Ti may push price down
with those cards u can get 23m/hash for 140$
its not clear yet ?
with those cards u can get 23m/hash for 140$
its not clear yet ?
You are funny, stating the price of one card and the hash rate of two. Stockholm syndrome perhaps?
Re: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast
Say to mine 1 BTC it costs a total of $510 and lets also say current value of BTC is $500. So to mine 1 BTC is COSTS you $10. So you are mining at a loss of $10 per BTC.
Now you could invest that $10 in saving into buying BTC or you could mine at a loss of $10 per BTC to sell them at a higher price later.
So I was saying it would cost $510 to mine 1 BTC that right now is worth $500. But say in 1 month it could be $650. So $140 profit.
It's all speculation of FUTURE value of a coin. But it CAN MAKE A LOT OF SENSE TO MINE AT A "PRESENT" LOSS!
Okay, so it costs you $510 to mine 1 BTC. Why is the alternative to only invest $10 in buying BTC? The alternative is to invest $510 in buying BTC, as that is what you have saved if you turn your equipment off.Now you could invest that $10 in saving into buying BTC or you could mine at a loss of $10 per BTC to sell them at a higher price later.
So I was saying it would cost $510 to mine 1 BTC that right now is worth $500. But say in 1 month it could be $650. So $140 profit.
It's all speculation of FUTURE value of a coin. But it CAN MAKE A LOT OF SENSE TO MINE AT A "PRESENT" LOSS!
Mining scenario - invest $510 to receive 1 BTC, value increases to $650, $140 profit
Invest via exchange scenario - invest $510 to receive 1.02 BTC, value increases to $663, $153 profit
When you mine you are converting fiat into coins via the cost of electricity, it never makes sense to pay more in electricity than you could get the same coins for from an exchange.
Doh, yea that does more sense
I use justcoin.com, they are great and don't charge you anywhere near as much.
Although at only $10 difference on a $500 coin it's probably a toss up due to brokerage fees. But yea I forgot the "true" cost to get that 1 BTC was $510.
BTW, any idea the best place (fee wise) to convert FIAT to BTC or other coins? As an Example getcoincafe.com charges 6%. In this case it's still better to mine at a loss then pay brokerage fees.
Re: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast
anybody knows whats does the command line --no-submit-stale mean? from hvc.1gh
Tried google for a change?
Re: [ANN] 1GH.COM - AUR / HVC / MAX / MMC / PTS Anonymous Pool ★
Heavycoin GPU miner updated on hvc.1gh.com, hashrate improvement >30%, please upgrade.
+47% here.
Development like this makes me stay on your pool.
Re: [ANN] 1GH.COM - AUR / HVC / MAX / MMC / PTS Anonymous Pool ★
Why is the diff changing every couple of minutes?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU 0: 53.0C 1492RPM | 8.944M/8.923Mh/s | R:0.4% HW:0 WU:0.0/m T:1 I: 8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[23:04:52] Accepted 208f5fd2 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:04] Accepted 30320728 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:14] Accepted 011ed9d7 Diff 1/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:18] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.017357
[23:05:25] Accepted 1ad07e61 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:29] Accepted 20404488 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:50] Accepted 150a3893 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:51] Accepted 2f8bc6f1 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:58] Accepted 322aab06 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:00] Accepted 27766b23 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:05] Accepted 2abb1749 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:15] Accepted 32e8e057 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:20] Accepted 2b5436d6 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:24] Accepted 02a81753 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:32] Accepted 13118262 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:54] Accepted 26d38c9f Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:57] Accepted 287170c2 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:10] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.020250
[23:07:31] Accepted 0ca41c85 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:44] Accepted 22c58893 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:49] Accepted 2757a7e3 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:51] Accepted 19430dd4 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:51] Accepted 1e313454 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:52] Accepted 2ad0d216 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:08] Accepted 9ed8af2f Diff 2/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:12] Accepted 2dacd2ff Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:16] Accepted f972d3ae Diff 1/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:19] Accepted 2d915e03 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:35] Accepted 2be8eaee Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:09] Accepted 2dcca49b Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:20] Accepted 26742c54 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:30] Accepted 0a706b7b Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:34] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.019677
[23:09:50] Accepted 19f9bb22 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:52] Accepted 09f92e23 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:55] Accepted 056ef5f8 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:56] Accepted 187ac73c Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:10:10] Accepted 290a2109 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:10:18] Accepted 2c6cab31 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:10:20] Accepted 306ef66c Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU 0: 53.0C 1492RPM | 8.944M/8.923Mh/s | R:0.4% HW:0 WU:0.0/m T:1 I: 8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[23:04:52] Accepted 208f5fd2 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:04] Accepted 30320728 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:14] Accepted 011ed9d7 Diff 1/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:18] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.017357
[23:05:25] Accepted 1ad07e61 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:29] Accepted 20404488 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:50] Accepted 150a3893 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:51] Accepted 2f8bc6f1 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:05:58] Accepted 322aab06 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:00] Accepted 27766b23 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:05] Accepted 2abb1749 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:15] Accepted 32e8e057 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:20] Accepted 2b5436d6 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:24] Accepted 02a81753 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:32] Accepted 13118262 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:54] Accepted 26d38c9f Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:06:57] Accepted 287170c2 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:10] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.020250
[23:07:31] Accepted 0ca41c85 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:44] Accepted 22c58893 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:49] Accepted 2757a7e3 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:51] Accepted 19430dd4 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:51] Accepted 1e313454 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:07:52] Accepted 2ad0d216 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:08] Accepted 9ed8af2f Diff 2/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:12] Accepted 2dacd2ff Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:16] Accepted f972d3ae Diff 1/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:19] Accepted 2d915e03 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:08:35] Accepted 2be8eaee Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:09] Accepted 2dcca49b Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:20] Accepted 26742c54 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:30] Accepted 0a706b7b Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:34] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.019677
[23:09:50] Accepted 19f9bb22 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:52] Accepted 09f92e23 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:55] Accepted 056ef5f8 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:09:56] Accepted 187ac73c Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:10:10] Accepted 290a2109 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:10:18] Accepted 2c6cab31 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[23:10:20] Accepted 306ef66c Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at Pool 0
Re: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com
Thanks for a reply.
But what I was wondering is how the pool calculates pool difficulty for a particular worker.
Which will be more optimal and preferable from server side, having all rigs under one login or split them individually.
But what I was wondering is how the pool calculates pool difficulty for a particular worker.
Which will be more optimal and preferable from server side, having all rigs under one login or split them individually.
VARDIFF makes no difference to your profits. Small rig or large rig. Doesn't matter. It's been explained on this forum and every other pool forum. You can read up on it.
It doesn't matter, AS LONG AS THE REJECTS ARE CLOSE TO ZERO.
No. It doesn't matter. Ever. Period.
I think it does. Otherwise tuning vardiff would not exist.
On wemineltc I am receiving various difficulties ranging from 64 to 600 depending on the particular rig's hashing power.
Taking into account that there is only one server in US and reject ratio is high due to latency I suspect that that it matters even more.
Currently i see across all rigs that difficulty is set to 512. Might be hard coded value.
Since clevermining is still in development I wonder what is Terk's opinion.
Should we use separate btc addresses for each mining rig?!
Is he working on sub-workers. Like for example "btcaddress_worker1"?!
Or should we just use one address for all of them?!
What is Terk's preference on this?
Sure vardiff matters, the guy just doesn't understand.
Re: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com
Hey there,
I know it has been asked before but I found no answer yet. Any idea when vardiff will be working again? 512 is kinda high for my smaller rigs. Thanks in advance for answering.
I know it has been asked before but I found no answer yet. Any idea when vardiff will be working again? 512 is kinda high for my smaller rigs. Thanks in advance for answering.
VARDIFF makes no difference to your profits. Small rig or large rig. Doesn't matter. It's been explained on this forum and every other pool forum. You can read up on it.
It doesn't matter, AS LONG AS THE REJECTS ARE CLOSE TO ZERO.
Re: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com
Last night I decided to give the pool another test. After 18 hours testing I feel safe to say that all seems to work fine for me. My ping to the pool is 217ms. Mining on a 7950.
- [18:48:22] Started at [2014-02-24 00:45:34]
[18:48:22] Runtime: 18 hrs : 2 mins : 42 secs
[18:48:22] Average hashrate: 621.0 Kilohash/s
[18:48:22] Solved blocks: 1
[18:48:22] Best share difficulty: 1.48M
[18:48:22] Share submissions: 1213
[18:48:22] Accepted shares: 1132
[18:48:22] Rejected shares: 81
[18:48:22] Accepted difficulty shares: 579584
[18:48:22] Rejected difficulty shares: 41472
[18:48:22] Reject ratio: 6.7%
[18:48:22] Hardware errors: 0
[18:48:22] Utility (accepted shares / min): 1.05/min
[18:48:22] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 576.14/min
Re: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com
I didnt go through all 35 pages but are there plans for an EU server with Clevermining?
A search would suffice.
Re: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com
so no-submit-stales should be false?
the thing is that on a regular pool without coin switch, my reject is bellow 1%, here i just tested again and got average of 8%.
on waffle now its bellow 1% (but waffle seems very unprofitable so far, havent tested for long, that sucks), i want go back to clevermining.
please set difficulty like waffle, when you can choose from 16 to 1024, it would be perfect
the thing is that on a regular pool without coin switch, my reject is bellow 1%, here i just tested again and got average of 8%.
on waffle now its bellow 1% (but waffle seems very unprofitable so far, havent tested for long, that sucks), i want go back to clevermining.
please set difficulty like waffle, when you can choose from 16 to 1024, it would be perfect
Waffle's choice starts at 64, not 16. 16 Would bring too much load om the servers I guess. As soon as clever will give this option to set a fixed diff I'll be back.