I can confirm this also - I mined on nordicminers and seemed to have lost EZC , something wrong or shady is going on there .

Great I really like the way nibble is progressing .

+1   at least he apologized -

markm - of course why wouldn't he have he been paid up front ?

if i were copying and pasting i'd like to be paid up front , or go to the community and ask the community what they agree he should pre-mine i.e "get for the work."

mudda:

so NAN is gone for good ?

Ahmed -

ok that clears one of the pre-mine options , if CGminer would work with it now.

I have secured the gmail cryptocurrencybroker@gmail.com, and i was going to do a similar thing , except focus more on economics of the positives, but everyone loves dirt , that's why i like this also.

you should call it "bottom of the barrel news" - or "the dump report"

i like "The Dump Report"

sums it up for me.

what about "error log Dump report"

if you want it a bit more spun .

If i were to give you political advice ahmed - the time is right now to sponsor a gpu miner for this currency as if you do not at least open the discussion on here , you run the strong risk of looking like you and a small group are trying to bring back from the grave a former pre-mined currency for another run at the pre-mine press .

Tenerbrix i actually like the name and I'm sure our team could do something with that , but without peer community support , its dubious retrospective past is problematic .

also of course there is the question of the original Block chain , where are all those units now?

i'll give this a "too many problems , not much direction. "

let them die - but in the process , don't 51% attack them  as that will only give them press and then some scammer will pick it up and try to make it into something/pretend it wasn't premined or a scam from its origin.

best just let the market decide these things , as most are not so much "cryptocurrencies" as a way to happily bilk people of actual cryptocurrencies , how can you revive something like that ?

i mean FTC , might , i mean might,  make it but i honestly doubt it , dumb guys will keep doing the same thing for a long time after realizing its dumb, its easy to cut and paste .

So you don't "need" a poll , do what we all do , know they are a scam and support honest currency.

nice news - i ignore most of these releases so its good to get a summary , and see what I'm ignoring .

as one could fall into the trap of ignoring all of them and missing something decent , but its pretty easy to spot the losers ans scams.

I want also to see Decrits get out of paper and into Beta .

hopefully you can market it correctly , and try to achieve the lofty goal of peers review and open source.

Great to see ! !

as long as people are still making profit it will continue and i expect even when they are not it will still continue -

Back at 25 M# , digi  I notice you seem to know every time hash moves do you have some notification system ?

Like for example does the explorer notify you in some way when the # shifts a certain percentage ?

 If so  it's really very effective , I hold Nibble I'm glad someone is finger on pulse.

This type of system would be a great security system , it would be good to link in exchanges to this system if it exists , and have an integrated security system ?

I'm no C++ coder but  I know people in fairly advanced areas of network security , MAC is completely flawed as per Etlase explains .  Its just a supposed  " Hard code identifier "  that runs on a certain protocol but it is easily faked .

Yet he announced it here ?

priceless .

Some people , too much time , not hugged enough as child.

+1

It's a symbiosis, so they know what they're meant to know.

That is fantastic , I'm raging with hate at this picture , this man's name is Osama no ?

I will take you up on that bet .

I don't want your money but.

I've run a 7970 for hours at i20  not a hw error in sight ,  don't really care if you believe me or not , I spent a lot of time on them .

Most of the devices I have are 7950 , they are generally better value , but the configuration I have both perform similar.

Only issue I have is the normal issues related to heat dissipation.

So disregard information that suggests I 13 only , I've never run a card under i17.

Is there an explanation of the changes , just for the forum , is this client for the checkpoints ?

Didn't Balthazar design a way to dynamically inplace checkpoints ?

I've always loved the term " simmer down " . Lol