Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 159 results by pinnpe
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
[ANN][ICO] PLIMST: Self serve ad platform (Money needed to run on Rootstock)
by
pinnpe
on 08/08/2017, 21:45:43 UTC


They need money so they can start implementing on Rootstock rsk.co
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: Plimst (spaarrekening met advertentiegeld voor founders)
by
pinnpe
on 12/02/2017, 11:36:46 UTC
verwijderen op verzoek eigenaar
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: Plimst (spaarrekening met advertentiegeld voor founders)
by
pinnpe
on 11/02/2017, 00:05:17 UTC
verwijderen op verzoek eigenaar
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: Plimst (spaarrekening met advertentiegeld voor founders)
by
pinnpe
on 09/02/2017, 08:20:48 UTC
verwijderen op verzoek eigenaar

Post
Topic
Board Archival
Topic OP
verwijderen op verzoek eigenaar
by
pinnpe
on 04/02/2017, 11:05:24 UTC


We beantwoorden alleen vragen van founders  Wink
Post
Topic
Board Marketplace (Altcoins)
Topic OP
Non-profit needs dev for Coinpunk powered wallet
by
pinnpe
on 18/11/2014, 11:42:43 UTC
Cottica.com is a Non-profit that helps family with a lower income since 2007.
They want to setup a Coinpunk powered wallet so that families can send money
to family members with a low income abroad.

Unfortunately they don't have a budget to hire a dev.
But if there is a dev that can help out, they would be glad.

PM if you can help out
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO [ICANNDY]
by
pinnpe
on 28/07/2014, 16:35:27 UTC
Meh We rather stick with ICANNDY

We're also sick of the whole word coin, everything is coin nowadays boring
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO [ICANNDY]
by
pinnpe
on 27/07/2014, 22:24:46 UTC
As far as I can tell, you do not have permission to use the term "namecoin" from anyone involved in the old namecoin project, nor the new embryonic effort.

Pick another name. Don't be a douche.

Also, "ICANNDY" is a terrible, terrible name with dark connotations.


Using the term "namecoin 2.O" is to indicate an improved version of what Namecoin did. No need to get all emotional, we respect the Namecoin team.

Bitcoin never had an IPO. Neither did the original Namecoin, nor did Litecoin. Why is it that all of a sudden all these new chains now require IPOs?

I've been wondering the same thing...

We have an IPO, because it will give us the time to develop the product in a proper manner. Companies constantly receive funding in Silicon Valley, maybe you guys should read more about investing and VCs.

BTW I don't understand the argument that Bitcoin never had an IPO, so other shoulden't. Imagine Satoshi having an IPO, he/she/they would have been killed/jailed or simply laughed at. His/Her/Their way of bringing the product Bitcoin to the market doesn't mean that it's LAW. Nothing is LAW or should be done exactly like the first person/persons who did it. The field of cryptocurrency is all about EXPERIMENTING that means trying new things, with another mindset. We are a startup that want to disrupt the DNS space, to do so you need funding. It's not only about making the product, we got to make infovids, do some serious marketing, do some extra security checks from parties outside the development team.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO [ICANNDY]
by
pinnpe
on 27/07/2014, 15:29:42 UTC
"buying shares in a product on the INTERNET from people that posted the text about that product as a huge image file..." [/b][/i]

that's where you are now, just informing not judging..

**p.s cool name though !


THE TEXT AS IMAGE:
The reason why I posted an image, is because I just wanted the text to be BIG and READABLE and DRAW
the ATTENTION, even more I just didn't know how to make the text THAT SIZE with this forums editor.
We didn't realize that something so small would matter.

FEEDBACK:
I don't really try to sound negative, but we got little to no feedback about the product that we plan to offer. ICANNDY is a big difference
from what is being offered now. 2 people said that http://dotp2p.io is better, but they don't really explain WHY?

To give an impression what ICANNDY is planning to offer
-  .icy domains & gTLD (I assume that P2P's idea is to only offer .p2p domains)
- A guranteed domain registration price (0,02 euros) (P2P has an domain auction, so you could pay more) (True our gTLD enterprise account will be a different price)
- A Proof Of Domain Ownership, which totally eliminates domain name squatting (P2P has an domain auction, if somebody pays more they get your domain)
- You pay 0,02 euros for an 10 year registration and your auto-renewal box is checked by default (With P2P we bet you, you'll pay more and maybe even for less time)

INVESTORS
- gTLD domains don't come cheap so every time we sell them you'll make money, matter of fact HERE you got a beautiful list with the ICANN prices.
- Just a 100 euros for a life time of returns is not a bad deal
- It will be decentralized so nobody can shut it down

Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO [ICANNDY]
by
pinnpe
on 27/07/2014, 08:57:22 UTC


Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 26/07/2014, 08:06:51 UTC
This one would be better than what you offer: http://dotp2p.io

Hi Mis069 I agree that Outernet is mindblowing and amazing

Could you explain why dotp2p would be a better offer, because
- We offer shareholders equity
- We offer TLD
- We offer a wallet with 2FA and browser builtin
- With our solution people can register domains for a guaranteed price and for a decade
- Users can set a price for their domain, let other bid on it and when they got paid the other party receives the domain

I'll give a few examples:
P2P got price fixing which means that the price of an domain is auctioned (so it can be everything).
When you register your domain with us you got a guaranteed price that you pay for it 0,02euros. Beside the guaranteed price, you can let people bid on your domain on a marketplace FOR FREE.

P2P eliminates domain squatting by letting users speculate on the value of the namespace.
We eliminate domain squatting, by linking namespaces to the existing internet and by listing them according to popularity
If you want to register AMAZON with us, we first look at which AMAZON.WHATEVER is the most popular
In this case that is AMAZON.COM, AMAZON.NET might be #2 and AMAZON.ORG might be #3 on this list that's determined by the internet
If you own AMAZON.COM all you have to do is place a token in your domains root folder which communicates with the client on your desktop. It will just take a minute and you can register AMAZON.
If your not in possession of one of the AMAZON.WHATEVER you can't register AMAZON yet
So basically you got to register an AMAZON.WHATEVER on the existing internet, after that you did that you can ask AMAZON.COM to relinquish their position. If they relinquish their position on the list to you, then you become #1 on this list of popularity and you can register AMAZON.
We realise that their is a possibility that AMAZON.COM doesn't even respond to your message and totally ignore you, but still unfortunately you have to wait for 9 months because this is the time they have to register AMAZON in our domain sphere. (The waiting periode can be changed, by users request)
If after the 9 months they still didn't register AMAZON, then you become the owner if you where the first one who took action to register the domain.


These are really big differences that we got compare to P2P, not that we are talking them down. But we feel like our way of guaranteeing a registration price won't get you paying costly just to register an domain. Also by tapping into the existing internet we prevent domain squatting, P2P fight this with a high price tag. With their DNS you might even pay more for your domain than you really did before the dotcom bubble, even worse somebody can just take your namespace if they offer more money.

I know that i've said a lot but can you please clairify what makes P2P better?

lol uses an image of text so that he can change it later?

For your information text can also be changed later LOL
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 25/07/2014, 21:32:41 UTC
Bitshares DNS is the new rival to Namecoin.

Oooh ok.


.bit though does work for ordinary people who use http://www.opennicproject.org/

I set my home router to use OpenNic and instantly every computing device in my house was able to resolve .bit domains.

Namecoin doesn't widely advertise that because it isn't as secure to trust the opennic DNS servers. But OpenNic is the solution for everyday users.

If you do start this project, hopefully you talk with them to get your TLD to resolve through their project because it makes things easier.

I think the biggest issue for me with trust is the premine.

If you did the premine such that the coins would be distributed back to you slowly over time and that was in the code, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But there have been too many cases where the purpose of a premine is to pump the price and dump the premine for BTC.

Wow thanks for sharing AliceWonder I never knew that.

I'll keep it in mind to talk to them, but that will be when Maidsafe is up and running and they got their servers running on Maidsafe. Maybe you didn't know about this project yet: https://www.outernet.is/

I just felt like sharing it....

I DON'T PUMP AND DUMP ANYTHING (I HATE THAT IDIOTIC SHIT). If I can't give somebody something of value I won't even bother.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 25/07/2014, 16:45:06 UTC
namecoin .bit is barely being used, and not because there is anything technically wrong with it, so this 2.0 thing you are trying to do has close to zero viability to become a widely used DNS alternative


You're probably right what you say about Namecoin
But their main problem is that .bit just don't show up in browsers without fuss (funny enough there is still not a clear video showing ordinary people how to get a website up and running)

Our solution comes with a browser in which you can view your websites and we will also offer TLD.
If you think there is no market for TLDs then maybe you should look at the prices that Icann charge
for them. We can/might/will probably offer .com as well but for far cheaper (0,01) and much longer (10 years).

We are not looking to serve the rich and spoiled people now allready on the internet, there is a bigger market out there. Of people who don't have 10euros for a domain or 500 euros for an SSL.

And besides all that, our operating cost is ZERO
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 25/07/2014, 10:32:33 UTC
1. escrow released in stages when the community sees what it is for.
2. your real ID

otherwise no chance.

1) We got no problem with escrow (thing is, why pay an arbitration fee?)
2) Our real ID will only be revealed to the shareholder, that will also have to reveal their real ID to us.

I'm actually I little shocked that people are so distrusfull. Worst things that could happen is:
- An investor loose 100 euros
- We are so DUMB to scam people and go to jail (the going to jail part is good btw)
- We are less successful than Icann & Namecoin

The best thing that can happen:
- We have a network on which people can register domains for dirtcheap
- Investors get money whenever somebody buys a product
- We are more successful than Icann & Namecoin
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 25/07/2014, 09:56:39 UTC
IPOs are all scams because as I've said a billion times before, the IPO creator can make thousands of mule accounts with 1 BTC in them each, send them all to the IPO addresses, get infinite premine/equity, then all the BTC comes back to him anyway.  If you believed you could actually pull this project off, you would just give yourself some kind of equity (premine in other words) for it and not ask for BTC.

Matter fact we will have a premine, but only the people who prepay for the coin will receive it. The shareholders won't receive any prepaid unless they also donate to receive prepay coins. If everybody had your idea that IPOs are a scam a lot of companies woulden't be in existence today. But I guess that your not an investor, in life everything you do is a gamble. As for scammers, there is always a nice jail cell waiting for them when they think they outsmart people. We're not here to outsmart people, because we know there is always some one who is way smarter. We want to offer people an option besides, Icann or Namecoin.

You won't get far with an IPO with just a post like that. The idea doesn't even sound too appealing. The domain idea which did sound good to me was something which these Bitshares guys came up with. Maybe you can head over there to see if they are interested in funding you, they are rolling in money right now.

We understand that this is not everybody's cup of tea. But can you please specify what is not appealing, this way we can improve it?

click to verify does not alleviate the responsibility of the seller to verify age before distributing explicit content.

For many images it is good enough in that prosecution is rare, but for explicit images showing penetration, and for cam girls it isn't enough.

It is the responsibility of the provider to use adequate means to verify age, just like you can't walk into a bar and "click" to verify you are old enough to buy beer.

AliceWonder the "AGE" topic is for old people, soon with decentralized/censorship proof websites providers can put online whatever they think is suitable. Before you spend time & energy to verify some ones age maybe you should look at:
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-id-verification-streamlined-jumios-bison/
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 25/07/2014, 09:17:41 UTC
Okay, fair enough, maybe my comment was too harsh and I should have said: "Because they are probably usually cleverly concealed scams..".

I did not mean to say this one definitely is a scam.

Just getting weary of what seems to be becoming an emerging trend, "We will do all this cool stuff, just give us ___ BTC". IPOs that offer nothing first other than a good idea and a list of bullet points are essentially asking for funds (in this case one million euros, not a trivial amount) for just that - an idea and a couple of parameters.

Most investors in my experience will say to you, "You are trying to sell me an idea for one million euros, but you actually have nothing yet - no code. If I really liked the idea why wouldn't I just go and do this myself? You are essentially asking me to invest one million euros in you, and I don't know you."


I fully agree with you that this is an idea. But Namecoin is allready reality, so what we say is not far from reality. Also with the product that we offer we are looking to give domain names to the other 6 billion people out there. Heck we will even provide TLD to big companies, if you think one million is a lot. Companies are willing to pay Icann $100000 minimum for a TLD and they allready got thousands lined up. The client wallet will come with 2FA by default and there are more security features.

If you like the idea your free to do it yourself we like competition and it's only good. True we are asking a million from people who don't know us and we don't know them. But it's actually about the product and that it's delivered with the improvements that we talk about. Companies/products are not made for free, everything costs money. Developers cost money, even free services cost advertisers money. What we will absolutely NOT do is waste money. The 1 million that people pour into this, is an investment that they will see returns from within 5 YEARS. ABSOLUTELY DON'T PUT YOUR MONEY INTO SOMETHING THAT YOU DON'T BELIEVE.

Sure everybody can do what we do, but I bet they won't do it with the same creativity.



Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 25/07/2014, 07:55:23 UTC
I sell porn online to a 12 year kid for bitcoins or whatever and my ass goes to prison and I may even end up on a sex offender registry for the rest of my life.

I care about age verification.

And a lot of these IPOs - if the buyer is not of legal age, technically it may be illegal for you to sell them your coin as an IPO investment. At least in the United States.

I assume that when somebody access a porn site they are told "ADULTS ONLY" if they click " ENTER HERE" it's there own responsibility. A Bitcoin transfer doesn't contain info like (age, gender etc) and that's what makes it right. It's parents responsibility to take care of their kids, nobody should have a say in it unless the parent are doing wrong. If a kid of 12YEARs invest in our IPO, I take my hat off to her/him because they are doing way better than I did at that age.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO
by
pinnpe
on 25/07/2014, 07:23:32 UTC

I think I speak for everyone when I say, we need an easy to use Namecoin. So yes I will be the first holder, do you have VIP positions?
Thanks for being openminded that's rare these days. It's not that we are saying no to Namecoin, but things can be done better.
- That's why you can't just register a domainname with our solution (website are also listed by popularity, btw it's not us that decides, the internet does)
- With our solution you can send a domain and enter a price that you ask for it, people can also bid on your domain
- We'll also offer TLDs for far cheaper than Icann
Actually every one using the internet is VIP, with what we propose you can become a shareholder because you are responsible that the system got put up in the first place. We deliberately keep the price low (100 euro per person), because we believe that it's time to start cutting costs. With the options we got you'll get the 100 euro's back within 5 years.

Bitcoin never had an IPO. Neither did the original Namecoin, nor did Litecoin. Why is it that all of a sudden all these new chains now require IPOs?

It's true that Bitcoin never had an IPO, but Satoshi would have had a hardtime convincing every one about this new system. Even I personally skipped Bitcoin when I heard about it, it was after 1 year that I started paying attention. Ethereum by far has the most powerful development team if you ask me. But even they have an IPO right now. The thing is, when you got money you can buy time and put up a better development team to develop a product the right way. The IPO is also to give people the change to invest in something that they believe in. Our shareholder get equity for life, if you think that their 100 euro's investment is a lost, let's talk 5 years later when the system is up and running.

Because they are cleverly concealed scams..

I've been on this forum for about 2 years now, I've never been accused of scamming some one. The people I've worked with will always say you that I've paid what I promised and I got proof of that. Please provide feedback instead of saying something totally clueless. You don't know me and we never did business with eachother. Just because you are saying something without any evidence makes me trust you less, say what you know for 99.9%, don't just say anything to fill up space.


I posted an idea for a namecoin fork but it has nothing to do with domain registration, and it looks like your 2.0 doesn't do it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=705244.0

Yours has several problems:

A) Premine

B) Possible registration time way too long - namecoin is too short but 10 years or lifetime, no

C) de-centralized SSL can be done with namecoin and doesn't need to be provided by anyone

D) Wallet client for viewing website? Sounds like a fucking security blunder waiting to happen... KISS

-=-

Your namecoin 2.0 smells like rotten fish.

With what I propose you could also buy a namespace exclusively and more.... I totally disagree with your ideas about * Age Verification: NOBODY GIVES A FUCK ABOUT YOUR AGE, THEY ONLY CARE ABOUT THE CONTENT OF YOUR WALLET. The only reason why the adult content industry is slow with accepting cryptocurrencies, is because these are still the same dinosaurs that had to adapt to their content on the internet. Btw it takes time to wrap your head around cryptocash.

A) Premine, the premine is like a prepaid, if you paid as a fanboy/girl you'll receive coins.
B) The registration time is on purpose so long (for years people have paid high annual prices or for a longer period, but still high prices). Our time and price has a few benefits, now you only have to register once in 10 YEARS, there will also be a checkbox for autorenewal. The price is just because we're sick and tired of people paying loads of money to get a domain online.
C) With our SSL we want to take out Certificate Authorities or Trust Notary (like the convergence.io model).
D) We'll have to see, your wallet will have Google's 2FactorAuthentication (dawn you made me say 1 of the security features, but there are more).

JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING SMELLS LIKE ROTTEN FISH DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN'T EAT IT. LOL

This one would be better than what you offer: http://dotp2p.io
Do they offer people equity for life?
Do they offer people a guaranteed fixed price (0,02) for domainregistration?
Do they offer people TLDs? I don't mean p2p
Do they offer people a marketplace where they can sell their domainnames (besides name your price/people can bid on your domain with our solution)
Do they even offer people webhosting?

Absolutely. ICANN is not going away, and if you want your website to show up in popular search engines, you'll use an ICANN tld.
We got no problems with Icann they will just do what they do, we'll just do the same but for a lot cheaper
TLD Icann ask $100000 we ask $50000
Domainname Icann (governmental take down) With us only you can take it down

BTW we also don't worry about showing up on a popular search engine. Our domainregistration is cheap and far more secure than those of the old internet. Our solution is specifically for the other 6 billion people out there, the free market will develop a searchengine that can find our websites and they will serve a bigger market than the popular searchengines on the old internet.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
NAMECOIN 2.O + IPO [ICANNDY]
by
pinnpe
on 24/07/2014, 21:21:16 UTC

Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: ALTCOIN ATM
by
pinnpe
on 17/05/2014, 16:27:38 UTC
platorin

I find the "and that was" part funny in your comment  Grin  actually your whole idea of "One" is funny

TiberiuC

Yes if you paid €1000 your coin would be included in a ATM