It's almost certain that the "improved" reported hashrate is not real and it's actually worse in terms of actual valid share submission rate compared to established miners, even after doing all the things the dev claims will make the reported hashrate real. This has been independently verified by various people in the thread and outside of it.

That being said, I'm sure you can make a better argument than complaining that TBM's dev copied lolminer, then highlight two completely different sentences.

On both Linux and Windows you can adjust the mem clocks without rebooting, so I'm not sure what you're talking about.

In either case, if you're going to waste your own power with a suboptimal setup, nobody's going to stop you.

That's your problem right there. 2150 is not stable on all cards, and it clearly shows that in your invalid share rate.

Unless you've pushed over 50k shares, the randomness intrinsic to mining makes any claims of faster or slower mining rates meaningless.

To be clear, these are not 2% stales, these are 2% invalid shares. Your overclock settings are way too high, they are crashing because they are unstable overclocks. Dial them down to a more sane number.

My stable OC 6800(xt) show 67-68M on TBM.

Thanks for the link, had already switched away due to multiple missing features such as built in OC and intentionally blocking proxies, but this seals the deal. I wasn't ever able to achieve anything close to the reported hashrates either, even with the "high share difficulty and using a pool with stales" settings.

I see, thanks for the reply. Would be good if you could clarify the OP that the socks5 proxy is not for the pool connection but only for dual mining.


Another question, the AMD device information (clocks, mem, temps etc) seems to be absent on a mixed nv/amd rig, even though I am using 1.25.

I am running AMD driver 21.8.2 (showing as driver 539303.288 on startup) and it detects the 6800 as "GPU0 gfx1030 17GB added to miner as OpenCL device"

Should I be using a different config for this?

The front page mentions that it supports socks5 proxy, but I could not find such an option on the readme flags list on github, or in the --help option list when starting the miner.

Interestingly enough, the --proxy option does allow the miner to start normally (other options cause the miner to exit with invalid option error), but the socks proxy connection is not used when that option is applied.

You know you're doing the right thing when they start posting like their true age.

Sorry for your loss.

To anyone else who reads this, remember to read the stickied thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3035620.0

There's 72M coins in circulation, so 0.72 LTC seems like a reasonable price for the entire market cap.
I'll raise that to 2 litoshi, in case anyone wants to sell at that price

New autobuy locked self mod scammer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720739.0

Another locked thread new user scammer:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4574139.msg41240080#msg41240080

New untagged self moderated / locked scammer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4428928.msg39525745#msg39525745

Another locked autobuy scammer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4406535.msg39211987#msg39211987

New untagged locked/self moderated scammers:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4161841.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3938851.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3854296.0

As yet untagged scammer with self moderated thread

Any system that has a nonzero chance of busting is bound to fail sooner rather than later, resulting in you losing all your money. There is mathematically no chance of winning long term with such a system, even with zero house edge. As long as the chance of "busting" exists, it is mathematically a martingale system and any claims to the contrary (including "mitigating risks") are bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)

As has already been mentioned in this thread, the only way for gambling to make money is to have positive EV, and I can't see such a method being sold for anything less than multiple BTC in value.

Surprised you aren't already using the ignore function on all of them, it's much easier to find and report the untagged ones here that way.

2 more untagged scammers:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3536935.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3536563.0

Another yet untagged scammer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1906008.msg35011513#msg35011513