Search content
Sort by
Showing 4 of 4 results by poorSathoshi
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
Well, I think your math is not correct
1 masternode each 4 days than 365 days / 4 days = 91,25 each year
it`s quite far from 400 don`t you think? ....Yes, it was pretty rushed and i have corrected my comment. Anyways, 100 masternodes per 1.1 years, if you judge based on his admission, is still a massive farm-like production, and there are very big chances that he owns more than what he admitted to. The real question is, how many Masternodes does Evan own ? "Within 8 hours over 1.5 million coins were mined, which is most of the instamine.". It is very funny to see people claiming a Decentralized Governance when these guys own this much voting power.
in my turn i always thought that bitcoin's blockchain should be reset, into a clean and evenly distributed coin. i'd gladly receive my personal stash of free 1000 bitcoins of personal potestative right.
If you are comparing the distribution of Bitcoin with the one of Dash, then you are completely banged up in the head.
First of all, Satoshi Nakamoto, the genius who created the platform for Evan to fork and instamine via bug implementations, gained so many bitcoins because nobody gave a shit about Bitcoin in the beginning. How can you even compare the two ?
fortunatelly anyone has got the right to fork. are you not satisfied? instead of fudding, why don't you do the work yourself?
ah, i see, you don't really have the real intention of working, and building... your objective is only to destroy other people's works :/
bye
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
(...)
I always thought that the only way to change this is for Evan to quit this project and start another one with a clean distribution and conscience. The current marketcap is at 13.5 million dollars, which should never be a problem considering that Bitcoin is about to fork with a 3.5 billion marketcap. Yes, some people would suffer as a result of this, but not many. 13.5 million dollars in marketcap is nothing. Start another blockchain, use the same code/vision and simply own the altcoin scene, unless you still want to make a lot of profit from those masternodes and you just cannot stop.
If that happens, i will be the first one to invest all my money into it. Probably many more after me...
I always thought that the only way to change this is for Evan to quit this project and start another one with a clean distribution and conscience. The current marketcap is at 13.5 million dollars, which should never be a problem considering that Bitcoin is about to fork with a 3.5 billion marketcap. Yes, some people would suffer as a result of this, but not many. 13.5 million dollars in marketcap is nothing. Start another blockchain, use the same code/vision and simply own the altcoin scene, unless you still want to make a lot of profit from those masternodes and you just cannot stop.
If that happens, i will be the first one to invest all my money into it. Probably many more after me...
in my turn i always thought that bitcoin's blockchain should be reset, into a clean and evenly distributed coin. i'd gladly receive my personal stash of free 1000 bitcoins of personal potestative right.
It was called Litecoin. Did you miss that boat too?
awww now there are boats!? hummm... i guess these boats should also be reset, just for the sake of equality
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
(...)
I'm not saying that the team should work for free, even though Satoshi showed you that the opposite can be possible, without having to rely on IPO/Crowdsale/Premines, but you could've been more upfront with the method of gaining funds in the beginning. Probably the best way would've been to have a development salary proposed every month and have people agree with it via voting. Unfortunately, the idea came too late.
(...)
I'm not saying that the team should work for free, even though Satoshi showed you that the opposite can be possible, without having to rely on IPO/Crowdsale/Premines, but you could've been more upfront with the method of gaining funds in the beginning. Probably the best way would've been to have a development salary proposed every month and have people agree with it via voting. Unfortunately, the idea came too late.
(...)
are u talking about the same satoshi who evaporated? poor abandoned coins with (icognito) devs who run away...
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
(...)
I'm not saying that the team should work for free, even though Satoshi showed you that the opposite can be possible, without having to rely on IPO/Crowdsale/Premines, but you could've been more upfront with the method of gaining funds in the beginning. Probably the best way would've been to have a development salary proposed every month and have people agree with it via voting. Unfortunately, the idea came too late.
(...)
I'm not saying that the team should work for free, even though Satoshi showed you that the opposite can be possible, without having to rely on IPO/Crowdsale/Premines, but you could've been more upfront with the method of gaining funds in the beginning. Probably the best way would've been to have a development salary proposed every month and have people agree with it via voting. Unfortunately, the idea came too late.
(...)
Bitcoin Mints Its First Billionaire: Its Inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto
http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/bitcoin-mints-its-first-billionaire-satoshi-nakamoto