Another shitcoin. There is no white paper. It is not clear how many coins will be in total, what is the reward for each block, when the reward decreases or increases.

The wallet is working, you need to add nodes. The question is different. Why are solo masternodes on the hosting increase, but there is no demand for a coin?

On the hosting of the GTM coin in group A, there are 3 566 masternodes. Group B contains 1 544 masternodes. Total 5 110 solo masternode. Every day, for an masternode, an average of 2.5 GTM coins must be paid. It turns out 12 775 coins. If the price of the coin is 4 cents, then this is more than $ 500 per day turnover. But there is no such turnover per day, or very rarely. And every day 2900 new coins appear. And 12 775 is used to pay for a masternode solo. Demand should exceed inflation by 4 times. But there is no coin price increase. Only a fall. So either the team discards their coins or statistics on their hosting fake. Or both. And fake data on the number of masternodes on the hosting, and the team throws off their coins. At the same time, doing nothing for the demand for a coin.

The coin has a new exchange for trading, Crex24. Now you can buy and sell a coin on 3 exchanges.
https://crex24.com/ru/exchange/GIC-BTC

I did not leave the robot, at the Graviex exchange, the freedom to maneuver, and the result was such. In 2 hours there was one sale of two GIC coins. And before that, the trade was intermittent from 1 to 9 minutes. All GIC coin trades on this exchange are scams.

More and more, the project becomes like a hoax. There are no volumes on exchanges. Only cheat. On the exchange Graviex sales and purchases go between the upper and lower rates of coins placed on the exchange. For a turnover of 0.3 Bitcoin on this exchange, only a commission of 0.2 percent is paid. This is about 5-6 dollars a day. The rest is a hoax. On the Cryptobridge exchange, they do not want to re-establish themselves as a team. Coin is not verified. So they are afraid. They do not go to new exchanges. All broadcasts, more than a year. just empty. There are no existing projects.
I will be glad if the team refutes the distrust of the coin with its actions. But at the moment, the project is a dummy and trading on exchanges is fictitious.

This is another step to ensure that the GTM coin is poured out. The new platform is in no way associated with the coin, except that it is one team. The coin is not used anywhere, except for masternode hosting. And judging by the sales of coins on exchanges, the number of masternode solos is fictitious. Either drawn or this is the masternode of the team and the team does not need to buy their own coins to pay for hosting. In reality, there is a payment for 500-600 masternodes hosted on a hosting. That is, nobody needs coins, even the development team. What their new project showed, which does not use GTM coins anywhere.

https://dextro.io/page/home
On this site you can connect masternode coins GTM for $1 per month.

https://dextro.io/page/home
On this site you can connect masternode coins GIC for $1 per month.

Assume that a shortage of GTM coins has been created. Every day 3000 new coins come out and it is necessary that these coins are fully redeemed and not enough to pay for the masternodes solo.
Now the hosting has 3000 masternode solos, but the coin price is very low, $ 0.06
Now for 1 solo, the masternode is paid $ 0.15 per day.
These are 2.2 GTM coins. Take an average of 2 GTM coins paid for 1 solo masternode per day.
It turns out that the shortage of coins is 3000 coins per day, which you need to buy in order to pay for hosting.
If the coins locked by masternodes will not be sold and the team will not throw their coins on the exchanges, then the price of the GTM coin will increase by 1 - 2 cents per week.
While the number of new coins does not equal the number of required coins to pay for masternode solo on the hosting.
After that, the price of the GTM coin will grow only when the number of masternode solos on the hosting increases.
Or the coin will be involved somewhere else. Plus, when will they buy GTM coins for the masternode. The community needs to help the team in hosting advertising. So that more people learn about hosting and run masternodes on it.
When the price of the GTM coin becomes $ 0.15, there will be a small profit from the solo masternode of the GTM coin
The more masternodes solo will be on the hosting, the more expensive the coin will be. Then the team will adjust the price of the coin by selling their GTM coins or by stopping the sale of their coins.

While the project is being done, announce the competition that if there was not a single care in the wallet from the address for a year, then after 366 days such an address will receive a reward from the team in the amount of 5 percent of the amount located at the address. If the masternode worked continuously for a year, it will also receive 5 percent.

It is very wrong that you cannot invest more than 1 incomplete masternode so as not to pay the full price. What difference does it make if 6 people put 500 coins in a common masternode or one person puts 3,000 coins?

Why not make a GTM coin bank? For those who placed GTM coins on the hosting and did not pick them up during the year, an additional bonus after the expiration of the year. Also for those who kept the masternode of the GTM coin on the coin hosting for one year. And so every year! And not once a month, as it was done.
The bank is replenished monthly, indicating the addresses to which the coins will be transferred, if the terms of the agreement are met. Rewards in accordance with the number of coins placed on a hosting or masternode solo. If the conditions are not met, then the reward is not paid.
Suppose that 10 percent per annum of the masternode's annual income. Approximately 40 coins per masternode solo per year. If the conditions are met. Count the annual income at the time of the launch of the masternode solo. Indeed, with the increase in the number of masternodes, income for the year will decrease. And consider the common nodes from the moment the common node is launched.
When a whole thousand coins are collected in the bank, then launch the masternode so that it replenishes the bank for payments. Such bank masternodes should be marked as a masternode of the bank of project participants. And the coins from them go to the bank to finance future payments.
Every month, release what address the reward will be credited to and how many coins over the past month.
Payment of rewards after 366-367 days.

No one has disappeared. Developers in place. Only there is no news. While there is no promised product, smart contracts and options exchange, this coin is one of many for which there is nothing. As soon as they deign to issue the product and the coin will be used as a means of payment, the coin will be in a row with those coins that are in demand and deserve attention.

The collateral increase is no longer relevant, since many developers removed the coins from circulation. They burned a part, they don’t sell the rest.

Even better is to make the block exit time, like Bitcoin, 1 time in 10 minutes. 2 coins each. This is 144 coins per day.
If you calculate everything by making such changes, the price of the coin will go up very much. And the reserves of coins that the team now has will become tens of millions of dollars.
I think that masternode owners will support such changes if they put it to the vote.

Increasing the masternode pledge is the wrong position. This is milking existing investors, and not attracting new ones because of the prospects of the project.
If you increase the deposit by 500 coins and make 1,500 GTM coins per masternode, then with the existing number of coins there will be 2,373 masternodes and the complete absence of coins in circulation. Many will simply drop coins when the price starts to rise and that's it.
The only positive point from such an increase in collateral will not be to immediately reduce the reward for the block. But subsequently, all the same, the reward for the block will need to be reduced by planning this in the roadmap.
However, the effect of increasing the collateral may be short-lived and after a short time investors will simply get rid of the coins and the price will fall again. And the credibility of the project will finally disappear.
The easiest way is not to reduce the block reward, but to return the block exit time of 2 minutes. Or make a block exit time of 1.5 minutes. And subsequently, do not reduce the reward for the block, but increase the time it takes for the block to exit.
The effect will be the same. But you will be the first to do so, does not reduce the reward for the block, but increases the time for the release of a new block.
By increasing the block exit time to 2 minutes, you will reduce inflation by 2 times. About 1,500 new coins will be issued per day.
And plan in a year to increase the output of the block 1 time in 4 minutes. After another year, 1 time in 8 minutes.
Upon receipt of a reward of 1.7 coins for 5 days, the cost of placing a GTM coin masternode is cost-effective at a price of 0.34 coins per day.
With 5,000 masternodes hosted on a hosting site for which payment is made with a GTM coin, with inflation of 1,500 new coins per day, there will be zero increase in the cost of coins. Or very small. In this case, holding a masternode of a GTM coin will be cost-effective. About 10 percent profitability. In this situation, the price for the placement of the masternode will be approximately 0.3 GTM per day, and the reward for the block will be 0.34 coins per day.
After the number of masternodes on the hosting starts to exceed 5000, the block exit time will be 2 minutes, the block reward will be 2 coins. This is approximately 1,500 new coins per day. Then the profitability of the placement of the masternode of the GTM coin will begin to grow.
And if you make the block exit time 4 minutes, then about 355 blocks will be released per day. 2 coins per block. This is 710 coins per day. You can achieve coin shortages 4 times faster.

A few months ago, asics for Bitcoin mining were sold for scrap. Then everything changed, the price of Bitcoin rose again. With masternode coins it will be the same. Not with everyone, but with those behind the project and the team.
The GTM project will feel good in 2-3 months. And if the GIC coin project finally starts to work and the price of this coin grows, then the number of masternodes on the Gentarium hosting will greatly increase. Increasing the demand for the GTM coin.
And new, promising projects that use masternodes will appear. An increase in the number of masternodes hosted on the hosting will give an even greater shortage of coins, and hence an increase in the value of the GTM coin.

Currently, about 4500 masternodes are hosted on the coin host. Another about 3000 common masternodes. An average of 2.5 GTM coins per day is paid for 1 masternode. This is 11250 coins per day. I count only whole masternodes. It is for them that they pay in the GTM coin.  This month, 337,500 coins are withdrawn from circulation. 3 558 974 GTM is in circulation.
2 365,000 coins blocked by masternodes.
It remains in circulation 1 193 974 coins.
I think that more than 500,000 of the remaining coins in circulation are already held by the developers.
Many more coins are held by the stakers and lost coins.
After 2 months, free coins will be redeemed and there will be a shortage of coins. Cost growth will begin.
But the growth in value will stop when the issue of new coins and the demand for a coin become equal. After all, paying for a masternode will already be cheaper in a GTM coin.
It is necessary to reduce coin inflation again so that block reward decreases.
And then the price of the coin will rise. And developers adjust the price of the coin by gradually selling part of their coins at the most favorable price for themselves.
The GTM coin is profitable for investments in the near future. In 2-3 months there will be a price increase due to a shortage of coins.
And if they reduce the remuneration for the block, then the growth will be very good.

That's right, that you were kicked out and from here you have to be kicked out. Lol If you need a coin with a high value and a chess pledge, then find one and invest in it. For normal investors, such a system is not suitable.
Not a single coin with an increasing pledge survived! All these coins are dead.
You have to be expelled from everywhere, with such offers.