Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 227 results by puck2
Lightning channel stuck closing, no info except remote public key.
I reset my lightning node. I didn't realize it would force close all of the open channels. All of them have closed except for one. All that is listed is the remote public key. This has been stuck open, in the state "closing" for weeks now. I think it is causing funds to be stuck in my wallet. Is there any way to move this channel closing along?
Re: Getting Low Hashrate with Antminer U3 on Raspberry Pi ( minepeon)
Have you ever raised the hashrate? I'm still getting about 15GH/s with the following instructions:
Quote
sudo cgminer/cgminer --bmsc-options 115200:0.57 -o stratum+tcp://us-east.stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u xxx -p xxx --bmsc-voltage 0800 --bmsc-freq 1286
After running it about 20 hours I have nothing to complain about the U3 so far. I will keep it underclocked because it seems to run quite stable that way. And it doesn't matter anyway 50 Gh/s or 67 Gh/s is way too little in any case these days.
Where did you pick up a U3? I'm looking around... I'd like to pay bitcoin.
I can't figure out how to run a node through PIA VPN. Should I use their SOCKS5 proxy option? Will my node traffic automatically be routed through the VPN if I am running the PIA client software?
Only recently I learned about this block size limit.
I understand not putting any limit might allow flooding. On the other hand, the smaller your block, the faster it will propagate to network (I suppose.. or is there "I've got a block!" sort of message sent before the entire content of the block?), so miners do have an interest on not producing large blocks.
I'm very uncomfortable with this block size limit rule. This is a "protocol-rule" (not a "client-rule"), what makes it almost impossible to change once you have enough different softwares running the protocol. Take SMTP as an example... it's unchangeable.
I think we should schedule a large increase in the block size limit right now while the protocol rules are easier to change. Maybe even schedule an infinite series of increases, as we can't really predict how many transactions there will be 50 years from now.
Honestly, I'd like to get rid of such rule. I find it dangerous. But I can't think of an easy way to stop flooding without it, though.
I understand not putting any limit might allow flooding. On the other hand, the smaller your block, the faster it will propagate to network (I suppose.. or is there "I've got a block!" sort of message sent before the entire content of the block?), so miners do have an interest on not producing large blocks.
I'm very uncomfortable with this block size limit rule. This is a "protocol-rule" (not a "client-rule"), what makes it almost impossible to change once you have enough different softwares running the protocol. Take SMTP as an example... it's unchangeable.
I think we should schedule a large increase in the block size limit right now while the protocol rules are easier to change. Maybe even schedule an infinite series of increases, as we can't really predict how many transactions there will be 50 years from now.
Honestly, I'd like to get rid of such rule. I find it dangerous. But I can't think of an easy way to stop flooding without it, though.
Prescient
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Peoples reluctance to keep cash on stamp seems to keep this train from flying off the rails.
right now stamp is nothing(check the volume stats)
^^^ His point exactly...
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Why exactly is Bitcoin rallying? Nothing has changed.
Unless you are at the center of the universe, in a black hole, or at absolute zero, things are always changing.
Monero is a one trick anon pony... with... every botnet gunning for it.
You mean CPUs all over the world ensuring its security and strength?
I can't download the blockchain from the link provided i OP, but when I delete my blockchain.bin file and resync, I end up with repeating errors such as the following:
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Sep-16 19:43:47.427565 [P2P0][107.152.130.98:54232 INC]Sync data returned u
nknown top block: 221011 -> 202659 [18352 blocks (-12 days) ahead]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Sep-16 19:43:47.427565 [P2P0][107.152.130.98:54232 INC]Sync data returned u
nknown top block: 221011 -> 202659 [18352 blocks (-12 days) ahead]
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LitecoinWidget: bitcoin / altcoin price widget for android
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
Topic change.
First personal ATM appliance for home.
First personal ATM appliance for home.
Will it make coffee and toast too?
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
At this time, please download the pre-compiled Release Candidates and read the PDF regarding the use of the wallet. When fully functional, the source will be made available. Please follow this link:
http://darkcoin.io/beta.php Use these binaries
http://darkcoin.io/beta.php Use these binaries
I get a 404 at this link... Where should I go to make sure I'm up to date after fork?
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
There is an issue with masternodes, that needs to be fixed, that is all...
But Masternodes are the big idea...
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
http://sharedcoin.com/ is trustless centralized CoinJoin by Greg Maxwell.
Darksend in DarkCoin is dezentralized CoinCoin by Evan Duffield.
Is dezentralized trustless CoinJoin possible?
Darksend in DarkCoin is dezentralized CoinCoin by Evan Duffield.
Is dezentralized trustless CoinJoin possible?
Ring signatures on Bytecoin and Monero?