Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 1,308 results by rav3n_pl
Re: [ANN] FuturoCoin - cryptocurrency with instant payments launched.
⭐ Merited by malevolent (3)
Does people REALLY still support this PONZI?
https://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/futurenet-i-futureadpro-to-piramidy-ostrzega-uokik-prokuratura-prowadzi-sledztwo
https://www.networkmagazyn.pl/futurenet-zarzuty-oraz-ostrzezenie-konsumenckie
https://www.fxmag.pl/artykul/uokik-prowadzi-postepowania-w-sprawie-futurenet-dascoina-i-onecoina
https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/UOKiK-ostrzega-przed-Future-Net-i-Future-AdPro-7649279.html
https://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/futurenet-i-futureadpro-to-piramidy-ostrzega-uokik-prokuratura-prowadzi-sledztwo
https://www.networkmagazyn.pl/futurenet-zarzuty-oraz-ostrzezenie-konsumenckie
https://www.fxmag.pl/artykul/uokik-prowadzi-postepowania-w-sprawie-futurenet-dascoina-i-onecoina
https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/UOKiK-ostrzega-przed-Future-Net-i-Future-AdPro-7649279.html
Re: [ANN] :: COPICO ::CRYPTO E-MARKET PLATFORM {SWAP FROM COPICO TO CAZ OVER}
This topic should be LOCKED and say, that there is NO COPICO [XCPO] anymore.
If you have any XCPO they are worthless, no exchange and no working nodes to connect.
XCPO network is dead.
If you have any XCPO they are worthless, no exchange and no working nodes to connect.
XCPO network is dead.
Re: [ANN] FuturoCoin - cryptocurrency with instant payments launched.
Where you take source from? I wanted p2pool really, not to mine on someone elses pool.
p2pool:
stratum+tcp://pool.futurocoin.org:7903
WorkerName: Walletaddr.
password: any
It was somewhere in the news or on twitter, don´t remember
this is the Github from the UI, but there you find the links to the P2p source, too
https://github.com/justino/p2pool-ui-punchy
This P2Pool have zero other nodes, it can be modified in many ways and steal from miners.
rav3n_pl
Do you suggesting what I was thinking ? That futurocoin is stealing hashing power from miners and also they using they using tricks to refuse block you mined ?
Thanks
Pozdrawiam
P2Pool meant to be decentralized - should be at least 3 nodes on same code.
Re: [ANN] FuturoCoin - cryptocurrency with instant payments launched.
Code:
Node Peers: 0 / 0
Node p2pool Version: 237c60c-dirty
It mean that node has not other nodes connected and code is not same as on source (github or whatever).Node p2pool Version: 237c60c-dirty
Re: [ANN] FuturoCoin - cryptocurrency with instant payments launched.
Where you take source from? I wanted p2pool really, not to mine on someone elses pool.
p2pool:
stratum+tcp://pool.futurocoin.org:7903
WorkerName: Walletaddr.
password: any
It was somewhere in the news or on twitter, don´t remember
this is the Github from the UI, but there you find the links to the P2p source, too
https://github.com/justino/p2pool-ui-punchy
This P2Pool have zero other nodes, it can be modified in many ways and steal from miners.
Re: [ANN] FuturoCoin - cryptocurrency with instant payments launched.
Where you take source from? I wanted p2pool really, not to mine on someone elses pool.
p2pool:
stratum+tcp://pool.futurocoin.org:7903
WorkerName: Walletaddr.
password: any
It was somewhere in the news or on twitter, don´t remember
...
Hello.It`s name is "Polcoin" not "Pol" as it is shown in explorer. Please update desciption.
Przypominajka o działających giełdach:
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=PLC_BTC
https://www.easycoin.pl/pair/PLC-BTC
Na Cryptopii zdecydowanie większy ruch, a czasem są okazje do arbitrażu na kilka satoshi ;]
Na coinmarketcap jest jako "inactive", wysłałem zgłoszenie aktualizacji.
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/polcoin/
Przypominam o trwających pracach nad nową wersją walleta
Na gitchubie jeszcze nic nie ma... Ale wkrótce @rav3n_pl as the resident guardian of the github repository do you have a plan for how to deal with this? As the entire network consists of a literal handful of people right now it shouldn't be too difficult to hard fork especially as the few currently mining probably won't want to see their own holdings devalued ninefold if we sit back and do nothing. Not sure what the best plan of action is myself as I haven't been following evolution of cryptocurrencies for the last 2 years. Based upon my knowledge a couple of years back I would have suggested POS (Proof Of Stake) post block 1,181,683 (8 million coins generated point) as it's very low effort mining and anyone staking will find their coins increase in line with the overall inflation just by holding on to them and unlocking their wallet to allow their coins to stake every so often. I'm not sure what other alternatives have come about in the last couple of years though.
It (change reward system) require a hardfork. It is doable.It is possible to change LTC v0.14 code into working DBL, but need to be chosen block in near future to allow blocks v3 and v4 and it will start voting for segwit.
So miners NEED to use new version as soon it will be released, or network will split.
Also, new versions will have trouble to accept transactions generated by older code (because of strict-DER-signing).
I`m not a fan of PoS, it is mostly killing coin and only make coin rich ppl richer. Also I have zero experience in coding it.
Re: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool
okey, thanks. i will take a look these days. would by nice to get it run on Win10 with Pyton 2.7 (pypy does not run here ...)
I was able to get pypy running on Windows 10 by using the Linux Subsystem for Windows:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg21025074#msg21025074
However, the reason I made these CPU improvement changes was in the hope that it would allow people to run CPython on medium-speed CPUs without crazy orphan rates. I'm very much interested in hearing whether it works.
Tested on cross-compiling coin daemons.
It would be way better choice to install Ubuntu desktop in VM, run it in seamless mode and use for whatever you want.
IMPORTANT NOTE: As of Bitcoin Core version 0.10.0 or later, this torrent is slower than a direct download using the bitcoin P2P protocol & client. This torrent is now only maintained for research and development purposes as a secondary option. Please use Bitcoin Core directly to download the blockchain.
This topic can be closed? Some people still asking about thing that is not need for like year.If there is some ppl intrested in this coin, we should hardfork to:
- new codebase (litecoin v0.14 or smth)
- adaptive diff (ie DGW)
- fix minig subsidy to "how it has been told" (or leave it like it is)
- new codebase (litecoin v0.14 or smth)
- adaptive diff (ie DGW)
- fix minig subsidy to "how it has been told" (or leave it like it is)
Re: [75+PH] KanoPool kano.is 0.9% PPLNS US,DE,SG,JP,NL,NYA 🐈
Sooo you updated it, right? Becasue next block https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/476772 IS signaling
Re: [75+PH] KanoPool kano.is 0.9% PPLNS US,DE,SG,JP,NL,NYA 🐈
The switch to BIP91 worked well ...
https://blockchain.info/block-height/476729"Kano CKPool"/"KanoPool"
Is your poll not signaling SegWit? Ot it is not your block?
If it is yours, update daemon ASAP, because in 2 days block like that will be orphaned.
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
Transaction encoding improvements: http://people.xiph.org/~greg/compacted_txn.txt
Schnorr: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377298.msg14011669#msg14011669
On-chain scaling is possible. Blocksizes are not scalable.
Transaction encoding can give 20-30% disk space and reduction of bandwidth. Good, but not good enough.Schnorr: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377298.msg14011669#msg14011669
On-chain scaling is possible. Blocksizes are not scalable.
New signatures need SegWit anyway:
Quote
So the way we could use this to improve scalability in Bitcoin would be to add a OP_GROUPCHECKSIGVERIFY (and perhaps a multi-version of it) as part of a new segwit
script typecode that takes as input sighash flags and a pubkey.
It can give additional 40% capacity and can raise security. Good, but still not enough to scale.script typecode that takes as input sighash flags and a pubkey.
So we can doube-triple current tps? We will need like 100x and more. This can help, but it is not a remedy on 10x or 50x more transactions we have now.
I`m not supporting scaling by raise block size to the moon, we just need more space now. Raising block size and adapting segwit in same time give us much more space and open new possibilities that segwit give us. But it all need TIME. And we run out of it, like 6 months ago.
So, raise block to 2MB is bare minimum we need. Segwit is must-have. We need both.
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
I know, that scaling on chain is impossible, bus as I mention earlier - segwit goodies need time to be up and running, block size works instantly.
No it isn't
Schnorr signatures confer scaling on-chain
Transaction encoding improvements confer scaling on-chain
Stop spreading falsehoods, these facts are readily avaliable
Or how much tps you want to scale to?
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
I am most certain that you don't know how Bitcoin works. You still verify the whole block, not just a partial part of it. 
You can effectively DoS the network with 2 MB blocks. 15 MB is absurdly large, unsafe, unneeded and would take down a high percent of our node count.
(...)
It is 'user-activated', not 'miner-activated'. Nodes >0.13.1 already support BIP148.
1. Looks like you really need catch up code. Node is verifying transaction only once - when arrived. You can effectively DoS the network with 2 MB blocks. 15 MB is absurdly large, unsafe, unneeded and would take down a high percent of our node count. (...)
It is 'user-activated', not 'miner-activated'. Nodes >0.13.1 already support BIP148.
2. Not a single line about enforcing activation of SegWit in 0.14, so how 0.13.1 is supporting BIP148 (reminder: BIP148 was published 12. march)?
I don`t know how bitcoin works, so I never write a single line of bitcoin-related software, I never contributed to Core code, I never make public lecture about Bitcoin... I`m not a moderator of national Bitcoin forum in Poland either.