can you please share the data again.

where is the address

I have been exploring the intricacies of Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) for several years. My interest stems from a skepticism about the ubiquitous use of ECC, which, while currently deemed secure, is susceptible to the relentless advancement of time and technology that historically challenges cryptographic methods.

During my research, I analyzed a collection of public keys attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto. Upon plotting these keys on an elliptic curve, I observed a curious pattern, as shown here: https://ibb.co/zrsDy6c

What struck me as extraordinary was the apparent orderly generation of these public keys. They seem to follow a sequential arrangement along the X-axis, with corresponding values on the Y-axis that collectively form a discernible shape on the curve. This discovery is baffling, as generating public keys in such a precise and ordered manner on an elliptic curve is, to my knowledge, an incredibly challenging, if not impossible feat. I have thoroughly investigated this phenomenon but have yet to find an explanation.

This pattern has led me to ponder several possibilities:
- Could it be possible that Satoshi had found a way to 'break' the elliptic curve as early as 2009?
- Is there a chance that these public keys represent a puzzle, intentionally designed by Satoshi, awaiting a solution?

As of today, these public keys are associated with an estimated value of $72 billion, adding another layer of intrigue to this cryptographic enigma.

I'm far from being an expert in this subject.

Isn't the probability of finding "?00?A87" in a random 64-digit hex string 0.00553%.

How many R values did you search for that sequence? The probability of finding "?00?A87" in 100,000 random strings would be 99.6%

Check my math.

It may be obvious but are you sure that you are looking at R value when you were checking those transactions and their signatures? You see signatures are encoded using DER encoding and there are certain bytes added in that which are always the same (eg. 4730440220 which is [stack size][sequence tag][sequence length][int tag][int length]).

It may be obvious but are you sure that you are looking at R value when you were checking those transactions and their signatures? You see signatures are encoded using DER encoding and there are certain bytes added in that which are always the same (eg. 4730440220 which is [stack size][sequence tag][sequence length][int tag][int length]).