really mintpond 783% luck?  

Back in the day when suprnova only have 1 GH/s the pool at least found a new block for every once or 2 days. What happen with mintpond 5 days no new block with 1.67 GH/s? I mined there because I thought suprnova closed their xzc pool on December 31st but then it canceled.

Speed and interface wise, mintpond is better in every way than suprnova, web interface more cleaner, reported hashrate shown way way bigger than my console maybe 2 or 3 times the real hashrate. Is it really that faster?
I don't know, can't compare with shitty income and bad pool "luck" there.

Right now I'm back to suprnova 

@ocminer glad to know the continuation of the pool. Hope the pool will get bigger and bigger everyday, cheers

joining now 

currently testing your zcoin pool from Asia, will give review and feedback, cheers 

Hey ocminer, may I suggest don't close your zcoin pool just yet, if you switch the payment to PPLNS system and see what's what for another month, maybe more miners will come and the hashrate getting bigger? I'm not a big fan to mine on MPH for the hashrate seems very very low then my hashrate on my miner side. I hope other miners will support you to spread and decentralize zcoin network hashrate 

It's ok the diff increased as long as xzc's price goes up too 

Yep, latest zm with --noconnect, latest nvidia and cuda driver.

For now ewbf's still a win for me, despite a little slower than zm, but I don't have to worry either pools going down, or have to restart the miner every X hours. I like zm with active dev and hope with constant update, the stability and features is up there or better then with ewbf.
I'm, still requesting pool failover, by the way 


I've got 478-489 sol/s Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1070 with micron memory, 70% power, +100 core, +700 memory


Seems like driver bug? I noticed after add more card, Sol/W reading shows "infinity" in my rig. I have to reinstall nvidia and cuda driver then the Sol/W reading back to normal.

Hey that's a good idea, but I don't think I can do that in my rig,

I've got a strange experience using zm after running 15 hours give or take, I received an e-mail from flypool, said that my miner was offline. Then I checked my rig, Internet connection ok, zm still running and mining but not sending any shares to the pool (only reporting my hashrate, temp, etc) therefore the pool sent an e-mail.

I tried to close the miner and restart it again, everything going back to normal. Now I have to set my batch file to auto restart zm every 12 hours, been running good for about a week. I tried to make a loop like you suggested but it didn't work, the miner didn't auto restarted like it used to be, it just opened new cmd window with the new backup pool address but not mining because the gpus somewhat still minning in the first cmd. 

Hello dstm, may I suggest add failover pools feature like in ewbf and cgminer, thanks.

18.7k diff ffs  it's not even profitable anymore, better off mine other coin

what's up with massive increased hashrate and difficulty but xzc price doesn't add up 

You need to make sure your username and workername in the batch file are the same with your username and workername in your suprnova account.

For example if your suprnova username is jomz09 and your workername is rig1, then your batch file should be written as jomz09.rig1
Hope it make senses.

I switched back from MPH to suprnova since got online earlier today and everything seems fine. I'm using port 1598 by the way.

suprnova is up and running merely 1 GH/s. Need more hash power like it used to be. Let's point our rigs to suprnova! 

Zpool.ca also removed lyra2z algo and Zcoin currency since yesterday I checked. Back to MPH for now.

Yep, I agree with you.

@Ocminer thanks for your reply. Hope suprnova will be back online very soon!

noob question, is there any chance our confirmed xzc balance will be lost if suprnova down?